-
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Jan 2024Laryngo-tracheal stenosis (LTS) is a relatively rare disease, and conventional methods have difficulty achieving one-lung ventilation (OLV) when an anatomical...
CONTEXT
Laryngo-tracheal stenosis (LTS) is a relatively rare disease, and conventional methods have difficulty achieving one-lung ventilation (OLV) when an anatomical abnormality exists. Selecting an appropriate method for patients with LTS can ensure oxygenation, collapse the lung, and reduce damage.
OBJECTIVE
The study intended to perform a comprehensive review of the literature and a systematic review to examine the characteristics and management of OLV for LTS patients.
DESIGN
The research team performed a narrative review by searching the PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. The search used the keywords one-lung ventilation and tracheal stenosis. The team then performed a review, including the studies found in the search and the research team's own case study.
SETTING
The study took place at the First Hospital of Jilin University in Changchun, Jilin, China.
PARTICIPANT
The participant in the current case study was a 72-year-old, female patient with generalized tracheal narrowing.
RESULTS
Nine participants achieved OLV through BB, with the anesthesiologist performing SLT and using extraluminal BB for six participants.
CONCLUSIONS
Several methods can successfully achieve OLV for patients with difficult airways, but the current research team found that a small, single-lumen tube (SLT) and extraluminal bronchial blocker (BB) may be a better choice for patients with tracheal stenosis.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; One-Lung Ventilation; Tracheal Stenosis; Lung; China
PubMed: 37793330
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023To systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients.
METHODS
Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid via the internet, covering studies from the establishment of the databases to March 15, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and used Stata 13.0 for meta-analysis of predictive factors and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients, evaluated the predictive performance.
RESULTS
This analysis included eight studies. Six studies used internal validation to assess the predictive models, while one combined both internal and external validation. The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the models ranged from 0.67 to 0.79. The most common predictors were preoperative dementia or dementia history (OR = 3.123, 95% CI 2.108-4.626, < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (OR = 2.343, 95% CI 1.146-4.789, < 0.05), and age (OR = 1.615, 95% CI 1.387-1.880, < 0.001). This meta-analysis shows that these were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in older adult patients with hip fracture.
CONCLUSION
Research on the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients is still in the developmental stage. The predictive performance of some of the established models achieve expectation and the applicable risk of all models is low, but there are also problems such as high risk of bias and lack of external validation. Medical professionals should select existing models and validate and optimize them with large samples from multiple centers according to their actual situation. It is more recommended to carry out a large sample of prospective studies to build prediction models.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
The protocol for this systematic review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registered number CRD42022365258.
PubMed: 37780558
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1226473 -
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2023Frailty, as an age-related syndrome of reduced physiological reserve, contributes significantly to post-operative outcomes. With the aging population, frailty poses a... (Review)
Review
Frailty, as an age-related syndrome of reduced physiological reserve, contributes significantly to post-operative outcomes. With the aging population, frailty poses a significant threat to patients and health systems. Since 2012, preoperative frailty assessment has been recommended, yet its implementation has been inhibited by the vast number of frailty tests and lack of consensus. Since the anesthesiologist is the best placed for perioperative care, an anesthesia-tailored preoperative frailty test must be simple, quick, universally applicable to all surgeries, accurate, and ideally available in an app or online form. This systematic review attempted to rank frailty tests by predictive accuracy using the c-statistic in the outcomes of extended length of stay, 3-month post-operative complications, and 3-month mortality, as well as feasibility outcomes including time to completion, equipment and training requirements, cost, and database compatibility. Presenting findings of all frailty tests as a future reference for anesthesiologists, Clinical Frailty Scale was found to have the best combination of accuracy and feasibility for mortality with speed of completion and phone app availability; Edmonton Frailty Scale had the best accuracy for post-operative complications with opportunity for self-reporting. Finally, extended length of stay had too little data for recommendation of a frailty test. This review also demonstrated the need for changing research emphasis from odds ratios to metrics that measure the accuracy of a test itself, such as the c-statistic.
