-
Journal of Pain Research 2024An early-stage, multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial with five-year follow-up was approved by Health Research Authority to compare the efficacy of a... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison.
PURPOSE
An early-stage, multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial with five-year follow-up was approved by Health Research Authority to compare the efficacy of a minimally invasive, laterally implanted interspinous fixation device (IFD) to open direct surgical decompression in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Two-year results are presented.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to IFD or decompression. Primary study endpoints included changes from baseline at 8-weeks, 6, 12 and 24-months follow-ups for leg pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), back pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), LSS physical function (Zurich Claudication Questionnaire), distance walked in five minutes and number of repetitions of sitting-to-standing in one minute. Secondary study endpoints included patient and clinician global impression of change, adverse events, reoperations, operating parameters, and fusion rate.
RESULTS
Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mean leg pain, back pain, ODI disability, LSS physical function, walking distance and sitting-to-standing repetitions compared to baseline over 24 months. Mean reduction of ODI from baseline levels was between 35% and 56% for IFD (p<0.002), and 49% to 55% for decompression (p<0.001) for all follow-up time points. Mean reduction of IFD group leg pain was between 57% and 78% for all time points (p<0.001), with 72% to 94% of participants having at least 30% reduction of leg pain from 8-weeks through 24-months. Walking distance for the IFD group increased from 66% to 94% and sitting-to-standing repetitions increased from 44% to 64% for all follow-up time points. Blood loss was 88% less in the IFD group (p=0.024) and operating time parameters strongly favoured IFD compared to decompression (p<0.001). An 89% fusion rate was assessed in a subset of IFD participants. There were no intraoperative device issues or re-operations in the IFD group, and only one healed and non-symptomatic spinous process fracture observed within 24 months.
CONCLUSION
Despite a low number of participants in the IFD group, the study demonstrated successful two-year safety and clinical outcomes for the IFD with significant operation-related advantages compared to surgical decompression.
PubMed: 38894862
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S453343 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized patients' lives with hip osteoarthritis. However, the increasing prevalence of THA in individuals with prior lumbar... (Review)
Review
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized patients' lives with hip osteoarthritis. However, the increasing prevalence of THA in individuals with prior lumbar arthrodesis (LA) poses unique challenges. This review delves into the biomechanical alterations, complications, and surgical strategies specific to this patient subset, highlighting the need for tailored preoperative assessments and planning. Due to altered pelvic and spinal biomechanics, patients with LA undergoing THA face a higher risk of dislocation and revision. The complex interplay between spinal and hip biomechanics underscores the need for meticulous preoperative planning. Comprehensive clinical examination and radiographic evaluation are vital for understanding patient-specific challenges. Various radiographic techniques, including computed tomography (CT)/X-ray matching and standing/seated studies, provide insights into postural changes affecting pelvic and spinal alignment. Complications following THA in patients with LA highlight the necessity for personalized surgical strategies. Careful consideration of implant selection, the surgical approach, and component positioning are essential to prevent complications. In summary, THA in patients with prior LA demands individualized preoperative assessments and planning. This approach is crucial to optimize outcomes and mitigate the heightened risks of complications, underlining the importance of tailored surgical strategies.
PubMed: 38892866
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113156 -
Cureus Jun 2024Ankle arthrodesis is a crucial surgical intervention for advanced hindfoot conditions, aiming to restore plantigrade walking and alleviate pain. This study evaluates the...
INTRODUCTION
Ankle arthrodesis is a crucial surgical intervention for advanced hindfoot conditions, aiming to restore plantigrade walking and alleviate pain. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a specific surgical approach for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA), focusing on rigorous risk factor control, corticocancellous grafting, and internal fixation using an angled retrograde femoral nail in the sagittal plane, and assesses the outcomes of this approach in terms of bone fusion and reduction of postoperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective analysis includes 17 patients who underwent TTCA in a trauma-orthopedic department over seven years. Data were collected from medical records, the HOSIX software, and patient consultations. Preoperative assessments, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and follow-up evaluations were documented.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients was 42.4 years, with a male predominance. Surgical indications included post-traumatic arthropathy (53%), inflammatory arthropathy, ankle infectious pathologies, and Charcot foot and ankle prosthesis failures. All patients underwent standard preoperative evaluations and received corticocancellous grafts. An angled retrograde femoral nail in the sagittal plane was used for internal fixation. Postoperative immobilization lasted 6 to 8 weeks, with subsequent rehabilitation. The bone fusion rate was 100%, with a low complication rate (23.5%).
