Authors: Ganesh Raghu, Martine Remy-Jardin, Luca Richeldi...

This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. ) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. ) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. ) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. ) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

Topics: Antacids; Biopsy; Humans; Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; United States

PubMed: 35486072
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0399ST

Review

Authors: Vandana Garg, Prashant Narang, Ritu Taneja...

Heartburn and acid regurgitation are the typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Despite the availability of several treatment options, antacids remain the mainstay treatment for gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms based on their efficacy, safety, and over-the-counter availability. Antacids are generally recommended for adults and children at least 12 years old, and the FDA recommends antacids as the first-line treatment for heartburn in pregnancy. This narrative review summarizes the mechanism, features, and limitations related to different antacid ingredients and techniques available to study the acid neutralization and buffering capacity of antacid formulations. Using supporting clinical evidence for different antacid ingredients, it also discusses the importance of antacids as OTC medicines and first-line therapies for heartburn, particularly in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, in which reliance on self-care has increased. The review will also assist pharmacists and other healthcare professionals in helping individuals with heartburn to make informed self-care decisions and educating them to ensure that antacids are used in an optimal, safe, and effective manner.

Topics: Adult; Antacids; Child; Female; Heartburn; Humans; Pandemics; Pregnancy; Self-Management; COVID-19 Drug Treatment

PubMed: 35343261
DOI: 10.1177/03000605221086457

Review

Authors: Mansour Altuwaijri

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs in approximately two-thirds of all pregnancies. Around 25% of pregnant women experience heartburn daily. Symptomatic GERD usually presents in the first trimester and progresses throughout pregnancy. The treatment goal is to alleviate heartburn and regurgitation without jeopardizing the pregnancy or its outcome. An English language electronic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Reviews was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, management recommendations and reviews of GERD and its treatment during pregnancy. The search period was defined by the date of inception of each database. The treatment in a pregnant GERD patient should follow the step-up approach, starting with lifestyle modification as the first step. If heartburn is severe, medication should be started after consultation with a physician (Recommendation Grade C). The preferred choice of antacids is calcium-containing antacids (Recommendation Grade A). If symptoms persist with antacids Sucralfate can be introduced at a 1g oral tablet, 3 times daily (Recommendation Grade C). Followed by histamine-2 receptor antagonist (Recommendation Grade B). Inadequate control while on histamine-2 receptor antagonist and antacid may mandate a step-up to proton pump inhibitors along with antacids as rescue medication for breakthrough GERD (Recommendation Grade C). This article presented the treatment recommendations for pregnant women with typical GERD, based on the best available evidence.

Topics: Antacids; Calcium; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Heartburn; Histamine; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Pregnancy; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Sucralfate

PubMed: 36107559
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030487

Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Doxepin Mouthwash or Diphenhydramine-Lidocaine-Antacid Mouthwash vs Placebo on Radiotherapy-Related Oral Mucositis Pain: The Alliance A221304 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors: Terence T Sio, Jennifer G Le-Rademacher, James L Leenstra...

IMPORTANCE

Oral mucositis causes substantial morbidity during head and neck radiotherapy. In a randomized study, doxepin mouthwash was shown to reduce oral mucositis-related pain. A common mouthwash comprising diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid is also widely used.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of doxepin mouthwash or diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash for the treatment of oral mucositis-related pain.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A phase 3 randomized trial was conducted from November 1, 2014, to May 16, 2016, at 30 US institutions and included 275 patients who underwent definitive head and neck radiotherapy, had an oral mucositis pain score of 4 points or greater (scale, 0-10), and were followed up for a maximum of 28 days.

INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-two patients were randomized to doxepin mouthwash (25 mg/5 mL water); 91 patients to diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid; and 92 patients to placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The primary end point was total oral mucositis pain reduction (defined by the area under the curve and adjusted for baseline pain score) during the 4 hours after a single dose of doxepin mouthwash or diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash compared with a single dose of placebo. The minimal clinically important difference was a 3.5-point change. The secondary end points included drowsiness, unpleasant taste, and stinging or burning. All scales ranged from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).

RESULTS

Among the 275 patients randomized (median age, 61 years; 58 [21%] women), 227 (83%) completed treatment per protocol. Mucositis pain during the first 4 hours decreased by 11.6 points in the doxepin mouthwash group, by 11.7 points in the diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash group, and by 8.7 points in the placebo group. The between-group difference was 2.9 points (95% CI, 0.2-6.0; P = .02) for doxepin mouthwash vs placebo and 3.0 points (95% CI, 0.1-5.9; P = .004) for diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash vs placebo. More drowsiness was reported with doxepin mouthwash vs placebo (by 1.5 points [95% CI, 0-4.0]; P = .03), unpleasant taste (by 1.5 points [95% CI, 0-3.0]; P = .002), and stinging or burning (by 4.0 points [95% CI, 2.5-5.0]; P < .001). Maximum grade 3 adverse events for the doxepin mouthwash occurred in 3 patients (4%); diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash, 3 (4%); and placebo, 2 (2%). Fatigue was reported by 5 patients (6%) in the doxepin mouthwash group and no patients in the diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy, the use of doxepin mouthwash or diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash vs placebo significantly reduced oral mucositis pain during the first 4 hours after administration; however, the effect size was less than the minimal clinically important difference. Further research is needed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety for both mouthwashes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02229539.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antacids; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method; Doxepin; Fatigue; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Lidocaine; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Mouthwashes; Pain; Radiation Injuries; Stomatitis

PubMed: 30990550
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.3504

Meta-Analysis Review

Authors: D A Leiman, B P Riff, S Morgan...

