-
Minerva Anestesiologica Sep 2018Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly affects intensive care unit patients and is associated with high mortality. In addition to etiologic treatment and... (Review)
Review
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly affects intensive care unit patients and is associated with high mortality. In addition to etiologic treatment and protective ventilation, non-ventilatory therapies represent a significant part of ARDS care. Pharmacological treatments, extra corporeal devices and prone positioning are commonly grouped under this term. Studies have evaluated the individual effects of some of these non-ventilatory therapies in large randomized controlled trials. Recent advances concerning the beneficial use of neuromuscular blocking agents and prone positioning deserve attention. Conversely, the use of inhaled nitric oxide and almitrine remains to be specified. The debate concerning the role of corticosteroids could be renewed considering the emergence of new biomarkers. Finally, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and extra-corporeal CO2 removal remain under question. The aim of this review is to summarize the latest data concerning the mainly used non-ventilatory therapies and to integrate them into a global strategy of ARDS patient care.
Topics: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Humans; Neuromuscular Blockade; Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PubMed: 29745620
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12328-5 -
Journal of Infection and Public Health Feb 2022To clarify the work done by using AI for identifying the genomic sequences, development of drugs and vaccines for COVID-19 and to recognize the advantages and challenges... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To clarify the work done by using AI for identifying the genomic sequences, development of drugs and vaccines for COVID-19 and to recognize the advantages and challenges of using such technology.
METHODS
A non-systematic review was done. All articles published on Pub-Med, Medline, Google, and Google Scholar on AI or digital health regarding genomic sequencing, drug development, and vaccines of COVID-19 were scrutinized and summarized.
RESULTS
The sequence of SARS- CoV-2 was identified with the help of AI. It can help also in the prompt identification of variants of concern (VOC) as delta strains and Omicron. Furthermore, there are many drugs applied with the help of AI. These drugs included Atazanavir, Remdesivir, Efavirenz, Ritonavir, and Dolutegravir, PARP1 inhibitors (Olaparib and CVL218 which is Mefuparib hydrochloride), Abacavir, Roflumilast, Almitrine, and Mesylate. Many vaccines were developed utilizing the new technology of bioinformatics, databases, immune-informatics, machine learning, and reverse vaccinology to the whole SARS-CoV-2 proteomes or the structural proteins. Examples of these vaccines are the messenger RNA and viral vector vaccines. AI provides cost-saving and agility. However, the challenges of its usage are the difficulty of collecting data, the internal and external validation, ethical consideration, therapeutic effect, and the time needed for clinical trials after drug approval. Moreover, there is a common problem in the deep learning (DL) model which is the shortage of interpretability.
CONCLUSION
The growth of AI techniques in health care opened a broad gate for discovering the genomic sequences of the COVID-19 virus and the VOC. AI helps also in the development of vaccines and drugs (including drug repurposing) to obtain potential preventive and therapeutic agents for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.
Topics: Artificial Intelligence; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Drug Development; Humans; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2; Viral Vaccines
PubMed: 35078755
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.011 -
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology Nov 2013Drug-induced respiratory depression (DIRD) is a common problem encountered post-operatively and can persist for days after surgery. It is not always possible to predict... (Review)
Review
Drug-induced respiratory depression (DIRD) is a common problem encountered post-operatively and can persist for days after surgery. It is not always possible to predict the timing or severity of DIRD due to the number of contributing factors. A safe and effective respiratory stimulant could improve patient care by avoiding the use of reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, which reverses analgesia as well as respiratory depression) thereby permitting better pain management by enabling the use of higher doses of analgesics, facilitate weaning from prolonged ventilation, and ameliorate sleep-disordered breathing peri-operatively. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current pharmaceutical armamentarium of drugs (doxapram and almitrine) that are licensed for use in humans as respiratory stimulants and that could be used to reverse drug-induced respiratory depression in the post-operative period. We also discuss new chemical entities (AMPAkines and GAL-021) that have been recently evaluated in Phase 1 clinical trials and where the initial regulatory registration would be as a respiratory stimulant.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Ventilation; Respiratory Insufficiency; Respiratory System Agents
PubMed: 23791825
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.06.010 -
Thorax Apr 1989
Review
Topics: Almitrine; Humans; Hypoxia; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Piperazines
PubMed: 2548298
DOI: 10.1136/thx.44.4.247 -
The European Respiratory Journal Dec 1999
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Almitrine; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Nitric Oxide; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory System Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 10624749
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.99.14612449 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2021Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is manifested by an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with intense inflammation and endothelial...
