-
Digestive Surgery 2020Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including...
BACKGROUND
Bile duct injury (BDI) is a devastating complication following cholecystectomy. After initial management of BDI, patients stay at risk for late complications including anastomotic strictures, recurrent cholangitis, and secondary biliary cirrhosis.
METHODS
We provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on the long-term outcome of BDI. Considering the availability of only limited data regarding treatment of anastomotic strictures in literature, we also retrospectively analyzed patients with anastomotic strictures following a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) from a prospectively maintained database of 836 BDI patients.
RESULTS
Although clinical outcomes of endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical treatment of BDI are good with success rates of around 90%, quality of life (QoL) may be impaired even after "clinically successful" treatment. Following surgical treatment, the incidence of anastomotic strictures varies from 5 to 69%, with most studies reporting incidences around 10-20%. The median time to stricture formation varies between 11 and 30 months. Long-term BDI-related mortality varies between 1.8 and 4.6%. Of 91 patients treated in our center for anastomotic strictures after HJ, 81 (89%) were treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation, with a long-term success rate of 77%. Twenty-four patients primarily or secondarily underwent surgical revision, with recurrent strictures occurring in 21%.
CONCLUSIONS
The long-term impact of BDI is considerable, both in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL. Treatment should be performed in tertiary expert centers to optimize outcomes. Patients require a long-term follow-up to detect anastomotic strictures. Strictures should initially be managed by percutaneous dilatation, with surgical revision as a next step in treatment.
Topics: Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y; Bile Ducts; Cholangitis; Cholecystectomy; Constriction, Pathologic; Dilatation; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Jejunum; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 30654363
DOI: 10.1159/000496432 -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Jan 2022Gastrointestinal hamartomas are rarely encountered benign growths made of an abnormal mixture of tissues normally found in the body where the growth occurs. Most...
INTRODUCTION
Gastrointestinal hamartomas are rarely encountered benign growths made of an abnormal mixture of tissues normally found in the body where the growth occurs. Most hamartomas are asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. Evidence regarding symptomatic hamartomas of the jejunum and ileum is limited and restricted to anecdotal case reports. We aim to provide a contemporary overview to clarify various aspects linked to symptomatic hamartomas, helping aide management and clinical decision-making.
METHODS
The search terms 'small bowel', 'small intestine', 'jejunum' and 'ileum' were combined with 'hamartoma'. Embase, Medline, PubMed searches and Google Scholar hand-searches were conducted. All English language papers from 1 January 2000 to 1 June 2020 were included.
RESULTS
In total 39 cases were reviewed: 29 adults and 10 paediatric (0-16 years). Presenting symptoms included abdominal pain (87%), vomiting (56%), gastrointestinal bleeding (20.5%) and weight loss (5%); 36 of 39 cases (92%) presented as emergencies. Diagnostic investigations included: abdominal x-ray (49%), endoscopy (38%), computed tomography (56%), magnetic resonance imaging (5%), contrast study (15%) and video capsule endoscopy (5%). Initial management strategy was either open (30) or laparoscopic (7) surgery or endoscopy (2). All cases required surgery for definitive management. Twenty-five cases recorded hamartoma size, and mean maximum diameter was 3.56cm (1.2-8cm) with stricturing in seven cases. Nine of the 39 cases were associated with hamartomatous syndromes. Two mortalities were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first published review addressing symptomatic hamartomas of the jejunum and ileum. New data relating to demographic cohort, symptom profile, investigations, management strategies, and morbidity and mortality provide greater insight to those encountering this challenging clinical finding in the future.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hamartoma; Humans; Ileal Diseases; Jejunal Diseases; Vomiting; Weight Loss
PubMed: 34545759
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0038 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Oct 2020Small bowel lipomas are rarely encountered benign adipose growths found within the small intestine wall or mesentery. Limited up-to-date evidence exists regarding such... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Small bowel lipomas are rarely encountered benign adipose growths found within the small intestine wall or mesentery. Limited up-to-date evidence exists regarding such lipomas. We aim to aid clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes through this comprehensive review.
METHODOLOGY
The terms 'small bowel,' 'small intestine,' 'jejunum' and 'ileum' were combined with 'lipoma.' EMBASE, Medline and PubMed database searches were performed. All papers published in English from 01/01/2000-31/12/2019 were included. Simple statistical analysis (-test, Anova) was performed.
