-
United European Gastroenterology Journal Feb 2019Success and event rates of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage vary with techniques, and results from different studies remain inconsistent. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Success and event rates of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage vary with techniques, and results from different studies remain inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a proportion meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage and compare the outcomes of current procedures.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Web of knowledge to identify studies reporting technical success, clinical success and complication rates of EUS-guided biliary drainage techniques to estimate their clinical and technical efficacy and safety.
RESULTS
We identified 17 studies including a total of 686 patients. The overall clinical success and technical success rates were respectively 84% confidence interval (CI) 95% (80-88) and 96% CI 95% (93-98) for hepaticogastrostomy, and respectively 87% CI 95% (82-91) and 95% CI 95 (91-97) for choledochoduodenostomy. Reported adverse event rates were significantly higher ( = 0.01) for hepaticogastrostomy (29% CI 95% (24-34)) compared to choledochoduodenostomy (20% CI 95% (16-25)). Compared with hepaticogastrostomy, the pooled odds ratio for the complication rate of choledochoduodenostomy was 2.01 (1.25; 3.24) ( = 0.0042), suggesting that choledochoduodenostomy might be safer than hepaticogastrostomy.
CONCLUSION
The available literature suggests choledochoduodenostomy may be a safer approach compared to hepaticogastrostomy. Randomized controlled trials with sufficiently large cohorts are needed to compare techniques and confirm these findings.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Choledochostomy; Drainage; Female; Hepatectomy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Stents; Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 30788117
DOI: 10.1177/2050640618808147 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2023External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a key factor in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) but associated with risks and complications. Intraventricular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage with External Ventricular Drainage and Fibrinolysis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications and Outcome.
BACKGROUND
External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a key factor in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) but associated with risks and complications. Intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) has been proposed to improve clinical outcome and reduce complications of EVD treatment. The following review and metaanalysis provides a comprehensive evaluation of IVH treatment with external ventricular drainage (EVD) and intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) with regards to complications and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
The PRISMA guidelines were followed preparing this review. Studies included in the meta-analysis were compared using forest plots and the related odds ratios.
RESULTS
After a literature search, 980 articles were identified and 65 and underwent full-text review. Forty-two articles were included in the review and meta-analysis. We found that bolted and antibiotic-coated catheters were superior to tunnelled/uncoated catheters (P < 0.001) and antibiotic- vs. silver-impregnated catheters (P < 0.001]) in preventing infection. Shunt dependency was related to the volume of blood in the ventricles but unaffected by IVF (P = 0.98). IVF promoted hematoma clearance, decreased mortality (22.4% vs. 40.9% with IVF vs. no IVF, respectively, P < 0.00001), improved good functional outcomes (47.2% [IVF] vs. 38.3% [no IVF], P = 0.03), and reduced the rate of catheter occlusion from 37.3% without IVF to 10.6% with IVF (P = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS
We present evidence and best practice recommendations for the treatment of IVH with EVD and intraventricular fibrinolysis. Our analysis further provides a comprehensive quantitative reference of the most relevant clinical endpoints for future studies on novel IVH technologies and treatments.
Topics: Humans; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebral Ventricles; Drainage; Fibrinolytic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36642373
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.021 -
Endoscopic Ultrasound 2022EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography biliary drainage (PTC) are the two alternate methods for biliary decompression in... (Review)
Review
EUS-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures in patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography biliary drainage (PTC) are the two alternate methods for biliary decompression in cases where ERCP fails. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with failed ERCP. A total of ten studies were included, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, including four retrospective studies and six randomized controlled trials. We compared the technical and clinical success rates and the acute, delayed, and total adverse events of EUS-BD with PTC. The odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. There was no difference between technical (OR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.20-1.07]; P = 0.27) and clinical (OR: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.10-4.55]; P = 0.51) success rates between EUS-PD and PTC groups. Procedural adverse events (OR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.09-0.31]; P = 0.03) and total adverse events (OR: 0.09 [95% CI: 0.02-0.38]; P < 0.01) were significantly different between the two groups; however, delayed adverse events were nonsignificantly different (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.34-1.57]; P = 0.97). This meta-analysis indicates that endoscopic biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is equally effective but safer in terms of acute and total adverse events than percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTC) for biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures who have failed an ERCP.
PubMed: 35083977
DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00009 -
BMJ Open Jul 2023To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) against percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) for liver abscess.
DESIGN
Systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception up to 16 March 2022.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials that compared PCD to PNA for liver abscess were considered eligible, without restriction on language.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Primary outcome was treatment success rate. Depending on heterogeneity, either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model was used to derive overall estimates. Review Manager V.5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis was performed using the Trial Sequential Analysis software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
RESULTS
Ten trials totalling 1287 individuals were included. Pooled analysis revealed that PCD, when compared with PNA, enhanced treatment success rate (risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.25). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated this robust finding with required information size attained. For large abscesses, subgroup analysis favoured PCD (test of subgroup difference, p<0.001). In comparison to PNA, pooled analysis indicated a significant benefit of PCD on time to achieve clinical improvement or complete clinical relief (mean differences (MD) -2.53 days; 95% CI -3.54 to -1.52) in six studies with 1000 patients; time to achieve a 50% reduction in abscess size (MD -2.49 days; 95% CI -3.59 to -1.38) in five studies with 772 patients; and duration of intravenous antibiotic use (MD -4.04 days, 95% CI -5.99 to -2.10) in four studies with 763 patients. In-hospital mortality and complications were not different.
