-
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
DATA SOURCES
Screening of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, other bases from inception to February 2022 using the keywords related to placenta accreta, increta, percreta, morbidly adherent placenta, and preoperative ultrasound diagnosis.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All available studies- whether were prospective or retrospective- including cohort, case control and cross sectional that involved prenatal diagnosis of PAS using 2D or 3D ultrasound with subsequent pathological confirmation postnatal were included. Fifty-four studies included 5307 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PAS was confirmed in 2025 of them.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Extracted data included settings of the study, study type, sample size, participants characteristics and their inclusion and exclusion criteria, Type and site of placenta previa, Type and timing of imaging technique (2D, and 3D), severity of PAS, sensitivity and specificity of individual ultrasound criteria and overall sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity was 0.8703, specificity was 0.8634 with -0.2348 negative correlation between them. The estimate of Odd ratio, negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 34.225, 0.155 and 4.990 respectively. The overall estimates of loss of retroplacental clear zone sensitivity and specificity were 0.820 and 0.898 respectively with 0.129 negative correlation. The overall estimates of myometrial thinning, loss of retroplacental clear zone, the presence of bridging vessels, placental lacunae, bladder wall interruption, exophytic mass, and uterovesical hypervascularity sensitivities were 0.763, 0.780, 0.659, 0.785, 0.455, 0.218 and 0.513 while specificities were 0.890, 0.884, 0.928, 0.809, 0.975, 0.865 and 0.994 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of PAS among women with low lying or placenta previa with previous cesarean section scars is high and recommended in all suspected cases.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Number CRD42021267501.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 37189095
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology :... Dec 2024Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy has been recognised as a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy has been recognised as a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy and clinical adverse effects using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed (including Medline), Cochrane Library and Science Direct were searched until June of 2023. Data analysis using statistical test fixed- and random-effects models in the meta-analysis, Cochran and meta-regression. The quality of the eligible studies was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist (NOS). A total of 46 relevant studies, with a sample size of 1,554,141 were entered into the meta-analysis. Vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth (OR: 1.8, CI 95%: 1.6-2.0), low birth weight (LBW; OR: 2.0, CI 95%: 1.5-2.6), premature rupture of membranes (PROMs; OR: 2.3, CI 95%: 1.8-3.0), abortion (OR: 4.3, CI 95%: 2.0-9.0), stillbirth (OR: 2.5, CI 95%: 1.2-5.0), placental abruption (OR: 2.2, CI 95%: 1.4-3.3) and placenta previa (OR: 1.9, CI 95%: 1.5-2.4). Vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with preterm birth, LBW, PROMs, miscarriage, stillbirth, placental abruption and placenta previa. Therefore, physicians or midwives need to be aware of the possibility of these consequences and manage them when they occur.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Stillbirth; Premature Birth; Abruptio Placentae; Placenta Previa; Placenta; Pregnancy Outcome; Abortion, Spontaneous; Uterine Hemorrhage
PubMed: 38305047
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2288224 -
Cadernos de Saude Publica Feb 2018This study aimed to investigate the existence and magnitude of the association between advanced maternal age (AMA) and occurrence of placenta praevia (PP) and placental... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to investigate the existence and magnitude of the association between advanced maternal age (AMA) and occurrence of placenta praevia (PP) and placental abruption (PA) among nulliparous and multiparous women, by a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched articles published between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015, in any language, in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS. Women were grouped into two age categories: up to 34 years old and 35 years or older. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. A meta-analysis was conducted for the PP and PA outcomes, using a meta-regression model to find possible covariates associated with heterogeneity among the studies and Egger's test to assess publication bias. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) system (CRD42016045594). Twenty-three studies met the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. For both outcomes, an increase in age increased the magnitude of association strength, and PP (OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 2.79-3.57) was more strongly associated with AMA than PA (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.35-1.54). For parity, there was no difference between nulliparous and multiparous women considered older for the PP and PA outcomes. Our review provided very low-quality evidence for both outcomes, since it encompasses observational studies with high statistical heterogeneity, diversity of populations, no control of confounding factors in several cases, and publication bias. However, the confidence intervals were small and there is a dose-response gradient, as well as a large magnitude of effect for PP.
