-
Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) Jun 2016Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) and FGF ligands are highly expressed in the developing kidney and lower urinary tract. Several classic studies showed many... (Review)
Review
Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) and FGF ligands are highly expressed in the developing kidney and lower urinary tract. Several classic studies showed many effects of exogenous FGF ligands on embryonic renal tissues in vitro and in vivo. Another older landmark publication showed that mice with a dominant negative Fgfr fragment had severe renal dysplasia. Together, these studies revealed the importance of FGFR signaling in kidney and lower urinary tract development. With the advent of modern gene targeting techniques, including conditional knockout approaches, several publications have revealed critical roles for FGFR signaling in many lineages of the kidney and lower urinary tract at different stages of development. FGFR signaling has been shown to be critical for early metanephric mesenchymal patterning, Wolffian duct patterning including induction of the ureteric bud, ureteric bud branching morphogenesis, nephron progenitor survival and nephrogenesis, and bladder mesenchyme patterning. FGFRs pattern these tissues by interacting with many other growth factor signaling pathways. Moreover, the many genetic Fgfr and Fgf animal models have structural defects mimicking numerous congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract seen in humans. Finally, many studies have shown how FGFR signaling is critical for kidney and lower urinary tract patterning in humans.
Topics: Acanthosis Nigricans; Acrocephalosyndactylia; Animals; Antley-Bixler Syndrome Phenotype; Apoptosis; Craniosynostoses; Ear; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Gene Knockout Techniques; Humans; Kidney; Mice; Models, Animal; Mutation; Organogenesis; Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor; Scalp Dermatoses; Signal Transduction; Skin Abnormalities; T-Box Domain Proteins; Ureter; Urinary Bladder; Wolffian Ducts
PubMed: 26293980
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-015-3151-1 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2023
Topics: Humans; Acrocephalosyndactylia; Syndactyly; Fingers; Toes
PubMed: 37521759
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.24.38946 -
BMJ Case Reports Mar 2022The management of patients with Apert syndrome (AS) is complex and reflects the multisystem disease as a result of premature fusion of cranial vault, cranial base and...
The management of patients with Apert syndrome (AS) is complex and reflects the multisystem disease as a result of premature fusion of cranial vault, cranial base and midface sutures as well as extremity anomalies characterised by syndactyly. Early cranial sutural fusion results in craniocerebral disproportion which can lead to crisis surgical intervention due to raised intracranial pressure, ophthalmic and compromised airway concerns. Childhood inventions are often determined by psychosocial concerns and adult surgical interventions are often determined by cosmetic concerns. Treatments are provided by many different specialists within multidisciplinary teams (MDT). The treatment pathway extends from birth well into adulthood and is often associated with a heavy burden of care. Due to the extensive nature of the interaction with these patients MDT members have opportunities to provide enhanced patient-centred care and support.This case report provides an overview of the current knowledge of the aetiology of AS, illustrates the pathway of surgical and non-surgical management of AS and provides a long-term review of the dentofacial treatment outcomes.By having a better understanding of the impact of AS and treatment provided, MDT members can not only provide improved clinical treatment but also offer improved patient experiences for those with craniofacial anomalies, in particular, an increased awareness of the psychosocial challenges they endure.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adult; Child; Cranial Sutures; Craniofacial Abnormalities; Face; Humans; Skull Base
PubMed: 35236672
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245224 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Mar 2022To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial proportions of a Dutch control group.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We included seventy-four patients (43 patients with Muenke syndrome, 22 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 9 patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis) who were referred between 1990 and 2020 (age range 4.84 to 16.83 years) and were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, Children's Hospital Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The control group consisted of 208 healthy children.
