-
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2017Aminoglycosides are a group of antibiotics used since the 1940s to primarily treat a broad spectrum of bacterial infections. The primary resistance mechanism against... (Review)
Review
Aminoglycosides are a group of antibiotics used since the 1940s to primarily treat a broad spectrum of bacterial infections. The primary resistance mechanism against these antibiotics is enzymatic modification by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes that are divided into acetyl-transferases, phosphotransferases, and nucleotidyltransferases. To overcome this problem, new semisynthetic aminoglycosides were developed in the 70s. The most widely used semisynthetic aminoglycoside is amikacin, which is refractory to most aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Amikacin was synthesized by acylation with the l-(-)-γ-amino-α-hydroxybutyryl side chain at the C-1 amino group of the deoxystreptamine moiety of kanamycin A. The main amikacin resistance mechanism found in the clinics is acetylation by the aminoglycoside 6'--acetyltransferase type Ib [AAC(6')-Ib], an enzyme coded for by a gene found in integrons, transposons, plasmids, and chromosomes of Gram-negative bacteria. Numerous efforts are focused on finding strategies to neutralize the action of AAC(6')-Ib and extend the useful life of amikacin. Small molecules as well as complexes ionophore-Zn or Cu were found to inhibit the acetylation reaction and induced phenotypic conversion to susceptibility in bacteria harboring the gene. A new semisynthetic aminoglycoside, plazomicin, is in advance stage of development and will contribute to renewed interest in this kind of antibiotics.
Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Genes, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Kanamycin Resistance
PubMed: 29257114
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22122267 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Oct 2016The objectives of this study were to identify the amikacin dosage regimens and drug concentrations consistent with good outcomes and to determine the drug exposures... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this study were to identify the amikacin dosage regimens and drug concentrations consistent with good outcomes and to determine the drug exposures related to nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.
METHODS
A literature review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Full journal articles reporting randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series trials, and controlled before and after studies involving amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and dose adjustment were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies for inclusion were identified, comprising 1677 participants. Amikacin doses ranged from 11 to 15 mg/kg/day with 13 studies using 15 mg/kg/day. Studies were generally designed to compare different aminoglycosides rather than to assess concentration-effect relationships. Only 11 papers presented data on target concentrations, rate of clinical cure and toxicity. Target peak concentrations ranged from 15 to 40 mg/L and target troughs were typically <10 or <5 mg/L. It was not clear whether these targets were achieved. Measured peaks averaged 28 mg/L for twice-daily dosing and 40-45 mg/L for once-daily dosing; troughs averaged 5 and 1-2 mg/L, respectively. Fifteen of the included studies reported rates of nephrotoxicity; auditory and vestibular toxicities were reported in 12 and 8 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review found little published evidence to support an optimal dosage regimen or TDM targets for amikacin therapy. The use of alternative approaches, such as consensus opinion and a review of current practice, will be required to develop guidelines to maximize therapeutic outcomes and minimize toxicity with amikacin.
Topics: Adult; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Interrupted Time Series Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27494904
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw250 -
Chest Sep 2021
Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Liposomes
PubMed: 34488977
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.050 -
PloS One 2022The prevalence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is increasing globally. Macrolide-based multidrug regimens have been recommended as the first-line treatment for...
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is increasing globally. Macrolide-based multidrug regimens have been recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with MAC pulmonary disease. However, developing macrolide resistance was associated with poor treatment outcomes and increased mortality. In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved liposomal amikacin for inhalation (LAI) to treat refractory MAC pulmonary disease. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate LAI's outcomes and adverse events in MAC pulmonary disease.
METHODS
The systematic search was performed in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) up to March 8, 2022. The search terms included Mycobacterium avium complex, MAC, amikacin, and liposomal amikacin.
RESULTS
After reviewing 1284 records, four papers met the inclusion criteria, including three clinical trials and one prospective cohort study. These studies showed that adding LAI to guideline-based therapies can increase sputum culture conversion rate and achieve early sustained (negative sputum culture results for 12 months with treatment) and durable (negative sputum culture results for three months after treatment) negative sputum culture. In addition, extended LAI use was a potential benefit in patients considered refractory to initial treatment. The most prevalent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) reported in the LAI group were the respiratory TEAE.
CONCLUSIONS
LAI could increase the sputum culture conversion rate and achieve early sustainable, durable negative sputum culture. However, additional large-scale research is required to confirm the results.
