-
World Journal of Gastroenterology Feb 2024In hepatology, the clinical use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has experienced a notable increase in recent times. These applications range from the diagnosis to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In hepatology, the clinical use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has experienced a notable increase in recent times. These applications range from the diagnosis to the treatment of various liver diseases. Therefore, this systematic review summarizes the evidence for the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of EUS in liver diseases.
AIM
To examine and summarize the current available evidence of the possible roles of the EUS in making a suitable diagnosis in liver diseases as well as the therapeutic accuracy and efficacy.
METHODS
PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were extensively searched until October 2023. The methodological quality of the eligible articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. In addition, statistical analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
RESULTS
Overall, 45 articles on EUS were included (28 on diagnostic role and 17 on therapeutic role). Pooled analysis demonstrated that EUS diagnostic tests had an accuracy of 92.4% for focal liver lesions (FLL) and 96.6% for parenchymal liver diseases. EUS-guided liver biopsies with either fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy had low complication rates when sampling FLL and parenchymal liver diseases (3.1% and 8.7%, respectively). Analysis of data from four studies showed that EUS-guided liver abscess had high clinical (90.7%) and technical success (90.7%) without significant complications. Similarly, EUS-guided interventions for the treatment of gastric varices (GV) have high technical success (98%) and GV obliteration rate (84%) with few complications (15%) and rebleeding events (17%).
CONCLUSION
EUS in liver diseases is a promising technique with the potential to be considered a first-line therapeutic and diagnostic option in selected cases.
Topics: Humans; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Endosonography; Digestive System Diseases; Liver Abscess
PubMed: 38515947
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i7.742 -
Pain Physician Mar 2024Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (UPEDD) and bilateral PEDD (BPEDD) are commonly implemented, and have consistently yielded favorable clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (UPEDD) and bilateral PEDD (BPEDD) are commonly implemented, and have consistently yielded favorable clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of literature contrasting the advantages and disadvantages between these 2 procedures.
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this research was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical effects of UPEDD and BPEDD.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A systematic review of studies reporting outcomes following UPEDD and/or BPEDD procedures was performed. The extracted data were used for meta-analysis. Pooled event rates for positive bacteria culture, pain control satisfaction, reoperation, and complications were estimated. The pooled operation time and blood loss were also calculated.
RESULTS
Among 764 retrieved articles, 28 studies with 661 patients met the inclusion criteria and were used for our meta-analysis. A total of 21 studies (462 patients) investigated UPEDD outcomes and 7 studies (199 patients) investigated BPEDD outcomes. For the UPEDD group, the pooled event rates for positive bacteria culture, pain control satisfaction, reoperation, and complications were 72%, 91%, 9% and 4%, respectively; the pooled operation time and blood loss were 89.90 minutes and 59.77 mL. For the BPEDD group, these were 79%, 92%, 4%, 8%, 93.23 minutes and 64.93 mL, respectively.
LIMITATIONS
First, all included studies were retrospective series, limiting our study design to a single-arm meta-analysis. Second, there was a limited amount of studies that were determined to be fitting, particularly on BPEDD; the sample size was also small. Third, the clinical effects of UPEDD and BPEDD needed to be compared in greater detail, such as the time it took for inflammatory markers to return to normal, the incidence of local kyphosis, and whether the duration of antibiotic use could be shortened after adequate debridement with BPEDD. Lastly, further studies are necessary to compare the clinical outcome of PEDD and percutaneous endoscopic interbody debridement and fusion.
CONCLUSIONS
Both UPEDD and BPEDD can provide a relatively reliable causative-pathogen identification and satisfactory clinical outcome. The 2 techniques are not significantly different in terms of positive bacteria culture rate, pain control satisfaction rate, complication rate, and reoperation rate.
Topics: Humans; Debridement; Retrospective Studies; Endoscopy; Drainage; Pain
PubMed: 38506676
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Feb 2024Chyle leakage/ascites after surgical resection of neuroblastic tumors may delay the start of chemotherapy and worsen prognosis. Previous studies have reported a highly... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chyle leakage/ascites after surgical resection of neuroblastic tumors may delay the start of chemotherapy and worsen prognosis. Previous studies have reported a highly variable incidence and risk factors remain largely unknown. This study aims to analyze the true incidence of chyle leaks and ascites and seeks to identify risk factors and optimal treatment strategies.
METHODS
Medline/Embase databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature reviews, case reports, and non-English papers were excluded. Data were extracted independently following paper selection by 2 authors.
RESULTS
The final analysis yielded 15 studies with N = 1468 patients. Chylous ascites was recorded postoperatively in 171 patients (12%). Most patients experiencing chyle leaks were successfully treated conservatively with drainage, bowel rest, parenteral nutrition and octreotide with variable combinations of these treatment options. 7/171 (4%) patients required operative exploration to control troublesome persistent chyle leaks. In risk factor analysis, higher tumor stage was significantly associated with the risk of chyle leak (P < 0.0001) whereas no correlation was observed with adrenal vs non-adrenal tumor location, INRG risk groups and tumor laterality.