Topics: Abruptio Placentae; Adult; Female; Humans; Maternal Age; Odds Ratio; Parity; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 29489954
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00206116 -
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology... Jun 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship of endometrial thickness (EMT) with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship of endometrial thickness (EMT) with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive cycles.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through April 2023. Obstetric outcomes include placenta previa, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and cesarean section (CS). Neonatal outcomes include birthweight, low birth weight (LBW), gestational age (GA), preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA). The effect size was estimated as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-square homogeneity test. One-study removal method was used to determine the sensitivity of the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies involving 76,404 cycles were included. The pooled results revealed significant differences between the thin endometrium group and the normal group in placental abruption (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.11-5.38, P = 0.03; I = 0%), HDP (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.44-2.05, P < 0.0001; I = 0%), CS (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.67, P = 0.01; I = 77%), GA (MD = -1.27 day, 95% CI: -2.41- -1.02, P = 0.03; I = 73%), PTB (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.34-1.81, P < 0.0001; I = 33%), birthweight (MD = -78.88 g, 95% CI: -115.79- -41.98, P < 0.0001; I = 48%), LBW (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.52-2.22, P < 0.00001; I = 3%) and SGA (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.17-1.70, P = 0.0003; I = 15%). No statistical differences were found in placenta previa, GDM, and LGA.
CONCLUSION
Thin endometrium was associated with lower birthweight or GA and higher risks of placental abruption, HDP, CS, PTB, LBW and SGA. Therefore, these pregnancies need special attention and close follow-up by obstetricians. Due to the limited number of included studies, further studies are needed to confirm the results.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Birth Weight; Abruptio Placentae; Cesarean Section; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Premature Birth; Diabetes, Gestational
PubMed: 37312205
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01105-6 -
Fertility and Sterility Feb 2012To determine whether elective single embryo transfer (eSET) lowers the risk of poor perinatal outcomes associated with IVF, when [1] compared with double embryo transfer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether elective single embryo transfer (eSET) lowers the risk of poor perinatal outcomes associated with IVF, when [1] compared with double embryo transfer (DET) or multiple embryo transfer (MET), and separately, [2] compared with spontaneous conceptions.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Centers for reproductive care.
PATIENT(S)
Infertility patients.
INTERVENTION(S)
MEDLINE, Embase, and bibliographies were searched for the period 1978-2011. Two reviewers independently assessed titles, abstracts, and full studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Dichotomous data were pooled using relative risks and continuous data with mean differences using a random effects model. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies, and cohort studies that examined any of the primary or secondary outcomes in singleton, twin, or multiple-order infants conceived by eSET as compared with [1] those conceived by DET or MET or [2] spontaneously conceived singleton gestations were included.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks' gestation) and low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g).
RESULT(S)
Sixteen studies were included (eight RCTs, eight cohort studies). Compared with DET-conceived infants, eSET-conceived singletons were less likely to be born either preterm (RCT-based relative risk [RR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.55) or with LBW (RCT-based RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.45; cohort study RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91). However, compared with spontaneously conceived singletons, eSET gestations had higher risks of PTB (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.26-3.61), placenta previa (RR 6.02, 95% CI 2.79-13.01), gestational diabetes (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.42), and ectopic pregnancy (RR 6.40, 95% CI 4.38-9.35).
CONCLUSION(S)
Elective single embryo transfer is associated with decreased risks of PTB and LBW compared with DET but higher risks of PTB compared with spontaneously conceived singletons.
Topics: Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infertility; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Single Embryo Transfer; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22177461
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.033 -
Biomedicines Jan 2023Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture.... (Review)
Review
Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture. Vasa previa is generally classified into types I and II. However, some cases are difficult to classify, and some studies have proposed a type III classification. This study aimed to review the current evidence on type III vasa previa. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 11 articles (2011-2022) were included. A systematic review showed that type III vasa previa accounts for 5.7% of vasa previa cases. Thirteen women with type III vasa previa were examined at a patient-level analysis. The median age was 35 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.5-38) years, and approximately 45% were assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies. The median gestational week of delivery was 36 (IQR 34-37) weeks; the antenatal detection rate was 84.6%, and no cases reported neonatal death. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of ART, antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between types I and III vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The current evidence on type III vasa previa is scanty, and further studies are warranted.