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is manifested by an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with intense inflammation and endothelial dysfunction leading to particularly severe hypoxemia. We hypothesized that an impaired hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction aggravates hypoxemia. The objective of the study was to test the effect of two pulmonary vasoactive drugs on patient oxygenation. Observational, single-center, open-label study in one intensive care unit (ICU) of the Paris area, realized in April 2020. Eligible patients had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and moderate to severe ARDS [arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO/FiO) <200 mmHg] despite conventional protective ventilation. Exclusion criteria included pulmonary artery hypertension defined by a pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAPs) >45 mmHg. The assessment of oxygenation was based on PaO/FiO at (1) baseline, then after (2) 30 min of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) 10 ppm alone, then (3) 30 min combination of iNO + almitrine infusion 8 μg/kg/min, then (4) 30 min of almitrine infusion alone. Among 20 patients requiring mechanical ventilation during the study period, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Baseline PaO/FiO was 146 ± 48 mmHg. When iNO was combined with almitrine, PaO/FiO rose to 255 ± 90 mmHg (+80 ± 49%, = 0.005), also after almitrine alone: 238 ± 98 mmHg (+67 ± 75%, = 0.02), but not after iNO alone: 185 ± 73 mmHg (+30 ± 5%, = 0.49). No adverse events related to almitrine infusion or iNO was observed. Combining iNO and infused almitrine improved the short-term oxygenation in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. This combination may be of interest when first-line therapies fail to restore adequate oxygenation. These findings argue for an impaired pulmonary hypoxic vasoconstriction in these patients.
PubMed: 34277653
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655763 -
Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain... Aug 2020
Topics: Almitrine; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Humans; Hypoxia; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory System Agents; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 32653550
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.07.003 -
Journal of Applied Physiology... Jul 1997The effects of almitrine bimesylate and doxapram HCl on isometric force produced by in vitro rat diaphragm were studied during direct muscle activation at 37 degrees C....
The effects of almitrine bimesylate and doxapram HCl on isometric force produced by in vitro rat diaphragm were studied during direct muscle activation at 37 degrees C. Doxapram and almitrine ameliorate respiratory failure clinically by indirectly increasing phrenic nerve activity. This study was carried out to investigate possible direct actions of these agents on the diaphragm before and after fatigue of the fibers. Two age groups of animals were chosen [6-14 wk (group 1) and 50-55 wk (group 2)] because it is known that increasing age decreases a muscle fiber's resistance to fatigue. Muscle strips were isolated from both group 1 and group 2 and directly stimulated (2-ms pulse duration, 5-15 V) to produce twitch tensions of 1.3 and 2.1 N/cm2, respectively. At low concentrations, doxapram (=20 microg/ml) and almitrine (=12 microg/ml) had no effect on twitch contraction or 100-Hz tetanic tension. However, 40 microg/ml doxapram and 30 microg/ml almitrine increased twitch tension by 9.0 +/- 1.4 and 11.6 +/- 1.9%, respectively, in animals of group 2 (n = 5). A fatigue protocol consisting of low-frequency stimulation (30-Hz trains, 250-ms duration every 2 s for 5 min) caused a reduction of twitch tension in animals of group 1 (48 +/- 4% of control) and group 2 (28 +/- 4% of control). At 90 min postfatigue, the twitch tension recovered to 72 +/- 3 and 42 +/- 2% of control values in group 1 and group 2, respectively. In the presence of doxapram (20 microg/ml), there was a significant increase in the recovery of twitch tension at 90 min in group 1 and group 2 (84.5 +/- 3.2 and 80.1 +/- 2.8%, respectively) compared with controls at 90 min postfatigue. In the presence of almitrine (12 microg/ml), there was a full recovery from fatigue in group 1 animals (100% of control) and a recovery to 95.6 +/- 2.1% of control in group 2 animals at 90 min. These results demonstrate a significant improvement in the rapidity and magnitude of recovery from fatigue in the rat diaphragm muscle in the presence of both doxapram and, especially, almitrine. These effects may be due to changes in intracellular calcium, ADP/ATP ratios, or oxygen free radical scavenging.