RESULTS
142 papers yielded 147 cases (adults = 138, pediatric = 9). Male = 88, female = 59 (average age = 49.9 years). Presenting symptoms: abdominal pain = 68.7%; nausea/vomiting = 35.3%, hematochezia/GI bleeding = 33.3%; anaemia = 10.9%; abdominal distension = 12.2%; constipation = 8.9%; weight loss = 7.5%. Mean preceding symptom length = 58.1 days (symptoms >1 year excluded (n = 9)). Diagnostic imaging utilised: abdominal X-Ray = 33.3%; endoscopy = 46.3%; CT = 78.2%; ultrasound = 23.8%. 124/137 (90.5%) required definitive surgical management (laparotomy = 89, laparoscopcic = 35). 9 patients were successfully managed endoscopically. Lipoma location: ileum = 59.9%, jejunum = 32%, mesentery = 4.8%. Maximal recorded lipoma size ranged 1.2-22 cm.Mean maximum lipoma diameter and management strategy comparison: laparotomy 5.6 cm, laparoscopic = 4.4 cm, endoscopic = 3.7 cm, conservative = 4.5 cm. One-way Anova test, p value = 0.21. Average length of stay (LOS) was 7.4 days (range = 2-30). T-test p value = 0.13 when comparing management modalities and LOS. 4 complications, 0 mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Important previously undocumented points are illustrated; a clearer symptom profile, diagnostic investigations utilised, size and site of lipomas, types and effectiveness of management modalities, associated morbidity and mortality. Open surgery remains the primary management. No statistically significant difference in LOS and lipoma size is demonstrated between management strategies. Endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques may reduce utilising invasive surgery in the future as skillset and availability improve.
PubMed: 32953101
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.028 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jul 2020Additional studies comparing several reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy have been published; of note, it is necessary to update systematic reviews and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Additional studies comparing several reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy have been published; of note, it is necessary to update systematic reviews and meta-analysis from the current evidence-based literature.
AIM
To expand the current knowledge on feasibility and safety, and also to analyze postoperative outcomes of several reconstructive techniques after proximal gastrectomy.
METHODS
PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline databases were searched for original studies, and relevant literature published between the years 1966 and 2019 concerning various reconstructive techniques on proximal gastrectomy were selected. The postoperative outcomes and complications of the reconstructive techniques were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed using Rev-Man 5.0. A total of 29 studies investigating postoperative outcomes of double tract reconstruction, jejunal pouch interposition, jejunal interposition, esophagogastrostomy, and double flap reconstruction were finally selected in the quantitative analysis.
RESULT
Pooled incidences of reflux esophagitis for double tract reconstruction, jejunal pouch interposition, jejunal interposition esophagogastrostomy, and double flap reconstruction were 8.6%, 13.8%, 13.8%, 19.3%, and 8.9% respectively. Meta-analysis showed a decreased length of hospital in the JI group as compared to the JPI group (heterogeneity: Chi = 1.34, df = 1 (P = 0.25); I = 26%, test for overall effect: Z = 2.22 (P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference between JI and EG in length of hospital stay with heterogeneity: Chi = 1.40, df = 3 (P = 0.71); I = 0%, test for overall effect: Z = 5.04 (P < 0.00001). Operative time was less in the EG group as compared to the JI group (heterogeneity: Chi = 31.09, df = 5 (P < 0.00001); I = 84%, test for overall effect: Z = 32.35 (P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION
Although current reconstructive techniques present excellent anti-reflux efficacy, the optimal reconstructive method remains to be determined. The double flap reconstruction proved to lower the rate of complication, but the DTR, JI, JPI, and EG groups showed higher incidence of complications in anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and residual food. In the meta-analysis result, the complications between the JI, JPI, and EG were comparable but the EG group showed to have better postoperative outcomes concerning the operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay.
Topics: Gastrectomy; Humans; Jejunum; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32677956
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01936-2 -
Endoscopy International Open Apr 2022Endoscopic methods of delivering uninterrupted feeding to the jejunum include direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) or PEG with jejunal extension (PEG-J),... (Review)
Review
Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J) technical success and outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endoscopic methods of delivering uninterrupted feeding to the jejunum include direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) or PEG with jejunal extension (PEG-J), validated from small individual studies. We aim to perform a meta-analysis to assess their effectiveness and safety in a variety of clinical scenarios. Major databases were searched until June 2021. Efficacy outcomes included technical and clinical success, while safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and malfunction rates. We assessed heterogeneity using and classic fail-safe to assess bias. 29 studies included 1874 patients (983 males and 809 females); mean age of 60 ± 19 years. Pooled technical and clinical success rates with DPEJ were 86.6 % (CI, 82.1-90.1, 73.1) and 96.9 % (CI, 95.0-98.0, 12.7). The pooled incidence of malfunction, major and minor AEs with DPEJ were 11 %, 5 %, and 15 %. Pooled technical and clinical success for PEG-J were 94.4 % (CI, 85.5-97.9, 33) and 98.7 % (CI, 95.5-99.6, < 0.001). The pooled incidence of malfunction, major and minor AEs with DPEJ were 24 %, 1 %, and 25 %. Device-assisted DPEJ performed better in altered gastrointestinal anatomy. First and second attempts were 87.6 % and 90.2 %. DPEJ and PEG-J are safe and effective procedures placed with high fidelity with comparable outcomes. DPEJ was associated with fewer tube malfunction and failure rates; however, it is technically more complex and not standardized, while PEG-J had higher placement rates. The use of balloon enteroscopy was found to enhance DPEJ performance.
