-
Cureus Sep 2022Flagellate dermatitis caused by bleomycin is a rare side effect with a distinctive pattern of whip-like, linear streaks. The clinical presentation has become uncommon...
Flagellate dermatitis caused by bleomycin is a rare side effect with a distinctive pattern of whip-like, linear streaks. The clinical presentation has become uncommon nowadays as bleomycin use in conventional chemotherapy regimens has decreased. We present a case of a 30-year-old female diagnosed with ovarian germ cell tumour, managed with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and later developed a widespread rash indicative of classic flagellate dermatitis. This brief report emphasizes the significance of detection and management of this transient dermatological complication in patients receiving bleomycin.
PubMed: 36258994
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29221 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2022Non-Gestational Ovarian Choriocarcinoma (NGOC) is an extremely rare ovarian tumor, with an incidence of less than 0.6% of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Its close... (Review)
Review
Non-Gestational Ovarian Choriocarcinoma (NGOC) is an extremely rare ovarian tumor, with an incidence of less than 0.6% of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Its close pathologic resemblance to Gestational Ovarian Choriocarcinoma (GOC), however, requires special attention as the treatments differ greatly. NGOC typically affects patients in late adolescence or early reproductive years. As a result, NGOCs are often misdiagnosed as ectopic pregnancies due to their common presentation of bleeding, abdominal pain, adnexal mass, and positive serum beta-HCG. On pathologic examination, the tumor is indistinguishable from GOC, and only after review of tissue for paternal genetic components can the diagnosis of NGOC be made. Imaging studies often show highly vascular lesions with further investigation with computer topography (CT) sometimes showing metastatic lesions in the lungs, pelvis, vagina, and liver. These lesions are often hemorrhagic and can lead to catastrophic bleeding. Treatment is vastly different from GOC; NGOC requires treatment with both surgical resection and chemotherapy, with Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin (BEP) being the most used regimen. With correct diagnosis and treatment, patients can often receive fertility sparing treatment with long term survival.
PubMed: 35328112
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030560 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2016Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a highly curable group of pregnancy-related tumours; however, approximately 25% of GTN tumours will be resistant to, or will... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a highly curable group of pregnancy-related tumours; however, approximately 25% of GTN tumours will be resistant to, or will relapse after, initial chemotherapy. These resistant and relapsed lesions will require salvage chemotherapy with or without surgery. Various salvage regimens are used worldwide. It is unclear which regimens are the most effective and the least toxic.
OBJECTIVES
To determine which chemotherapy regimen/s for the treatment of resistant or relapsed GTN is/are the most effective and the least toxic.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to October 2011. In addition, we handsearched the relevant society conference proceedings and study reference lists. For the updated review, we searched Cochrane Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE to 16 Novemeber 2015. In addition, we searched online clinical trial registries for ongoing trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We designed a data extraction form and planned to use random-effects methods in Review Manager 5.1 for meta-analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
The search identified no RCTs; therefore we were unable to perform any meta-analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
RCTs in GTN are scarce owing to the low prevalence of this disease and its highly chemosensitive nature. As chemotherapeutic agents may be associated with substantial side effects, the ideal treatment should achieve maximum efficacy with minimal side effects. For methotrexate-resistant or recurrent low-risk GTN, a common practice is to use sequential five-day dactinomycin, followed by MAC (methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide) or EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine) if further salvage therapy is required. However, five-day dactinomycin is associated with more side effects than pulsed dactinomycin, therefore an RCT comparing the relative efficacy and safety of these two regimens in the context of failed primary methotrexate treatment is desirable.For high-risk GTN, EMA/CO is the most commonly used first-line therapy, with platinum-etoposide combinations, particularly EMA/EP (etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin/etoposide, cisplatin), being favoured as salvage therapy. Alternatives, including TP/TE (paclitaxel, cisplatin/ paclitaxel, etoposide), BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin), FAEV (floxuridine, dactinomycin, etoposide, vincristine) and FA (5-fluorouracil (5-FU), dactinomycin), may be as effective as EMA/EP and associated with fewer side effects; however, this is not clear from the available evidence and needs testing in well-designed RCTs. In the UK, an RCT comparing interventions for resistant/recurrent GTN will be very challenging owing to the small numbers of patients with this scenario. International multicentre collaboration is therefore needed to provide the high-quality evidence required to determine which salvage regimen/s have the best effectiveness-to-toxicity ratio in low- and high-risk disease. Future research should include economic evaluations and long-term surveillance for secondary neoplasms.
