-
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Jul 2022Systematic review.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review evaluates all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted on assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)-associated pain.
METHODS
The PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library online databases were searched from 1946 to May 2019 using specific search terms for SCI, pain, and RCTs meeting predetermined inclusion criteria. The efficacy outcome of interest was pain reduction, discontinuations, and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
Of 2746 records identified through database searching, 703 duplicates were deleted. 1814 were excluded, the full text of the remaining 230 articles was reviewed, and finally, 28 papers were selected for drafting. The most studied medications were pregabalin, gabapentin, amitriptyline, and ketamine. Pregabalin, gabapentin, and amitriptyline reduced VAS by more than 30%, and ketamine reduced VAS by 40%. Oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, alfentanil, tramadol, and morphine added to clonidine, baclofen, and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) significantly reduced pain compared with placebo. On the other hand, valproate, levetiracetam, trazodone, and duloxetine did not significantly alleviate SCI-associated pain compared to placebo. The risks of AEs and discontinuations in anticonvulsants were the least, while it was highest in analgesics.
CONCLUSIONS
Studies of SCI-associated pain were few, small, heterogenic in measures and values, and did not allow quantitative comparisons of efficacy. However, available data suggested pregabalin and gabapentin led to a more marked reduction in SCI-associated pain with fewer AEs. Additional clinical studies are needed to assess the effect of established and novel management options.
Topics: Amitriptyline; Anticonvulsants; Gabapentin; Humans; Ketamine; Pain; Pregabalin; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 35788127
DOI: 10.1038/s41394-022-00529-3 -
Journal of Pharmacological Sciences May 2009Although often necessary for obtaining remission following major depressive disorder, combined antidepressant treatment is frequently associated with drug interactions... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Although often necessary for obtaining remission following major depressive disorder, combined antidepressant treatment is frequently associated with drug interactions and enhanced adverse drug effects. We investigated pharmacokinetic interactions following combined fluvoxamine and amitriptyline treatment and their impact on therapeutic efficacy and tolerability. Twenty-two inpatients with major depression [Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) rating > or =18] were treated with either amitriptyline (75 mg/day), fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) or both. Blood samples, for determination of amitriptyline, its major metabolite nortritpyline, and fluvoxamine, were obtained after single dose administration and in steady-state. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using HAM-D and adverse drug effects were evaluated using the clinical global impression scale. Following combined treatment, steady-state plasma levels of nortriptyline were significantly decreased compared to monotherapy. HAM-D scores after two-week treatment showed that there was a better response to combined treatment. There was no significant difference in severity of adverse effects among groups. We observed a pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvoxamine and amitritpyline resulting in impaired metabolism of the later. However, no significant impact of the interaction on treatment safety was observed. Moreover, concomitant use of amitriptyline at 75 mg/day and fluvoxamine at 100 mg/day was well tolerated with a more prompt and stronger onset of clinical response compared to monotherapy in patients with major depression.
Topics: Adult; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluvoxamine; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
PubMed: 19444001
DOI: 10.1254/jphs.09013fp -
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2022Amitriptyline is a major tricyclic antidepressant that is also used to relieve chronic orofacial pain. Recently, alterations in gut flora due to various antidepressants...
BACKGROUND/AIM
Amitriptyline is a major tricyclic antidepressant that is also used to relieve chronic orofacial pain. Recently, alterations in gut flora due to various antidepressants have been demonstrated. However, it remains unknown how antidepressants affect the oral environment, including microbiota and innate immunity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of amitriptyline on oral microflora and antimicrobial peptides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sprague-Dawley rats were intraperitoneally injected with amitriptyline for 2 weeks. The DNA extracted from the oral swabs were used to perform 16SrRNA sequencing to evaluate the oral microbiome. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to evaluate the mRNA levels of antimicrobial peptides in the buccal tissues.
RESULTS
No significant differences in salivary flow rates were observed between the amitriptyline and control groups. Taxonomic analysis showed significant alterations in bacteria such as Corynebacterium, Rothia, and Porphyromonas due to amitriptyline administration. The beta diversity showed significant differences between the amitriptyline and control groups. Additionally, the predicted metagenome functions were significantly different between the two groups. The mRNA expression levels of antimicrobial peptides in the amitriptyline group were significantly higher as compared to controls.
CONCLUSION
Systemic administration of amitriptyline may affect the oral environment, including oral microbes and innate immunity in the oral mucosa.
Topics: Amitriptyline; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley
PubMed: 36099099
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12939 -
Translational Psychiatry Feb 2021Antidepressant medications are known to modulate the central nervous system, and gut microbiota can play a role in depression via microbiota-gut-brain axis. But the...
