• Directory
  • Search
  • All results
  • Journals
  • Definitions
Sort by: Relevance
Relevance Date
Date: Anytime
Anytime Past year Past 5 years Past 10 years
Format: Full text
Full text All results
Viewing results 1 - 10 of 2,893
Sort by:
Relevance Date
Date range:
Anytime Past year Past 5 years Past 10 years
Availability:
Free full text Abstracts and full text
Result type:
All types Reviews
  • [Lung auscultation in the 21th century].
    Revista Chilena de Pediatria Aug 2020
    Lung auscultation is an essential part of the physical examination for diagnosing respiratory diseases. The terminology standardization for lung sounds, in addition to... (Review)
    Summary PubMed Full Text

    Review

    Authors: Francisca Bertrand Z, Dafne Segall K, Ignacio Sánchez D...

    Lung auscultation is an essential part of the physical examination for diagnosing respiratory diseases. The terminology standardization for lung sounds, in addition to advances in their analysis through new technologies, have improved the use of this technique. However, traditional auscultation has been questioned due to the limited concordance among health professionals. Despite the revolu tionary use of new diagnostic tools of imaging and lung function tests allowing diagnostic accuracy in respiratory diseases, no technology can replace lung auscultation to guide the diagnostic process. Lung auscultation allows identifying those patients who may benefit from a specific test. Moreover, this technique can be performed many times to make clinical decisions, and often with no need for- complicated and sometimes unavailable tests. This review describes the current state-of-the-art of lung auscultation and its efficacy based on the current respiratory sound terminology. In addition, it describes the main evidence on respiratory sound concordance studies among health professionals and its objective analysis through new technology.

    Topics: Adolescent; Auscultation; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Decision-Making; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Observer Variation; Pediatrics; Respiratory Sounds; Terminology as Topic

    PubMed: 33399725
    DOI: 10.32641/rchped.v91i4.1465

  • [Cardiac erethism].
    Revue Medicale de Liege May 2023
    Cardiac erethism is a state of hyperexcitability of the heart. It results in hyperpulsatility, which is characterized by an ample pulse, an accentuation of heart sounds...
    Summary PubMed Full Text

    Authors: Caroline Piette, Pierre Mélon, Patrizio Lancellotti...

    Cardiac erethism is a state of hyperexcitability of the heart. It results in hyperpulsatility, which is characterized by an ample pulse, an accentuation of heart sounds on auscultation, and an exaggeration of heart movements on echocardiography. While it can be very troublesome, cardiac erethism has no pathological significance. However, care must be taken to exclude any underlying cardiac or extracardiac pathology before confirming the diagnosis. No treatment is usually considered except to reassure the patient and avoid contributing factors. Beta-blockers are effective and should be prescribed on a case-by-case basis.

    Topics: Humans; Heart; Echocardiography; Auscultation

    PubMed: 37350212
    DOI: No ID Found

  • Accidental Heart Murmurs.
    Medical Archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and... Aug 2017
    Accidental murmurs occur in anatomically and physiologically normal heart. Accidental (innocent) murmurs have their own clearly defined clinical characteristics... (Review)
    Summary PubMed Full Text PDF

    Review

    Authors: Edin Begic, Zijo Begic

    INTRODUCTION

    Accidental murmurs occur in anatomically and physiologically normal heart. Accidental (innocent) murmurs have their own clearly defined clinical characteristics (asymptomatic, they require minimal follow-up care).

    AIM

    To point out the significance of auscultation of the heart in the differentiation of heart murmurs and show clinical characteristics of accidental heart murmurs.

    MATERIAL AND METHODS

    Article presents review of literature which deals with the issue of accidental heart murmurs in the pediatric cardiology.

    RESULTS

    In the group of accidental murmurs we include classic vibratory parasternal-precordial Stills murmur, pulmonary ejection murmur, the systolic murmur of pulmonary flow in neonates, venous hum, carotid bruit, Potaine murmur, benign cephalic murmur and mammary souffle.

    CONCLUSION

    Accidental heart murmurs are revealed by auscultation in over 50% of children and youth, with a peak occurrence between 3-6 years or 8-12 years of life. Reducing the frequency of murmurs in the later period can be related to poor conduction of the murmur, although the disappearance of murmur in principle is not expected. It is the most common reason of cardiac treatment of the child, and is a common cause of unreasonable concern of parents.