Topics: Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gestational Trophoblastic Disease; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pregnancy
PubMed: 26760424
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008891.pub3 -
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2018The effectiveness and safety of pegfilgrastim during bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy have not yet been investigated.
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness and safety of pegfilgrastim during bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy have not yet been investigated.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with germ cell tumors (GCTs) who received pegfilgrastim during BEP at the Kanazawa University Hospital between January 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The frequency of adverse events and effectiveness in inhibiting neutropenia were compared between cycles using pegfilgrastim and those using filgrastim.
RESULTS
Pegfilgrastim and filgrastim were administered in 13 and 22 cycles, respectively. The absolute neutrophil count at the nadir was significantly lower in patients receiving pegfilgrastim than in those receiving filgrastim (p=0.003). The duration of grade 2-4 neutropenia in cycles using filgrastim was significantly longer than that in those pegfilgrastim (p=0.01). No significant differences in the incidence of febrile neutropenia and serious adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION
Pegfilgrastim can be safely and effectively administrated during BEP for patients with GCT.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Cisplatin; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Etoposide; Female; Filgrastim; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Neutropenia; Polyethylene Glycols; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 29936477
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11326 -
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Mar 2023To evaluate the impact of bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin (BEP) and paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy regimens on the fertility and prognostic outcomes in malignant...
Fertility and prognosis assessment between bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy regimens in the conservative treatment of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a multicenter and retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the impact of bleomycin/etoposide/cisplatin (BEP) and paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy regimens on the fertility and prognostic outcomes in malignant ovarian germ cell tumor (MOGCT) patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS).
METHODS
A propensity score matching algorithm was performed between the BEP and PC groups. The χ² test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare the fertility outcome, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify risk factor of DFS.
RESULTS
We included 213 patients, 185 (86.9%) underwent BEP chemotherapy, and 28 (13.1%) underwent PC chemotherapy. The median age was 22 years (range, 8-44 years), and the median follow-up period was 63 months (range, 2-191 months). Fifty-one (29.3%) patients had a pregnancy plan, and 35 (85.4%) delivered successfully. In the before and after propensity score matching cohorts, there were no significant differences in spontaneous abortion, selective termination of pregnancy, during-pregnancy status, and live birth between the BEP and PC groups (p>0.05). Fourteen (6.6%) patients experienced recurrence, including 11 (5.9%) in the BEP group and 3 (10.7%) in the PC group. Four (1.9%) patients in the BEP group died. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (p=0.328) and OS (p=0.446) between the BEP and PC groups, and the same survival results were observed in the after matching cohort.
CONCLUSION
The PC regimen is as safe as the BEP regimen for MOGCT patients with fertility preservation treatment, and no differences were observed in fertility and clinical prognosis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Young Adult; Adult; Cisplatin; Etoposide; Carboplatin; Retrospective Studies; Conservative Treatment; Ovarian Neoplasms; Bleomycin; Prognosis; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 36890292
DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e12 -
Cureus Nov 2023Germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent a diverse group of rare neoplasms that vary in location, histology, and clinical presentation. This study focuses on the clinical...
BACKGROUND
Germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent a diverse group of rare neoplasms that vary in location, histology, and clinical presentation. This study focuses on the clinical outcomes and survival rates of children and adolescents treated with the bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) protocol.