CONCLUSION
Chyle leakage after surgery for neuroblastic tumors is a common morbid complication occurring in some 12% of patients. Higher INSS tumor stage portends greater risk(s). Conservative therapy strategies appear successful in the majority of cases. To avert this complication meticulous mesenteric lymphatic ligation is recommended especially for those patients with higher tumor stage(s) requiring extensive radical surgery including retroperitoneal lymph node resection.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
TYPE OF STUDY
Systematic review.
PubMed: 38490882
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.02.018 -
Annals of Gastroenterology 2024Spontaneous esophageal perforation traditionally mandates urgent surgical treatment. Lately, esophageal stents have been used to reduce the associated morbidity and...
BACKGROUND
Spontaneous esophageal perforation traditionally mandates urgent surgical treatment. Lately, esophageal stents have been used to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The current systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of stents as a primary treatment option in this scenario.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for studies published in the English language between 2000 and 2023. We included observational studies reporting on the use of stents, alongside conservative measures and drainage procedures, in patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Primary outcomes were sealing rate (persistent leak occlusion) and failure rate (mortality or conversion to a major surgical operation). Secondary outcomes included patients' presentation, sepsis, drainage procedures, and reinterventions. Results for primary outcomes were presented as pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies involving 171 patients were included. Sealing rate was 86% (95%CI 77-93%) and failure rate was 14% (95%CI 7-22%). Weighted mortality rate was 6% (95%CI 2-13%), while conversion to surgical treatment was 2% (95%CI 0-9%). Late presentation was not related to a statistically significant increase in treatment failure (odds ratio 1.85, 95%CI 0.37-9.30; P=0.72). Drainage procedures were required for the majority of patients, with a high rate of surgical and endoscopic reinterventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results imply that stents may offer an effective and safe alternative treatment for patients with spontaneous esophageal perforations. Additional endoscopic and surgical drainage procedures are frequently needed.
PubMed: 38481783
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0857 -
Cureus Feb 2024This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of surgical interventions in improving the quality of life for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). A thorough... (Review)
Review
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of surgical interventions in improving the quality of life for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). A thorough literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identified 11 studies that focused on patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatments, including pancreatic resections, drainage procedures, and duodenum-preserving head resections. The findings indicate that organ-preserving procedures, notably the Frey and Beger operations, significantly enhance pain control and overall quality of life while reducing analgesic dependency. This review provides crucial insights into the long-term efficacy and comparative benefits of different surgical approaches, highlighting the need for personalized surgical strategies in CP management. It emphasizes the necessity for standardized outcome measures and further comparative research to refine CP treatment protocols.
PubMed: 38476813
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53989 -
European Journal of Medical Research Mar 2024Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare, benign, inflammatory breast disease with an unknown etiology that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. The definitive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare, benign, inflammatory breast disease with an unknown etiology that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. The definitive treatment of GM is currently controversial; an appropriate therapeutic strategy has yet to be identified, and the disease's high recurrence rate remains. This study aims to determine the recurrence rate for each GM treatment strategy to identify the most appropriate treatment modality.
METHODS
The search for relevant articles was undertaken using three international databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles published in English until the end of 2021 evaluating the recurrence rate of GM were included. Using Stata 13.0, the pooled incidence and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the recurrence rate were determined.
RESULTS
Sixty-five eligible studies were included in our study. The recurrence rates of systemic steroid use, topical steroid use, antibiotic use, methotrexate use, observation, drainage, excision, antibiotic use and surgery, steroid use and surgery, antibiotic and steroid use, methotrexate and steroid use were 24% (95% CI: 21-27%), 11% (95% CI: 6-21%), 18% (95% CI: 14-22%), 13% (95% CI: 7-22%), 11% (95% CI: 7-17%), 65% (95% CI: 50-78%), 13% (95% CI: 10-16%), 23% (95% CI: 14-36%), 7% (95% CI: 5-11%), 11% (95% CI: 6-18%), and 4% (95% CI: 2-8%), respectively. Drainage had the highest recurrence rate, while combined methotrexate and steroid treatment had the lowest rate.
CONCLUSION
The optimal treatment strategy for GM depends on the disease's severity, consequences, and the patient's features. The study results indicate that combination therapy is preferable for minimizing the risk of relapse and reducing treatment complications.
Topics: Female; Humans; Granulomatous Mastitis; Methotrexate; Steroids; Combined Modality Therapy; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Recurrence
PubMed: 38475841
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01761-3 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mar 2024The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) contributes to a lower rate of spinal cord... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) contributes to a lower rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies reported before May 7, 2023. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023441392). The primary outcome was permanent SCI. Secondary outcomes were temporary SCI and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The data were presented as the pooled event rates (ERs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 1008 studies were screened, of which 34 studies with 2749 patients were included in the present analysis. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 8.71 (range, 5-12). The pooled rate of permanent SCI with prophylactic CSFD was identical to that without prophylactic CSFD (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; P = 0.445). No statistically significant difference was found between the rates of permanent SCI with routine vs. selective prophylactic CSFD (P = 0.596). The pooled rate of temporary SCI was 1.0% (95% CI, 0.00-1.0%). The pooled rate for 30-day or in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (P = 0.525) in patients with prophylactic CSFD (4.0, 95% CI 2.0-6.0) or without prophylactic CSFD (5.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.0).
