-
Colombia Medica (Cali, Colombia) Dec 2020Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) seeks to combat metabolic decompensation of the severely injured trauma patient by battling on three major fronts: Permissive... (Review)
Review
Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) seeks to combat metabolic decompensation of the severely injured trauma patient by battling on three major fronts: Permissive Hypotension, Hemostatic Resuscitation, and Damage Control Surgery (DCS). The aim of this article is to perform a review of the history of DCR/DCS and to propose a new paradigm that has emerged from the recent advancements in endovascular technology: The Resuscitative Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Thanks to the advances in technology, a bridge has been created between Pre-hospital Management and the Control of Bleeding described in Stage I of DCS which is the inclusion and placement of a REBOA. We have been able to show that REBOA is not only a tool that aids in the control of hemorrhage, it is also a vital tool in the hemodynamic resuscitation of a severely injured blunt and/or penetrating trauma patient. That is why we propose a new paradigm "The Fourth Pillar": Permissive Hypotension, Hemostatic Resuscitation, Damage Control Surgery and REBOA.
Topics: Aorta; Balloon Occlusion; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Hypotension, Controlled; Injury Severity Score; Resuscitation; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 33795897
DOI: 10.25100/cm.v51i4.4353 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Apr 2020Blunt thoracic aortic injury, a life-threatening concern, remains the second most common cause of mortality among all non-penetrating traumatic injuries, second only to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Blunt thoracic aortic injury, a life-threatening concern, remains the second most common cause of mortality among all non-penetrating traumatic injuries, second only to intracranial hemorrhage. Kinetic forces from the rapid deceleration are the impetus for the injury mechanism and are graded accordingly. Given the prevalence of trauma as a public health problem, contemporary management considerations are important.
MAIN BODY
Blunt thoracic aortic injury may be fatal if not diagnosed and treated expeditiously. Endovascular options allow safe and effective management of these dangerous injuries. This paper describes the overview of blunt thoracic aortic trauma, the epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options with a focus on endovascular management.
CONCLUSION
Blunt thoracic aortic injury requires a high index of suspicion based on mechanism of injury in the trauma population. Endovascular options have become the mainstay of blunt thoracic aortic injury treatment whenever feasible with satisfactory results and long-term outcomes.
Topics: Aorta, Thoracic; Diagnostic Imaging; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 32307000
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01101-6 -
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia 2015Intraoperative aortic dissection is a rare but fatal complication of open heart surgery. By recognizing the population at risk and by using a gentle operative technique... (Review)
Review
Intraoperative aortic dissection is a rare but fatal complication of open heart surgery. By recognizing the population at risk and by using a gentle operative technique in such patients, the surgeon can usually avoid iatrogenic injury to the aorta. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and epiaortic scanning are invaluable for prompt diagnosis and determination of the extent of the injury. Prevention lies in the strict control of blood pressure during cannulation/decannulation, construction of proximal anastomosis, or in avoiding manipulation of the aorta in high-risk patients. Immediate repair using interposition graft or Dacron patch graft is warranted to reduce the high mortality associated with this complication.
Topics: Aorta; Aortic Rupture; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26440240
DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.166463 -
European Journal of Vascular and... 2022Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a devastating condition that commonly occurs in healthy and young patients. Endovascular treatment is the first choice; however,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a devastating condition that commonly occurs in healthy and young patients. Endovascular treatment is the first choice; however, it has also been demonstrated to alter cardiovascular haemodynamics. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the cardiovascular modifications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for BTAI.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for eligible studies reporting on modifications in aortic stiffness, blood pressure, cardiac mass, and aortic size.
REVIEW METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies reporting on 265 patients were included. Severe heterogeneity existed among the included studies with regard to demographics, BTAI grade, endograft specifications, reported outcomes, and the method of evaluation. Regarding aortic stiffness, two studies found a significant increase in pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients after TEVAR compared with a control group, while one did not find a significant increase in PWV and augmentation index after > 3 years of follow up. Five studies reported an increase in the incidence of post-TEVAR hypertension up to 55% (range 34.8% - 55.0%) vs. baseline. One study found a statistically significant increase in left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index during follow up. Nine studies report data regarding aortic dilatation or remodelling after TEVAR. One found a 2.4 fold faster growth rate in ascending aortic diameter vs. controls, while other studies described significant changes in aortic size at different locations along the aorta and endograft after TEVAR.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review highlights adverse cardiac and aortic modifications after TEVAR for BTAI. The results stress the need for lifelong surveillance in these patients and the necessity of developing a more compliant endograft to prevent cardiovascular complications in the long term.