METHODS
This observational study evaluated children under 18 years diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors and treated with the BEP protocol from January 2008 to December 2018. We employed descriptive analysis and used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival rates.
RESULTS
The study included 32 patients with an average age of 9.8 years (SD ± 6.7). The primary reason for consultation was a testicular mass. The classification of patients was E-I for 14 patients (44%) and E-III and E-IV for nine patients (28%). Endodermal sinus tumors and mixed germ cell tumors were the most commonly identified histological types. With a median follow-up of 7.8 years (95% confidence interval {CI}: 5.9-9.6), the event-free survival was 63.7%. The overall survival at a median follow-up of 9.1 years (95% CI: 7.5-10.7) was 76.1%.
CONCLUSION
The BEP chemotherapy regimen offers promising results for treating testicular germ cell tumors in children and adolescents, characterized by its low toxicity and minimal late side effects. However, patients older than 11 years displayed more adverse histological indicators, advanced disease stages, and higher relapse and mortality rates.
PubMed: 38074010
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48394 -
World Journal of Urology Feb 2022Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor...
PURPOSE
Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS.
METHODS
Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher's exact and Chi-square test.
RESULTS
Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death.
CONCLUSION
Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Etoposide; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Orchiectomy; Seminoma; Testicular Neoplasms
PubMed: 34854948
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03889-x -
European Urology Mar 2015Standard chemotherapy for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma has remained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for many years; more effective regimens are... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Standard chemotherapy for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma has remained bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) for many years; more effective regimens are required.
OBJECTIVE
To explore whether response rates with a new intensive chemotherapy regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin/BEP), versus those in concurrent patients treated with standard BEP justify a phase 3 trial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
We conducted a phase 2 open-label randomised trial in patients with germ cell tumours of any extracranial primary site and one or more International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group poor-prognosis features. Patients were randomised between 2005 and 2009 at 16 UK centres.
INTERVENTION
BEP (bleomycin 30,000 IU) was composed of four cycles over 12 wk. CBOP/BEP was composed of 2×CBOP, 2×BO, and 3×BEP (bleomycin 15,000 IU).
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Primary end point was favourable response rate (FRR) comprising complete response or partial response and normal markers. Success required the lower two-sided 90% confidence limit to exclude FRRs <60%; 44 patients on CBOP/BEP gives 90% power to achieve this if the true FRR is ≥80%. Equal numbers were randomised to BEP to benchmark contemporary response rates.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 89 patients were randomised (43 CBOP/BEP, 46 BEP); 40 and 41, respectively, completed treatment. CBOP/BEP toxicity, largely haematologic, was high (96% vs 63% on BEP had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 grade ≥3). FRRs were 74% (90% confidence interval [CI], 61-85) with CBOP/BEP, 61% with BEP (90% CI, 48-73). After a median of 58-mo follow-up, 1-yr progression-free survival (PFS) was 65% and 43%, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.06); 2-yr overall survival (OS) was 67% and 61%. Overall, 3 of 14 CBOP/BEP and 2 of 18 BEP deaths were attributed to toxicity, one after an overdose of bleomycin during CBOP/BEP. The trial was not powered to compare PFS.
CONCLUSIONS
The primary outcome was met, the CI for CBOP/BEP excluding FRRs <61%, but CBOP/BEP was more toxic. PFS and OS data are promising but require confirmation in an international phase 3 trial.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this study we tested a new, more intensive way to deliver a combination of drugs often used to treat men with testicular cancer. We found that response rates were higher but that the CBOP/BEP regimen caused more short-term toxicity. Because most patients are diagnosed when their cancer is less advanced, it took twice as long to complete the trial as expected. Although we plan to carry out a larger trial, we will need international collaboration.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN53643604; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN53643604.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Carboplatin; Cisplatin; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Etoposide; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Proportional Hazards Models; Testicular Neoplasms; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Vincristine; Young Adult
PubMed: 25001888
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.034 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Mar 2020Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604).