CONCLUSION
In patients with liver abscess, ultrasound-guided PCD raises the treatment success rate by 136 in 1000 patients, improves clinical outcomes by 3 days and reduces the need for intravenous antibiotics by 4 days.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022316540.
Topics: Humans; Drainage; Suction; Liver Abscess; Biopsy, Needle; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Catheters
PubMed: 37518084
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072736 -
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology... May 2022Endoscopic drainage is an established treatment modality for adult patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Available data regarding the efficacy and safety of...
PURPOSE
Endoscopic drainage is an established treatment modality for adult patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Available data regarding the efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage in pediatric patients are limited. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of endoscopic drainage in children with PFCs.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar for studies on the outcomes of endoscopic drainage with or without endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) guidance in pediatric patients with PFCs from inception to May 2021. The study's primary objective was clinical success, defined as resolution of PFCs. The secondary outcomes included technical success, adverse events, and recurrence rates.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies (187 children, 70.3% male) were included in this review. The subtypes of fluid collection included pseudocysts (60.3%) and walled-off necrosis (39.7%). The pooled technical success rates in studies where drainage of PFCs were performed with and without EUS guidance were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6-98%; =0) and 93.9% (95% CI, 82.6-98%; =0), respectively. The pooled clinical success after one and two endoscopic interventions were 88.7% (95% CI, 82.7-92.9%; =0) and 92.3% (95% CI, 87.4-95.4%; =0), respectively. The pooled rate of major adverse events was 6.3% (95% CI, 3.3-11.4%; =0). The pooled rate of recurrent PFCs after endoscopic drainage was 10.4% (95% CI, 6.1-17.1%; =0).
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic drainage is safe and effective in children with PFCs. However, future studies are required to compare endoscopic and EUS-guided drainage of PFCs in children.
PubMed: 35611379
DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2022.25.3.251 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jan 2023Commonly used clinical treatments for intracranial hypertension include continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CLCFD) and conventional lumbar puncture. However,...
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and lumbar puncture in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury.
BACKGROUND
Commonly used clinical treatments for intracranial hypertension include continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CLCFD) and conventional lumbar puncture. However, lumbar puncture is more invasive, requires multiple punctures. CLCFD has less trauma, and drainage can be manipulated to avoid repeated lumbar puncture. However, CLCFD may also lead to complications such as intracranial hematoma and intracranial pneumothorax. Therefore, there is no agreement on which method is more effective. This study evaluated the efficacy of CLCFD and conventional lumbar puncture in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury.
METHODS
The search terms 'brain injury' and 'CLCFD' were used to search CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Longyuan, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases (from inception to November 1, 2022). Inclusion criteria: (I) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), CLCFD and conventional lumbar puncture drainage for patients with cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury; (II) evaluation of indicators such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage stop time, clearance time, intracranial infection and complications. Cochrane systematic review was performed to assess the quality of the literature. RevMan 5.3 software was used for systematic analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 8 studies, involving 568 patients. There is some publication bias in the statistics. The cessation time of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (95% confidence interval (CI): -3.65 to -2.86, Z=16.21, P<0.00001), the time to return to normal pressure (95% CI: -3.13 to -2.09, Z=9.79, P<0.00001), cerebrospinal fluid clearing time (95% CI: -1.96 to -1.09, Z=6.91, P<0.00001), hospitalization time (95% CI: -1.99 to -0.91, Z=5.27, P<0.00001), incidence of intracranial infection (95% CI: 0.07-0.27, Z=5.84, P<0.00001) and complications (95% CI: 0.10-0.43, Z=4.22, P<0.0001) in the CLCFD group were lower than those in the conventional group. The cure rate of the CLCFD group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (OR =3.75, 95% CI: 2.26-6.23, Z=5.11, P<0.00001); the difference in mortality between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with conventional lumbar puncture, CLCFD can significantly increase the cure rate, shorten the recovery time of cerebrospinal fluid, and significantly reduce the incidence of intracranial infections, reduce complications, is conducive to the prognosis of patients.