Topics: Humans; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Pulse Wave Analysis; Vascular System Injuries; Retrospective Studies; Thoracic Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Aorta, Thoracic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35537638
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.05.004 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Jun 2022Treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) has shifted from the open surgical approach to the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), of which early...
PURPOSE
Treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs) has shifted from the open surgical approach to the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), of which early outcomes appear promising but controversy regarding long-term outcomes remains. The goal of this study was to determine the long-term TEVAR outcomes for BTAI, particularly radiographic outcomes, complications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
METHODS
Retrospectively, all patients with BTAIs presented at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were determined (early and long term). In addition, HRQoL scores using EuroQOL-5-Dimensions-3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) and Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) questionnaires were assessed, and compared to an age-adjusted reference and trauma population.
RESULTS
Thirty-one BTAI patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 19/31 received TEVAR of which three died in hospital due to aorta-unrelated causes. In total, 10/31 patients died due to severe (associated) injuries before TEVAR could be attempted. The remaining 2/31 had BTAIs that did not require TEVAR. Stent graft implantation was successful in all 19 patients (100%). At a median radiographic follow-up of 3 years, no stent graft-related problems (endoleaks/fractures) were observed. However, one patient experienced acute stent graft occlusion approximately 2 years after TEVAR, successfully treated with open repair. Twelve patients required complete stent graft coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) (63%), which did not result in ischemic complaints or re-interventions. Of fourteen surviving TEVAR patients, ten were available for questionnaire follow-up (follow-up rate 71%). At a median follow-up of 5.7 years, significant HRQoL impairment was found (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
This study shows good long(er)-term radiographic outcomes of TEVAR for BTAIs. LSCA coverage did not result in complications. Patients experienced HRQoL impairment and were unable to return to an age-adjusted level of daily-life functioning, presumably due to concomitant orthopedic and neurological injuries.
Topics: Aorta; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Thoracic Injuries; Treatment Outcome; Vascular System Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 32632630
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01432-y -
Journal of Vascular Surgery May 2012Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is a rare injury with less than 200 cases in the current reported world literature, mostly in case report format. We sought to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is a rare injury with less than 200 cases in the current reported world literature, mostly in case report format. We sought to describe the experience of a high-volume trauma center and to provide a contemporary review of the literature to better understand the natural history and management of this injury.
METHODS
This was a retrospective review of patients with BAAI between 1996 and 2010. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, type of intervention, subsequent imaging, and follow-up. BAAI was classified by the presence of external aortic contour abnormality noted as an intimal tear, large intimal flap, pseudoaneurysm, or free rupture. Abdominal aorta zones of injury were classified by possible surgical approaches as zone I (diaphragmatic hiatus to superior mesenteric artery [SMA]), zone II (includes SMA and renal arteries), and zone III (from the inferior aspect of the renal arteries to the aortic bifurcation).
RESULTS
We identified 28 individuals (68% male) with BAAI (median age, 28.5; range, 6-61 years). The median injury severity score was 45 (range, 16-75), and 39% were hypotensive at presentation. BAAI presented as intimal tear (21%), large intimal flap (39%), pseudoaneurysm (11%), and free rupture (29%). Zone III was the most common location of injury. Management depended on the location and type of injury: nonoperative (32%), open aortic repair (36%), endovascular repair (21%), and multimodality (10%). Overall mortality was 32%. Most deaths occurred during the initial operative exploration. The mortality rate of free aortic rupture was 100%. Intimal tears resolved or remained stable. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 8 days-7.5 years). Vascular complications due to repair included a thrombosed access femoral artery during an endovascular repair and death of a patient who underwent a hybrid repair.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the largest BAAI series described in the English literature at one institution. BAAIs range from intimal tears to free rupture, with outcomes and management correlating with type and location of injury. Nonoperative management with blood pressure control using β-blockers coupled with antiplatelet therapy and close follow-up is successful in individuals with intimal tears with minimal thrombus formation because they remain stable or resolve on follow-up. Free rupture remains a devastating injury, with 100% mortality. For all other categories of aortic injury, successful repair correlates with a favorable prognosis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aneurysm, False; Aorta, Abdominal; Aortic Aneurysm; Aortic Diseases; Aortic Rupture; Aortography; Cardiovascular Agents; Child; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Vascular System Injuries; Washington; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Young Adult
PubMed: 22322120
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.132 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jul 2022Although the current guidelines for the management of blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) have recommended intervention for grade 2 injuries or higher, a national trend...
