-
Australian Family Physician Jun 2016Acute and chronic sinusitis are common primary care presentations. They are caused by mucosal inflammation, which inhibits mucociliary function of the nose and paranasal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute and chronic sinusitis are common primary care presentations. They are caused by mucosal inflammation, which inhibits mucociliary function of the nose and paranasal sinuses.
OBJECTIVE
This article provides an overview of acute and chronic sinusitis, and a guide to workup and management in a primary care setting. Complications and other indications for referral are discussed.
DISCUSSION
Sinusitis involves a wide spectrum of presentations, both acute and chronic. It is primarily a medical condition, and surgical management is reserved for complicated or refractory cases.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Child; Chronic Disease; Humans; Primary Health Care; Sinusitis
PubMed: 27622225
DOI: No ID Found -
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Jun 2020The purposes of the review are as follows: (1) to define acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and their phenotypes, (2) to highlight the ARS management according to international... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The purposes of the review are as follows: (1) to define acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and their phenotypes, (2) to highlight the ARS management according to international guidelines, (3) to compare the physicians' management with the ARS guideline recommendations, and (4) to report ARS socioeconomic burden.
RECENT FINDINGS
Bacterial and non-bacterial ARS have similar symptoms, although they can be discriminated by using a combination of specific signs and symptoms. The prescription of antibiotics should be limited to clearly suspected bacterial ARS. There is an overuse of diagnosis tools and treatment prescriptions. The total cost per ARS episode in Europe is over €1000. ARS is mainly an inflammatory disease triggered by viral infection, and few cases end up developing bacterial infection. In most of the cases, it is a self-resolving disease which diagnosis is mainly clinical and the treatment symptomatic. The incidence of complications is low and independent of antibiotic use. There is a high socioeconomic burden associated to ARS.
Topics: Acute Disease; Common Cold; History, 21st Century; Humans; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Virus Diseases
PubMed: 32495003
DOI: 10.1007/s11882-020-00917-5 -
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Dec 2001Acute respiratory infections accounts for 20-40% of outpatient and 12-35% of inpatient attendance in a general hospital. Upper respiratory tract infections including... (Review)
Review
Acute respiratory infections accounts for 20-40% of outpatient and 12-35% of inpatient attendance in a general hospital. Upper respiratory tract infections including nasopharyngitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis and otitis media constitute 87.5% of the total episodes of respiratory infections. The vast majority of acute upper respiratory tract infections are caused by viruses. Common cold is caused by viruses in most circumstances and does not require antimicrobial agent unless it is complicated by acute otitis media with effusion, tonsillitis, sinusitis, and lower respiratory tract infection. Sinusitis is commonly associated with common cold. Most instances of rhinosinusitis are viral and therefore, resolve spontaneously without antimicrobial therapy. The most common bacterial agents causing sinusitis are S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. aureus and S. pyogenes. Amoxycillin is antibacterial of choice. The alternative drugs are cefaclor or cephalexin. The latter becomes first line if sinusitis is recurrent or chronic. Acute pharyngitis is commonly caused by viruses and does not need antibiotics. About 15% of the episodes may be due to Group A beta hemolytic streptococcus (GABS). Early initiation of antibiotics in pharyngitis due to GABS can prevent complications such as acute rheumatic fever. The drug of choice is penicillin for 10-14 days. The alternative medications include oral cephalosporins (cefaclor, cephalexin), amoxicillin or macrolides.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Common Cold; Humans; India; Pharyngitis; Respiratory Tract Infections; Sinusitis
PubMed: 11838568
DOI: 10.1007/BF02722930 -
Otolaryngologia Polska = the Polish... Aug 2021Understanding the appropriate use of diagnostics and treatment in acute rhinosinusitis is of immense importance given the high prevalence of this disease in the general...