PubMed: 36747386
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-1302 -
AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2016Mechanisms underlying bleeding in nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH remain unclear. Previous investigators have suggested a relationship between nonaneurysmal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Mechanisms underlying bleeding in nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH remain unclear. Previous investigators have suggested a relationship between nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH and primitive venous drainage of the basal vein of Rosenthal. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relation between primitive basal vein of Rosenthal drainage and nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search of all studies examining the prevalence of primitive basal vein of Rosenthal drainage in patients with aneurysmal SAH and nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH. Data collected were primitive basal vein of Rosenthal drainage (direct connection of perimesencephalic veins into the dural sinuses instead of the Galenic system) in at least 1 cerebral hemisphere, normal bilateral basal vein of Rosenthal drainage systems, and the number of overall primitive venous systems in the nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH and aneurysmal SAH groups. Statistical analysis was performed by using a random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight studies with 888 patients (334 with nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH and 554 with aneurysmal SAH) and 1657 individual venous systems were included. Patients with nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH were more likely to have a primitive basal vein of Rosenthal drainage in at least 1 hemisphere (47.7% versus 22.1%; OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.15-5.08; P < .01) and were less likely to have bilateral normal basal vein of Rosenthal drainage systems than patients with aneurysmal SAH (18.3% versus 37.4%; OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52; P < .01). When we considered individual venous systems, there were higher rates of primitive venous systems in patients with nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH than in patients with aneurysmal SAH (34.9% versus 15.3%; OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 2.37-6.43; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH have a higher prevalence of primitive basal vein of Rosenthal drainage in at least 1 hemisphere than patients with aneurysmal SAH. This finding suggests a venous origin of some nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAHs. A primitive basal vein of Rosenthal pattern is an imaging finding that has the potential to facilitate the diagnosis of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic SAH.
Topics: Cerebral Veins; Humans; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
PubMed: 27173362
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4806 -
Computational and Mathematical Methods... 2022To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect and safety of drainage after the hip arthroplasty in randomized control trials. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize the evidence regarding the effect and safety of drainage after the hip arthroplasty in randomized control trials.
BACKGROUND
Although the standard of hip replacement has matured in recent years, the need for postoperative drainage is still controversial which also is a clinical problem that needs to be addressed.
DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Cochrane methods and Prisma guideline. . A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ovid, Wan Fang database, CNKI, and CBM database was carried out from January 1, 2000, to December, 2021. . The quality of included randomized controlled trials was assessed individually by two reviewers independently using criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0.
RESULTS
Nineteen randomized control trials involving 3354 participants were included in this analysis. From the above analysis, we can know that compared with nondrainage, there was a statistically significant difference in VAS score on the postoperative first day (SD = -0.6; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.41) and second day (SD = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.58, -0.18), hematocrit reduction (MD =2.89; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.48), blood transfusion rate (OR =1.47; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.92), change of thigh circumstance (SMD = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.66, -0.31), and hospital stay (MD = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.39) in drainage. However, there were no statistically significant differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit level, hip function, total blood loss, transfusion volume, dressing use, and complications between them.
CONCLUSION
Drainage after hip arthroplasty can reduce swelling in the thigh and relieve pain while no drainage can bring down hematocrit reduction, decrease dressing uses, and shorten the hospital stay which promotes rapid recovery. This review provides a detailed theoretical reference for the proper clinical application of drains and improves the efficient use of resources.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Computational Biology; Drainage; Edema; Female; Humans; Male; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Visual Analog Scale
PubMed: 35251296
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2069468 -
Medicine Nov 2018In the current meta-analysis, we focus on the exploration of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in terms of its overall safety as well as efficacy in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In the current meta-analysis, we focus on the exploration of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in terms of its overall safety as well as efficacy in the treatment of infected pancreatitis necrosis based on qualified studies.
METHODS
The following electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies through the use of index words updated to May 2018: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were utilized for the main outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 622 patients in the PCD group and 650 patients in the control group from 13 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The aggregated results indicated that the incidence of bleeding was decreased significantly (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.25-0.70) in the PCD group as compared with the control group. In addition, PCD decreased the mortality (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.41-1.42), hospital duration (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.33), duration in intensive care unit (ICU) (SMD: -0.13, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.04), pancreatic fistula (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.46-1.17), and organ failure (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.45-1.82) in comparison with the control group, but without statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
Our findings provide evidence for the treatment effect of PCD in the decrease of bleeding, mortality, duration in hospital and ICU, pancreatic fistula, organ failure as compared with the surgical treatment. In conclusion, further studies based on high-quality RCTs with larger sample size and long-term follow-ups are warranted for the confirmation of PCD efficacy in treating infected pancreatitis necrosis.
Topics: Drainage; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Infections; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Multiple Organ Failure; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing
PubMed: 30461605
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012999 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Apr 2016Closed drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used routinely for many decades, but controversies have arisen in recent years. The purposes of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Closed drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used routinely for many decades, but controversies have arisen in recent years. The purposes of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of closed drainage with nondrainage after primary TKA; and to assess the benefit and drawback of closed drainage.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, CENTRAL, Embase and Web of Science) were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and risks of closed drainage after primary TKA. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was then performed using Review Manager Software.
RESULTS
Twelve RCTs totalling 889 TKAs were identified. No significant differences in infection rate or blood loss were found between the closed drainage and nondrainage TKAs, and there was also no significant difference in haematoma formation, deep venous thrombosis, postoperative VAS score or range of motion between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be no clear benefit or drawback to the use of closed drainage after primary TKA. Improving the use of closed drainage might provide better outcomes.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Drainage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 27118129
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1039-2