Antidepressant medications are known to modulate the central nervous system, and gut microbiota can play a role in depression via microbiota-gut-brain axis. But the impact of antidepressants on gut microbiota function and composition remains poorly understood. Thus this study assessed the effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant fluoxetine (Flu) and tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline (Ami) administration on gut microbiota composition, diversity, and species abundance, along with microbial function in a chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS)-induced depression rat model. Oral administration of Ami and Flu significantly altered the overall gut microbiota profile of CUMS-induced rats, as assessed using the permutational multivariate analysis of variance test. At the phylum level, 6-week of antidepressant treatment led to a decreased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio due to an enhanced Bacteroidetes and reduced Firmicutes relative abundance. Flu was more potent than Ami at altering the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes levels in the CUMS rats. At the family level, both antidepressants significantly increased the abundance of Porphyromonadaceae. However, an increased Bacteroidaceae level was significantly associated with Ami, not Flu treatment. Furthermore, at the genus level, an increase in the relative abundance of Parabacteroides, Butyricimonas, and Alistipes was observed following Ami and Flu treatment. Subsequent metagenomics and bioinformatics analysis further indicated that Ami and Flu likely also modulated metabolic pathways, such as those involved in carbohydrate metabolism, membrane transport, and signal transduction. Additionally, both antidepressants affected antibiotic resistome, such as for aminoglycoside (aph3iiiA), multidrug (mdtK, mdtP, mdtH, mdtG, acrA), and tetracycline (tetM) resistance in CUMS rats. These data clearly illustrated the direct impact of oral administration of Flu and Ami on the gut microbiome, thus set up the foundation to reveal more insights on the therapeutic function of the antidepressants and their overall contribution to host health.
Topics: Amitriptyline; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Fluoxetine; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Rats; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 33602895
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01254-5 -
Redox Biology Feb 2023Alcoholic (ASH) and nonalcoholic. (NASH).steatohepatitis are advanced.stages.of.fatty.liver.disease.Methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) plays a key role in hepatic...
Alcoholic (ASH) and nonalcoholic. (NASH).steatohepatitis are advanced.stages.of.fatty.liver.disease.Methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) plays a key role in hepatic methionine metabolism and germline Mat1a deletion in mice promotes NASH. Acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase) triggers hepatocellular apoptosis and liver fibrosis and has been shown to downregulate MAT1A expression in the context of fulminant liver failure. Given the role of ASMase in steatohepatitis development, we investigated the status of ASMase in Mat1a mice and the regulation of ASMase by SAM/SAH. Consistent with its role in NASH, Mat1a mice fed a choline-deficient (CD) diet exhibited macrosteatosis, inflammation, fibrosis and liver injury as well as reduced total and mitochondrial GSH levels. Our data uncovered an increased basal expression and activity of ASMase but not neutral SMase in Mat1a mice, which further increased upon CD feeding. Interestingly, adenovirus-mediated shRNA expression targeting ASMase reduced ASMase activity and protected Mat1a mice against CD diet-induced NASH. Similar results were observed in CD fed Mat1a mice by pharmacological inhibition of ASMase with amitriptyline. Moreover, Mat1a/ASMase double knockout mice were resistant to CD-induced NASH. ASMase knockdown protected wild type mice against NASH induced by feeding a diet deficient in methionine and choline. Furthermore, Mat1a mice developed acute-on-chronic ASH and this outcome was ameliorated by amitriptyline treatment. In vitro data in primary mouse hepatocytes revealed that decreased SAM/SAH ratio increased ASMase mRNA level and activity. MAT1A and ASMase mRNA levels exhibited an inverse correlation in liver samples from patients with ASH and NASH. Thus, disruption of methionine metabolism sensitizes to steatohepatitis by ASMase activation via decreased SAM/SAH. These findings imply that MAT1A deletion and ASMase activation engage in a self-sustained loop of relevance for steatohepatitis.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Amitriptyline; Choline; Diet; Disease Models, Animal; Liver; Methionine; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Racemethionine; Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase; Hepatitis
PubMed: 36610223
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102596 -
Arquivos de Neuro-psiquiatria Apr 2018Nonpharmacological treatments, such as the Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibition Tension Suppression System (NTI-tss), are approved for migraine prophylaxis. We aimed at... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
Nonpharmacological treatments, such as the Nociceptive Trigeminal Inhibition Tension Suppression System (NTI-tss), are approved for migraine prophylaxis. We aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the NTI-tss and to compare its efficacy with amitriptyline and with a sham intraoral device in the preventive treatment of migraine.
METHODS
Consecutive patients with migraine were randomized to receive 25 mg of amitriptyline/day (n = 34), NTI-tss (n = 33) and a non-occlusal splint (n = 30). The headache frequency was evaluated at six and 12 weeks.
RESULTS
The amitriptyline group showed, respectively, 60% and 64% reduction in attack frequency at six and 12 weeks (P = 0.000). In the NTI-tss and non-occlusal splint groups, reduction was 39% and 30%, respectively, at six weeks and 48% for both groups at 12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
Amitriptyline proved superior to the NTI-tss and the non-occlusal splint. Despite its approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, the NTI-tss was not superior to a sham device.