RESULTS
Cephalometric values comprising the midface were decreased in Muenke syndrome (ANB: β = -1.87, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0,001), Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (ANB: β = -1.76, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0.001), and TCF12-related craniosynostosis (ANB: β = -1.70, p = 0.015; and PC1: p < 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we showed that the midface is hypoplastic in Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis compared to the Dutch control group. Furthermore, the rotation of the maxilla and the typical craniofacial buildup is significantly different in these three craniosynostosis syndromes compared to the controls.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The maxillary growth in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is impaired, leading to a deviant dental development. Therefore, timely orthodontic follow-up is recommended. In order to increase expertise and support treatment planning by medical and dental specialists for these patients, and also because of the specific differences between the syndromes, we recommend the management of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis in specialized multidisciplinary teams.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adolescent; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cephalometry; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Syndrome
PubMed: 34904178
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04275-y -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Sep 2012More than 60 different mutations have been identified to be causal in syndromic forms of craniosynostosis. The majority of these mutations occur in the fibroblast growth... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
More than 60 different mutations have been identified to be causal in syndromic forms of craniosynostosis. The majority of these mutations occur in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene (FGFR2). The clinical management of syndromic craniosynostosis varies based on the particular causal mutation. Additionally, the diagnosis of a patient with syndromic craniosynostosis is based on the clinical presentation, signs, and symptoms. The understanding of the hallmark features of particular syndromic forms of craniosynostosis leads to efficient diagnosis, management, and long-term prognosis of patients with syndromic craniosynostoses.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature review was done with respect to the major forms of syndromic craniosynostosis and additional less common FGFR-related forms of syndromic craniosynostosis. Additionally, information and data gathered from studies performed in our own investigative lab (lab of Dr. Muenke) were further analyzed and reviewed. A literature review was also performed with regard to the genetic workup and diagnosis of patients with craniosynostosis.
RESULTS
Patients with Apert syndrome (craniosynostosis syndrome due to mutations in FGFR2) are most severely affected in terms of intellectual disability, developmental delay, central nervous system anomalies, and limb anomalies. All patients with FGFR-related syndromic craniosynostosis have some degree of hearing loss that requires thorough initial evaluations and subsequent follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis require management and treatment of issues involving multiple organ systems which span beyond craniosynostosis. Thus, effective care of these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Craniosynostoses; Follow-Up Studies; History, 20th Century; Humans; Mutation; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 22872262
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1756-2 -
Indian Journal of Dermatology,... 2010
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Female; Humans; Infant; Isotretinoin; Male; Young Adult
PubMed: 21079334
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.72479 -
Journal of Anatomy Nov 2005Normal and abnormal jaw growth and tooth eruption are topics of great importance for several dental and medical disciplines. Thus far, clinical studies on these topics... (Review)
Review
Normal and abnormal jaw growth and tooth eruption are topics of great importance for several dental and medical disciplines. Thus far, clinical studies on these topics have used two-dimensional (2D) radiographic techniques. The purpose of the present study was to analyse normal mandibular growth and tooth eruption in three dimensions based on computer tomography (CT) scans, extending the principles of mandibular growth analysis proposed by Björk in 1969 from two to three dimensions. As longitudinal CT data from normal children are not available (for ethical reasons), CT data from children with Apert syndrome were employed, because it has been shown that the mandible in Apert syndrome is unaffected by the malformation, and these children often have several craniofacial CT scans performed during childhood for planning of cranial and midface surgery and for follow-up after surgery. A total of 49 datasets from ten children with Apert syndrome were available for study. The number of datasets from each individual ranged from three to seven. The first CT scan in each of the ten series was carried out before 1 year of age, and the ages for the 49 scans ranged from 1 week to 14.5 years. The mandible and the teeth were segmented and iso-surfaces generated. Landmarks were placed on the surface of the mandible, along the mandibular canals, the inner contour of the cortical plate at the lower border of the symphysis menti, and on the teeth. Superimposition of the mandibles in the longitudinal series was performed using the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as suggested by Björk. The study supported the findings of stability of the symphysis menti and the mandibular canals as seen in profile view previously reported by Björk & Skieller in 1983. However, the mandibular canals were, actually, relocated laterally during growth. Furthermore, the position of tooth buds remained relatively stable inside the jaw until root formation started. Eruption paths of canines and premolars were vertical, whereas molars erupted in a lingual direction. The 3D method would seem to offer new insight into jaw growth and tooth eruption, but further studies are needed.