Comparative Study Review

Authors: David S Pisetsky, Peter E Lipsky

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterized by antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) that form immune complexes that mediate pathogenesis by tissue deposition or cytokine induction. Some ANAs bind DNA or associated nucleosome proteins, whereas other ANAs bind protein components of complexes of RNA and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Levels of anti-DNA antibodies can fluctuate widely, unlike those of anti-RBP antibodies, which tend to be stable. Because anti-DNA antibody levels can reflect disease activity, repeat testing is common; by contrast, a single anti-RBP antibody determination is thought to suffice for clinical purposes. Experience from clinical trials of novel therapies has provided a new perspective on ANA expression during disease, as many patients with SLE are ANA negative at screening despite previously testing positive. Because trial results suggest that patients who are ANA negative might not respond to certain agents, screening strategies now involve ANA and anti-DNA antibody testing to identify patients with so-called 'active, autoantibody-positive SLE'. Evidence suggests that ANA responses can decrease over time because of the natural history of disease or the effects of therapy. Together, these findings suggest that, during established disease, more regular serological testing could illuminate changes relevant to pathogenesis and disease status.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Autoantibodies; Biomarkers; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytokines; DNA; Glomerulonephritis; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Mass Screening; Mice; Middle Aged; Models, Animal; Nucleosomes; RNA-Binding Proteins

PubMed: 32884126
DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-0480-7

Authors: Jan Damoiseaux, Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade, Orlando Gabriel Carballo...

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) on HEp-2 cells is widely used for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The dichotomous outcome, negative or positive, is integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for several systemic autoimmune diseases. However, the HEp-2 IIFA test has much more to offer: besides the titre or fluorescence intensity, it also provides fluorescence pattern(s). The latter include the nucleus and the cytoplasm of interphase cells as well as patterns associated with mitotic cells. The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative has previously reached consensus on the nomenclature and definitions of HEp-2 IIFA patterns. In the current paper, the ICAP consensus is presented on the clinical relevance of the 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. This clinical relevance is primarily defined within the context of the suspected disease and includes recommendations for follow-up testing. The discussion includes how this information may benefit the clinicians in daily practice and how the knowledge can be used to further improve diagnostic and classification criteria.

Topics: Antibodies, Antinuclear; Autoimmune Diseases; Biomarkers; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect; Humans; International Cooperation

PubMed: 30862649
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214436

Authors: Melissa R Arbuckle, Micah T McClain, Mark V Rubertone...

BACKGROUND

Although much is known about the natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the development of SLE autoantibodies before the diagnosis of the disease has not been extensively explored. We investigated the onset and progression of autoantibody development before the clinical diagnosis.

METHODS

The Department of Defense Serum Repository contains approximately 30 million specimens prospectively collected from more than 5 million U.S. Armed Forces personnel. We evaluated serum samples obtained from 130 persons before they received a diagnosis of SLE, along with samples from matched controls.

RESULTS

In 115 of the 130 patients with SLE (88 percent), at least one SLE autoantibody tested was present before the diagnosis (up to 9.4 years earlier; mean, 3.3 years). Antinuclear antibodies were present in 78 percent (at a dilution of 1:120 or more), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in 55 percent, anti-Ro antibodies in 47 percent, anti-La antibodies in 34 percent, anti-Sm antibodies in 32 percent, anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies in 26 percent, and antiphospholipid antibodies in 18 percent. Antinuclear, antiphospholipid antibodies, anti-Ro, and anti-La antibodies were present earlier than anti-Sm and anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies (a mean of 3.4 years before the diagnosis vs. 1.2 years, P=0.005). Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, with a mean onset 2.2 years before the diagnosis, were found later than antinuclear antibodies (P=0.06) and earlier than anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies (P=0.005). For many patients, the earliest available serum sample was positive; therefore, these measures of the average time from the first positive antibody test to the diagnosis are underestimates of the time from the development of antibodies to the diagnosis. Of the 130 initial matched controls, 3.8 percent were positive for one or more autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies are typically present many years before the diagnosis of SLE. Furthermore, the appearance of autoantibodies in patients with SLE tends to follow a predictable course, with a progressive accumulation of specific autoantibodies before the onset of SLE, while patients are still asymptomatic.