PubMed: 36672661
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010152 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2021This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring the relationship between prior UAE and obstetric complications through a meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic literature review through March 31, 2021, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines and determined the effect of prior UAE for PPH on the rate of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), PPH, placenta previa, hysterectomy, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and preterm birth (PTB). Twenty-three retrospective studies (2003-2021) met the inclusion criteria. They included 483 pregnancies with prior UAE and 320,703 pregnancies without prior UAE. The cumulative results of all women with prior UAE indicated that the rates of obstetric complications PAS, hysterectomy, and PPH were 16.3% (34/208), 6.5% (28/432), and 24.0% (115/480), respectively. According to the patient background-matched analysis based on the presence of prior PPH, women with prior UAE were associated with higher rates of PAS (odds ratio [OR] 20.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.27-132.41) and PPH (OR 5.32, 95% CI 1.40-20.16) but not with higher rates of hysterectomy (OR 8.93, 95% CI 0.43-187.06), placenta previa (OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.35-15.22), FGR (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.28-188.69), or PTB (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.74-12.14), compared with those who did not undergo prior UAE. Prior UAE for PPH may be a significant risk factor for PAS and PPH during subsequent pregnancies. Therefore, at the time of delivery, clinicians should be more attentive to PAS and PPH when women have undergone prior UAE. Since the number of women included in the patient background-matched study was limited, further investigations are warranted to confirm the results of this study.
Topics: Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; Humans; Hysterectomy; Particle Size; Placenta Accreta; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Publication Bias; Risk; Uterine Artery Embolization
PubMed: 34413380
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96273-z -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023The assessment of the relative impacts of uterine artery embolization (UAE) treatment for female patients is a critical field that informs clinical decisions, yet there...
OBJECTIVE
The assessment of the relative impacts of uterine artery embolization (UAE) treatment for female patients is a critical field that informs clinical decisions, yet there is a noticeable scarcity of high-quality, long-term comparative studies. This meta-analysis aimed to focus on the pregnancy rate and outcomes in female patients following UAE and to conduct subgroup analyses based on different patient populations or various control treatments.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted on 2 August 2023 through the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials for all potential studies. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to compare pregnancy rates and outcomes between the UAE group and the control group. Heterogeneity was evaluated statistically by using the chi-square-based Cochran's Q test and Higgins I statistics, and 95% prediction interval (PI). Software R 4.3.1 and Stata 12.0 were used for meta-analysis. The trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed with TSA v0.9.5.10 Beta software.
RESULTS
A total of 15 eligible studies (11 cohort studies, 3 randomized controlled trials, and 1 non-randomized clinical trial) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall results revealed that UAE significantly decreased postoperative pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI): 0.721 (0.531-0.979), 95% PI: 0.248-2.097] and was associated with an increased risk of postoperative PPH [RR (95% CI): 3.182 (1.319-7.675), 95% PI: 0.474-22.089]. Analysis grouped by population indicated that UAE decreased the risk of preterm delivery [RR (95% CI): 0.326 (0.128-0.831), = 0.019] and cesarean section [RR (95% CI): 0.693 (0.481-0.999), = 0.050] and increased the risk of placenta previa [RR (95% CI): 8.739 (1.580-48.341), = 0.013] in patients with UFs, CSP, and PPH, respectively. When compared with myomectomy, HIFU, and non-use of UAE, UAE treatment was associated with the reduced risks of preterm delivery [RR (95% CI): 0.296 (0.106-0.826)] and cesarean section [(95% CI): 0.693 (0.481-0.999), = 0.050] and increased placenta previa risk [RR (95% CI): 10.682 (6.859-16.636)], respectively.
CONCLUSION
UAE treatment was associated with a lower postoperative pregnancy rate and increased risk of PPH. Subgroup analysis suggested that UAE was shown to decrease the risk of preterm delivery and cesarean section and increase placenta previa risk.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier CRD42023448257.
PubMed: 38179282
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1283279 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Apr 2023To determine, by expert consensus through a modified Delphi process, the role of standardized and new ultrasound signs in the prenatal evaluation of patients at high...
