-
Clinical Oral Investigations Mar 2022To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial proportions of a Dutch control group.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We included seventy-four patients (43 patients with Muenke syndrome, 22 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 9 patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis) who were referred between 1990 and 2020 (age range 4.84 to 16.83 years) and were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, Children's Hospital Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The control group consisted of 208 healthy children.
RESULTS
Cephalometric values comprising the midface were decreased in Muenke syndrome (ANB: β = -1.87, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0,001), Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (ANB: β = -1.76, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0.001), and TCF12-related craniosynostosis (ANB: β = -1.70, p = 0.015; and PC1: p < 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we showed that the midface is hypoplastic in Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis compared to the Dutch control group. Furthermore, the rotation of the maxilla and the typical craniofacial buildup is significantly different in these three craniosynostosis syndromes compared to the controls.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The maxillary growth in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is impaired, leading to a deviant dental development. Therefore, timely orthodontic follow-up is recommended. In order to increase expertise and support treatment planning by medical and dental specialists for these patients, and also because of the specific differences between the syndromes, we recommend the management of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis in specialized multidisciplinary teams.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adolescent; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cephalometry; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Syndrome
PubMed: 34904178
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04275-y -
American Journal of Medical Genetics.... Aug 2019Muenke syndrome (MIM #602849), the most common syndromic craniosynostosis, results from the recurrent pathogenic p.P250R variant in FGFR3. Affected patients exhibit wide...
Muenke syndrome (MIM #602849), the most common syndromic craniosynostosis, results from the recurrent pathogenic p.P250R variant in FGFR3. Affected patients exhibit wide phenotypic variability. Common features include coronal craniosynostosis, hearing loss, carpal and tarsal anomalies, and developmental/behavioral issues. Our study examined the phenotypic findings, medical management, and surgical outcomes in a cohort of 26 probands with Muenke syndrome identified at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. All probands had craniosynostosis; 69.7% had bicoronal synostosis only, or bicoronal and additional suture synostosis. Three male patients had autism spectrum disorder. Recurrent ear infections were the most common comorbidity, and myringotomy tube placement the most common extracranial surgical procedure. Most patients (76%) required only one fronto-orbital advancement. de novo mutations were confirmed in 33% of the families in which proband and both parents were genetically tested, while in the remaining 66% one of the parents was a mutation carrier. In affected parents, 40% had craniosynostosis, including 71% of mothers and 13% of fathers. We additionally analyzed the medical resource utilization of probands with Muenke syndrome. To our knowledge, these data represent the first comprehensive examination of long-term management in a large cohort of patients with Muenke syndrome. Our study adds valuable information regarding neuropsychiatric and medical comorbidities, and highlights findings in affected relatives.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Craniosynostoses; Disease Management; Female; Gene Expression; Hearing Loss; Humans; Male; Middle Ear Ventilation; Mutation; Osteogenesis, Distraction; Otitis; Pedigree; Philadelphia; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3; Recurrence
PubMed: 31111620
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61199 -
European Journal of Orthodontics May 2022To determine whether dental maturity (dental development) was delayed in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis,...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether dental maturity (dental development) was delayed in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis, compared with a Dutch control group without syndromes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 60 patients (38 patients with Muenke syndrome, 17 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 5 with TCF12-related craniosynostosis), aged 5.8-16.8 years that were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care, and Orthodontics, in Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dental age was calculated according to Demirjian's index of dental maturity. The control group included 451 children without a syndrome.
RESULTS
Compared with the control group, dental development was delayed by an average of one year in 5- to 8-year-old patients with Muenke syndrome (P = 0.007) and in 8- to 10-year-old patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (P = 0.044), but not in patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicated that dental development was delayed by one year, on average, in patients with Muenke syndrome and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, compared with a Dutch control group without syndromes.
