-
Annals of Emergency Medicine Mar 2018We provide recommendations for stocking of antidotes used in emergency departments (EDs). An expert panel representing diverse perspectives (clinical pharmacology,... (Review)
Review
We provide recommendations for stocking of antidotes used in emergency departments (EDs). An expert panel representing diverse perspectives (clinical pharmacology, medical toxicology, critical care medicine, hematology/oncology, hospital pharmacy, emergency medicine, emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric critical care medicine, poison centers, hospital administration, and public health) was formed to create recommendations for antidote stocking. Using a standardized summary of the medical literature, the primary reviewer for each antidote proposed guidelines for antidote stocking to the full panel. The panel used a formal iterative process to reach their recommendation for both the quantity of antidote that should be stocked and the acceptable timeframe for its delivery. The panel recommended consideration of 45 antidotes; 44 were recommended for stocking, of which 23 should be immediately available. In most hospitals, this timeframe requires that the antidote be stocked in a location that allows immediate availability. Another 14 antidotes were recommended for availability within 1 hour of the decision to administer, allowing the antidote to be stocked in the hospital pharmacy if the hospital has a mechanism for prompt delivery of antidotes. The panel recommended that each hospital perform a formal antidote hazard vulnerability assessment to determine its specific need for antidote stocking. Antidote administration is an important part of emergency care. These expert recommendations provide a tool for hospitals that offer emergency care to provide appropriate care of poisoned patients.
Topics: Antidotes; Consensus; Emergency Medical Services; Guidelines as Topic; Hospitals; Humans; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; Poisoning; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 28669553
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.021 -
Archives of Toxicology Feb 2022Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose can cause hepatotoxicity and even liver failure. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is still the only FDA-approved antidote against APAP overdose... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose can cause hepatotoxicity and even liver failure. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is still the only FDA-approved antidote against APAP overdose 40 years after its introduction. The standard oral or intravenous dosing regimen of NAC is highly effective for patients with moderate overdoses who present within 8 h of APAP ingestion. However, for late-presenting patients or after ingestion of very large overdoses, the efficacy of NAC is diminished. Thus, additional antidotes with an extended therapeutic window may be needed for these patients. Fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole), a clinically approved antidote against methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning, recently emerged as a promising candidate. In animal studies, fomepizole effectively prevented APAP-induced liver injury by inhibiting Cyp2E1 when treated early, and by inhibiting c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and oxidant stress when treated after the metabolism phase. In addition, fomepizole treatment, unlike NAC, prevented APAP-induced kidney damage and promoted hepatic regeneration in mice. These mechanisms of protection (inhibition of Cyp2E1 and JNK) and an extended efficacy compared to NAC could be verified in primary human hepatocytes. Furthermore, the formation of oxidative metabolites was eliminated in healthy volunteers using the established treatment protocol for fomepizole in toxic alcohol and ethylene glycol poisoning. These mechanistic findings, together with the excellent safety profile after methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning and after an APAP overdose, suggest that fomepizole may be a promising antidote against APAP overdose that could be useful as adjunct treatment to NAC. Clinical trials to support this hypothesis are warranted.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Acetylcysteine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Animals; Antidotes; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Overdose; Fomepizole; Hepatocytes; Humans; Mice
PubMed: 34978586
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03211-z -
Biomolecules Feb 2020High arsenic (As) levels in food and drinking water, or under some occupational conditions, can precipitate chronic toxicity and in some cases cancer. Millions of... (Review)
Review
High arsenic (As) levels in food and drinking water, or under some occupational conditions, can precipitate chronic toxicity and in some cases cancer. Millions of people are exposed to unacceptable amounts of As through drinking water and food. Highly exposed individuals may develop acute, subacute, or chronic signs of poisoning, characterized by skin lesions, cardiovascular symptoms, and in some cases, multi-organ failure. Inorganic arsenite(III) and organic arsenicals with the general formula R-As are bound tightly to thiol groups, particularly to vicinal dithiols such as dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA), which together with some seleno-enzymes constitute vulnerable targets for the toxic action of As. In addition, R-As-compounds have even higher affinity to selenol groups, e.g., in thioredoxin reductase that also possesses a thiol group vicinal to the selenol. Inhibition of this and other ROS scavenging seleno-enzymes explain the oxidative stress associated with arsenic poisoning. The development of chelating agents, such as the dithiols BAL (dimercaptopropanol), DMPS (dimercapto-propanesulfonate) and DMSA (dimercaptosuccinic acid), took advantage of the fact that As had high affinity towards vicinal dithiols. Primary prevention by reducing exposure of the millions of people exposed to unacceptable As levels should be the prioritized strategy. However, in acute and subacute and even some cases with chronic As poisonings chelation treatment with therapeutic dithiols, in particular DMPS appears promising as regards alleviation of symptoms. In acute cases, initial treatment with BAL combined with DMPS should be considered.
Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Arsenic; Arsenic Poisoning; Arsenicals; Chelating Agents; Dimercaprol; Drinking Water; Humans; Models, Molecular; Occupational Exposure; Oxidative Stress; Succimer; Unithiol; Water Pollutants, Chemical
PubMed: 32033229
DOI: 10.3390/biom10020235 -
Clinical and Applied... Jul 2017Bleeding is the most common complication of all anticoagulants. Any bleeding patient on an anticoagulant should be risk-stratified based on hemodynamic instability,... (Review)
Review
Bleeding is the most common complication of all anticoagulants. Any bleeding patient on an anticoagulant should be risk-stratified based on hemodynamic instability, source of bleeding, and degree of blood loss. Although minor bleed may be managed with discontinuation of anticoagulant, major bleed may require transfusion of blood products and use of specific antidote. The residual effects of each anticoagulant may be monitored with distinct coagulation assay. Intravenous or oral vitamin K can reverse the effect of warfarin within 24 to 48 hours and is indicated for any bleeding, international normalized ratio of >10 or 4.5 to 10 in patients with other risk factors for bleeding. Fresh frozen plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may be necessary in major bleeding related to warfarin. Protamine sulfate reverses the effect of unfractionated heparin completely and of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) partially. Idarucizumab has recently been approved in United States for dabigatran reversal, whereas andexanet alfa is expected to get approved in the near future for reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors. The PCC may reverse the effect of rivaroxaban to some extent, but no data are available regarding reversal of apixaban and edoxaban. Aripazine has shown promising results to reverse the effects of LMWH, fondaparinux, and direct oral anticoagulants but is still in the developmental phase.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Plasma; Protamines
PubMed: 27789605
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616675970 -
Journal of Medical Toxicology :... Apr 2019Cyanide, a metabolic poison, is a rising chemial threat and ingestion is the most common route of exposure. Terrorist organizations have threatened to attack the USA and... (Review)
Review
Cyanide, a metabolic poison, is a rising chemial threat and ingestion is the most common route of exposure. Terrorist organizations have threatened to attack the USA and international food and water supplies. The toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of oral cyanide are unique, resulting in high-dose exposures, severe symptoms, and slower onset of symptoms. There are no FDA-approved therapies tested for oral cyanide ingestions and no approved intramuscular or oral therapies, which would be valuable in mass casualty settings. The aim of this review is to evaluate the risks of oral cyanide and its unique toxicokinetics, as well as address the lack of available rapid diagnostics and treatments for mass casualty events. We will also review current strategies for developing new therapies. A review of the literature using the PRISMA checklist detected 7284 articles, screened 1091, and included 59 articles or other reports. Articles referenced in this review were specific to risk, clinical presentation, diagnostics, current treatments, and developing therapies. Current diagnostics of cyanide exposure can take hours or days, which can delay treatment. Moreover, current therapies for cyanide poisoning are administered intravenously and are not specifically tested for oral exposures, which can result in higher cyanide doses and unique toxicodynamics. New therapies developed for oral cyanide exposures that are easily delivered, safe, and can be administered quickly by first responders in a mass casualty event are needed. Current research is aimed at identifying an antidote that is safe, effective, easy to administer, and has a rapid onset of action.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antidotes; Cyanides; Humans; Mass Casualty Incidents; Poisoning; Risk; Terrorism; Toxicokinetics
PubMed: 30539383
DOI: 10.1007/s13181-018-0688-y -
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology &... Jan 2016Flumazenil is used for the reversal of benzodiazepine overdose. Serious adverse events (SAEs) including seizures and cardiac arrhythmias have been reported in patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Adverse Events Associated with Flumazenil Treatment for the Management of Suspected Benzodiazepine Intoxication--A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses of Randomised Trials.
