Review

Authors: Csaba Ertsey, Máté Magyar, Tamás Gyüre...

Tension type headache, the most common type of primary headaches, affects approximately 80% of the population. Mainly because of its high prevalence, the socio-economic consequences of tension type headache are significant. The pain in tension type headache is usually bilateral, mild to moderate, is of a pressing or tightening quality, and is not accompanied by other symptoms. Patients with frequent or daily occurrence of tension type headache may experience significant distress because of the condition. The two main therapeutic avenues of tension type headache are acute and prophylactic treatment. Simple or combined analgesics are the mainstay of acute treatment. Prophylactic treatment is needed in case of attacks that are frequent and/or difficult to treat. The first drugs of choice as preventatives of tension type headache are tricyclic antidepressants, with a special focus on amitriptyline, the efficacy of which having been documented in multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Among other antidepressants, the efficacy of mirtazapine and venlafaxine has been documented. There is weaker evidence about the efficacy of gabapentine, topiramate, and tizanidin. Non-pharmacological prophylactic methods of tension type headache with a documented efficacy include certain types of psychotherapy and acupuncture.

Topics: Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Humans; Tension-Type Headache

PubMed: 30785242
DOI: 10.18071/isz.72.0013

Randomized Controlled Trial

Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment in primary care (ATLANTIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors: Alexander C Ford, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Sarah L Alderson...

BACKGROUND

Most patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are managed in primary care. When first-line therapies for IBS are ineffective, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline suggests considering low- dose tricyclic antidepressants as second-line treatment, but their effectiveness in primary care is unknown, and they are infrequently prescribed in this setting.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment [ATLANTIS]) was conducted at 55 general practices in England. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with Rome IV IBS of any subtype, and ongoing symptoms (IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] score ≥75 points) despite dietary changes and first-line therapies, a normal full blood count and C-reactive protein, negative coeliac serology, and no evidence of suicidal ideation. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to low-dose oral amitriptyline (10 mg once daily) or placebo for 6 months, with dose titration over 3 weeks (up to 30 mg once daily), according to symptoms and tolerability. Participants, their general practitioners, investigators, and the analysis team were all masked to allocation throughout the trial. The primary outcome was the IBS-SSS score at 6 months. Effectiveness analyses were according to intention-to-treat; safety analyses were on all participants who took at least one dose of the trial medication. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN48075063) and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 18, 2019, and April 11, 2022, 463 participants (mean age 48·5 years [SD 16·1], 315 [68%] female to 148 [32%] male) were randomly allocated to receive low-dose amitriptyline (232) or placebo (231). Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome showed a significant difference in favour of low-dose amitriptyline in IBS-SSS score between groups at 6 months (-27·0, 95% CI -46·9 to -7·10; p=0·0079). 46 (20%) participants discontinued low-dose amitriptyline (30 [13%] due to adverse events), and 59 (26%) discontinued placebo (20 [9%] due to adverse events) before 6 months. There were five serious adverse reactions (two in the amitriptyline group and three in the placebo group), and five serious adverse events unrelated to trial medication.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the largest trial of a tricyclic antidepressant in IBS ever conducted. Titrated low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care across multiple outcomes, and was safe and well tolerated. General practitioners should offer low-dose amitriptyline to patients with IBS whose symptoms do not improve with first-line therapies, with appropriate support to guide patient-led dose titration, such as the self-titration document developed for this trial.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (grant reference 16/162/01).

Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Amitriptyline; England; Double-Blind Method; Primary Health Care; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 37858323
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01523-4

Authors: Yo-Taro Shirai, Nobuo Hoshi, Jerrold M Ward...