Topics: Humans; Amikacin; Mycobacterium avium Complex; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Liposomes; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Prospective Studies; Macrolides; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Lung Diseases
PubMed: 36574432
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279714 -
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2022Children show a very wide range of physical development processes. These changes impact pharmacokinetic (PK) variability in pediatric patients. Most PK studies have been... (Review)
Review
Children show a very wide range of physical development processes. These changes impact pharmacokinetic (PK) variability in pediatric patients. Most PK studies have been conducted on the Caucasian population. Therefore, whether current evidence of how developmental change affects PK and exposure-response relationships applies to Japanese pediatric patients remains unclear. This narrative review focuses on amikacin therapy in Japanese pediatric patients and shows the relationship between amikacin concentrations and efficacy/toxicity. Ten relevant articles were identified. Of these, nine articles were published in the 1980s. All studies reported a maximum concentration (Cmax) and minimum concentration (Cmin) of amikacin. Overall, articles reporting PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) indices and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolated bacteria in Japanese pediatric patients is lacking, whereas all patients recovered from an infection state and showed negative cultures. Five of the included studies reported the association between Cmin and toxicity. The Cmin in three of four patients who developed toxicity was above 10 mg/L. This narrative review shows that further PK study of amikacin in Japanese pediatric patients is necessary. In particular, the pursuit of knowledge of Cmax/MIC ratio is vital. On the other hand, this review demonstrates that the optimal Cmin for Japanese pediatric patients is below 10 mg/L as a candidate concentration. However, it is noted that the number of patients who developed toxicity is very small.
Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Child; Humans; Japan; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 35206156
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041972 -
Microbiology Spectrum Jun 2022Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by...
Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of ~1 × 10 CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive β-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained.
Topics: Amikacin; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Critical Illness; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas Infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PubMed: 35442072
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00525-22 -
Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 2014The purpose of the study was to compare peak (Cpeak) and trough (Ctrough) amikacin levels after twice-daily (TD) or once-daily dosing (OD) in full-term neonates....
The purpose of the study was to compare peak (Cpeak) and trough (Ctrough) amikacin levels after twice-daily (TD) or once-daily dosing (OD) in full-term neonates. Additionally, the study aimed to address amikacin pharmacokinetics and its variability. Data included 31 patients born on term. Amikacin daily dose was 15 or 20 mg/kg depending on the neonate's age. Patients randomly received amikacin every 12 or 24 h. In all patients corresponding Cpeak and Ctrough were taken. Volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (CL) and half-life (t1/2) were calculated. Mean Cpeak of 21.79 μg/ml in the TD group was statistically different from Cpeak of 36.39 μg/ml in the OD group. Average Ctrough in TD (5.67 μg/ml) was statistically different from the corresponding 3.99 μg/ml in the OD group. Mean amikacin Vd, CL, and t1/2 were 0.78 ± 0.38 l/kg, 86.99 ± 48.22 ml/h∙kg, and 6.81 ± 2.51 h, respectively. High interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was observed. Further analysis showed that neonatal age contributed to the pharmacokinetic parameters' values. Statistically significant difference in CL and t1/2 was observed between patients age ≤ 2 and > 2 days on therapy initiation. As expected, amikacin given OD achieved higher Cpeak and lower Ctrough than TD. Based on the results, observed variability in amikacin pharmacokinetics was possibly due to the renal maturation process.
Topics: Age Factors; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Half-Life; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Kidney; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation
PubMed: 24441865
DOI: 10.1254/jphs.13126fp -
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2022Aminoglycosides are widely known for their ototoxic side effects. Nevertheless, they are potent antibiotics used in the treatment of life-threatening conditions because...
INTRODUCTION
Aminoglycosides are widely known for their ototoxic side effects. Nevertheless, they are potent antibiotics used in the treatment of life-threatening conditions because of the current concern for antibiotic resistance. We hypothesized that creatine supplements which are believed to improve mitochondrial antioxidant defense system and maintain optimal energy homeostasis may improve the ototoxic side effects.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of creatine monohydrate against ototoxicity induced by amikacin in rats in an experimental animal model, using distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response.
METHODS
Twenty healthy rats were assigned to four groups (5 rats in each): the control group, the creatine monohydrate group, the amikacin group and the amikacin+creatine monohydrate group. The creatine monohydrate group received creatine at a dose of 2g/kg once daily via gastric gavage for 21 days. The amikacin group received amikacin at a dose of 600mg/kg by intramuscular injections once daily for 21 days. The amikacin+creatine monohydrate group received intramuscular injections of amikacin (600mg/kg) once daily for 21 days and creatine monohydrate (2g/kg) once daily via gastric gavage for 21 days. The control group received nothing. The distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response measurements were performed on all rats on days 0, 7, 21.