DISCUSSION
Our study showed a younger patient population with a male predominance, different from some previous studies. Surgical techniques, including the anterior approach combined with a lateral subtalar approach, were consistent with some studies but differed from others. Corticocancellous grafts and the angled retrograde femoral nail in the sagittal plane demonstrated favorable outcomes in terms of fusion. Complication rates were lower compared to some previous reports, highlighting potential improvements in postoperative management.
CONCLUSION
The surgical approach described for TTCA, emphasizing rigorous risk factor control, corticocancellous grafting, and internal fixation using an angled retrograde femoral nail in the sagittal plane, led to satisfactory bone fusion and reduced postoperative complications. These results underscore the importance of this approach in achieving optimal functional outcomes in ankle arthrodesis.
PubMed: 38887747
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62014 -
Orthopedic Research and Reviews 2024Ankle arthrodesis is one of the treatments of choice, particularly in late-stage and unstable diabetic Charcot arthropathy. Unfortunately, poor healing capacity might...
INTRODUCTION
Ankle arthrodesis is one of the treatments of choice, particularly in late-stage and unstable diabetic Charcot arthropathy. Unfortunately, poor healing capacity might play a role in the high nonunion rate (10-40%). The advancement in regenerative medicine opens a new horizon for enhancing fusion after ankle arthrodesis in patients with poor healing capacity. However, a suitable small animal model is warranted to study the effectivity of these regenerative medicine approaches. Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes models and adjuvant-induced arthritis models with complete Freund's adjuvant are two established models. However, no study has combined those two models to make a diabetic arthritic model that more closely resembles the condition in Charcot arthropathy.
METHODS
Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned into five groups, consisting of one control group, and four diabetic groups which were induced by STZ injection and a high-fat diet. Among these diabetic rats, two groups received complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) injections to the left ankle of the hind limb. The control group, one of the diabetic-only groups, and one of the arthritic-diabetic-induced groups were euthanized at 4 weeks after STZ induction, and the remainder were euthanized 6 weeks after STZ induction. Clinical, radiological, and histological examinations were then compared in all five groups.
RESULTS
Diabetic status was successfully achieved in the model, which was maintained until the completion of the study. The CFA-induced ankles were significantly larger than the contralateral ankles in all groups (p<0.05). Histopathological evaluation confirmed arthritic changes in the CFA-induced group with less variability after 4 weeks of arthritis induction.
CONCLUSION
This rat model of arthritic diabetic mimics the progressive and chronic nature of Charcot arthropathy in humans. This model can be further use to study treatments that might enhance the fusion rate in ankle arthrodesis in healing-defective patients such as those with diabetes.
LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE
5.
PubMed: 38882468
DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S457848 -
Tibiotalocalcaneal ankle arthrodesis with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing.Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2024End-stage ankle arthrosis causes severe pain and limited movement. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with arthroscopy-assisted hindfoot nailing can be used to achieve a...
PURPOSE
End-stage ankle arthrosis causes severe pain and limited movement. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with arthroscopy-assisted hindfoot nailing can be used to achieve a high union rate and low complication rate. We aimed to examine the early- and mid-term results of patients treated with this technique from various perspectives and to evaluate them by comparing them with the current literature.
METHODS
Data were collected from 25 patients who met the established criteria and underwent TTCA with arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing. In addition to the demographic data of the patients, their clinical and pain scores were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the union time and complication data during the follow-up period were examined.
RESULTS
When the AOFAS and VAS scores of the 25 patients were examined, a significant improvement was observed in the preoperative period and early postoperative period comparisons ( < .001). No significant change was observed between the comparison of the postoperative 12th month and last postoperative control clinical scores. While the union rate of the patients was observed to be 92%, the average union time was 13.1 ± 3.5 weeks. During follow-up, peri-implant fracture, deep infection, and non-union were observed in one patient each (12%).
CONCLUSION
The early- and mid-term postoperative results of patients treated with TTCA surgery with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing show that this technique may be an option with low complication and high union rates for the appropriate group of patients planned for ankle arthrodesis.
