-
Clinical & Experimental Optometry Sep 2013The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anisometropia in an urban adult population in the north of Iran.
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anisometropia in an urban adult population in the north of Iran.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted among the 40-64-year-old population in Shahroud, Iran. Random cluster sampling was applied to select 6,311 people. Following an interview, optometric and ophthalmologic examinations, including objective non-cycloplegic refractions, were carried out. The prevalence of anisometropia was reported according to non-cycloplegic refraction and with cut-off points of 0.50, 1.00, 2.00 and 3.00 D.
RESULTS
Of the sampled people, 5,190 (82.2 per cent) took part in the study. After considering exclusion criteria, data from 4,918 participants were included in the final analysis. Most participants were female (57.6 per cent) and the average age (with standard deviation) was 50.7 ± 6.2 years. The prevalence of anisometropia with cut-off points of 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 D were 23.1 (95%CI: 22.0-24.3), 7.7 (95%CI: 7.0-8.4) and 3.2 per cent (95%CI: 2.7-3.7), respectively. The prevalence of severe anisometropia (3.00 D or more) was 1.9 per cent (95%CI: 1.5-2.3). The odds ratio (OR) of anisometropia was 1.06 times higher for every year of increasing age. The OR of anisometropia in participants with cataract was 2.78 times more than in those without (p < 0.001). Anisometropia was more frequent among participants with unilateral cataract (21.7 per cent) compared to those with bilateral cataract (13.4 per cent). Anisometropia of 1.00 D or more was significantly more prevalent among myopic participants compared to hyperopic participants (13.8 versus 12.7 per cent, p < 0.001) and there was a stronger association between anisometropia and myopia (OR = 2.93) than hyperopia (OR = 2.23). With increasing educational level, the prevalence of anisometropia decreased significantly (p < 0.001). The prevalence of aniso-astigmatism of 1.00 D or more was 11.1 per cent (95%CI: 10.2-11.9).
CONCLUSION
In the present study, the prevalence of anisometropia in Iran was not negligible; however, it is less than in Eastern Asia. Myopia, cataract, age and educational level were associated with anisometropia.
Topics: Adult; Anisometropia; Astigmatism; Cataract; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Iran; Male; Middle Aged; Myopia; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Urban Population
PubMed: 23560991
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12045 -
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual... Aug 2011In uncorrected anisometropia, protracted dichoptic stimulation may result in interocular inhibition, which may be a contributing factor in amblyopia development. This... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
PURPOSE
In uncorrected anisometropia, protracted dichoptic stimulation may result in interocular inhibition, which may be a contributing factor in amblyopia development. This study investigates the relationship between interocular interactions and anisometropic amblyopia.
METHODS
Three visual functions (low-contrast acuity, contrast sensitivity, and alignment sensitivity) were measured in the nondominant eye of 44 children aged 5 to 11 years: 10 with normal vision, 17 with anisometropia without amblyopia, and 17 with anisometropic amblyopia. The dominant eye was either fully or partially occluded. The difference in nondominant eye visual function between the full-and partial-occlusion conditions was termed the interaction index. The index of each visual function was compared between subject groups. A higher index indicates stronger inhibition of nondominant eye function with partial occlusion of the dominant eye. Amblyopic children had 6 months of therapy (refractive correction and occlusion), and the reduction in interocular difference in high-contrast acuity was regarded as the treatment outcome. The relationships of the interaction index with the degree of anisometropia, the severity of amblyopia, and the treatment outcomes were examined.
RESULTS
The acuity interaction index was significantly higher in anisometropic children with amblyopia than in those without (P = 0.003). It was positively correlated with the degree of anisometropia (r(s) = 0.35, P = 0.042) and the amblyopic treatment outcomes (r(s) = 0.54, P = 0.038). No such difference or association was found between the contrast sensitivity or alignment sensitivity interaction index and anisometropic amblyopia.
CONCLUSIONS
Interocular interactions are associated with amblyopia, the degree of anisometropia, and amblyopia treatment outcomes, but these associations are visual function dependent.
Topics: Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Child; Child, Preschool; Eyeglasses; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Refraction, Ocular; Sensory Deprivation; Treatment Outcome; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 21775663
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6755 -
Medicine Nov 2020To compare distant visual acuity (DVA) and near visual acuity (NVA) in amblyopia and evaluate if NVA can be used to diagnose amblyopia.A retrospective study was...