IMPLICATIONS
Our findings have improved the understanding of dental development in patients with Muenke and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. These results can provide guidance on whether the orthodontist needs to consider growth disturbances related to dental development.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Netherlands; Syndrome
PubMed: 34424951
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjab056 -
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery May 2012Although Muenke syndrome is the most common syndromic form of craniosynostosis, the frequency of oral and palatal anomalies including high-arched palate, cleft lip with... (Review)
Review
Although Muenke syndrome is the most common syndromic form of craniosynostosis, the frequency of oral and palatal anomalies including high-arched palate, cleft lip with or without cleft palate has not been documented in a patient series of Muenke syndrome to date. Further, to our knowledge, cleft lip and palate has not been reported yet in a patient with Muenke syndrome (a previous patient with isolated cleft palate has been reported). This study sought to evaluate the frequency of palatal anomalies in patients with Muenke syndrome through both a retrospective investigation and literature review. A total of 21 patients who met criteria for this study were included in the retrospective review. Fifteen patients (71%) had a structural anomaly of the palate. Cleft lip and palate was present in 1 patient (5%). Other palatal findings included high-arched hard palate in 14 patients (67%). Individuals with Muenke syndrome have the lowest incidence of cleft palate among the most common craniosynostosis syndromes. However, high-arched palate in Muenke syndrome is common and may warrant clinical attention, as these individuals are more susceptible to recurrent chronic otitis media with effusion, dental malocclusion, and hearing loss.
Topics: Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Craniosynostoses; Female; Hearing Loss; Humans; Incidence; Male; Malocclusion; Otitis Media with Effusion; Palate, Hard; Retrospective Studies; United States
PubMed: 22565872
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824db8bb -
Cureus Dec 2023Craniosynostosis is a fetal skull condition that occurs when one or multiple sutures merge prematurely. This leads to limited growth perpendicular to the fused suture,... (Review)
Review
Craniosynostosis is a fetal skull condition that occurs when one or multiple sutures merge prematurely. This leads to limited growth perpendicular to the fused suture, which results in compensatory growth of cranial bones parallel to it. Syndromic craniosynostosis ensues when the cranial deformity is accompanied by respiratory, neurological, cardiac, musculoskeletal, and audio-visual abnormalities. The most common syndromes are Apert, Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes and craniofrontonasal syndrome. Each of these syndromes has distinct genetic mutations that contribute to their development. Mutations in genes such as FGFR, TWIST, and EFNB1 have been identified as playing a role in the development of these syndromes. Familiarity with the genetic basis of each syndrome is not only essential for identifying them but also advantageous for current pharmacological investigations. Surgical treatment is often necessary for syndromic craniosynostosis to correct the cranial deformities. Advances have been made in surgical techniques for each specific syndrome, but further research is needed to develop personalized approaches that address the unique symptoms and complications of individual patients, particularly those related to neurological and respiratory issues. This group of syndromes included in cranial synostosis presents significant educational and clinical interest due to the wide range of symptoms and the variable course of the disease, especially in the last decades when crucial advances in diagnosis and treatment have been achieved, altering the prognosis as well as the quality of life of these patients. In summary, this article provides a comprehensive overview of syndromic craniosynostosis, including the genetic mutations associated with each syndrome and the surgical treatment options available.