Thyroid cancer cell lines have been of great value for the study of thyroid cancer. However, the availability of benign thyroid adenoma cell lines is limited. Cell lines were established from thyroid adenomatous nodules that developed in mice treated with the goitrogen amitrole. Expression of epithelial, mesenchymal, and thyroid markers of these established cell lines was determined, and the effect of lentivirus-transduced overexpression of NKX2-1, a master regulator of thyroid development, on the thyroid marker expression was examined. Signal transduction and cell proliferation were evaluated after treatment with insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the selective IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) inhibitor NVP-ADW742. Xenograft studies were performed to examine tumorigenicity of the cells in mice. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to comprehensively determine the genetic mutations in the established two cell lines. Five mouse thyroid adenomatous nodules-derived cell lines named CAT (cells from amitrole-treated thyroids) were established. Among these, two cell lines, CAT458/458s (CAT458s: a subline of CAT458) and CAT459, were found to be positive for epithelial markers and negative for a mesenchymal marker. NKX2-1-positive CAT459 cells showed higher messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of some thyroid differentiation markers than NKX2-1-negative CAT458s cells, and NKX2-1 overexpression increased and/or induced their expression. IGF-I signaling was transduced in thyrotropin receptor ()-negative CAT458s and 459 cells, and NVP-ADW742 suppressed their proliferation. No tumors developed in mice after subcutaneous injection of CAT458s or 459 cells. The WGS analysis revealed the presence of missense mutations in the tumor suppressor genes such as (encoding DNA polymerase kappa) and (encoding transforming growth factor beta 1), while no mutations were found in the prominent thyroid cancer-related genes , (encoding p53), and (encoding telomerase reverse transcriptase). Two mouse thyroid adenomatous nodule-derived cell lines with different thyroid differentiation marker expression were established. NKX2-1 induced partial differentiation of these cell lines. They lacked tumorigenicity and prominent gene mutations involved in thyroid cancer development, while missense mutations were found in some tumor suppressors as revealed by WGS. The CAT458s and 459 provide a new tool to further clarify the process of thyroid multistep carcinogenesis and differentiation.

Topics: Humans; Animals; Mice; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Amitrole; Thyroid Neoplasms; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

PubMed: 38149583
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2023.0341

Authors: Anita Krishnan, Nicholas Silver

INTRODUCTION

Chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) is a disorder that evolves from episodic tension-type headache, with daily or very frequent episodes of headache lasting minutes to days. It affects 4.1% of the general population in the USA, and is more prevalent in women (up to 65% of cases).

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of drug treatments for chronic tension-type headache? What are the effects of non-drug treatments for chronic tension-type headache? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2007 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 50 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: acupuncture; amitriptyline; analgesics; anticonvulsant drugs; benzodiazepines; botulinum toxin; chiropractic and osteopathic manipulations; cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT); Indian head massage; mirtazapine; relaxation and electromyographic biofeedback; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs); and tricyclic antidepressants (other than amitriptyline).

Topics: Amitriptyline; Headache; Humans; Manipulation, Osteopathic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Tension-Type Headache

PubMed: 21696647
DOI: No ID Found

Authors: Louise Ramhøj, Terje Svingen, Caroline Frädrich...

Disruption of the thyroid hormone system during development can impair brain development and cause irreversible damage. Some thyroid hormone system disruptors act by inhibiting the thyroperoxidase (TPO) enzyme, which is key to thyroid hormone synthesis. For the potent TPO-inhibiting drug propylthiouracil (PTU) this has been shown to result in thyroid hormone system disruption and altered brain development in animal studies. However, an outstanding question is which chemicals beside PTU can cause similar effects on brain development and to what degree thyroid hormone insufficiency must be induced to be able to measure adverse effects in rats and their offspring. To start answering these questions, we performed a perinatal exposure study in pregnant rats with two TPO-inhibitors: the drug methimazole (MMI) and the triazole herbicide amitrole. The study involved maternal exposure from gestational day 7 through to postnatal day 22, to MMI (8 and 16 mg/kg body weight/day) or amitrole (25 and 50 mg/kg body weight/day). Both MMI and amitrole reduced serum T4 concentrations in a dose-dependent manner in dams and offspring, with a strong activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis. This reduction in serum T4 led to decreased thyroid hormone-mediated gene expression in the offspring's brains and caused adverse effects on brain function, seen as hyperactivity and decreased habituation in preweaning pups. These dose-dependent effects induced by MMI and amitrole are largely the same as those observed with PTU. This demonstrates that potent TPO-inhibitors can induce effects on brain development in rats and that these effects are driven by T4 deficiency. This knowledge will aid the identification of TPO-inhibiting thyroid hormone system disruptors in a regulatory context and can serve as a starting point in search of more sensitive markers of developmental thyroid hormone system disruption.