Flumazenil is used for the reversal of benzodiazepine overdose. Serious adverse events (SAEs) including seizures and cardiac arrhythmias have been reported in patients treated with flumazenil, and the clinical advantage of flumazenil treatment has been questioned. The objective was to assess the risk of (S)AEs associated with the use of flumazenil in patients with impaired consciousness due to known or suspected benzodiazepine overdose. Studies included in the meta-analyses were identified by literature search in Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase using combinations of the words flumazenil, benzodiazepines, anti-anxiety agents, poisoning, toxicity and overdose. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in verified or suspected benzodiazepine overdose patients comparing treatment with flumazenil versus placebo were included. Pre-defined outcome measures were AEs, SAEs and mortality. Thirteen trials with a total of 994 randomised (990 evaluable) patients were included. AEs were significantly more common in the flumazenil group (138/498) compared with the placebo group (47/492) (risk ratio: 2.85; 95% confidence interval: 2.11-3.84; p < 0.00001). SAEs were also significantly more common in the flumazenil group compared with the placebo group (12/498 versus 2/492; risk ratio: 3.81; 95% CI: 1.28-11.39; p = 0.02). The most common AEs in the flumazenil group were agitation and gastrointestinal symptoms, whereas the most common SAEs were supraventricular arrhythmia and convulsions. No patients died during the blinded phase of the RCTs. The use of flumazenil in a population admitted at the emergency department with known or suspected benzodiazepine intoxication is associated with a significantly increased risk of (S)AEs compared with placebo. Flumazenil should not be used routinely, and the harms and benefits should be considered carefully in every patient.
Topics: Antidotes; Benzodiazepines; Drug Overdose; Flumazenil; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, GABA-A
PubMed: 26096314
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12434 -
Nature Communications May 2023The "death cap", Amanita phalloides, is the world's most poisonous mushroom, responsible for 90% of mushroom-related fatalities. The most fatal component of the death...
The "death cap", Amanita phalloides, is the world's most poisonous mushroom, responsible for 90% of mushroom-related fatalities. The most fatal component of the death cap is α-amanitin. Despite its lethal effect, the exact mechanisms of how α-amanitin poisons humans remain unclear, leading to no specific antidote available for treatment. Here we show that STT3B is required for α-amanitin toxicity and its inhibitor, indocyanine green (ICG), can be used as a specific antidote. By combining a genome-wide CRISPR screen with an in silico drug screening and in vivo functional validation, we discover that N-glycan biosynthesis pathway and its key component, STT3B, play a crucial role in α-amanitin toxicity and that ICG is a STT3B inhibitor. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ICG is effective in blocking the toxic effect of α-amanitin in cells, liver organoids, and male mice, resulting in an overall increase in animal survival. Together, by combining a genome-wide CRISPR screen for α-amanitin toxicity with an in silico drug screen and functional validation in vivo, our study highlights ICG as a STT3B inhibitor against the mushroom toxin.
Topics: Humans; Male; Animals; Mice; Alpha-Amanitin; Indocyanine Green; Antidotes; Amanita; Mycotoxins; Hexosyltransferases; Membrane Proteins
PubMed: 37193694
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37714-3 -
BMJ Case Reports Mar 2020A middle-aged patient presented with toxic inhalational injury, and was resuscitated prehospitally and treated in the emergency department for smoke inhalation, carbon...
