-
Clinical & Translational Oncology :... Apr 2022Among the side effects of anticancer treatment, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most feared given its high prevalence, affecting up to 40%...
Among the side effects of anticancer treatment, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most feared given its high prevalence, affecting up to 40% of patients. It can impair patient's quality of life and provoke low adherence to cancer treatment or chemotherapy dose reductions that can comprise treatment efficacy. Suffering CINV depends on factors related to the intrinsic emetogenicity of antineoplastic drugs and on patient characteristics. CINV can appear at different times regarding the administration of antitumor treatment and the variability of risk according to the different antitumor regimens has, as a consequence, the need for a different and adapted antiemetic treatment prophylaxis to achieve the desired objective of complete protection of the patient in the acute phase, in the late phase and in the global phase of emesis. As a basis for the recommendations, the level of emetogenicity of anticancer treatment is considered and they are classified as high, moderate, low and minimal emetogenicity and these recommendations are based on the use of antiemetic drugs with a high therapeutic index: anti 5-HT, anti-NK and steroids. Despite having highly effective treatments, clinical reality shows that they are not applied enough, so evidence-based recommendations are needed to show the best options and help in decision-making. To cover all the antiemetic prophylaxis options, we have also included recommendations for oral treatments, multiday regimens and radiation-induced emesis prevention.
Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Nausea; Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Vomiting
PubMed: 35347571
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02802-1 -
British Medical Journal Feb 1968
Topics: Antiemetics; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Radiography; Stomach
PubMed: 5639631
DOI: No ID Found -
Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.... Oct 1960
Topics: Antiemetics; Fluorescent Antibody Technique
PubMed: 13695290
DOI: No ID Found -
Advances in Clinical and Experimental... Jan 2023Although the treatment and mechanisms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are similar, the interactions... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Although the treatment and mechanisms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are similar, the interactions between these 2 morbidities require more research.
OBJECTIVES
In our prospective observational study, we investigated whether previous chemotherapy has an effect on PONV in breast cancer surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
One hundred and forty-eight female patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, aged 18-65 years and with a scheduled breast cancer surgery were recruited into the study. After they completed preoperative follow-up questionnaires, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg/kg), remifentanil (1.0 μg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and maintained with sevoflurane (1.5-2.0%), 45% oxygen/air mixture and infusion of remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μg/kg/min). After extubation, the intensity of PONV was assessed during the first 2 h and at 2-24 h after surgery. The symptoms of PONV were classified as mild (mild nausea, vomiting once, and nausea caused by an external stimulant (eating, drinking or motion)), moderate (vomiting twice, mild nausea without an external stimulant, and antiemetic medication required once) and severe (vomiting more than twice, severe nausea, antiemetic medication required more than once) by a different researcher. Preoperative interview forms, perioperative anesthetic follow-up forms and postoperative assessment forms were recorded and evaluated by different members of this research group.
RESULTS
Data of 143 patients were analyzed. In the group of patients who received chemotherapy, the prevalence of nausea and vomiting within the postoperative period of 2-24 h significantly increased (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Previous chemotherapy may be a risk factor for the presence of PONV.
Topics: Humans; Female; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Antiemetics; Remifentanil; Propofol; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 36603139
DOI: 10.17219/acem/157242 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine May 2020
Topics: Antiemetics; Humans; Nausea; Olanzapine; Vomiting
PubMed: 32498523
DOI: 10.21037/apm.2020.04.32 -
Current Cancer Drug Targets 2022Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse event associated with many anticancer therapies and can negatively impact patients' quality of life... (Review)
Review
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse event associated with many anticancer therapies and can negatively impact patients' quality of life and potentially limit the effectiveness of chemotherapy. Currently, CINV can be prevented in most patients with guideline-recommended antiemetic regimens. However, clinicians do not always follow guidelines, and patients often face difficulties adhering to their prescribed treatments. Therefore, approaches to increase guideline adherence need to be implemented. NEPA is the first and only fixed combination antiemetic, composed of netupitant (oral)/fosnetupitant (intravenous) and palonosetron, which, together with dexamethasone, constitute a triple antiemetic combination recommended for the prevention of CINV for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy and for certain patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Thus, NEPA offers a convenient and straightforward antiemetic treatment that could improve adherence to guidelines. This review provides an overview of CINV, evaluates the accumulated evidence of NEPA's antiemetic activity and safety from clinical trials and real-world practice, and examines the preliminary evidence of antiemetic control with NEPA in daily clinical settings beyond those described in pivotal trials. Moreover, we review the utility of NEPA in controlling nausea and preserving patients' quality of life during chemotherapy, two major concerns in managing patients with cancer.
Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzeneacetamides; Dexamethasone; Humans; Nausea; Palonosetron; Piperazines; Pyridines; Quality of Life; Vomiting
PubMed: 35570542
DOI: 10.2174/1568009622666220513094352 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2016Nausea and vomiting remain a problem for children undergoing treatment for malignancies despite new antiemetic therapies. Optimising antiemetic regimens could improve... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Nausea and vomiting remain a problem for children undergoing treatment for malignancies despite new antiemetic therapies. Optimising antiemetic regimens could improve quality of life by reducing nausea, vomiting, and associated clinical problems. This is an update of the original systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and adverse events of pharmacological interventions in controlling anticipatory, acute, and delayed nausea and vomiting in children and young people (aged less than 18 years) about to receive or receiving chemotherapy.
SEARCH METHODS
Searches included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, International Society of Paediatric Oncology, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, and ISI Science and Technology Proceedings Index from incept to December 16, 2014, and trial registries from their earliest records to December 2014. We examined references of systematic reviews and contacted trialists for information on further studies. We also screened the reference lists of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Two review authors independently screened abstracts in order to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a pharmacological antiemetic, cannabinoid, or benzodiazepine with placebo or any alternative active intervention in children and young people (less than 18 years) with a diagnosis of cancer who were to receive chemotherapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted outcome and quality data from each RCT. When appropriate, we undertook meta-analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 34 studies that examined a range of different antiemetics, used different doses and comparators, and reported a variety of outcomes. The quality and quantity of included studies limited the exploration of heterogeneity to narrative approaches only.The majority of quantitative data related to the complete control of acute vomiting (27 studies). Adverse events were reported in 29 studies and nausea outcomes in 16 studies.Two studies assessed the addition of dexamethasone to 5-HT3 antagonists for complete control of vomiting (pooled risk ratio (RR) 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 3.04). Three studies compared granisetron 20 mcg/kg with 40 mcg/kg for complete control of vomiting (pooled RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.07). Three studies compared granisetron with ondansetron for complete control of acute nausea (pooled RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.17; 2 studies), acute vomiting (pooled RR 2.26; 95% CI 2.04 to 2.51; 3 studies), delayed nausea (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.38; 2 studies), and delayed vomiting (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29; 2 studies). No other pooled analyses were possible.Narrative synthesis suggests that 5-HT3 antagonists are more effective than older antiemetic agents, even when these agents are combined with a steroid. Cannabinoids are probably effective but produce frequent side effects.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our overall knowledge of the most effective antiemetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in childhood is incomplete. Future research should be undertaken in consultation with children, young people, and families that have experienced chemotherapy and should make use of validated, age-appropriate measures. This review suggests that 5-HT3 antagonists are effective in patients who are to receive emetogenic chemotherapy, with granisetron or palonosetron possibly better than ondansetron. Adding dexamethasone improves control of vomiting, although the risk-benefit profile of adjunctive steroid remains uncertain.