Topics: Almitrine; Animals; Diaphragm; Doxapram; Electric Stimulation; In Vitro Techniques; Isometric Contraction; Male; Muscle Contraction; Muscle Relaxation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Respiratory System Agents
PubMed: 9216944
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.52 -
Annals of Intensive Care Nov 2020In COVID-19 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the relatively preserved respiratory system compliance despite severe hypoxemia, with...
BACKGROUND
In COVID-19 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the relatively preserved respiratory system compliance despite severe hypoxemia, with specific pulmonary vascular dysfunction, suggests a possible hemodynamic mechanism for VA/Q mismatch, as hypoxic vasoconstriction alteration. This study aimed to evaluate the capacity of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)-almitrine combination to restore oxygenation in severe COVID-19 ARDS (C-ARDS) patients.
METHODS
We conducted a monocentric preliminary pilot study in intubated patients with severe C-ARDS. Respiratory mechanics was assessed after a prone session. Then, patients received iNO (10 ppm) alone and in association with almitrine (10 μg/kg/min) during 30 min in each step. Echocardiographic and blood gases measurements were performed at baseline, during iNO alone, and iNO-almitrine combination. The primary endpoint was the variation of oxygenation (PaO/FiO ratio).
RESULTS
Ten severe C-ARDS patients were assessed (7 males and 3 females), with a median age of 60 [52-72] years. Combination of iNO and almitrine outperformed iNO alone for oxygenation improvement. The median of PaO/FiO ratio varied from 102 [89-134] mmHg at baseline, to 124 [108-146] mmHg after iNO (p = 0.13) and 180 [132-206] mmHg after iNO and almitrine (p < 0.01). We found no correlation between the increase in oxygenation caused by iNO-almitrine combination and that caused by proning.
CONCLUSION
In this pilot study of severe C-ARDS patients, iNO-almitrine combination was associated with rapid and significant improvement of oxygenation. These findings highlight the role of pulmonary vascular function in COVID-19 pathophysiology.
PubMed: 33150525
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00769-2 -
EClinicalMedicine Oct 2022Severe hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia might result from hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, contributing to ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. Because...
Effect of intravenous almitrine on intubation or mortality in patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Severe hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia might result from hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, contributing to ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch. Because almitrine improves V/Q, it might reduce the risk for mechanical ventilation (MV) in such patients. Our primary objective was to determine the effect of almitrine on the need for MV at day 7.
METHODS
In a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 15 ICUs, patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia and experiencing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were randomly assigned to receive 5 days of intravenous low-dose (2 µg.kg.min) almitrine or placebo. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation for MV or death within 7 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, number of ventilator-free days, number of days in the ICU and the hospital, and treatment discontinuation for pre-specified adverse effects. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04357457.
FINDINGS
Between September 3, 2020 and September 25, 2021 181 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to almitrine (n=89) or placebo (n=92). 179 patients (excluding two who withdrew from the study) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age: 60·1 years; 34% women) and analyzed. On day 7, the primary endpoint occurred in 32 patients assigned to almitrine (36%) and in 37 patients assigned to placebo (41%), for a difference of -4·3% (95% confidence interval: -18·7% to 10·2%). Secondary outcomes (28-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days at day 28, days in the ICU and the hospital, and treatment discontinuation for pre-specified adverse effects) did not differ between the two groups.
INTERPRETATION
In patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, low-dose almitrine failed in reducing the need for MV or death at day 7.
FUNDING
Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC COVID 2020) funded by the French Ministry of Health, Les Laboratoires Servier (Suresnes, France) providing the study drug free of charge.
PubMed: 36157895
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101663