Topics: Humans; Arthrodesis; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Ankle Joint; Arthroscopy; Bone Nails; Aged; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Osteoarthritis
PubMed: 38881517
DOI: 10.1177/10225536241264623 -
Zhurnal Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.... 2024To analyze surgical strategy for nonspecific spondylitis of the craniovertebral region (CVR) taking into account clinical features and morphological signs of disease.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze surgical strategy for nonspecific spondylitis of the craniovertebral region (CVR) taking into account clinical features and morphological signs of disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Eight patients with nonspecific spondylitis of CVR underwent surgery (4 women and 4 men aged 31-75 years). Three patients had pain syndrome, 5 ones - conduction disorders. Combined interventions were performed in 5 patients with neurological disorders. Of these, 3 patients underwent transoral decompression with subsequent occipitospondylodesis. In other cases, stages of surgical treatment were reverse. Four patients underwent simultaneous interventions, 1 patient - with 7-day interval. Patients with pain syndrome underwent occipitospondylodesis.
RESULTS
In all patients, postoperative VAS score of pain syndrome decreased by 5-7 points (mean 5.5). Among 5 patients with conduction symptoms, regression of neurological disorders 1 year after surgery was achieved in 2 cases, and complete recovery was observed in 3 patients (Frankel E). In all cases, examination confirmed relief of inflammatory process and no compression of the spinal cord and medulla oblongata. One patient had a dehiscence of the wound edges of posterior pharyngeal wall, and another one had implant fracture in 3 years after surgery.
CONCLUSION
Active surgical approach is reasonable for nonspecific spondylitis of CVR. Craniocervical fixation eliminates pain and risk of neurological complications following atlantoaxial instability. Conduction disorders require simultaneous transoral decompression and occipitospondylodesis in patients with nonspecific purulent craniovertebral lesions. Impaired head tilt complicates transoral stage. In this regard, it is more rational to carry out craniocervical fixation at the last stage.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Adult; Spondylitis; Decompression, Surgical; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 38881012
DOI: 10.17116/neiro20248803121 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... May 2024Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological...
BACKGROUND
Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes after using the Phantom® Lapidus intramedullary nail to find an effective technique with low complications.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed data of 52 patients who underwent a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail at our center from November 2019 to September 2022. The mean follow-up period was 27 (range, 18-34) months. Clinical results were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the European Foot and Ankle Society score (EFAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); three different radiological measures were analyzed.
RESULTS
The mean AOFAS score increased from 44.8 to 82 points. The mean EFAS score increased from 11.2 to 20.1 points. The mean VAS score decreased by 4.7 points. The mean EFAS Sport score was increased from 9.2 (SD 4.6) to 12.6 (SD 5.4) points. The intermetatarsal angle decreased from 15° to 6.9° and the hallux valgus angle by a mean of 17.9°. The forefoot width reduced from 93.6 to 84.7 mm. All results were statistically significant (p < .001). One case of nonunion was recorded. No implant-related complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
This device was effective in correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus, with significant patient satisfaction. Its complication rate was not higher than that of other fixation devices. Correct compression of the arthrodesis, absence of extraosseous material, and multidirectional stability are important qualities of this implant for the correct treatment of this pathology.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, retrospective case series.
PubMed: 38879389
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.001 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... Jun 2024Given high patient expectations in the setting of complex surgeries, orthopedic surgeons are at risk of being subject to malpractice claims which can impose significant...
Given high patient expectations in the setting of complex surgeries, orthopedic surgeons are at risk of being subject to malpractice claims which can impose significant economic and psychological burden. This study investigates malpractice claims against orthopedic surgeons and podiatrists performing hindfoot arthrodesis and determine factors associated with plaintiff verdicts and settlements using the Westlaw legal database. The database was queried for all cases involving hindfoot arthrodesis using the terms "malpractice" and either "ankle fusion," "arthrodesis," "subtalar fusion," "tibiotalar fusion," "tibiotalocalcaneal fusion," "TTC fusion," or "tibiofibular fusion" from 1987 to 2023. Data regarding patient demographics, causes cited for litigation, case outcomes, and indemnity settlements were collected. Cases were excluded if the defendant was not an orthopedic surgeon or a podiatrist, the procedure involved was not a hindfoot arthrodesis, or if the patient was a minor. Forty-five cases of hindfoot arthrodesis met the inclusion criteria. The mean plaintiff age was 51.5 ± 13.8 years with 51.1% male. Thirty-three cases (73%) were in favor of the defendant, with an average inflation-adjusted payout of $853,863 (± 456,179). The most alleged category of negligence was procedural/intraoperative error (75%) followed by post-surgical error (38%) and failure to inform (31%). The most common specific damages included functional/ROM limitation (49%), need for additional surgery (47%), continuing/worsened pain (27%), and nonunion/malunion (29%). Given the frequency of hindfoot arthrodesis performed, this study highlights the importance of effective communication with patients concerning potential postoperative complications, prognosis of their injury, and risks and benefits associated with each treatment modality. Level of Evidence: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study; Epidemiology Study.