Topics: Adolescent; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Nausea; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serotonin Antagonists; Vomiting
PubMed: 26836199
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007786.pub3 -
Canadian Family Physician Medecin de... Mar 2007One of my pediatric patients was diagnosed with cyclic vomiting syndrome, and the parents are understandably frustrated with the recurrent yet unpredictable episodes... (Review)
Review
QUESTION
One of my pediatric patients was diagnosed with cyclic vomiting syndrome, and the parents are understandably frustrated with the recurrent yet unpredictable episodes that control and disrupt their family life. Are there any effective treatments for this condition?
ANSWER
There is currently no evidence-based treatment regimen for cyclic vomiting syndrome. Pharmacologic remedies, according to anecdotal cases, retrospective reports, and open-label trials, have found that some antimigraine, antiemetic, prokinetic, and anticonvulsant agents have been effective. Management focuses on correct diagnosis of the syndrome, avoidance of potential triggers, prophylactic pharmacotherapy, and supportive care for children and their families during episodes.
Topics: Age Distribution; Antiemetics; Child; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Incidence; Male; Ontario; Periodicity; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Distribution; Syndrome; Vomiting
PubMed: 17872673
DOI: No ID Found -
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Mar 2023Incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) are increasing among adults born in and after the 1960s, implicating pregnancy-related exposures introduced at that time as... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) are increasing among adults born in and after the 1960s, implicating pregnancy-related exposures introduced at that time as risk factors. Dicyclomine, an antispasmodic used to treat irritable bowel syndrome, was initially included in Bendectin (comprising doxylamine, pyridoxine, and dicyclomine), an antiemetic prescribed during pregnancy in the 1960s.
METHODS
We estimated the association between in utero exposure to Bendectin and risk of CRC in offspring of the Child Health and Development Studies, a multigenerational cohort that enrolled pregnant women in Oakland, CA, between 1959 and 1966 (n = 14 507 mothers and 18 751 liveborn offspring). We reviewed prescribed medications from mothers' medical records to identify those who received Bendectin during pregnancy. Diagnoses of CRC in adult (aged ≥18 years) offspring were ascertained by linkage with the California Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios, with follow-up accrued from birth through cancer diagnosis, death, or last contact.
RESULTS
Approximately 5% of offspring (n = 1014) were exposed in utero to Bendectin. Risk of CRC was higher in offspring exposed in utero (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69 to 6.77) compared with unexposed offspring. Incidence rates of CRC were 30.8 (95% CI = 15.9 to 53.7) and 10.1 (95% CI = 7.9 to 12.8) per 100 000 in offspring exposed to Bendectin and unexposed, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher risk of CRC in offspring exposed in utero may be driven by dicyclomine contained in the 3-part formulation of Bendectin used during the 1960s. Experimental studies are needed to clarify these findings and identify mechanisms of risk.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Antiemetics; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dicyclomine; Mothers; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
PubMed: 36895101
DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad021 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Oct 2022Common treatment methods for malignant tumors include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc., among which chemotherapy plays an... (Review)
Review
Common treatment methods for malignant tumors include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, etc., among which chemotherapy plays an important role. However, chemotherapy brings corresponding side effects while killing tumor cells, and nausea and vomiting are the most common adverse reactions induced by chemotherapy. It not only affects the patient's appetite, resulting in malnutrition and electrolyte disturbances, but also reduces the patient's compliance with treatment, which further aggravates the disease. Thus, it is important to quickly prevent and cure nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy (CINV). In addition, with the continuous development of medicine, more and more antiemetic drugs have been developed. At present, the most common antiemetic agents for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are NK-1R antagonists, 5-HT3R antagonists, and dexamethasone. Surprisingly, olanzapine, often used as a psychotropic drug, has been found to be an effective antiemetic and is similar to other regimens on the safety of medicine. However, although there are numerous studies on the antiemetic effects of olanzapine, its comprehensive application remains unclear. Therefore, this review will elaborate the antiemetic effect of olanzapine in terms of the antiemetic mechanism and the safety, economic cost, dose, administration time, and drug delivery aspects.
Topics: Humans; Olanzapine; Antiemetics; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Nausea; Vomiting; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 36354710
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110650