Topics: Antibodies, Antinuclear; Autoantibodies; Autoantigens; DNA; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Military Personnel; Prospective Studies; Ribonucleoproteins; Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear; Time Factors; snRNP Core Proteins; SS-B Antigen

PubMed: 14561795
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021933

Review

Authors: Xiaoyu Wang, Yumin Xia

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by high-titer serological autoantibodies, including antibodies that bind to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The origin, specificity, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies have been studied from a wider perspective. These autoantibodies have been suggested to contribute to multiple end-organ injuries, especially to lupus nephritis, in patients with SLE. Moreover, serum levels of anti-DNA antibodies fluctuate with disease activity in patients with SLE. By directly binding to self-antigens or indirectly forming immune complexes, anti-dsDNA antibodies can accumulate in the glomerular and tubular basement membrane. These autoantibodies can also trigger the complement cascade, penetrate into living cells, modulate gene expression, and even induce profibrotic phenotypes of renal cells. In addition, the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 is reduced by anti-DNA antibodies simultaneously with upregulation of profibrotic genes. Anti-dsDNA antibodies may even participate in the pathogenesis of SLE by catalyzing hydrolysis of certain DNA molecules or peptides in cells. Recently, anti-dsDNA antibodies have been explored in greater depth as a therapeutic target in the management of SLE. A substantial amount of data indicates that blockade of pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies can prevent or even reverse organ damage in murine models of SLE. This review focuses on the recent research advances regarding the origin, specificity, classification, and pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA antibodies and highlights the emerging therapies associated with them.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Autoantibodies; DNA; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Molecular Targeted Therapy

PubMed: 31379858
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01667

Review

Authors: Dhiman Basu, John D Reveille

OBJECTIVE

To develop an overview focusing on the utility of anti-Scl-70 autoantibody determinations in the rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

Articles from electronic literature searches were retrieved, critiqued and data were extracted and pooled on anti-Scl-70 (topoisomerase I) in relation to history, optimal tests used for its detection, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, indications, interpretation and pitfalls.

RESULTS

Anti-Scl 70 antibodies are very useful in distinguishing systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients from healthy controls, from patients with other connective tissue diseases, and from unaffected family members. Among patients with SSc, anti-Scl-70 positivity is useful in predicting those at higher risk for diffuse cutaneous involvement and interstitial fibrosis/restrictive lung disease, though the latter has not been universally observed. Of the four different techniques notably immunodiffusion, immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used to assay anti-Scl-70, immunodiffusion has been the most extensively validated. ELISAs are somewhat less specific than other techniques, especially in distinguishing SSc patients from those with other rheumatic diseases, though newer generation ELISAs have been developed to overcome the problem of low specificity inherent with the traditional techniques. As of yet, the need for serial testing of anti-Scl-70 has not been established.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines suggest that anti-Scl-70 antibodies are very useful in the diagnosis and clinical management of SSc patients and also to establish prognosis in these patients, particularly those with diffuse skin involvement.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Autoantigens; DNA Topoisomerases, Type I; Diagnosis, Differential; History, 20th Century; Humans; Immunoassay; Nuclear Proteins; Prognosis; Scleroderma, Systemic

PubMed: 15804707
DOI: 10.1080/08916930400022947

Authors: Karen Kruzer, Roberta Goncalves Marangoni, Ilana Heckler...

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:

The subset of ANA-positive patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who lack prototypic SSc-specific autoantibodies (centromere, topoisomerase, RNA polymerase III, “triple negative SSc”) is poorly characterized. We assessed clinical features and prevalence of additional autoantibodies in these patients.

METHODS:

In this case series patients with ANA+ and triple negative SSc antibodies were identified from two independent SSc cohorts (n=280) and demographic and clinical data were obtained over two years. Sera were screened for ANA and autoantibodies were examined by immunoblots. Significance was assessed through Fisher’s exact test and Student’s T-test.

RESULTS:

Forty ANA+ triple negative SSc patients (14% of the two SSc cohorts) were identified. Mean age was 53 ± 14.5 years, 53% had limited disease, average disease duration was 9 ± 9.7 years, and MRSS was 7.6 ± 6.8. 47.5% of the patients had digital ulcers, 60% had interstitial lung disease and 15% had pulmonary hypertension. The most common immunofluorescence patterns were speckled and mixed speckled/nucleolar. Of 29 autoantibodies tested, the most prevalent were Ro-52 (50%), Th/To (40%), MDA5 (35%), SAE1 (28%). Ro-52 was associated with ILD (RR 2.67, p<0.001) and elevated CK (RR 2.64, p<0.05), and PM-75 was associated with digital ulcers (RR 2.18, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

ANA+ triple negative SSc patients represent an understudied and heterogeneous population of patients with a high prevalence of Ro-52 antibodies, an enrichment for myositis specific antibodies, and increased risk of interstitial lung disease. These patients are seen relatively frequently and should be regularly assessed for evidence of myopathy and lung involvement.

