-
The Oncologist Sep 2017Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease for which clinical management is challenging. We aim to review the literature regarding... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease for which clinical management is challenging. We aim to review the literature regarding modalities of treatment to guide the management of AMNs.
METHODS AND REVIEW CRITERIA
We conducted a PubMed search in February 2016 for English-language publications, using the terms "appendiceal," "appendix," "carcinoma," "cancer," "mucinous," "treatment," "genes," "target," "genomic," and terms listed in the articles' subheadings. Published reports and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were also searched.
RESULTS
In this review, we summarize current data and controversies in AMN classification, clinical presentation, molecular alterations, treatment outcomes with regard to cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the role of systemic chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION
Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of tumors with a rising incidence. Treatment is based on stage and histology. Low-grade tumors are treated surgically with resection of the primary site in early stage disease, or peritoneal debulking and HIPEC in patients with advanced stage disease. Treatment of high-grade tumors requires further prospective trials, and options include debulking surgery and HIPEC with or without preoperative chemotherapy. Trials evaluating novel therapies based on the molecular profiling of AMN tumors are needed to evaluate therapeutic options in patients who are not surgical candidates.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This review provides a reference to guide gastroenterologists, pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists in the management of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs), a rare and heterogeneous disease with no consensus on histologic classification or guidelines for treatment algorithms. This review summarizes all AMN classifications and proposes a treatment algorithm based on stage and histology of disease.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Appendix; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Neoplasm Staging; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rare Diseases; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28663356
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0081 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Jun 2021Clinical trials of the KRAS inhibitors adagrasib and sotorasib have shown promising activity in cancers harboring KRAS glycine-to-cysteine amino acid substitutions at...
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials of the KRAS inhibitors adagrasib and sotorasib have shown promising activity in cancers harboring KRAS glycine-to-cysteine amino acid substitutions at codon 12 (KRAS). The mechanisms of acquired resistance to these therapies are currently unknown.
METHODS
Among patients with -mutant cancers treated with adagrasib monotherapy, we performed genomic and histologic analyses that compared pretreatment samples with those obtained after the development of resistance. Cell-based experiments were conducted to study mutations that confer resistance to KRAS inhibitors.
RESULTS
A total of 38 patients were included in this study: 27 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 10 with colorectal cancer, and 1 with appendiceal cancer. Putative mechanisms of resistance to adagrasib were detected in 17 patients (45% of the cohort), of whom 7 (18% of the cohort) had multiple coincident mechanisms. Acquired alterations included G12D/R/V/W, G13D, Q61H, R68S, H95D/Q/R, Y96C, and high-level amplification of the allele. Acquired bypass mechanisms of resistance included amplification; activating mutations in , , , and ; oncogenic fusions involving , , , , and ; and loss-of-function mutations in and . In two of nine patients with lung adenocarcinoma for whom paired tissue-biopsy samples were available, histologic transformation to squamous-cell carcinoma was observed without identification of any other resistance mechanisms. Using an in vitro deep mutational scanning screen, we systematically defined the landscape of mutations that confer resistance to KRAS inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS
Diverse genomic and histologic mechanisms impart resistance to covalent KRAS inhibitors, and new therapeutic strategies are required to delay and overcome this drug resistance in patients with cancer. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).
Topics: Acetonitriles; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Piperazines; Protein Conformation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Pyridines; Pyrimidines
PubMed: 34161704
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105281 -
Acta Gastro-enterologica Belgica 2020Primary appendiceal cancer is rare and most commonly found incidentally on a surgical specimen after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. This small organ gives rise to... (Review)
Review
Primary appendiceal cancer is rare and most commonly found incidentally on a surgical specimen after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. This small organ gives rise to different subtypes which are histological and biological distinct. Historically the classification of these tumors has been confusing because of the different nomenclature that is used. This review has broadly classified them into four subgroups: colonic-type adenocarcinoma, mucinous neoplasm, goblet cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm. Signet ring cells is not considered as a distinct subgroup but as a histologic feature that can be present in colonic-type adenocarcinoma and mucinous neoplasms. As staging and management of appendiceal tumors depend on these subtypes, an adequate classification of them is important. This review aimed to give an overview of the epidemiology, grading and staging, management and prognosis of these neoplasms. Despite its rarety, specific staging systems and treatment guidelines exist for some subtypes. For other subtypes staging systems and management is extrapolised from colorectal cancer because of the lack of randomised, prospective trials.
Topics: Appendectomy; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Appendicitis; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 33094592
DOI: No ID Found -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Aug 2023Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment.
METHODS
This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochranedatabases.
RESULTS
0.5% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arise in the appendix. Their treatment depends on their histopathologicalclassification and tumor stage. The mucosal epithelium gives rise to adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, adenocarcinomas,goblet-cell adenocarcinomas, and mucinous neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms originate in neuroectodermal tissue. Adenomasof the appendix can usually be definitively treated by appendectomy. Mucinous neoplasms, depending on their tumorstage, may require additional cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC). Adeno -carcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomas can metastasize via the lymphatic vessels and the bloodstream and should thereforebe treated by oncological right hemicolectomy. Approximately 80% of neuroendocrine tumors are less than 1 cm in diameterwhen diagnosed and can therefore be adequately treated by appendectomy; right hemicolectomy is recommended if the patienthas risk factors for metastasis via the lymphatic vessels. Systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to be beneficial forappendiceal neoplasms in prospective, randomized trials; it is recommended for adenocarcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomasof stage III or higher, in analogy to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.