Topics: Amitrole; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Antithyroid Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Maternal Exposure; Methimazole; Motor Activity; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Rats; Signal Transduction; Thyroid Function Tests; Thyroid Gland

PubMed: 34757178
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.10.010

Authors: Ayan Mohamud Yusuf, Nina Hagemann, Xiaoni Zhang...

Antidepressants have been reported to enhance stroke recovery independent of the presence of depressive symptoms. They have recently been proposed to exert their mood-stabilizing actions by inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to ceramide. Their restorative action post-ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) still had to be defined. Mice subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion or cerebral microvascular endothelial cells exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation were treated with vehicle or with the chemically and pharmacologically distinct antidepressants amitriptyline, fluoxetine or desipramine. Brain ASM activity significantly increased post-I/R, in line with elevated ceramide levels in microvessels. ASM inhibition by amitriptyline reduced ceramide levels, and increased microvascular length and branching point density in wildtype, but not sphingomyelinase phosphodiesterase-1 ([Smpd1]) (i.e., ASM-deficient) mice, as assessed by 3D light sheet microscopy. In cell culture, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, and desipramine increased endothelial tube formation, migration, VEGFR2 abundance and VEGF release. This effect was abolished by Smpd1 knockdown. Mechanistically, the promotion of angiogenesis by ASM inhibitors was mediated by small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) released from endothelial cells, which exhibited enhanced uptake in target cells. Proteomic analysis of sEVs revealed that ASM deactivation differentially regulated proteins implicated in protein export, focal adhesion, and extracellular matrix interaction. In vivo, the increased angiogenesis was accompanied by a profound brain remodeling response with increased blood-brain barrier integrity, reduced leukocyte infiltrates and increased neuronal survival. Antidepressive drugs potently boost angiogenesis in an ASM-dependent way. The release of sEVs by ASM inhibitors disclosed an elegant target, via which brain remodeling post-I/R can be amplified.

Topics: Amitriptyline; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Brain; Ceramides; Desipramine; Endothelial Cells; Extracellular Vesicles; Fluoxetine; Ischemia; Mice; Proteomics

PubMed: 36038749
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-022-00950-7

Meta-Analysis

Authors: A M Alhowiti, H O Mirghani

OBJECTIVE

Painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PRDN) is a common disabling condition. Pregabalin and amitriptyline are commonly prescribed as the first-line for PPDN despite the contradicting recommendations. There is a need to inform the scientific community regarding first-line pain control among patients with PPDN. This meta-analysis assessed pregabalin and amitriptyline effects on PPDN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Google Scholar; the terms used were amitriptyline, pregabalin, painful diabetic neuropathy, antidepressant, gabapentinoids, quality of life, and adverse events. Boolean operators like AND, and OR were used. Six hundred and thirty-one studies were retrieved, and 37 full texts were screened. However, only six randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

No significant statistical differences between amitriptyline and pregabalin regarding pain score and significant pain reduction (odd ratio, -0.82, 95% CI, -2.21-0.58, and odd ratio, 1.16, 95% CI, 0.76-1.76 respectively). Quality of life, total adverse events, and drug discontinuation were not different between the two drugs (odd ratio, 0.89, 95% CI, -2.11-3.89, odd ratio, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.52-1.85, and odd ratio, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.08-3.15, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant statistical differences between amitriptyline and pregabalin regarding their effects on pain and quality of life. The drugs showed similar total adverse events and drug withdrawal. Further larger real-world studies are needed.