Topics: Adult; Amitriptyline; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Female; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Occlusal Splints; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29742243
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20180023 -
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and... 2022To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults.
METHODS
After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies.
RESULTS
Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Melatonin; Migraine Disorders; Valproic Acid; Amitriptyline; Analgesics
PubMed: 36445912
DOI: 10.11607/ofph.3211 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2021Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders (FAPDs) present a considerable burden to paediatric patients, impacting quality of life, school attendance and causing higher rates... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders (FAPDs) present a considerable burden to paediatric patients, impacting quality of life, school attendance and causing higher rates of anxiety and depression disorders. There are no international guidelines for the management of this condition. A previous Cochrane Review in 2011 found no evidence to support the use of antidepressants in this context.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of antidepressants for FAPDs in children and adolescents.
SEARCH METHODS
In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and two clinical trial registers from inception until 03 February 2020. We also updated our search of databases of ongoing research, reference lists and 'grey literature' from inception to 03 February 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antidepressants to placebo, to no treatment or to any other intervention, in children aged 4 to 18 years with a FAPD diagnosis as per the Rome or any other defined criteria (as defined by the authors). The primary outcomes of interest included treatment success (as defined by the authors), pain severity, pain frequency and withdrawal due to adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors checked all citations independently, resolving disagreement with a third-party arbiter. We reviewed all potential studies in full text, and once again made independent decisions, with disagreements resolved by consensus. We conducted data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessments independently, following Cochrane methods. Where homogeneous data were available, we performed meta-analysis using a random-effects model. We conducted GRADE analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
We found one new study in this updated search, making a total of three trials (223 participants) eligible for inclusion: two using amitriptyline (AMI) and one using citalopram. For the primary outcome of treatment success, two studies used reports of success on a symptom-based Likert scale, with either a two-point reduction or the two lowest levels defined as success. The third study defined success as a 15% improvement in quality of life (QOL) ratings scales. Therefore, meta-analysis did not include this final study due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measure. There is low-certainty evidence that there may be no difference when antidepressants are compared with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.56; 2 studies, 205 participants; I = 0%). We downgraded the evidence for significant imprecision due to extremely sparse data (see Summary of findings table 1). The third study reported that participants receiving antidepressants were significantly more likely than those receiving placebo to experience at least a 15% improvement in overall QOL score at 10 and 13 weeks (P = 0.007 and P = 0.002, respectively (absolute figures were not given)). The analysis found no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events between antidepressants and placebo: RR 3.17 (95% CI 0.65 to 15.33), with very low certainty due to high risk of bias in studies and imprecision due to low event and participant numbers. Sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effect model and analysing just for AMI found no change in this result. Due to heterogeneous and limited reporting, no further meta-analysis was possible.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There may be no difference between antidepressants and placebo for treatment success of FAPDs in childhood. There may be no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events, but this is also of low certainty. There is currently no evidence to support clinical decision making regarding the use of these medications. Further studies must consider sample size, homogenous and relevant outcome measures and longer follow up.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adolescent; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Child; Citalopram; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Placebos; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33560523
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008013.pub3 -
British Medical Journal Jun 1973
Topics: Amitriptyline; Dibenzazepines; Diphenhydramine; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Humans; Methaqualone; Sleep; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 4733259
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5868.716-b -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2022The facilitated activity of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) in the central and peripheral nervous systems promotes neuropathic pain. Amitriptyline (ATL) and...
The facilitated activity of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) in the central and peripheral nervous systems promotes neuropathic pain. Amitriptyline (ATL) and desipramine (DES) are tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) whose anti-NMDAR properties contribute to their analgetic effects. At therapeutic concentrations <1 µM, these medicines inhibit NMDARs by enhancing their calcium-dependent desensitization (CDD). Li+, which suppresses the sodium−calcium exchanger (NCX) and enhances NMDAR CDD, also exhibits analgesia. Here, the effects of different [Li+]s on TCA inhibition of currents through native NMDARs in rat cortical neurons recorded by the patch-clamp technique were investigated. We demonstrated that the therapeutic [Li+]s of 0.5−1 mM cause an increase in ATL and DES IC50s of ~10 folds and ~4 folds, respectively, for the Ca2+-dependent NMDAR inhibition. The Ca2+-resistant component of NMDAR inhibition by TCAs, the open-channel block, was not affected by Li+. In agreement, clomipramine providing exclusively the NMDAR open-channel block is not sensitive to Li+. This Ca2+-dependent interplay between Li+, ATL, and DES could be determined by their competition for the same molecular target. Thus, submillimolar [Li+]s may weaken ATL and DES effects during combined therapy. The data suggest that Li+, ATL, and DES can enhance NMDAR CDD through NCX inhibition. This ability implies a drug−drug or ion−drug interaction when these medicines are used together therapeutically.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Amitriptyline; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Lithium; Calcium; Desipramine; Calcium, Dietary
PubMed: 36555818
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232416177