To compare distant visual acuity (DVA) and near visual acuity (NVA) in amblyopia and evaluate if NVA can be used to diagnose amblyopia.A retrospective study was performed on 73 patients diagnosed with amblyopia based on DVA, by measuring their NVA and comparing the DVA and NVA. The NVA was measured by Snellen chart at 30 cm and the DVA was measured by Dr Hahn vision test chart at 5m. The patients' age, type of amblyopia, spherical equivalent, the difference between spherical equivalent and the fellow eye spherical equivalent spherical, and prism diopter (PD) were evaluated and their relationship with the difference between the DVA and NVA was analyzed.The NVA was significantly better than the DVA in amblyopia (P = .000). The difference between the DVA and NVA was not significantly related to the type of amblyopia (P = .600) or the patients' age(P = .351). Also, the difference between the DVA and NVA was not significantly affected by the spherical equivalent (P = .425) or the difference between spherical equivalent and the fellow eye spherical equivalent (P = .212) in anisometropia amblyopia, and also not by the PD (P = .882) in strabismus amblyopia.In amblyopes, the NVA was better than the DVA before amblyopia treatment. The difference between the DVA and NVA was not affected by age, type of amblyopia, spherical equivalent, the difference between spherical equivalent and the fellow eye spherical equivalent spherical, or PD. Therefore, it should be taken into consideration that NVA could underestimate the severity of amblyopia and affect the accuracy at diagnosing amblyopia.
Topics: Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Child; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Male; Severity of Illness Index; Strabismus; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33181679
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023111 -
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 2022The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and determinants of refractive error (RE) and related ocular morbidities among preparatory and secondary Saudi...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and determinants of refractive error (RE) and related ocular morbidities among preparatory and secondary Saudi students in Riyadh.
METHODS
This study was conducted in 2017-2018 at preparatory (12-14 years) and secondary (15-18 years) schools. A "Spot Screener" was used to determine if the child passed or failed a refraction test. Fail test meant RE ≥ ± 0.50 D. Data were collected on refractive status in each eye, anisometropia, and strabismus. The type of RE was estimated and analysis was performed for an association to gender, age, and education levels. The use of spectacle while screening defined the compliance of spectacle wear.
RESULTS
The study sample was comprised of 708 Saudi students. There were 59.5% of boys. The prevalence of RE was 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.0, 47.3). The prevalence of RE in preparatory and secondary students was 44.5% and 43.2%, respectively. The proportion of myopia (≥ -0.5 D) and hyperopia (≥ +0.5 D) among students with RE was 82.2% and 17.8%, respectively. Family history of RE was positively associated to RE in students (odds ratio: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.5]). The current screening initiative identified 45 (6.4%) new cases of RE who required spectacles. The compliance rate for using visual aid among students with RE was 74.6%. The prevalence of anisometropia and strabismus was 3.0% and 4.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
A high proportion of Saudi adolescence in Riyadh have RE. Periodic ophthalmic assessment and refractive services are recommended as part of school health screening initiatives.
PubMed: 35388239
DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_114_21 -
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Aug 2021To determine the prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment in Down syndrome (DS) patients compared to normal controls.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment in Down syndrome (DS) patients compared to normal controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cycloplegic refraction was tested in 213 DS patients and 184 normal age- and gender-matched controls using autorefraction followed by retinoscopy. Data from the worse eye of each case were used in the analyses.
RESULTS
In the DS and control groups, respectively, mean age was 17.2±4.8 and 17.2±4.4 years (p=0.993) and 53.0% and 49.5% were male (p=0.473). In the DS and control groups, respectively, mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.13±4.47 and -4.15±3.04 diopters (D) in myopics (p=0.050) and 2.47±1.64 and 2.36±2.04 D in hyperopics (p=0.482), mean cylinder error was -2.17±1.39 and -2.05±1.57 D (p=0.451), mean J0 was -0.03±0.89 and 0.12±0.76 D (p=0.086), and mean J45 was 0.11±1.02 and -0.13±1.03 D (p=0.024). The prevalence of oblique astigmatism was higher in the DS group (20.4% vs. 6.1%) while against-the-rule astigmatism was more prevalent in the control group (84.0% vs. 71.6%) (p<0.001). The prevalence of anisometropia was not significantly different between the groups (19.4% vs. 13.8%). Visual impairment was detected in 11.7% of the DS and 0.5% of the control group (p<0.001). The prevalence of amblyopia was 36.3% and 3.8% in the DS and control groups, respectively (p<0.001). Based on the multiple model, only absolute SE inversely correlated with age and differed between males and females (all p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
In DS patients, the prevalence rates of refractive errors, amblyopia, and visual impairment are higher than those in non-DS individuals, and emmetropization appears to be either defective or slow. Cylinder error is stable in this age range, but the rotation of astigmatism axis is different from normal samples.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anisometropia; Astigmatism; Child; Down Syndrome; Female; Humans; Male; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors; Young Adult
PubMed: 34461695
DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.52959 -
Optometry and Vision Science : Official... Apr 2015To analyze changes in myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia after laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), including aggressive posterior retinopathy of...