PubMed: 38879145
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.012 -
Medicine Jun 2024Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it has several advantages, it has some disadvantages and risks, such as paraspinal muscle injury, potential intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, hardware failure, subsidence, and medical comorbidity. Lumbar decompressive bilateral laminectomy with interspinous fixation (DLISF) is less invasive and can be used on some patients with PLIF, but this has not been reported. To compare the efficacy and safety of DLISF in the treatment of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with that of PLIF. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 81 patients with grade I spondylolisthesis, who had undergone PLIF or DLISF and were followed up for more than 1 year. Surgical outcomes, visual analog scale, radiologic outcomes, including Cobb angle and difference in body translation, and postoperative complications were assessed. Forty-one patients underwent PLIF, whereas 40 underwent DLISF. The operative times were 271.0 ± 57.2 and 150.6 ± 29.3 minutes for the PLIF and DLISF groups, respectively. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PLIF group versus the DLISF group (290.7 ± 232.6 vs 122.2 ± 82.7 mL, P < .001). Body translation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Overall pain improved during the 1-year follow-up when compared with baseline data. Medical complications were significantly lower in the DLISF group, whereas perioperative complications and hardware issues were higher in the PLIF group. The outcomes of DLISF, which is less invasive, were comparable to PLIF outcomes in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. As a salvage technique, DLISF may be a good option when compared with PLIF.
Topics: Humans; Spondylolisthesis; Male; Female; Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Decompression, Surgical; Pilot Projects; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Laminectomy; Operative Time
PubMed: 38875412
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038501 -
Acta Orthopaedica Jun 2024There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There is conflicting evidence regarding treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. The primary aim of our cohort study was to investigate change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint surgery in daily practice in the Swedish Spine Registry. Secondary aims were to explore the proportion of patients reaching a patient acceptable symptom score (PASS) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain scores, physical function, and health-related quality of life outcomes; furthermore, to evaluate self-reported satisfaction, walking distance, and changes in proportions of patients on full sick leave/disability leave and report complications and reoperations.
METHODS
Data from the Swedish Spine Registry was collected for patients with first-time sacroiliac joint fusion, aged 21 to 70 years, with PROMs available preoperatively, at 1 or 2 years after last surgery. PROMs included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, and EQ-VAS, in addition to demographic variables. We calculated mean change from pre- to postoperative and the proportion of patients achieving MCID and PASS.
RESULTS
68 patients had available pre- and postoperative data, with a mean age of 45 years (range 25-70) and 59 (87%) were female. At follow-up the mean reduction was 2.3 NRS points (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9; P < 0.001) for LBP and 14.8 points (CI 10.6-18.9; P < 0.001) for ODI. EQ-VAS improved by 22 points (CI 15.4-30.3, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Approximately half of the patients achieved MCID and PASS for pain (MCID NRS LBP: 38/65 [59%] and PASS NRS LBP: 32/66 [49%]) and physical function (MCID ODI: 27/67 [40%] and PASS ODI: 24/67 [36%]). The odds for increasing the patient's walking distance to over 1 km at follow-up were 3.5 (CI 1.8-7.0; P < 0.0001), and of getting off full sick leave or full disability leave was 0.57 (CI 0.4-0.8; P = 0.001). In the first 3 months after surgery 3 complications were reported, and in the follow-up period 2 reoperations.
CONCLUSION
We found moderate treatment outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion when applied in daily practice with moderate pain relief and small improvements in physical function.
Topics: Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Middle Aged; Sweden; Female; Male; Registries; Adult; Sacroiliac Joint; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Aged; Cohort Studies; Spinal Fusion; Pain Measurement; Low Back Pain; Disability Evaluation; Quality of Life; Patient Satisfaction; Young Adult; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38874434
DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40817