OBJECTIVE
Although the current guidelines for the management of blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) have recommended intervention for grade 2 injuries or higher, a national trend has occurred for aggressive endovascular treatment of low-grade BTAIs. Little is known about the natural history of grade 1 and 2 injuries treated nonoperatively. We hypothesized that most of these low-grade injuries would remain stable with nonoperative management.
METHODS
We performed a review of BTAIs at a large referral level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2020. The injuries were graded using a standard 1 to 4 scale. The outcomes of the nonoperative and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) management strategies were compared, including post-trauma morbidity, mortality, reinterventions, and lesion stability.
RESULTS
A total of 176 patients with BTAIs and sufficient imaging studies and follow-up data available were identified during the study period, including 36 with grade 1, 24 with grade 2, 115 with grade 3, and 1 with a grade 4 injury. Of these 176 patients, 112 had undergone TEVAR and 64 had been treated nonoperatively. Most of the patients (90.2%) who had undergone TEVAR had had grade 3 injuries. Nonoperative management was performed for 97.2% of the grade 1 injuries and 62.5% of the grade 2 injuries. Endovascular reintervention after TEVAR was rare (2.7%). The rates of post-trauma morbidity within 30 days (stroke, 3.6% vs 3.1%; myocardial infarction/arrhythmia, 8.9% vs 1.6%; respiratory failure, 31.2% vs 28.1%; acute kidney injury, 9.8% vs 12.5%; urinary tract infection, 2.7% vs 4.8%; gastrointestinal bleeding, 3.6% vs 0.0%; pulmonary embolism, 10.9% vs 4.5%) and 1-year mortality after discharge (1.8% vs 3.1%) were comparable between the operative and nonoperative groups. The median follow-up was 1501 days (interquartile range [IQR], 475.6-2804 days) for the TEVAR group and 1170.5 days (IQR, 317-2173 days) for the nonoperative group. No lesion progression had occurred in the patients with low-grade (grade 1-2) injuries managed nonoperatively. Resolution of grade 1 and 2 injury had occurred in 20% of the patients at 30 days, which had improved to 44% at long-term follow-up. Fourteen patients with grade 3 injuries (12.2% of the grade 3 injuries in our series) were also observed and did not require future intervention. These patients had generally had smaller pseudoaneurysms with minimal periaortic hematoma. None of these 14 patients had experienced progression or rupture during follow-up (median, 454.5 days; IQR, 81-1199 days) using computed tomography.
CONCLUSIONS
Nonoperative management of low-grade BTAIs did not result in long-term aortic complications or the need for reintervention. We found that grade 3 injuries with smaller pseudoaneurysms and minimal periaortic hematoma can be safely observed if the patients can be appropriately followed up. Thus, the indications for treatment of select grade 3 injuries merit further consideration.