PURPOSE
To analyze changes in myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia after laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), including aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP), in Mainland Chinese children.
METHODS
This was a retrospective study of children who had laser treatment for threshold or type 1 prethreshold ROP between January 2004 and October 2012 and age-matched control subjects with spontaneously regressed type 2 prethreshold ROP. One hundred fifteen eyes of 60 patients were included as the laser-treated group, which were further subdivided into APROP and non-APROP groups. Thirty-seven eyes of 20 patients who were diagnosed during the same period were included as the control group. Between 12 and 36 months postnatal age (PA) (mean [±SD], 22.9 [±8.1] months), cycloplegic retinoscopy was performed to measure refractive outcomes. A general linear model was used to analyze refractive changes among different groups at each PA.
RESULTS
After adjusting for PA and the correlation between right and left eyes, the magnitude and proportion of astigmatism (p = 0.04 and p = 0.004, respectively) and myopia (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006, respectively) were greater in the laser-treated group than in the control group. The differences in myopia were even greater in children with APROP than those with non-APROP, whereas the differences in astigmatism were not. Eyes with APROP had higher prevalence of high myopia and spherical anisometropia than the control (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively) and the non-APROP groups (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.04, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Children with laser treatment for ROP, including APROP, tended to have higher myopia, astigmatism, and anisometropia, which may progress to amblyopia. These findings highlight the need for regular refractive screening after laser treatment of ROP.
Topics: Anisometropia; Asian People; Astigmatism; Child, Preschool; China; Female; History, Ancient; History, Medieval; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Laser Coagulation; Male; Myopia; Prevalence; Retinopathy of Prematurity; Retinoscopy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 25756334
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000533 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022To investigate the development of refraction in anisometropic amblyopia who had been with patching therapy.
PURPOSE
To investigate the development of refraction in anisometropic amblyopia who had been with patching therapy.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 37,528 medical records of the amblyopes who had been treated with patching therapy between July 2003 and January 2020 at the School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. We included unilateral anisometropic amblyopia with a follow-up length of not < 2 years. In total, 371 cases were enrolled and followed up for a mean of 4.76 ± 2.11 years. The subjects were then divided into different groups and periods according to their initial spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the amblyopic eye. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to calculate the annual change of SE.
RESULTS
The annual changes in SE were -0.32 (-0.35 to -0.30) and -0.16 (-0.19 to -0.14) D/yr for the amblyopic eye and the fellow eye, respectively. The annual changes in SE of amblyopic eyes during the treatment period and the successfully treated period were -0.36 (-0.43 to -0.29; 95% CI) and -0.27 (-0.32 to -0.23; 95% CI) D/yr, respectively; the annual SE changes of the fellow eye during the treatment period and the successfully-treated period were -0.07 (-0.14 to -0.01; 95% CI) and -0.18 (-0.22 to -0.14; 95% CI) D/yr, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The amblyopic eye experienced a significantly greater degree of refractive error changes than the fellow eye and underwent a continuous refractive error reduction before and after 7 years old. After the patching therapy was terminated, emmetropization in the amblyopic eye remained synchronized, whereas the refractive error change was increased in the fellow eye.
PubMed: 36330057
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.959085 -
Optometry and Vision Science : Official... Jan 2014Anisometropia shows an exponential increase in prevalence with increasing age based on cross-sectional studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal...
PURPOSE
Anisometropia shows an exponential increase in prevalence with increasing age based on cross-sectional studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal changes in anisometropia in all refractive components in older observers and to assess the influence of early cataract development.
METHODS
Refractive error was assessed at two time points separated by approximately 12 years in 118 older observers (aged 67.1 and 79.3 years at the two test times). Anisometropia defined as greater than or equal to 1.00 D was calculated for all refractive components. The subjects had intact ocular lenses in both eyes throughout the study. Lens evaluations were performed at the second test using the Lens Opacities Classification System III.