Topics: Humans; Autoantibodies; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Scleroderma, Systemic

PubMed: 35767831
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001881

Review

Authors: Longhuan Ma, Laurence Morel

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disease and its etiology remains unknown. Increased gut permeability has been reported in lupus patients, yet whether it promotes or results from lupus progression is unclear. Recent studies indicate that an impaired intestinal barrier allows the translocation of bacteria and bacterial components into systemic organs, increasing immune cell activation and autoantibody generation. Indeed, induced gut leakage in a mouse model of lupus enhanced disease characteristics, including the production of anti-dsDNA antibody, serum IL-6 as well as cell apoptosis. Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been suggested to be one of the factors that decreases gut barrier integrity by outgrowing harmful bacteria and their products, or by perturbation of gut immune homeostasis, which in turn affects gut barrier integrity. The restoration of microbial balance eliminates gut leakage in mice, further confirming the role of microbiota in maintaining gut barrier integrity. In this review, we discuss recent advances on the association between microbiota dysbiosis and leaky gut, as well as their influences on the progression of lupus. The modifications on host microbiota and gut integrity may offer insights into the development of new lupus treatment.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Dysbiosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Microbiota

PubMed: 35795671
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.919792

Authors: Sandra Zampieri, Anna Ghirardello, Luca Iaccarino...

Anti-Jo-1 antibody is a myositis specific autoantibody most commonly found in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). This antibody is directed against the histidyl-tRNA synthetase which catalyses the binding of the histidine to its cognate tRNA during protein synthesis. It can be considered a specific marker of IIM, predominantly found in 20-30% of patients with PM and in the 60-70% of those with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. These antibodies are also found in DM, although less frequently than in PM, and are rare in children with PM or DM and in other connective tissue diseases.ELISA, CIE and immunoblotting are highly specific and sensitive techniques for testing anti-Jo-1 antibodies. The detection of this antibody is particularly useful in diagnosis and classification of IIM. Moreover, anti-Jo-1 serum levels strongly correlate with disease activity representing a good marker for disease monitoring.

Topics: Antibodies, Antinuclear; Connective Tissue Diseases; Diagnosis, Differential; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect; History, 20th Century; Humans; Immunoassay; Immunogenetics; Immunoglobulin Isotypes; Myositis; Polymyositis; Sensitivity and Specificity

PubMed: 15804708
DOI: 10.1080/08916930400022640

Authors: Maedeh Vahabi, Ensie Sadat Mirsharif, Tooba Ghazanfari...

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces an overreaction of the immune system, resulting in the production of auto-antibodies. Several studies have reported that autoantibodies are prevalent in COVID-19 patients. In our study, antinuclear antibodies were evaluated in patients with COVID-19. We examined 131 sera from patients (>17-year-old) with confirmed COVID-19. Samples were collected prior to receiving any medication and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) levels were measured by the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method. Furthermore, the immunoblotting test was used to determine the presence of anti-nuclear antigen antibodies. The IIF-ANA test was positive in 36.4% (48/131) of patients. Overall, non-ICU patients had higher IIF-ANA titers than ICU patients. In particular, ICU patients had fewer nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitotic IIF-ANA antibodies than non-ICU patients. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients frequently have ANA possibly reflecting the immune dysregulation due to several damaged cells by SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Antibodies, Antinuclear; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Autoantibodies; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect

PubMed: 36682573
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101791

Review

Authors: Shawn A Mahmud, Bryce A Binstadt

Autoantibody production occurs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and numerous other autoimmune diseases. In some conditions, the autoantibodies are clearly pathogenic, whereas in others the roles are less defined. Here we review various autoantibodies associated with JIA, with a particular focus on antinuclear antibodies and antibodies recognizing citrullinated self-antigens. We explore potential mechanisms that lead to the development of autoantibodies and the use of autoantibody testing in diagnosis and prognosis. Finally, we compare and contrast JIA-associated autoantibodies with those found in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Topics: Antibodies, Antinuclear; Antigen-Antibody Complex; Arthritis, Juvenile; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoantibodies; Autoantigens; Autoimmunity; Biomarkers; Humans; Immune Tolerance; Molecular Mimicry; Prognosis; Protein Binding; Rheumatoid Factor

PubMed: 30693002
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03168