PubMed: 35433212
DOI: 10.1055/a-1774-4736 -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Jul 2018Introduction The free jejunal flap represents the gold standard for circumferential defects in upper digestive tract reconstruction. It is a technically demanding... (Review)
Review
Introduction The free jejunal flap represents the gold standard for circumferential defects in upper digestive tract reconstruction. It is a technically demanding procedure with significant failure rates. Unrecognised failure leads to flap necrosis and potentially fatal sequelae, including sepsis and carotid artery bleed. Despite these catastrophic consequences, however, there remains no consensus on an optimum method for postoperative flap monitoring. Our unit has pioneered the use of external colour duplex ultrasound to monitor flap vascularity. We describe this technique and systematically review other published monitoring systems. Materials and methods A patient underwent oesophageal reconstruction using a jejunal free flap. Monitoring commenced immediately via external application of a colour duplex probe over the flap's vascular pedicle to facilitate flow volume assessment. Further bi-daily assessments were successfully used to monitor the postoperative viability of the flap. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results Six alternative monitoring techniques were identified: exteriorised jejunal segment, implantable Doppler probe, watch window, microdialysis, microendoscopy and reflectance photoplethysmography. Discussion Exteriorised jejunal segment and implantable Doppler probe are most commonly described, yet both are associated with high false positive rates, which is particularly significant in a patient demographic facing increased general anaesthetic risk. Most other techniques remain experimental. External colour Doppler ultrasound provides the surgeon with immediate reassurance following the reconstruction, requires minimal training to use, and eliminates the need for revisional procedures. Conclusion Our initial experience suggests that external colour Doppler ultrasound has exciting potential as an efficient and noninvasive technique for monitoring the free jejunal flap.
Topics: Esophagus; Female; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Jejunum; Middle Aged; Postoperative Care; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
PubMed: 29543049
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0043 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... May 2015The accuracy of prenatal ultrasound examination in detecting jejunal and ileal atresia has been reported in the literature to be highly variable, at 25-90%. The aim of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The accuracy of prenatal ultrasound examination in detecting jejunal and ileal atresia has been reported in the literature to be highly variable, at 25-90%. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in detecting non-duodenal small bowel atresia (ND-SBA).
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library, including The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), were searched electronically. The overall detection rate of jejunal or ileal atresia using ultrasound was reported. The accuracy of using polyhydramnios and dilated loops of bowel as diagnostic signs was also explored.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies involving 640 fetuses were included in this review. The detection rate of ND-SBA by prenatal ultrasound was highly variable, with values ranging from 10 to 100%, with an overall prediction of 50.6% (95% CI, 38.0-63.2%). When analyzed separately, the detection rates of jejunal and ileal atresia were 66.3%, (95% CI, 33.9-91.8%) and 25.9% (95% CI, 4.0-58.0%), respectively. Both dilated loops of bowel and polyhydramnios as diagnostic signs for ND-SBA provided a low overall detection rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound in identifying ND-SBA is extremely variable. Large studies are needed in order to identify objective and combined criteria for the diagnosis of these anomalies.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ileum; Infant, Newborn; Intestinal Atresia; Intestine, Small; Jejunum; Pregnancy; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 25157626
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14651 -
Medicine Jul 2016Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare entity with distinctive morphology and of expressing myomelanocytic markers. Gastrointestinal tract (GI) is one of... (Review)
Review
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare entity with distinctive morphology and of expressing myomelanocytic markers. Gastrointestinal tract (GI) is one of the most common anatomic sites of origin and counts for 20% to 25% of all reported cases of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors not otherwise specified (PEComas-NOS). However, the biologic behavior of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors of gastrointestinal tract (GI PEComas-NOS) is still unclear. The aim of conducting this systematic review is to sum up what is known so far of the epidemiology, natural history, management and prognosis of GI PEComas-NOS.A systematic research was performed on PubMed and EMBASE using the following terms: ("perivascular epithelioid cell tumor" or "PEComa") and ("gastrointestinal tract" or "GI" or "oral " or "mouth" or "esophagus" or "gullet" or "gastric" or "stomach" or "duodenum" or "jejunum" or "ileum" or "cecum" or "colon" or "colorectal" or "sigmoid" or "rectum" or "anus" or "mesentery") up to December 1, 2015. Retrieved GI PEComas-NOS publications, which included these terms, contains case reports, case series to case characteristic