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is highly effective. However, in some patients, especially those with nonerosive reflux disease or atypical GERD symptoms, acid-suppressive therapy with PPIs is not as successful. Alginates are medications that work through an alternative mechanism by displacing the postprandial gastric acid pocket. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefit of alginate-containing compounds in the treatment of patients with symptoms of GERD. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched through October 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing alginate-containing compounds to placebo, antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), or PPIs for the treatment of GERD symptoms. Additional studies were identified through a bibliography review. Non-English studies and those with pediatric patients were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models to calculate odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the I2 statistic. Analyses were stratified by type of comparator. The search strategy yielded 665 studies and 15 (2.3%) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were included in the meta-analysis (N = 2095 subjects). Alginate-based therapies increased the odds of resolution of GERD symptoms when compared to placebo or antacids (OR: 4.42; 95% CI 2.45-7.97) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 71%, P = .001). Compared to PPIs or H2RAs, alginates appear less effective but the pooled estimate was not statistically significant (OR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.27-1.22). Alginates are more effective than placebo or antacids for treating GERD symptoms.

Topics: Adult; Alginates; Antacids; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucuronic Acid; Hexuronic Acids; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 28375448
DOI: 10.1093/dote/dow020

Review

Authors: Juan C Vazquez

INTRODUCTION

Heartburn is a common complaint during pregnancy; the incidence is reported to be between 17% and 45%.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic overview and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of interventions to prevent or treat heartburn in pregnancy? We searched Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to December 2014 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review).

RESULTS

At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 80 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 59 records were screened for inclusion in the review. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 58 studies and the further review of one full publication. The full article evaluated did not meet our reporting criteria, and thus no new evidence was added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for two PICO combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for six interventions, based on information about the effectiveness and safety of acid-suppressing drugs, antacids with or without alginates, raising the head of the bed, reducing caffeine intake, reducing intake of fatty foods, and reducing the size and frequency of meals.

Topics: Antacids; Beds; Diet; Female; Heartburn; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications

PubMed: 26348641
DOI: No ID Found

Review

Authors: Chan Hyuk Park, Sang Kil Lee

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. The prevalence of GERD is increasing worldwide and in Asia-Pacific. The latest Korean guidelines for GERD were published in 2012, and several international guidelines and consensus statements for the management of GERD have also been recently published. Here, we review these guidelines and consensus statements in order to provide a better understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.

Topics: Antacids; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Proton Pump Inhibitors

PubMed: 30845382
DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2019.73.2.70

Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Megumi Kubota, Kazuya Ito, Kazuhiko Tomimoto...

OBJECTIVE

Chronic functional constipation is a frequent condition. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the probiotic Lactobacillus (L.) reuteri DSM 17938 and magnesium oxide (MgO) for relieving chronic functional constipation in children.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, and parallel-group trial was conducted in five pediatric outpatient clinics in Japan. Sixty patients who were more than six months old and under six years of age with a diagnosis of functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria were randomly divided into three groups: group A (n = 20) received L. reuteri DSM 17938 and lactose hydrate as a placebo of MgO; group B (n = 19) received L. reuteri DSM 17938 and MgO; and group C (n = 21) received a placebo of L. reuteri DSM 17938 and MgO.

RESULTS

All three groups exhibited significant improvement in defecation frequency in the fourth week compared with the baseline condition (group A: p < 0.05; group B: p < 0.05; group C: p < 0.05). The MgO group and combination group showed a significant decrease in stool consistency, but the L. reuteri DSM 17938 group did not (group A: p = 0.079; group B: p < 0.05; group C: p < 0.05). MgO significantly suppressed the presence of the genus Dialister. Defecation frequency negatively correlated with the frequency of Clostridiales-belonging bacteria among the gut microbiome.

CONCLUSIONS

L. rueteri DSM 17938 and MgO were both effective in the management of functional constipation in young children. MgO caused an imbalance in the gastrointestinal microbiome, which was not the case in the probiotic group.

Topics: Antacids; Child, Preschool; Chronic Disease; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infant; Limosilactobacillus reuteri; Magnesium Oxide; Male; Probiotics

PubMed: 31952280
DOI: 10.3390/nu12010225

Authors: J G Feeney

Topics: Antacids; Esophagogastric Junction; Female; Heartburn; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Progesterone

PubMed: 6803867
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.284.6323.1138

Review

Authors: Paul Moayyedi, Brendan Delaney

INTRODUCTION

Up to 25% of people have symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), but only 25-40% of these have oesophagitis visible on endoscopy. About 80% of people with GORD will have recurrent symptoms if treatment is stopped, and severe oesophagitis may result in oesophageal stricture or Barrett's oesophagus.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of initial treatment of GORD associated with oesophagitis? What are the effects of maintenance treatment of GORD associated with oesophagitis? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to July 2007 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 29 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antacids/alginates, H(2) receptor antagonists, laparoscopic surgery, lifestyle advice/modification, motility stimulants, open surgery, and proton pump inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Antacids; Esophagitis; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Laparoscopy; Life Style; Proton Pump Inhibitors

PubMed: 19450297
DOI: No ID Found