Topics: Pregabalin; Amitriptyline; Humans; Diabetic Neuropathies; Analgesics; Quality of Life

PubMed: 38856135
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202405_36296

Comparative Study

Authors: Kayla D Mashoudy, Luis F Andrade, Nicole Khalil...

This retrospective study investigates the efficacy of 2 treatment regimens, pregabalin alone versus pregabalin combined with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream, in reducing itch in patients with brachioradial pruritus at a tertiary care center. Electronic medical records of 64 brachioradial pruritus patients seen at the University of Miami Itch Center were analyzed. A significant reduction in itch scores was seen with both treatments, with no significant difference between the groups. A small number of patients experienced adverse effects, including drowsiness and weight gain with pregabalin and skin irritation with ketamine, amitriptyline, and lidocaine cream. Ultimately, our findings underscore the potential of utilizing combined therapy for difficult-to-treat brachioradial pruritus cases and implementing individualized approaches for managing neuropathic pruritus. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to establish optimal treatment protocols.

Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Pruritus; Female; Male; Tertiary Care Centers; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Amitriptyline; Lidocaine; Ketamine; Pregabalin; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Adult; Antipruritics; Florida; Skin Cream; Administration, Cutaneous; Electronic Health Records

PubMed: 38916180
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40246

Meta-Analysis

Authors: Christian Lampl, Jan Versijpt, Faisal Mohammad Amin...

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to critically re-appraise the published trials assessing amitriptyline for migraine prophylaxis.

METHODS

We report our methods and results following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized trials of pharmacologic treatments for migraine prophylaxis. We included randomized trials that compared amitriptyline with placebo for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Our outcomes of interest were informed by the Outcome Set for preventive intervention trials in chronic and episodic migraine (COSMIG) and include the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in migraine days per month, migraine days per month, and adverse events leading to discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias by using a modified Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence by using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 10.826 unique records, of which three trials (n = 622) were eligible for data synthesis and analysis. We found moderate certainty evidence that amitriptyline increases the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo (relative risk: 1.60 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.19); absolute risk difference: 165 more per 1,000 (95% CI 47 more to 327 more). We found moderate certainty evidence that amitriptyline increases the proportion of patients who discontinue due to adverse events compared to placebo (risk difference: 0.05 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.10); absolute risk difference: 50 more per 1,000 (95% CI 10 more to 100 more).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that amitriptyline may have a prophylactic role in migraine patients, however these results are far from robust. This warrants further large-scale research to evaluate the role of amitriptyline in migraine prevention.

Topics: Adult; Humans; Amitriptyline; Migraine Disorders; Headache; Transcription Factors

PubMed: 37038134
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01573-6

Review

Authors: A Alcántara-Montero, S R Pacheco-de Vasconcelos

INTRODUCTION

Neuropathic pain (NP) is difficult to treat due to the heterogeneity of causes, symptoms and underlying mechanisms. It constitutes a great medical need that is not covered, and has a high number of therapeutic failures in recent randomized clinical trials.

DEVELOPMENT

This narrative review presents an update on the pharmacological treatment of NP with emphasis on the new published clinical guidelines, new drugs in development, and the new challenges that arise in the therapeutic management of this entity.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line drugs proposed include tricyclic antidepressants (particularly amitriptyline), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (particularly duloxetine), pregabalin, and gabapentin. However, the latest recommendations are still relevant and the most recent clinical studies even question the role of pregabalin as a first-line treatment. Therefore, we consider that periodic updates of the clinical guidelines in NP are necessary to better guide our daily clinical practice and rationalize the use of all available therapeutic options. Furthermore, the expansion of knowledge in NP has generated a series of challenges, such as the development of new drugs based on pathophysiological mechanisms investigated in animals, and the development of optimal therapeutic approaches in clinical trials, based more on personalized than etiological approaches.

Topics: Amitriptyline; Analgesics; Animals; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Gabapentin; Humans; Neuralgia; Pregabalin

PubMed: 35383875
DOI: 10.33588/rn.7408.2021381