PubMed: 37779562
DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_358_23 -
BMC Surgery Sep 2023The Surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a straightforward and unbiased measure to assess the probability of experiencing complications after surgery. It is calculated upon...
BACKGROUND
The Surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a straightforward and unbiased measure to assess the probability of experiencing complications after surgery. It is calculated upon completion of the surgical procedure and provides valuable predictive information. The SAS evaluates three specific factors during surgery: the estimated amount of blood loss (EBL), the lowest recorded mean arterial pressure (MAP), and the lowest heart rate (LHR) observed. Considering these factors, the SAS offers insights into the probability of encountering postoperative complications.
METHODS
Three authors independently searched the Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases until June 2022. This search was conducted without any language or timeframe restrictions, and it aimed to cover relevant literature on the subject. The inclusion criteria were the correlation between SAS and any modified/adjusted SAS (m SAS, (Modified SAS). eSAS, M eSAS, and SASA), and complications before, during, and after surgeries. Nevertheless, the study excluded letters to the editor, reviews, and case reports. Additionally, the researchers employed Begg and Egger's regression model to evaluate publication bias.
RESULTS
In this systematic study, a total of 78 studies \were examined. The findings exposed that SAS was effective in anticipating short-term complications and served as factor for a long-term prognostic following multiple surgeries. While the SAS has been validated across various surgical subspecialties, based on the available evidence, the algorithm's modifications may be necessary to enhance its predictive accuracy within each specific subspecialty.
CONCLUSIONS
The SAS enables surgeons and anesthesiologists to recognize patients at a higher risk for certain complications or adverse events. By either modifying the SAS (Modified SAS) or combining it with ASA criteria, healthcare professionals can enhance their ability to identify patients who require continuous observation and follow-up as they go through the postoperative period. This approach would improve the accuracy of identifying individuals at risk and ensure appropriate measures to provide necessary care and support.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Apgar Score; Bradycardia; Databases, Factual; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37723504
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02171-8 -
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Jul 2023Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide and is associated with a poor prognosis. Oesophagectomy remains the best prospect for a cure if...
BACKGROUND
Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide and is associated with a poor prognosis. Oesophagectomy remains the best prospect for a cure if diagnosed in the early disease stages. However, the procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is undertaken only after careful consideration. Appropriate patient selection, counselling and resource allocation is essential. Numerous risk models have been devised to guide surgeons in making these decisions.
AIM
To evaluate which multivariate risk models, using intraoperative information with or without preoperative information, best predict perioperative oesophagectomy outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases was undertaken from 2000-2020. The search terms used were [(Oesophagectomy) AND (Model OR Predict OR Risk OR score) AND (Mortality OR morbidity OR complications OR outcomes OR anastomotic leak OR length of stay)]. Articles were included if they assessed multivariate based tools incorporating preoperative and intraoperative variables to forecast patient outcomes after oesophagectomy. Articles were excluded if they only required preoperative or any post-operative data. Studies appraising univariate risk predictors such as preoperative sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary fitness and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were also excluded. The review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses model. All captured risk models were appraised for clinical credibility, methodological quality, performance, validation and clinical effectiveness.
RESULTS
Twenty published studies were identified which examined eleven multivariate risk models. Eight of these combined preoperative and intraoperative data and the remaining three used only intraoperative values. Only two risk models were identified as promising in predicting mortality, namely the Portsmouth physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and POSSUM scores. A further two studies, the intraoperative factors and Esophagectomy surgical Apgar score based nomograms, adequately forecasted major morbidity. The latter two models are yet to have external validation and none have been tested for clinical effectiveness.
CONCLUSION
Despite the presence of some promising models in forecasting perioperative oesophagectomy outcomes, there is more research required to externally validate these models and demonstrate clinical benefit with the adoption of these models guiding postoperative care and allocating resources.