OBJECTIVE
To determine, by expert consensus through a modified Delphi process, the role of standardized and new ultrasound signs in the prenatal evaluation of patients at high risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
METHODS
A systematic review of articles providing information on ultrasound imaging signs or markers associated with PAS was performed before the development of questionnaires for the first round of the Delphi process. Only peer-reviewed original research studies in the English language describing one or more new ultrasound sign(s) for the prenatal evaluation of PAS were included. A three-round consensus-building Delphi method was then conducted under the guidance of a steering group, which included nine experts who invited an international panel of experts in obstetric ultrasound imaging in the evaluation of patients at high risk for PAS. Consensus was defined as agreement of ≥ 70% between participants.
RESULTS
The systematic review identified 15 articles describing eight new ultrasound signs for the prenatal evaluation of PAS. A total of 35 external experts were approached, of whom 31 agreed and participated in the first round. Thirty external experts (97%) and seven experts from the steering group completed all three Delphi rounds. A consensus was reached that a prior history of at least one Cesarean delivery, myomectomy or PAS should be an indication for detailed PAS ultrasound assessment. The panelists also reached a consensus that seven of the 11 conventional signs of PAS should be included in the examination of high-risk patients and the routine mid-gestation scan report: (1) loss of the 'clear zone', (2) myometrial thinning, (3) bladder-wall interruption, (4) placental bulge, (5) uterovesical hypervascularity, (6) placental lacunae and (7) bridging vessels. A consensus was not reached for any of the eight new signs identified by the systematic review. With respect to other ultrasound features that are not specific to PAS but increase the probability of PAS at birth, the panelists reached a consensus for the finding of anterior placenta previa or placenta previa with cervical involvement. The experts were also asked to determine which PAS signs should be quantified and consensus was reached only for the quantification of placental lacunae using an existing score. For predicting surgical outcome in patients with a high probability of PAS at delivery, a consensus was obtained for loss of the clear zone, bladder-wall interruption, presence of placental lacunae and presence of placenta previa involving the cervix.
CONCLUSIONS
We have confirmed the continued importance of seven established standardized ultrasound signs of PAS, highlighted the role of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluating the placental position and anatomy of the cervix, and identified new ultrasound signs that may become useful in the future prenatal evaluation and management of patients at high risk for PAS at birth. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Delphi Technique; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36609827
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26155 -
Journal of Endocrinological... Jun 2023To examine the association between isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia (IMH) and adverse obstetric outcomes and offspring outcomes and also investigate the effects of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between isolated maternal hypothyroxinaemia (IMH) and adverse obstetric outcomes and offspring outcomes and also investigate the effects of levothyroxine therapy on IMH for the above outcomes.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, and the reference lists of key reviews were hand searched on June 9, 2021. Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts. Full articles were further assessed if the information suggested that the study met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and two researchers performed data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment using standardized tables. Summary relative risks or the mean difference between maternal effects and offspring outcomes were calculated by a random-effects model.
RESULTS
We identified 38 eligible articles (35 cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials [RCT]). Meta-analysis showed that maternal IMH was associated with increased gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, fetal distress, and macrosomia outcomes in IMH compared to euthyroid women, and the relative risks were 1.42 (1.03-1.96), 1.50 (1.05-2.14), 1.33 (1.15-1.55), 1.75 (1.16-2.65) and 1.62 (1.35-1.94), respectively. IMH was not associated with placenta previa, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and offspring outcomes like birth weight, low birth weight infants, fetal macrosomia, neonatal intensive care, neonatal death, or fetal head circumference. In addition, we did not find an association between IMH and adverse offspring cognitive defects. Due to insufficient data for meta-analysis, it failed to pool the evidence of levothyroxine's therapeutic effect on IMH and their offspring.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
IMH in pregnancy may relate to a few maternal and offspring outcomes. Moreover, there is currently no sufficient evidence that levothyroxine treatment during pregnancy reduces adverse maternal outcomes and disability in offspring. Further investigation to explore the beneficial effects of levothyroxine therapy is warranted.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Thyroxine; Premature Birth; Diabetes, Gestational; Pre-Eclampsia; Birth Weight
PubMed: 36422828
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01967-4