Understanding the appropriate use of diagnostics and treatment in acute rhinosinusitis is of immense importance given the high prevalence of this disease in the general population. The ability to differentiate between the principal phenotypes of acute sinusitis, namely acute viral infection (cold), acute post-viral sinusitis and acute bacterial sinusitis, determines the future management and is fundamental to providing rational therapeutic recommendations - especially as regards antibiotic treatment, which is very often overused in acute sinusitis even though bacterial phenotypes only account for 0.5-2% of all cases of the disease. The latest therapeutic recommendations contained in the EPOS2020 position paper introduce a system based on integrated care pathways (ICPs), which comprise pharmacy-supported self-care and e-health as the first level, followed by primary care as the second, with specialist care being reserved for patients who develop a more severe course of the disease, have suspected complications or suffer from recurrent acute sinusitis. Management of acute sinusitis is primarily based on symptomatic treatment modalities, with phytotherapeutic support, as well as on antiinflammatory treatment, while antibiotic therapy is used in very specific and limited indications. Complications are relatively rare in acute sinusitis and they are not considered to be associated with antibiotic intake. Considering the high prevalence of acute forms of sinusitis, their significant impact on quality of life and high direct and indirect costs of treatment, the right diagnosis and management, without unnecessary escalation of therapy, can substantially translate into a number of public health benefits.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Humans; Quality of Life; Rhinitis; Sinusitis
PubMed: 34552023
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.2378 -
JAMA Jul 2023The large overlap between symptoms of acute sinusitis and viral upper respiratory tract infection suggests that certain subgroups of children being diagnosed with acute... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
The large overlap between symptoms of acute sinusitis and viral upper respiratory tract infection suggests that certain subgroups of children being diagnosed with acute sinusitis, and subsequently treated with antibiotics, derive little benefit from antibiotic use.
OBJECTIVE
To assess if antibiotic therapy could be appropriately withheld in prespecified subgroups.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Randomized clinical trial including 515 children aged 2 to 11 years diagnosed with acute sinusitis based on clinical criteria. The trial was conducted between February 2016 and April 2022 at primary care offices affiliated with 6 US institutions and was designed to evaluate whether symptom burden differed in subgroups defined by nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis on bacterial culture and by the presence of colored nasal discharge.
INTERVENTIONS
Oral amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/d) and clavulanate (6.4 mg/kg/d) (n = 254) or placebo (n = 256) for 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was symptom burden based on daily symptom scores on a validated scale (range, 0-40) during the 10 days after diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, adverse events including clinically significant diarrhea, and resource use by families.
RESULTS
Most of the 510 included children were aged 2 to 5 years (64%), male (54%), White (52%), and not Hispanic (89%). The mean symptom scores were significantly lower in children in the amoxicillin and clavulanate group (9.04 [95% CI, 8.71 to 9.37]) compared with those in the placebo group (10.60 [95% CI, 10.27 to 10.93]) (between-group difference, -1.69 [95% CI, -2.07 to -1.31]). The length of time to symptom resolution was significantly lower for children in the antibiotic group (7.0 days) than in the placebo group (9.0 days) (P = .003). Children without nasopharyngeal pathogens detected did not benefit from antibiotic treatment as much as those with pathogens detected; the between-group difference in mean symptom scores was -0.88 (95% CI, -1.63 to -0.12) in those without pathogens detected compared with -1.95 (95% CI, -2.40 to -1.51) in those with pathogens detected. Efficacy did not differ significantly according to whether colored nasal discharge was present (the between-group difference was -1.62 [95% CI, -2.09 to -1.16] for colored nasal discharge vs -1.70 [95% CI, -2.38 to -1.03] for clear nasal discharge; P = .52 for the interaction between treatment group and the presence of colored nasal discharge).
CONCLUSIONS
In children with acute sinusitis, antibiotic treatment had minimal benefit for those without nasopharyngeal bacterial pathogens on presentation, and its effects did not depend on the color of nasal discharge. Testing for specific bacteria on presentation may represent a strategy to reduce antibiotic use in this condition.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02554383.