PubMed: 37555117
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1485 -
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health... 2023Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections occurring following 1%-3% of all surgical procedures. Their rates are the...
OBJECTIVE
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections occurring following 1%-3% of all surgical procedures. Their rates are the highest following abdominal surgery. They are still associated with increased morbidity and healthcare costs despite the advancement in the medical field. Many risk factors for SSIs following abdominal surgery have been identified. The aim of this study is to comprehensively assess these risk factors as published in peer-reviewed journals.
DESIGN
A systematic review was conducted with accordance to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
SETTING
The databases for search were PubMed and Cochrane Library, in addition to reference lists. Studies were retrieved and assessed for their quality. Data were extracted in a designed form, and a stratified synthesis of data was conducted to report the significant risk factors.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients undergoing general abdominal surgery.
INTERVENTION
The intervention of general abdominal surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
To identify and assess the risk factors for SSI following abdominal surgery.
RESULTS
Literature search yielded 813 articles, and the final screening process identified 11 eligible studies. The total number of patients is 11 996. The rates of SSI ranged from 4.09% to 26.7%. Nine studies were assessed to be of high quality, the remaining two studies have moderate quality. Stratified synthesis of data was performed for risk factors using summary measures (OR/risk ratio, 95% CI, and p value). Male sex and increased body mass index (BMI) were identified as significant demographic risk factors, and long operative time was among the major significant procedure-related risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Male sex, increased BMI, diabetes, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of >2, low albumin level, low haemoglobin level, preoperative hospital stay, long operative time, emergency procedure, open surgical approach, increased wound class, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative infection, perioperative blood transfusion, and use of drains are potential independent risk factors for SSI following abdominal surgery.
PubMed: 37529828
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000182 -
Health Policy and Planning Sep 2023The global shortage of skilled anaesthesiologists, surgeons and obstetricians is a leading cause of high unmet surgical need. Although anaesthetic and surgical...
The global shortage of skilled anaesthesiologists, surgeons and obstetricians is a leading cause of high unmet surgical need. Although anaesthetic and surgical task-shifting are widely practised to mitigate this barrier, little is known about their safety and efficacy. This systematic review seeks to highlight the existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of patients operated on by non-physicians or non-specialist physicians globally. Relevant articles were identified by searching four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Health) in all languages between January 2008 and February 2022. Retrieved documents were screened against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their qualities were appraised critically. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and findings were synthesized narratively. In total, 40 studies have been included. Thirty-five focus on task-shifting for surgical and obstetric procedures, whereas four studies address anaesthetic task-shifting; one study covers both interventions. The majority are located in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. Seventy-five per cent present perioperative mortality outcomes and 85% analyse morbidity measures. Evidence from low- and middle-income countries, which primarily concentrates on caesarean sections, hernia repairs and surgical male circumcisions, points to the overall safety of non-surgeons. On the other hand, the literature on surgical task-shifting in high-income countries (HICs) is limited to nine studies analysing tube thoracostomies, neurosurgical procedures, caesarean sections, male circumcisions and basal cell carcinoma excisions. Finally, only five studies pertaining to anaesthetic task-shifting across all country settings answer the research question with conflicting results, making it difficult to draw conclusions on the quality of non-physician anaesthetic care. Overall, it appears that non-specialists can safely perform high-volume, low-complexity operations. Further research is needed to understand the implications of surgical task-shifting in HICs and to better assess the performance of non-specialist anaesthesia providers. Future studies must adopt randomized study designs and include long-term outcome measures to generate high-quality evidence.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Male; Anesthetics; Cesarean Section; Africa South of the Sahara; Income
PubMed: 37506040
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad059 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify and summarize the existing evidence regarding ERAS failure and related risk factors after... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify and summarize the existing evidence regarding ERAS failure and related risk factors after hepatic surgery. The objective was to provide physicians with a better understanding of these factors so that they can take appropriate action to minimize ERAS failure and improve patient outcomes.