CONCLUSIONS
The systematic review has shown that prophylactic CSFD was not associated with a lower rate of permanent SCI and 30-day or in-hospital mortality after TEVAR for TBAD.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Spinal Cord Ischemia; Aortic Dissection; Endovascular Procedures; Drainage; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
PubMed: 38475763
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02603-3 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2024High tibial osteotomy (HTO) can cause postoperative hemorrhage. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce the hemorrhage is still controversial.
BACKGROUND
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) can cause postoperative hemorrhage. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce the hemorrhage is still controversial.
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in HTO.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the authors conducted a comprehensive search of the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Foreign Medical Literature Retrieval Service databases between their inception and January 1, 2023. All clinical studies comparing the use of tranexamic acid versus no tranexamic acid during HTO were collected. The primary outcome measures were hemoglobin decrease, drainage volume, and blood loss, and the secondary outcome measures were wound complications, blood transfusion, and postoperative thrombosis. All indicators were analyzed using meta-analysis software. Results were reported as mean differences or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Of 152 initial results, 9 studies involving 908 patients were included. The tranexamic acid group had lower indicators for total blood loss, hemoglobin decrease, and total drainage volume ( < .00001 for all). There were no differences between patients with versus without tranexamic acid in wound complications, including hematoma ( = .21) or infection ( = .18), nor were there any group differences in the prevalence of blood transfusion ( = .21) or postoperative thrombosis ( = .36).
CONCLUSION
Tranexamic acid was able to effectively reduce postoperative hemorrhage in patients undergoing HTO without affecting the rates of wound complications, blood transfusion, or postoperative thrombosis.
PubMed: 38455151
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241231761 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Mar 2024The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of postoperative drainage in reducing the incidence of Surgical Site...
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of postoperative drainage in reducing the incidence of Surgical Site Hemorrhage (SSH) and Surgical Site Infections (SSI) in patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies. Only Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) focusing on patients diagnosed preoperatively with non-infectious spinal diseases and undergoing posterior spinal surgery were included. The meta-analysis examined the efficacy of postoperative drainage in reducing SSH and SSI incidence. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate heterogeneity and publication bias.
RESULTS
A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria for SSH analysis, while six studies were included in the SSI analysis. The findings revealed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSH in patients with postoperative drainage, with a Relative Risk (RR) of 0.35 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.62, P < .01). However, no statistically significant impact was observed on the incidence of SSI (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.36 to 2.59, P = .81). Funnel plot symmetry and Egger's linear regression test confirmed the absence of significant publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of postoperative drainage in posterior spinal surgery is recommended to significantly reduce the risk of SSH. However, its effectiveness in preventing SSI remains inconclusive and requires further investigation. These can inform clinical decision-making and potentially improve patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38430147
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Cancer Feb 2024Whether Transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) placement reduces the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery remains controversial. Most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Whether Transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) placement reduces the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery remains controversial. Most existing meta-analyses rely on retrospective studies, while the prospective studies present an inadequate level of evidence.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on TDTs placement in RC patients after surgery was conducted. The main analysis index was the incidence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL, while secondary analysis index was the incidence of anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, and anastomotic stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed utilizing the databases Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. We recorded Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each included study, and a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to investigate the correlation between TDTs placement and four outcomes after RC surgery.
RESULTS
Seven studies (1774 participants, TDT 890 vs non-TDT 884) were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of AL was 9.3% (83/890) in the TDT group and 10.2% (90/884) in the non-TDT group. These disparities were found to lack statistical significance (P = 0.58). A comprehensive meta-analysis, comprising four studies involving a cumulative sample size of 1259 participants, revealed no discernible disparity in the occurrence of Grade B AL or Grade C AL between the TDT group and the non-TDT group (Grade B AL: TDT 34/631 vs non-TDT 26/628, P = 0.30; Grade C AL: TDT 11/631 vs non-TDT 27/628, P = 0.30). Similarly, the incidences of anastomotic bleeding (4 studies, 876 participants), incision infection (3studies, 713 participants), and anastomotic stenosis (2studies, 561 participants) were 5.5% (24/440), 8.1% (29/360), and 2.9% (8/280), respectively, in the TDT group, and 3.0% (13/436), 6.5% (23/353), and 3.9% (11/281), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences were also determined to lack statistical significance (P = 0.08, P = 0.43, P = 0.48, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The placement of TDTs does not significantly affect the occurrence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL following surgery for rectal cancer. Additionally, TDTs placement does not be associated with increased complications such as anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, or anastomotic stenosis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO: CRD42023427914.
Topics: Humans; Anastomotic Leak; Incidence; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Constriction, Pathologic; Anal Canal; Rectal Neoplasms; Drainage
PubMed: 38402391
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8