RESULTS
Regarding auditory brainstem response values, a significant increase in the auditory threshold was observed in the amikacin group on day 21 (p< 0.001). The amikacin+creatine monohydrate group showed significantly lower levels of auditory brainstem response auditory thresholds on day 21 in comparison to the amikacin group (p< 0.001). Additionally, the control group and the amikacin+creatine monohydrate group did not differ significantly with respect to auditory brainstem response thresholds on treatment day 21 (p> 0.05). When we compare distortion product otoacoustic emissions values, there was no significant difference between the amikacin and amikacin+creatine monohydrate groups on day 7 (p> 0.05), However significantly greater distortion product otoacoustic emissions values were observed in the amikacin+creatine monohydrate group on day 21 compared to the amikacin group (p< 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Our findings demonstrate that creatine treatment protects against amikacin ototoxicity when given at a sufficient dose and for an adequate time period.
Topics: Amikacin; Aminoglycosides; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antioxidants; Creatine; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous; Ototoxicity; Rats
PubMed: 33121925
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.002 -
World Journal of Microbiology &... Oct 2022Amikacin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used in drug-resistant bacterial infections. The spread of bacterial infections has become a severe concern for the treatment...
Amikacin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used in drug-resistant bacterial infections. The spread of bacterial infections has become a severe concern for the treatment system because of the simultaneous drug resistance bacteria and SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized patients. One of the most common bacteria in the development of drug resistance is Klebsiella strains, which is a severe threat due to the possibility of biofilm production. In this regard, recent nanotechnology studies have proposed using nanocarriers as a practical proposal to improve the performance of antibiotics and combat drug resistance. Among drug nanocarriers, niosomes are considered for their absorption mechanism, drug coverage, and biocompatibility. In this study, niosomal formulations were synthesized by the thin-layer method. After optimizing the synthesized niosomes, their properties were evaluated in terms of stability and drug release rate. The toxicity of the optimal formulation was then analyzed. The effect of free amikacin and amikacin encapsulated in niosome on biofilm inhibition were compared in multi-drug resistant isolated Klebsiella strains, and the mrkD gene expression was calculated. The MIC and MBC were measured for the free drug and amikacin loaded in the noisome. The particle size of synthesized amikacin-loaded niosomes ranged from 175.2 to 248.3 nm. The results showed that the amount of lipid and the molar ratio of tween 60 to span 60 has a positive effect on particle size, while the molar ratio of surfactant to cholesterol has a negative effect. The highest release rate in amikacin-loaded niosomes is visible in the first 8 h, and then a slower release occurs up to 72 h. The cytotoxicity induced by amikacin-loaded niosome is significantly less than the cytotoxicity of free amikacin in HFF cells (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01). The mrkD mRNA expression level in the studied strains was significantly reduced after treatment with niosome-containing amikacin compared to free amikacin (***p < 0.001). It was confirmed that in the presence of the niosome, the amikacin antibacterial activity increased while the concentration of the drug used decreased, the formation of biofilm inhibited, and reduced antibiotics resistance in MDR Klebsiella strains.
Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; COVID-19; Cholesterol; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Lipids; Liposomes; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Nanoparticles; Polysorbates; RNA, Messenger; SARS-CoV-2; Surface-Active Agents
PubMed: 36184645
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-022-03405-2 -
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious... Aug 2023Antibiotic resistance surveillance may be essential to identify patterns of antibiotic resistance and guide treatment choices. Therefore, this systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Antibiotic resistance surveillance may be essential to identify patterns of antibiotic resistance and guide treatment choices. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate amikacin resistance and susceptibility in children with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). From inception to September 5, 2022, relevant studies were searched via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. A network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the sequencing of resistance rates in amikacin and other antibiotics. Totally, 26 studies with 2582 clusters of bacterial isolates were included. The resistance rate of amikacin in children with ESBL-PE was 10.1%, higher than the resistance rate of tigecycline (0.0%), ertapenem (0.4%), meropenem (0.7%), and imipenem (3.0%). For the drug susceptibility rate in children with ESBL-PE, the susceptibility rate of amikacin (89.7%) was lower than tigecycline (99.6%), imipenem (96.8%), meropenem (97.3%), and ertapenem (95.6%). Amikacin showed a low drug resistance and a high drug resistance in children with ESBL-PE infection, making it a good option for the treatment of the infection caused by ESBL-PE.
Topics: Child; Humans; Amikacin; Ertapenem; Meropenem; Tigecycline; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Imipenem; beta-Lactamases; Drug Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37290259
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115956