Topics: Child; Humans; Male; Acute Disease; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clavulanic Acid; Common Cold; Sinusitis; Female; Child, Preschool; Nasopharynx; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Haemophilus influenzae; Moraxella catarrhalis
PubMed: 37490085
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.10854 -
American Family Physician Oct 2017Chronic rhinosinusitis is an inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that occurs in 1% to 5% of the U.S. (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Chronic rhinosinusitis is an inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses that occurs in 1% to 5% of the U.S.
POPULATION
It may significantly decrease quality of life. Chronic rhinosinusitis is defined by the presence of at least two out of four cardinal symptoms (i.e., facial pain/pressure, hyposmia/anosmia, nasal drainage, and nasal obstruction) for at least 12 consecutive weeks, in addition to objective evidence. Objective evidence of chronic rhinosinusitis may be obtained on physical examination (anterior rhinoscopy, endoscopy) or radiography, preferably from sinus computed tomography. Treatment is directed at enhancing mucociliary clearance, improving sinus drainage/outflow, eradicating local infection and inflammation, and improving access for topical medications. First-line treatment is nasal saline irrigation and intranasal corticosteroid sprays. There may be a role for antibiotics in patients with evidence of an active, superimposed acute sinus infection. If medical management fails, endoscopic sinus surgery may be effective. Patients not responding to first-line medical therapy should be referred to an otolaryngologist, and selected patients with a history suggestive of other comorbidities (e.g., vasculitides, granulomatous diseases, cystic fibrosis, immunodeficiency) may also benefit from referral to an allergist or pulmonologist.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chronic Disease; Female; Humans; Male; Nasal Sprays; Quality of Life; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Sodium Chloride; Therapeutic Irrigation; United States
PubMed: 29094889
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2018Acute rhinosinusitis is an acute infection of the nasal passages and paranasal sinuses that lasts less than four weeks. Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis is generally... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute rhinosinusitis is an acute infection of the nasal passages and paranasal sinuses that lasts less than four weeks. Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis is generally based on clinical signs and symptoms in ambulatory care settings. Technical investigations are not routinely performed, nor are they recommended in most countries. Some trials show a trend in favour of antibiotics, but the balance of benefit versus harm is unclear.We merged two Cochrane Reviews for this update, which comprised different approaches with overlapping populations, resulting in different conclusions. For this review update, we maintained the distinction between populations diagnosed by clinical signs and symptoms, or imaging.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment in adults with acute rhinosinusitis in ambulatory care settings.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (2017, Issue 12), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1950 to January 2018), Embase (January 1974 to January 2018), and two trials registers (January 2018). We also checked references from identified trials, systematic reviews, and relevant guidelines.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment in people with rhinosinusitis-like signs or symptoms or sinusitis confirmed by imaging.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data about cure and side effects and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for additional information as required.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 15 trials involving 3057 participants. Of the 15 included trials, 10 appeared in our 2012 review, and five (631 participants) are legacy trials from merging two reviews. No new studies were included from searches for this update. Overall, risk of bias was low. Without antibiotics, 46% of participants with rhinosinusitis, whether or not confirmed by radiography, were cured after 1 week and 64% after 14 days. Antibiotics can shorten time to cure, but only 5 to 11 more people per 100 will be cured faster if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo or no treatment: clinical diagnosis (odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.54; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 19, 95% CI 10 to 205; I² = 0%; 8 trials; high-quality evidence) and diagnosis confirmed by radiography (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.39; NNTB 10, 95% CI 5 to 136; I² = 0%; 3 trials; moderate-quality evidence). Cure rates with antibiotics were higher when a fluid level or total opacification in any sinus was found on computed tomography (OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.75 to 13.72; NNTB 4, 95% CI 2 to 15; 1 trial; moderate-quality evidence). Purulent secretion resolved faster with antibiotics (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.22; NNTB 10, 95% CI 6 to 35; I² = 0%; 3 trials; high-quality evidence). However, 13 more people experienced side effects with antibiotics compared to placebo or no treatment (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.82; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 8, 95% CI 6 to 12; I² = 16%; 10 trials; high-quality evidence). Five fewer people per 100 will experience clinical failure if they receive antibiotics instead of placebo or no treatment (Peto OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.63; NNTH 19, 95% CI 15 to 27; I² = 21%; 12 trials; high-quality evidence). A disease-related complication (brain abscess) occurred in one participant (of 3057) one week after receiving open antibiotic therapy (clinical failure, control group).