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adolescent; Bicuspid; Child; Child, Preschool; Cuspid; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Infant; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Mandible; Molar; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tooth Eruption
PubMed: 16313399
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00479.x -
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America Dec 2000This article reviews a number of well-known syndromes involving craniofacial synostosis and associated midface deficiencies. Syndromes discussed include Apert's,... (Review)
Review
This article reviews a number of well-known syndromes involving craniofacial synostosis and associated midface deficiencies. Syndromes discussed include Apert's, Crouzon's, Saethre-Chotzen, and Carpenter's. Clinical characteristics and genetic defects are discussed. A general approach to surgical management is outlined.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adolescent; Craniosynostoses; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Prevalence; Plastic Surgery Procedures
PubMed: 11449786
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70280-2 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Jun 2009Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is a syndromic craniosynostosis defined by a genetic mutation affecting the TWIST1 gene on chromosome 7p21. It is typically associated with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is a syndromic craniosynostosis defined by a genetic mutation affecting the TWIST1 gene on chromosome 7p21. It is typically associated with unicoronal or bicoronal synostosis, eyelid ptosis, dysmorphic external ears, and other variable facial and limb abnormalities. Surgical management of the craniosynostosis addresses the calvarial deformity and may relieve or reduce the risk of intracranial hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess surgical intervention, with particular consideration of the reoperation rate for intracranial hypertension, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome patients.
METHODS
A retrospective case note analysis was performed on all patients with a confirmed TWIST1 gene abnormality who attended the Oxford Craniofacial Unit over a 15-year period. Each patient's mutation and clinical features were recorded. Surgical intervention and sequelae were examined in greater detail.
RESULTS
Thirty-four patients with genetically confirmed Saethre-Chotzen syndrome were identified. All had craniosynostosis (bicoronal, 76 percent; unicoronal, 18 percent; bicoronal and sagittal, 6 percent), and the majority had eyelid ptosis, low frontal hairline, and external ear anomalies. Thirty-one patients had received surgical intervention. Nine of 26 patients (35 percent) with at least 12 months of follow-up after primary intervention and eight of 19 patients (42 percent) with at least 5 years of follow-up developed intracranial hypertension necessitating secondary calvarial surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite standard surgical intervention, patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome have a high rate (35 to 42 percent) of recurrent intracranial hypertension necessitating further surgical expansion. All patients with either bicoronal synostosis or unicoronal synostosis with syndromic features should be screened for TWIST1 mutations, as this confers a greater risk than nonsyndromic synostosis of the same sutures. Regular follow-up throughout the childhood years is essential.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Female; Gene Deletion; Humans; Infant; Intracranial Hypertension; Male; Nuclear Proteins; Point Mutation; Recurrence; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Twist-Related Protein 1
PubMed: 19483581
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f391 -
Revue Medicale de Liege Oct 2021Apert syndrome, or acrocephalosyndactilia type I, is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in the FGFR2 gene and characterized by craniosynostosis, craniofacial...
Apert syndrome, or acrocephalosyndactilia type I, is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in the FGFR2 gene and characterized by craniosynostosis, craniofacial dysmorphia and symmetrical syndactyly of the hands and feet. The estimated prevalence of this syndrome is 10 to 15.5 cases per 1,000,000 live births. This syndrome presents significant clinical variability and its early diagnosis is essential. We report an isolated case of Apert syndrome, diagnosed during follow-up of a biamniotic bichorium twin pregnancy.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Craniosynostoses; Female; Humans; Mutation; Pregnancy; Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2; Syndactyly
PubMed: 34632738
DOI: No ID Found