PubMed: 38222144
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50448 -
Anales de Pediatria (Barcelona, Spain :... Jul 2017
Topics: Craniosynostoses; Humans; Infant; Phenotype
PubMed: 27106663
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2016.02.005 -
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society May 2016Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures. It leads not only to secondary distortion of skull shape but to various... (Review)
Review
Craniosynostosis is defined as the premature fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures. It leads not only to secondary distortion of skull shape but to various complications including neurologic, ophthalmic and respiratory dysfunction. Craniosynostosis is very heterogeneous in terms of its causes, presentation, and management. Both environmental factors and genetic factors are associated with development of craniosynostosis. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis accounts for more than 70% of all cases. Syndromic craniosynostosis with a certain genetic cause is more likely to involve multiple sutures or bilateral coronal sutures. FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR1, TWIST1 and EFNB1 genes are major causative genes of genetic syndromes associated with craniosynostosis. Although most of syndromic craniosynostosis show autosomal dominant inheritance, approximately half of patients are de novo cases. Apert syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Crouzon syndrome, and Antley-Bixler syndrome are related to mutations in FGFR family (especially in FGFR2), and mutations in FGFRs can be overlapped between different syndromes. Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, Muenke syndrome, and craniofrontonasal syndrome are representative disorders showing isolated coronal suture involvement. Compared to the other types of craniosynostosis, single gene mutations can be more frequently detected, in one-third of coronal synostosis patients. Molecular diagnosis can be helpful to provide adequate genetic counseling and guidance for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
PubMed: 27226847
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.3.187 -
The Journal of Pediatrics Aug 2015To investigate executive function and adaptive behavior in individuals with Muenke syndrome using validated instruments with a normative population and unaffected...
OBJECTIVE
To investigate executive function and adaptive behavior in individuals with Muenke syndrome using validated instruments with a normative population and unaffected siblings as controls.
STUDY DESIGN
Participants in this cross-sectional study included individuals with Muenke syndrome (P250R mutation in FGFR3) and their mutation-negative siblings. Participants completed validated assessments of executive functioning (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [BRIEF]) and adaptive behavior skills (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition [ABAS-II]).
RESULTS
Forty-four with a positive FGFR3 mutation, median age 9 years, range 7 months to 52 years were enrolled. In addition, 10 unaffected siblings served as controls (5 males, 5 females; median age, 13 years; range, 3-18 years). For the General Executive Composite scale of the BRIEF, 32.1% of the cohort had scores greater than +1.5 SD, signifying potential clinical significance. For the General Adaptive Composite of the ABAS-II, 28.2% of affected individuals scored in the 3rd-8th percentile of the normative population, and 56.4% were below the average category (<25th percentile). Multiple regression analysis did not identify craniosynostosis as a predictor of BRIEF (P = .70) or ABAS-II scores (P = .70). In the sibling pair analysis, affected siblings performed significantly poorer on the BRIEF General Executive Composite and the ABAS-II General Adaptive Composite.
CONCLUSION
Individuals with Muenke syndrome are at an increased risk for developing adaptive and executive function behavioral changes compared with a normative population and unaffected siblings.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Adolescent; Adult; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Craniosynostoses; Cross-Sectional Studies; Executive Function; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Siblings; Young Adult
PubMed: 26028288
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.04.080 -
Pediatric Neurology Nov 2012Epilepsy, a neurologic disorder characterized by the predisposition to recurrent unprovoked seizures, is reported in more than 300 genetic syndromes. Muenke syndrome is... (Review)
Review
Epilepsy, a neurologic disorder characterized by the predisposition to recurrent unprovoked seizures, is reported in more than 300 genetic syndromes. Muenke syndrome is an autosomal-dominant craniosynostosis syndrome characterized by unilateral or bilateral coronal craniosynostosis, hearing loss, intellectual disability, and relatively subtle limb findings such as carpal bone fusion and tarsal bone fusion. Muenke syndrome is caused by a single defining point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. Epilepsy rarely occurs in individuals with Muenke syndrome, and little detail is reported on types of epilepsy, patient characteristics, and long-term outcomes. We present seven patients with Muenke syndrome and seizures. A review of 789 published cases of Muenke syndrome, with a focus on epilepsy and intracranial anomalies in Muenke syndrome, revealed epilepsy in six patients, with intracranial anomalies in five. The occurrence of epilepsy in Muenke syndrome within our cohort of 58 patients, of whom seven manifested epilepsy, and the intracranial anomalies and epilepsy reported in the literature, suggest that patients with Muenke syndrome may be at risk for epilepsy and intracranial anomalies. Furthermore, the impact of Muenke syndrome on the central nervous system may be greater than previously thought.
Topics: Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
PubMed: 23044018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.07.004