METHOD
A literature search of the PubMed MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. The search strategy involved terms related to ERAS, failure, and hepatectomy.
RESULT
A meta-analysis was conducted on four studies encompassing a total of 1,535 patients, resulting in the identification of 20 risk factors associated with ERAS failure after hepatic surgery. Four of these risk factors were selected for pooling, including major resection, ASA classification of ≥3, advanced age, and male gender. Major resection and ASA ≥ 3 were identified as statistically significant factors of ERAS failure.
CONCLUSION
The comprehensive literature review results indicated that the frequently identified risk factors for ERAS failure after hepatic surgery are linked to operative and anesthesia factors, including substantial resection and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher. These insights will assist healthcare practitioners in taking prompt remedial measures. Nevertheless, there is a requirement for future high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized evaluation frameworks for ERAS programs.
PubMed: 37497275
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159960 -
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Jul 2023The knotting or in vivo entrapment of epidural catheters is an uncommon but challenging issue for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to identify the possible causes...
BACKGROUND
The knotting or in vivo entrapment of epidural catheters is an uncommon but challenging issue for anesthesiologists. This study aimed to identify the possible causes behind entrapped epidural catheters and the effective methods for their removal.
METHODS
A systematic review of relevant case reports and series was conducted using the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome framework and keywords such as "epidural," "catheter," "knotting," "stuck," "entrapped," and "entrapment." The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed, and the review protocol was registered with International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42021291266).
RESULTS
The analysis included 59 cases with a mean depth of catheter insertion from the skin of 11.825 cm and an average duration of 8.17 h for the detection of non-functioning catheters. In 27 cases (45.8%), a radiological knot was found, with an average length of 2.59 cm from the tip. The chi-squared test revealed a significant difference between the initial and final positions of catheter insertion (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS
Deep insertion was the primary cause of epidural catheter entrapment. To remove the entrapped catheters, the lateral decubitus position should be attempted first, followed by the position used during insertion. Based on these findings, recommendations for the prevention and removal of entrapped catheters have been formulated.
PubMed: 37468204
DOI: 10.17085/apm.23013 -
BMC Anesthesiology Jul 2023Cook Stage extubation is a tool developed by Cook Medical for patients with difficult airways. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cook Stage extubation is a tool developed by Cook Medical for patients with difficult airways. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of Cook Stage extubation Set (CSES). Currently, no systematic review evidence has been published in this field. Therefore, this study aimed to review the clinical success rate, safety, and tolerability of CSES in patients with difficult airways.
METHOD
The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included difficult airway and CSES. The primary outcome was the CSES clinical success rate.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Series were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. R studio, version 4.2.2. was used to perform the statistical analysis. The Cochrane Q and I statistics were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Details of the included case reports were summarized in the systematic review part.
RESULTS
Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis, and 7 case reports were included for systematic review. The pooled overall CSES clinical success rate was 93% (95% CI: 85%, 97%). The CSES intolerable and complication incidence rates were 9% (95% CI: 5%, 18%) and 5% (95% CI: 2%, 12%), respectively. CSES clinical success rate was influenced by the study center and study design. The success rate of CSES was higher in multicenter and prospective design studies. Seven case reports have documented the successful operation of CSES intubation in obese, tall, oncologist, and pediatric patients.
DISCUSSION
This meta-analysis suggested that CSES have achieved a high clinical success rate in adult and pediatric patients with different physical conditions and types of surgery. The results of all original studies and meta-analysis confirmed a remarkably high tolerance rate and low overall complication rate. However, regardless of the tools chosen, a personalized, safe intubation strategy and a highly qualified anesthesiologist should be considered as the fundamental guarantee of a high clinical success rate. Future studies should also focus on the success rate of reintubation using CSES in patients with airway difficulties.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Airway Extubation; Intubation, Intratracheal; Prospective Studies; Obesity; Incidence; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37420175
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02191-0