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The potential benefit of antibiotics to treat acute rhinosinusitis diagnosed either clinically (low risk of bias, high-quality evidence) or confirmed by imaging (low to unclear risk of bias, moderate-quality evidence) is marginal and needs to be seen in the context of the risk of adverse effects. Considering antibiotic resistance, and the very low incidence of serious complications, we conclude there is no place for antibiotics for people with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. We could not draw conclusions about children, people with suppressed immune systems, and those with severe sinusitis, because these populations were not included in the available trials.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Radiography; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Time Factors
PubMed: 30198548
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006089.pub5 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Jan 2022The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The term "orbital complication" does not designate an independent nosological entity, but is rather a collective designation for diseases or disease effects that involve the orbit and its internal structures by extension from outside. In general, their most prominent manifestation is swelling of the orbital soft tissues, usually unilaterally. The incidence of sinogenic orbital complications is approximately 1.6 per 100 000 children and 0.1 per 100 000 adults per year.
METHODS
This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sinogenic orbital complications.
RESULTS
Acute sinusitis is the most common cause of orbital complications. These are diseases of the orbit with potentially serious consequences for the eye and the risk of intracranial complications such as cavernous sinus thrombosis, meningitis, or brain abscess. Aside from acute sinusitis, many other infectious and non-infectious diseases can extend to and involve the orbit. Because of the complexity and severity of the condition, its diagnosis and treatment are always an interdisciplinary matter. The treatment is primarily conservative, under observation in a hospital, and generally consists of the treatment of acute sinusitis with measures to combat edema along with the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surgical intervention is needed in severe cases or if there is an abscess. An endonasal approach is usually used for drainage.
CONCLUSION
In 95-98% of cases in stages I-IV, healing is complete and without further sequelae. Even if vision is affected preoperatively, it usually recovers fully when therapy is appropriate. Approximately 15% of the patients who undergo surgery need more than one operative procedure.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Abscess; Sinusitis; Drainage; Acute Disease; Disease Progression; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34874263
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0379 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Dec 2011Acute sinusitis is defined pathologically, by transient inflammation of the mucosal lining of the paranasal sinuses lasting less than 4 weeks. Clinically, it is... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acute sinusitis is defined pathologically, by transient inflammation of the mucosal lining of the paranasal sinuses lasting less than 4 weeks. Clinically, it is characterised by nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, facial pain, hyposmia, sneezing, and, if more severe, additional malaise and fever. It affects 1% to 5% of the adult population each year in Europe.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in people with clinically diagnosed acute sinusitis, and in people with radiologically or bacteriologically confirmed acute sinusitis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2011 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 19 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antibiotics (amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid [co-amoxiclav], doxycycline, cephalosporins, macrolides; different doses, long-course regimens), antihistamines, decongestants (xylometazoline, phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine), saline nasal washes, steam inhalation, and topical corticosteroids (intranasal).
Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Amoxicillin; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Double-Blind Method; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Macrolides; Sinusitis
PubMed: 22189346
DOI: No ID Found -
American Family Physician Jul 2016
Topics: Acute Disease; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Nasal Lavage; Nasal Sprays; Sinusitis; Sodium Chloride
PubMed: 27419339
DOI: No ID Found