Topics: Humans; Appendix; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Hyperthermia, Induced; Adenocarcinoma; Appendectomy
PubMed: 37282595
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0136 -
Human Pathology Feb 2023Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are unique tumors of the appendix, characterized by low-grade mucinous epithelium with villiform, undulating, or flat... (Review)
Review
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are unique tumors of the appendix, characterized by low-grade mucinous epithelium with villiform, undulating, or flat architecture. These tumors lack infiltrative growth or destructive invasion, but can extend into the appendiceal wall by a "pushing" pattern of invasion, with a broad front that can mimic a diverticulum. These neoplasms have a propensity for peritoneal dissemination, resulting in the clinical presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei. The pathologic staging of these neoplasms is challenging and fraught with confusing terminology and numerous classification systems. This review focuses on the AJCC pathologic staging of these tumors with a focus on challenging situations.
Topics: Humans; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Appendix; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
PubMed: 35843338
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.07.004 -
JAMA Surgery Mar 2021Studies on the prognostic role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) are currently not available.
IMPORTANCE
Studies on the prognostic role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) are currently not available.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC compared with CRS alone in patients with PMP.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study analyzed data from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) registry, including 1924 patients with histologically confirmed PMP due to an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Eligible patients were treated with CRS with or without HIPEC from February 1, 1993, to December 31, 2017, and had complete information on the main prognostic factors and intraperitoneal treatments. Inverse probability treatment weights based on the propensity score for HIPEC treatment containing the main prognostic factors were applied to all models to balance comparisons between the CRS-HIPEC vs CRS-alone groups in the entire series and in the following subsets: optimal cytoreduction, suboptimal cytoreduction, high- and low-grade histologic findings, and different HIPEC drug regimens. Data were analyzed from March 1 to June 1, 2018.
INTERVENTIONS
HIPEC including oxaliplatin plus combined fluorouracil-leucovorin, cisplatin plus mitomycin, mitomycin, and other oxaliplatin-based regimens.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Overall survival, severe morbidity (determined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology for Adverse Events, version 3.0), return to operating room, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Differences in overall survival were compared using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards multivariable models. A sensitivity analysis was based on the E-value from the results of the main Cox proportional hazards model. Differences in surgical outcomes were compared using weighted multivariable logistic models.
RESULTS
Of the 1924 patients included in the analysis (997 [51.8%] men; median age, 56 [interquartile range extremes (IQRE), 45-65] years), 376 were in the CRS-alone group and 1548 in the CRS-HIPEC group. Patients with CRS alone were older (median age, 60 [IQRE, 48-70] vs 54 [IQRE, 44-63] years), had less lymph node involvement (14 [3.7%] vs 119 [7.7%]), received more preoperative systemic chemotherapy (198 [52.7%] vs 529 [34.2%]), and had higher proportions of high-grade disease (179 [47.6%] vs 492 [31.8%]) and suboptimal cytoreduction residual disease (grade 3, 175 [46.5%] vs 117 [7.6%]). HIPEC was not associated with a higher risk of worse surgical outcomes except with mitomycin, with higher odds of morbidity (1.99; 95% CI, 1.25-3.19; P = .004). HIPEC was associated with a significantly better overall survival in all subsets (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 0.60-0.68, with 95% CIs not crossing 1.00). The weighted 5-year overall survival was 57.8% (95% CI, 50.8%-65.7%) vs 46.2% (95% CI, 40.3%-52.8%) for CRS-HIPEC and CRS alone, respectively (weighted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.83; P < .001; E-value, 2.03). Such prognostic advantage was associated with oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil-leucovorin (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.93; P = .03) and cisplatin plus mitomycin (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.78; P = .001) schedules.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cohort study, HIPEC was associated with better overall survival when performed after CRS in PMP, generally without adverse effects on surgical outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pseudomyxoma Peritonei; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33502455
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.6363 -
Neuroendocrinology 2016
Topics: Appendiceal Neoplasms; Europe; Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors
PubMed: 26730583
DOI: 10.1159/000443165 -
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory... Jun 2021The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system tumors discusses several advancements and developments in understanding the etiology,... (Review)
Review
What is New in the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System: Review of Selected Updates on Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Appendiceal Tumors, and Molecular Testing.
CONTEXT.—
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of digestive system tumors discusses several advancements and developments in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of several digestive tract tumors.
OBJECTIVE.—
To provide a summary of the updates with a focus on neuroendocrine neoplasms, appendiceal tumors, and the molecular advances in tumors of the digestive system.
DATA SOURCES.—
English literature and personal experiences.
CONCLUSIONS.—
Some of the particularly important updates in the 5th edition are the alterations made in the classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, understanding of pathogenesis of appendiceal tumors and their precursor lesions, and the expanded role of molecular pathology in establishing an accurate diagnosis or predicting prognosis and response to treatment.
Topics: Appendiceal Neoplasms; Appendix; Digestive System; Digestive System Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Genomics; Humans; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Neuroendocrine Tumors; World Health Organization
PubMed: 32233993
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0665-RA -
Cancer Jun 2020The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of...
The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.
Topics: Appendiceal Neoplasms; Chicago; Consensus; Humans; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 32282073
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32881 -
American Society of Clinical Oncology... Mar 2021Appendiceal neoplasms include a heterogeneous group of epithelial and nonepithelial tumors that exhibit varying malignant potential. This review article summarizes... (Review)
Review
Appendiceal neoplasms include a heterogeneous group of epithelial and nonepithelial tumors that exhibit varying malignant potential. This review article summarizes current diagnostic criteria, classification systems, and optimal therapeutic strategies for the five main histopathologic subtypes of appendiceal neoplasms. In particular, the management of epithelial appendiceal neoplasms has evolved. Although their treatment has historically been extrapolated from colon cancer, improved understanding of their unique histopathologic and molecular characteristics and a growing body of published clinical data support a more nuanced approach to their management.
Topics: Appendiceal Neoplasms; Humans; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
PubMed: 33770459
DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_321009