RESULTS
All refractive components approximately doubled in prevalence of anisometropia. Spherical equivalent anisometropia changed from 16.1 to 32.2%. Similar changes were found for spherical error (17 to 38.1%), primary astigmatism (7.6 to 17.8%), and oblique astigmatism (14.4 to 29.7%). Many who did not have anisometropia at the first visit subsequently developed anisometropia (e.g., 26.3% for spherical error and 22.9% for oblique cylinder). The onset of anisometropia occurred at all ages within the studied age range, with no particular preference for any one age. A small number lost anisometropia over time. Individual comparisons of refractive error changes in the two eyes in combination with nuclear lens changes showed that early changes in nuclear sclerosis in the two eyes could account for a large proportion of anisometropia (~40%), but unequal hyperopic shift in the spherical component in the two eyes was the primary cause of the anisometropia.
CONCLUSIONS
Anisometropia is at least 10 times more common in the elderly than in children, and anisometropia develops in all refractive components in the oldest observers. Clinicians need to be aware of this common condition that could lead to binocular vision problems and potentially cause falls in the elderly.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Anisometropia; Astigmatism; Cataract; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Lens, Crystalline; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence
PubMed: 24276578
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000114 -
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual... Jun 2023To identify gene variants associated with anisometropia development in children.
PURPOSE
To identify gene variants associated with anisometropia development in children.
METHODS
This is a population-based, cross-sectional, and longitudinal genetic association study involving 1057 children aged 6 to 10 years with both baseline and 3-year follow-up data. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), ZC3H11B rs4373767, ZFHX1B rs13382811, KCNQ5 rs7744813, SNTB1 rs7839488, PAX6 rs644242, and GJD2 rs524952 were analyzed in all children. Anisometropia was defined by an interocular difference in SE of ≥1 diopter (D) (Aniso-SE) and an interocular difference in axial length (AL) of ≥0.3 mm (Aniso-AL), respectively. Genetic associations of individual SNPs and joint SNP effects were analyzed.
RESULTS
ZFHX1B rs13382811 was associated nominally with Aniso-AL (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = 0.003) at baseline. At 3 years, rs13382811 was significantly associated with Aniso-AL (OR, 1.49; P = 0.001) and became nominally associated with Aniso-SE (OR, 1.40; P = 0.01). In addition, PAX6 rs644242 was significantly associated with Aniso-AL at 3 years (OR, 1.45; P = 0.002). At the 3-year follow-up, PAX6 rs644242 was associated significantly with Aniso-AL development (OR, 1.61; P = 0.0003) and nominally with Aniso-SE development (P = 0.03) in children who were not anisometropic at baseline, whereas ZFHX1B rs13382811 was associated nominally with Aniso-AL development (P = 0.02). An additive SNP analysis indicated children carrying the risk allele T of ZFHX1B rs13382811 and allele A of PAX6 rs644242 might have a 4.33- and 6.90-fold of increased risk of Aniso-SE and Aniso-AL development by 3 years, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This study identified two susceptible gene variants, ZFHX1B rs13382811 and PAX6 rs644242, for anisometropia development in Hong Kong Chinese children, implicating their role in imbalanced refractive change and axial elongation between both eyes.
Topics: Child; Humans; Anisometropia; Axial Length, Eye; Cross-Sectional Studies; East Asian People; Eye; Hong Kong; PAX6 Transcription Factor; Zinc Finger E-box Binding Homeobox 2
PubMed: 37266952
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.7.6 -
The British Journal of Ophthalmology Jun 2018To investigate the presence of asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.
BACKGROUND/AIMS
To investigate the presence of asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.
METHODS
Accommodation in each eye and binocular vergence were measured simultaneously using a PlusoptiX SO4 photorefractor in 26 children aged 4-8 years with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia and 13 controls (group age-matched) while they viewed a detailed target moving in depth.
RESULTS
Without spectacles, only 5 (19%) anisometropes demonstrated symmetrical accommodation (within the 95% CI of the mean gain of the sound eye of the anisometropic group), whereas 21 (81%) demonstrated asymmetrical accommodation. Of those, 15 (58%) showed aniso-accommodation and 6 (23%) demonstrated 'anti-accommodation' (greater accommodation for distance than for near). In those with anti-accommodation, the response gain in the sound eye was (0.93±0.20) while that of the amblyopic eye showed a negative accommodation gain of (-0.44±0.23). Anti-accommodation resolved with spectacles. Vergence gains were typical in those with symmetrical and asymmetrical accommodation.
CONCLUSION
The majority of hyperopic anisometropic amblyopes demonstrated non-consensual asymmetrical accommodation. Approximately one in four demonstrated anti-accommodation.
Topics: Accommodation, Ocular; Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Convergence, Ocular; Female; Humans; Hyperopia; Male; Refraction, Ocular; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 29051327
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310282