BACKGROUND
Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), met response targets in a randomised, phase II trial (74% complete response or partial response marker negative, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61%-85%).
AIM
To assess long-term outcomes and late toxicity associated with CBOP/BEP.
METHODS
Patients with poor prognosis extracranial GCT were randomised to 4xBEP or CBOP/BEP (2xCBOP, 2xBO, 3xBEP with 15,000iu of bleomycin). Low-dose, stabilising chemotherapy before entry was permitted. Response rates (primary outcome) were reported previously. Here, we report secondary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and late toxicity. Prognostic factors and the impact of marker decline are assessed in exploratory analysis.
RESULTS
Eighty-nine patients (43 CBOP/BEP) were randomised. After median 63 months follow-up, 3-year PFS is 55.7% (95% CI: 39.7%, 69.0%) for CBOP/BEP and 38.7% (95% CI: 24.7%, 52.4%) for BEP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 (0.33, 1.06), p = 0.079). Three-year OS is 65.0% (48.8%, 77.2%) and 58.5% (43.0%, 71.2%), respectively (HR: 0.79 (0.41, 1.52), p = 0.49). Twelve-month toxicity was affected by subsequent treatments, with no clear differences between arms. Stabilising chemotherapy was associated with poorer PFS (HR: 2.09 (1.14, 3.81), p = 0.017), whereas unfavourable marker decline, in 60 (70%) patients, was not.
CONCLUSION
Although not powered for PFS, results for CBOP/BEP are promising. Impact on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy). Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN 53643604.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Carboplatin; Cisplatin; Etoposide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Vincristine; Young Adult
PubMed: 32007714
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.028 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2018Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles remains the standard first line treatment for patients with...
Protocol for the P3BEP trial (ANZUP 1302): an international randomised phase 3 trial of accelerated versus standard BEP chemotherapy for adult and paediatric male and female patients with intermediate and poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours.
BACKGROUND
Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles remains the standard first line treatment for patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs). Administering standard chemotherapy 2-weekly rather than 3-weekly, so-called 'accelerating chemotherapy', has improved cure rates in other cancers. An Australian multicentre phase 2 trial demonstrated this regimen is feasible and tolerable with efficacy data that appears promising. The aim of this trial is to determine if accelerated BEP is superior to standard BEP as first line chemotherapy for adult and paediatric male and female participants with intermediate and poor risk metastatic GCTs.
METHODS
This is an open label, randomised, stratified, 2-arm, international multicentre, 2 stage, phase 3 clinical trial. Participants are randomised 1:1 to receive accelerated BEP or standard BEP chemotherapy. Eligible male or female participants, aged between 11 and 45 years with intermediate or poor-risk metastatic GCTs for first line chemotherapy will be enrolled from Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Participants will have regular follow up for at least 5 years. The primary endpoint for stage 1 of the trial (n = 150) is complete response rate and for the entire trial (n = 500) is progression free survival. Secondary endpoints include response following treatment completion (by a protocol-specific response criteria), adverse events, health-related quality of life, treatment preference, delivered dose-intensity of chemotherapy (relative to standard BEP), overall survival and associations between biomarkers (to be specified) and their correlations with clinical outcomes.
DISCUSSION
This is the first international randomised clinical trial for intermediate and poor-risk metastatic extra-cranial GCTs involving both adult and pediatric age groups open to both males and females. It is also the largest, current randomised trial for germ cell tumours in the world. Positive results for this affordable intervention could change the global standard of care for intermediate and poor risk germ cell tumours, improve cure rates, avoid the need for toxic and costly salvage treatment, and return young adults to long, healthy and productive lives.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ACTRN 12613000496718 on 3rd May 2013 and Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02582697 on 21st October 2015.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bleomycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Cisplatin; Clinical Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Etoposide; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Young Adult
PubMed: 30157803
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4745-3