-
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2019Cephalosporins that contain the N-methylthiotetrazole side chain (NMTT-cephalosporin) have been reported to be associated with coagulation-related adverse events;... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cephalosporins that contain the N-methylthiotetrazole side chain (NMTT-cephalosporin) have been reported to be associated with coagulation-related adverse events; however, a comprehensive evaluation regarding the association is lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety profile of NMTT-cephalosporins with respect to hypoprothrombinemia and bleeding. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and RISS databases were systematically searched for clinical studies up to October 2018. The association between NMTT-cephalosporins and hypoprothrombinemia was estimated using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 studies on cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and moxalactam were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Hypoprothrombinemia (OR 1.676, 95% CI 1.275-2.203) and prothrombin time (PT) prolongation (OR 2.050, 95% CI 1.398-3.005) were significantly associated with NMTT-cephalosporins, whereas bleeding was not (OR 1.359, 95% CI 0.920-2.009). Subgroup analyses revealed that cefoperazone (OR 2.506, 95% CI 1.293-4.860), cefamandole (OR 3.247, 95% CI 1.083-9.733), and moxalactam (OR 3.367, 95% CI 1.725-6.572) were significantly associated with hypoprothrombinemia. An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program led by a multidisciplinary team could play a critical role in monitoring cephalosporin-related hypoprothrombinemia or PT prolongation in patients with underlying clinical conditions at risk for bleeding. The multidisciplinary team could also assist in communicating the potential safety concerns regarding NMTT-cephalosporin use with healthcare professionals to decrease the risk of adverse events.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Humans; Hypoprothrombinemias; Male
PubMed: 31623191
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203937 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Cholera is a challenging ancient disease caused by (. Antibiotics that prevent cell wall synthesis are among the first known antibiotic groups. Due to its high... (Review)
Review
Cholera is a challenging ancient disease caused by (. Antibiotics that prevent cell wall synthesis are among the first known antibiotic groups. Due to its high consumption, has developed resistance to the majority of antibiotics in this class. Resistance to recommended antibiotics for the treatment of has also increased. In light of the decrease in consumption of certain antibiotics in this group that inhibit cell wall synthesis and the implementation of new antibiotics, it is necessary to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of and to employ the most effective treatment antibiotic. An comprehensive systematic search for relevant articles was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE through October 2020. Stata version 17.1 utilized the Metaprop package to execute a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in order to estimate weighted pooled proportions. A total of 131 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Ampicillin was the most investigated antibiotic. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance was in order aztreonam (0%), cefepime (0%), imipenem (0%), meropenem (3%), fosfomycin (4%), ceftazidime (5%), cephalothin (7%), augmentin (8%), cefalexin (8%), ceftriaxone (9%), cefuroxime (9%), cefotaxime (15%), cefixime (37%), amoxicillin (42%), penicillin (44%), ampicillin (48%), cefoxitin (50%), cefamandole (56%), polymyxin-B (77%), carbenicillin (95%) respectively. Aztreonam, cefepime, and imipenem are the most efficient cell wall synthesis inhibitors. There has been an increase in resistance to antibiotics such as cephalothin, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, and meropenem. Over the years, resistance to penicillin, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime, has decreased.
PubMed: 37021056
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1027277 -
Medicine Feb 2020This meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam for empiric therapy febrile neutropenia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam for empiric therapy febrile neutropenia.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov database were searched through May 10, 2019. Only clinical trials comparing cefoperazone-sulbactam with other antibiotics for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia were included. The primary outcome was treatment success without modification, and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 retrospective cohort study were included. Overall, cefoperazone-sulbactam exhibited a treatment success rate similar to those of comparator drugs for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.24, I = 0%). A similar finding was noted in pooled analysis of 10 RCTs (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.30, I = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed that cefoperazone-sulbactam had a treatment success rate similar to the rates of comparators for adults (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.38, I = 0%) and children (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.46, I = 0%). Cefoperazone-sulbactam did not differ significantly from comparators in the risks of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.58, I = 0%) or common AEs, namely rash, nausea/vomiting, and superinfection.
CONCLUSION
The clinical efficacy and tolerability of cefoperazone-sulbactam are comparable to those of comparator drugs in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefoperazone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Sulbactam
PubMed: 32080150
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019321