A middle-aged patient presented with toxic inhalational injury, and was resuscitated prehospitally and treated in the emergency department for smoke inhalation, carbon monoxide (CO) exposure and cyanide poisoning with the use of antidotes. Due to the CO effects on spectrophotometry, an anaemia initially identified on blood gas analysis was thought to be artefactual, but was later confirmed by laboratory testing to be accurate. In addition, cyanide can confound haemoglobin testing due to its use in the analytical process and non-cyanide analysis is required when there is suspected exposure. Although no consensus exists on a first-line cyanide antidote choice, hydroxocobalamin is the only antidote without a serious side effect profile and/or deleterious cardiovascular effects. We propose prehospital enhanced care teams consider carrying hydroxocobalamin for early administration in toxic inhalational injury.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Antidotes; Blood Gas Analysis; Carbon Monoxide Poisoning; Cyanides; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Hydroxocobalamin; Male; Middle Aged; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Smoke Inhalation Injury
PubMed: 32161078
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232875 -
British Journal of Hospital Medicine... Sep 2022Intentional and accidental drug overdose, recreational drug use and exposure to toxic substances are common reasons for people presenting to emergency departments.... (Review)
Review
Intentional and accidental drug overdose, recreational drug use and exposure to toxic substances are common reasons for people presenting to emergency departments. Although the mortality rate associated with these presentations is low in the UK, they can lead to significant morbidity and prolonged hospital admissions. This review discusses new developments in the management of paracetamol overdose. Several new protocols for the infusion of acetylcysteine, the antidote for paracetamol overdose, have been proposed in the past decade and evaluated in clinical studies. The 12-hour Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol regimen and 20-hour Australian two-infusion bag protocol have been widely adopted into clinical practice and endorsed in national guidelines because of their shorter duration, reduction in adverse effects and efficacy in treating overdose. This article includes a care pathway that can facilitate the implementation of the Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol. This article also discusses the emergency management of ingested button batteries, describes the emerging threat of novel psychoactive substances, and provides an update on new UK antidote guidelines. Further up-to-date guidance on management of clinical toxicology is available to healthcare professionals on the internet database TOXBASE.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Acetylcysteine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antidotes; Australia; Drug Overdose; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans
PubMed: 36193928
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0313 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Mar 2022Hydrogen cyanide and methanethiol are two toxic gases that inhibit mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase. Cyanide is generated in structural fires and methanethiol is...
CONTEXT
Hydrogen cyanide and methanethiol are two toxic gases that inhibit mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase. Cyanide is generated in structural fires and methanethiol is released by decaying organic matter. Current treatments for cyanide exposure do not lend themselves to treatment in the field and no treatment exists for methanethiol poisoning. Sodium tetrathionate (tetrathionate), a product of thiosulfate oxidation, could potentially serve as a cyanide antidote, and, based on its chemical structure, we hypothesized it could react with methanethiol.
RESULTS
We show that tetrathionate, unlike thiosulfate, reacts directly with cyanide under physiological conditions, and based on rabbit studies where we monitor cyanide poisoning in real-time, tetrathionate likely reacts directly with cyanide . We found that tetrathionate administered by intramuscular injection rescues >80% of juvenile, young adult, and old adult mice from exposure to inhaled hydrogen cyanide gas that is >80% lethal. Tetrathionate also rescued young adult rabbits from intravenously administered sodium cyanide. Tetrathionate was reasonably well-tolerated by mice and rats, yielding a therapeutic index of ∼5 in juvenile and young adult mice, and ∼3.3 in old adult mice; it was non-mutagenic in Chinese Hamster ovary cells and by the Ames bacterial test. We found by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry that both tetrathionate and thiosulfate react with methanethiol to generate dimethyldisulfide, but that tetrathionate was much more effective than thiosulfate at recovering intracellular ATP in COS-7 cells and rescuing mice from a lethal exposure to methanethiol gas.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that tetrathionate has the potential to be an effective antidote against cyanide and methanethiol poisoning.
Topics: Animals; Antidotes; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Cyanides; Humans; Mice; Rabbits; Rats; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Tetrathionic Acid; Thiosulfates
PubMed: 34328378
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1953517