researches.A total of 168 articles were reviewed, 41 GI PEComa-NOS English studies among which were retrieved for analysis. We reviewed epidemiology, natural history, management and prognosis of GI PEComa-NOS. Generally GI PEComa-NOS is believed to have women predomination. The most frequently involved location is colon with non-specific clinical signs. Pathologically, GI PEComas-NOS shows epithelioid predominance (70%), meanwhile coexpresses melanocytic and muscle markers characteristically, while immunohistochemistry is a useful tool for identify, which indicates that HMB-45 is regarded as the most sensitive reagent. Complete resection served as mainstay of treatment, while chemotherapy should be unanimously considered to apply in malignant cases. Eventually, it is necessary for closed and long-term follow-up with endoscope and imaging for ruling out local recurrence or distant metastasis of this tumor.GI PEComas-NOS lives with unclear behavior. There are still many unverified clinicopathological issues of GI PEComas-NOS that needs to be clarified. Further studies and analyses concerning this rare entity should be brought out. Thus, the randomized clinical researches (RCTs) are required to be conducted.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Diagnosis, Differential; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 27428182
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003890 -
Pediatric Radiology Apr 2020Ultrasound (US) is a noninvasive method of assessing the bowel that can be used to screen for bowel pathology, such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease, in children. Knowledge... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Ultrasound (US) is a noninvasive method of assessing the bowel that can be used to screen for bowel pathology, such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease, in children. Knowledge about US findings of the bowel in healthy children is important for interpreting US results in cases where disease is suspected.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the bowel wall thickness in different bowel segments in healthy children and to assess differences in bowel wall thickness among pediatric age categories.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases for studies describing bowel wall thickness measured by transabdominal US in healthy children. We excluded studies using contrast agent. We calculated the pooled mean and standard deviation scores and assessed differences among age categories (0-4 years, 5-9 years, 10-14 years, 15-18 years), first with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and further with subsequent Student's t-tests for independent samples, corrected for multiple testing.
RESULTS
We identified 191 studies and included 7 of these studies in the systematic review. Reported bowel wall thickness values ranged from 0.8 mm to 1.9 mm in the small bowel and from 1.0 mm to 1.9 mm in the colon. The mean colonic bowel wall thickness is larger in children ages 15-19 years compared to 0-4 years (range in difference: 0.3-0.5 mm [corrected P<0.02]).
CONCLUSION
The reported upper limit of bowel wall thickness in healthy children is 1.9 mm in the small bowel and the colon, and mean thickness increases slightly with age in jejunum and colon. These values can be used as guidance when screening for bowel-related pathology in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intestines; Reference Values; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 31838567
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04567-2 -
PloS One 2020The outcomes of children with Choledochal cyst who undergo laparoscopic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus open cyst excision and Roux-en-Y... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The outcomes of children with Choledochal cyst who undergo laparoscopic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus open cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy have not been adequately compared. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain further insight into the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic excision in children with choledochal cysts.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1973 to January 31, 2020 was performed utilizing the PRISMA guidelines. Short-term, long-term and total postoperative complications were the primary endpoint measurements, whereas intraoperative outcomes and other postoperative outcomes were the secondary endpoints.
RESULTS
The final analysis included 14 retrospective cohorts comprising 1767 patients. There were no significant differences in the patients' short-term postoperative complications (RR = -1.08; 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.67) between the 2 approaches. However, improvements in long-term (RR = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18) and total postoperative complications (RR = -0.29; 95% CI = -0.40 to -0.21), estimated intraoperative blood loss and transfusion, time of initial feeding, and length of hospital stay were observed in patients who underwent laparoscopic excision when compared to those who underwent open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy provides similar or even improved intraoperative, postoperative outcomes when compared to open excision for children with Choledochal cyst.
Topics: Adolescent; Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures; Child; Child, Preschool; Choledochal Cyst; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Jejunum; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Liver; Male; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32986787
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239857