Topics: Aneurysm, False; Aorta, Thoracic; Endovascular Procedures; Hematoma; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Thoracic Injuries; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular System Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 35314302
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.012 -
The British Journal of Radiology Sep 2018Blunt thoracic aortic injury (TAI) occurs most frequently as a sequelae of high impact deceleration such as high-velocity road traffic accidents and falls from height.... (Review)
Review
Blunt thoracic aortic injury (TAI) occurs most frequently as a sequelae of high impact deceleration such as high-velocity road traffic accidents and falls from height. The burden of mortality and morbidity is high, however advances in pre-hospital care, diagnostic imaging and endovascular therapies have improved outcomes in this group of patients. Emergent treatment depends on accurate, early diagnosis by the radiologist. It is therefore of paramount importance that radiologists are familiar with both the direct (intimal flap, pseudoaneurysm, aortic contour irregularity and contrast extravasation) and indirect (periaortic haematoma) imaging findings of TAI. Furthermore, it is critical that technical (breathing artefact and cardiac motion artefact) as well as anatomical (ductus diverticulum, aortic spindle and mediastinal structures which imitate periaortic haematoma) pitfalls are recognised to avoid misdiagnosis. This pictorial review will help the diagnostic radiologist to recognise the patterns of injury and imaging features associated with TAI, as well as highlighting potential mimics when interrogating CTangiography (CTA) in major trauma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aneurysm, False; Aorta, Thoracic; Computed Tomography Angiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Radiography; Vascular System Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 29644869
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180130 -
Tidsskrift For Den Norske Laegeforening... Oct 2015The neuroprotective effects of hypothermia have been shown in case reports and animal studies. Therapeutic hypothermia is used to provide neuroprotection during certain... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The neuroprotective effects of hypothermia have been shown in case reports and animal studies. Therapeutic hypothermia is used to provide neuroprotection during certain types of surgery and after serious events that pose a threat to the brain. The aim of this review is to describe the efficacy of such treatment in adults.
METHOD
All articles retrieved from five searches in PubMed were examined. Studies were included if they had a hypothermia protocol and a measurement of neuroprotection. The list of randomised studies was completed using studies identified from five international review articles. In all, 103 of 678 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 48 were clinical trials. Ten of the clinical trials were randomised, using a normothermic control group.
RESULTS
Several randomised clinical trials have suggested that avoidance of hyperthermia provides the same neuroprotection as therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury, but prognostic factors and inclusion criteria vary markedly between the patient populations, including time to target temperature. Two studies found that cognitive function after prolonged aortic surgery under deep hypothermia was equivalent to that after brief normothermic interventions. Animal studies show a neuroprotective effect of hypothermia, but this is dependent on the extent of anoxic damage as well as the rate of cooling.
INTERPRETATION
It remains uncertain how best to implement therapeutic hypothermia to achieve neuroprotection after acute events that pose a threat to the brain. Hypothermia during aortic surgery seems to provide adequate neuroprotection for prolonged interventions.
Topics: Aorta; Brain Injuries; Brain Ischemia; Heart Arrest; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26442733
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.1250 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Mar 2022Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) in severe trauma patients is rare but potentially lethal. The aim of this work was to perform a current epidemiological analysis of...
OBJECTIVE
Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) in severe trauma patients is rare but potentially lethal. The aim of this work was to perform a current epidemiological analysis of the clinical and surgical management of these patients in a European country.
METHODS
This was a multicentre, retrospective study using prospectively collected data from the French National Trauma Registry and the National Uniform Hospital Discharge Database from 10 trauma centres in France. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of BTAI. The secondary endpoints focused chronologically on injury characteristics, management, and patient outcomes.
RESULTS
209 patients were included with a mean age of 43 ± 19 years and 168 (80%) were men. The calculated prevalence of BTAI at hospital admission was 1% (162/15 094) (BTAI admissions/all trauma). The time to diagnosis increased with the severity of aortic injury and the clinical severity of the patients (grade 1: 94 [74, 143] minutes to grade 4: 154 [112, 202] minutes, p = .020). This delay seemed to be associated with the intensity of the required resuscitation. Sixty seven patients (32%) received no surgical treatment. Among those treated, 130 (92%) received endovascular treatment, 14 (10%) open surgery (two were combined), and 123 (85%) were treated within the first 24 hours. Overall mortality was 20% and the attributed cause of death was haemorrhagic shock (69%). Mortality was increased according to aortic injury severity, from 6% for grade 1 to 65% for grade 4 (p < .001). Twenty-six (18.3%) patients treated by endovascular aortic repair had complications.
CONCLUSION
BTAI prevalence at hospital admission was low but occurred in severe high velocity trauma patients and in those with a high clinical suspicion of severe haemorrhage. The association of shock with high grade aortic injury and increasing time to diagnosis suggests a need to optimise early resuscitation to minimise the time to treatment. Endovascular treatment has been established as the reference treatment, accounting for more than 90% of interventional treatment options for BTAI.
Topics: Adult; Aorta, Thoracic; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular System Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating; Young Adult
PubMed: 35144894
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.043