    Topics: Asymptomatic Diseases; Diagnosis, Differential; Heart; Heart Auscultation; Heart Murmurs; Heart Sounds; Humans

    PubMed: 28974851
    DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.284-287

  • Dysphagia Management and Cervical Auscultation: Reliability and Validity Against FEES.
    Dysphagia Feb 2023
    This study investigated the reliability and validity (sensitivity and specificity) of cervical auscultation (CA) using both swallow and pre-post swallow-respiratory...
    Summary PubMed Full Text PDF

    Authors: Mariam Jaghbeer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Liza Bergström...

    This study investigated the reliability and validity (sensitivity and specificity) of cervical auscultation (CA) using both swallow and pre-post swallow-respiratory sounds, as compared with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). With 103 swallow-respiratory sequences from 23 heterogenic patients, these swallows sounds were rated by eight CA-trained Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) to investigate: (1) if the swallow was safe (primary outcome); (2) patient dysphagia status; (3) the influence of liquid viscosity on CA accuracy (secondary outcomes). Primary outcome data showed high CA sensitivity (85.4%), and specificity (80.3%) with all consistencies for the safe measurement, with CA predictive values of [Formula: see text] 90% to accurately detect unsafe swallows. Intra-rater reliability was good (Kappa [Formula: see text] 0.65), inter rater reliability moderate (Kappa [Formula: see text] 0.58). Secondary outcome measures showed high sensitivity (80.1%) to identify if a patient was dysphagic, low specificity (22.9%), and moderate correlation (r [Formula: see text] 0.62) with FEES. A difference across bolus viscosities identified that CA sensitivities (90.1%) and specificities ([Formula: see text] 84.7%) for thin liquids were greater than for thick liquids (71.0-77.4% sensitivities, 74.0-81.3% specificities). Results demonstrate high validity and moderate-good reliability of CA-trained SLPs to determine swallow safety when compared with FEES. Data support the use of CA as an adjunct to the clinical swallow examination. CA should include pre-post respiratory sounds and requires specific training. Clinical implications: The authors advocate for holistic dysphagia management including instrumental assessment and ongoing CSE/review [Formula: see text] CA. Adding CA to the CSE/review does not replace instrumental assessment, nor should CA be used as a stand-alone tool.

    Topics: Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Deglutition; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory Sounds; Auscultation

    PubMed: 35838785
    DOI: 10.1007/s00455-022-10468-8

  • Chest percussion.
    The European Respiratory Journal Oct 1995
    The direct method of chest percussion, first described by Auenbrugger but disseminated by Corvisart, has rapidly been replaced by the indirect or digitodigital method.... (Review)
    Summary PubMed Full Text

    Review

    Authors: J C Yernault, A B Bohadana

    The direct method of chest percussion, first described by Auenbrugger but disseminated by Corvisart, has rapidly been replaced by the indirect or digitodigital method. Chest percussion has not been evaluated by modern acoustic means, so that our present knowledge of the method does not consistently differ from the 19th century approach. Auscultatory percussion is not superior to conventional percussion.

    Topics: Auscultation; Heart; History, 18th Century; History, 19th Century; Humans; Lung; Percussion; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Thorax

    PubMed: 8586135
    DOI: 10.1183/09031936.95.08101756

  • Diagnostic accuracy of heart auscultation for detecting valve disease: a systematic review.
    BMJ Open Mar 2023
    The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy in detecting valvular heart disease (VHD) by heart auscultation, performed by medical doctors.
    Summary PubMed Full Text PDF

    Authors: Anne Herefoss Davidsen, Stian Andersen, Peder Andreas Halvorsen...

    OBJECTIVE

    The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy in detecting valvular heart disease (VHD) by heart auscultation, performed by medical doctors.

    DESIGN/METHODS

    A systematic literature search for diagnostic studies comparing heart auscultation to echocardiography or angiography, to evaluate VHD in adults, was performed in MEDLINE (1947-November 2021) and EMBASE (1947-November 2021). Two reviewers screened all references by title and abstract, to select studies to be included. Disagreements were resolved by consensus meetings. Reference lists of included studies were also screened. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis, and risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

    Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LRs).

    RESULTS

    We found 23 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Auscultation was compared with full echocardiography in 15 of the articles; pulsed Doppler was used as reference standard in 2 articles, while aortography and ventriculography was used in 5 articles. One article used point-of-care ultrasound. The articles were published from year 1967 to 2021. Sensitivity of auscultation ranged from 30% to 100%, and specificity ranged from 28% to 100%. LRs ranged from 1.35 to 26. Most of the included studies used cardiologists or internal medicine residents or specialists as auscultators, whereas two used general practitioners and two studied several different auscultators.

    CONCLUSION

    Sensitivity, specificity and LRs of auscultation varied considerably across the different studies. There is a sparsity of data from general practice, where auscultation of the heart is usually one of the main methods for detecting VHD. Based on this review, the diagnostic utility of auscultation is unclear and medical doctors should not rely too much on auscultation alone. More research is needed on how auscultation, together with other clinical findings and history, can be used to distinguish patients with VHD.

    PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

    CRD42018091675.

    Topics: Adult; Humans; Heart Auscultation; Ultrasonography; Auscultation; Echocardiography; Heart Valve Diseases

    PubMed: 36963797
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068121

  • Digital auscultation as a diagnostic aid to detect childhood pneumonia: A systematic review.
    Journal of Global Health 2022
    Frontline health care workers use World Health Organization Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) guidelines for child pneumonia care in low-resource...
    Summary PubMed Full Text PDF

    Authors: Salahuddin Ahmed, Saima Sultana, Ahad M Khan...

    BACKGROUND

    Frontline health care workers use World Health Organization Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) guidelines for child pneumonia care in low-resource settings. IMCI guideline pneumonia diagnostic criterion performs with low specificity, resulting in antibiotic overtreatment. Digital auscultation with automated lung sound analysis may improve the diagnostic performance of IMCI pneumonia guidelines. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on detecting adventitious lung sounds by digital auscultation with automated analysis compared to reference physician acoustic analysis for child pneumonia diagnosis.

    METHODS

    In this review, articles were searched from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, Global Health, IEEExplore database, Scopus, and the ClinicalTrial.gov databases from the inception of each database to October 27, 2021, and reference lists of selected studies and relevant review articles were searched manually. Studies reporting diagnostic performance of digital auscultation and/or computerized lung sound analysis compared against physicians' acoustic analysis for pneumonia diagnosis in children under the age of 5 were eligible for this systematic review. Retrieved citations were screened and eligible studies were included for extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. All these steps were independently performed by two authors and disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion with an arbiter. Narrative data synthesis was performed.

    RESULTS

    A total of 3801 citations were screened and 46 full-text articles were assessed. 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half of the studies used a publicly available respiratory sound database to evaluate their proposed work. Reported methodologies/approaches and performance metrics for classifying adventitious lung sounds varied widely across the included studies. All included studies except one reported overall diagnostic performance of the digital auscultation/computerised sound analysis to distinguish adventitious lung sounds, irrespective of the disease condition or age of the participants. The reported accuracies for classifying adventitious lung sounds in the included studies varied from 66.3% to 100%. However, it remained unclear to what extent these results would be applicable for classifying adventitious lung sounds in children with pneumonia.

    CONCLUSIONS

    This systematic review found very limited evidence on the diagnostic performance of digital auscultation to diagnose pneumonia in children. Well-designed studies and robust reporting are required to evaluate the accuracy of digital auscultation in the paediatric population.

    Topics: Auscultation; Child; Humans; Lung; Pneumonia; Respiratory Sounds

    PubMed: 35493777
    DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.04033

  • The stethoscope as metaphor.
    Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Aug 2012
    Summary PubMed Full Text

    Authors: Salvatore Mangione

    Topics: Clinical Competence; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Heart Auscultation; Humans; Male

    PubMed: 22854432
    DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.79a.12075

  • [Normal and Adventitious Breath Sounds].
    Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) Jun 2016
    Auscultation of the lung is an inexpensive, noninvasive and easy-to-perform tool. It is an important part of the physical examination and is help ful to distinguish... (Review)
    Summary PubMed Full Text

    Review

    Authors: U Koehler, O Hildebrandt, S Kerzel...

    Auscultation of the lung is an inexpensive, noninvasive and easy-to-perform tool. It is an important part of the physical examination and is help ful to distinguish physiological respiratory sounds from pathophysiological events. Computerized lung sound analysis is a powerful tool for optimizing and quantifying electronic auscultation based on the specific lung sound spectral characteristics. The automatic analysis of respiratory sounds assumes that physiological and pathological sounds are reliably analyzed based on special algorithms. The development of automated long-term lungsound monitors enables objective assessment of different respiratory symptoms.

    Topics: Algorithms; Auscultation; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Lung Diseases; Respiratory Sounds; Sound Spectrography

    PubMed: 27177168
    DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-106155

  • Lung sounds.
    Thorax Sep 1992
    Summary PubMed Full Text PDF

    Authors: J Earis

    Topics: Auscultation; Humans; Lung; Lung Diseases; Respiratory Sounds

    PubMed: 1440457
    DOI: 10.1136/thx.47.9.671

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next >
Try this search on: Bing, Google Scholar, or PubMed
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Guides
  • Terms
© 2025 OpenMD
The content on this site is NOT a substitute for professional medical advice or diagnosis. Always seek the advice of your doctor or health care provider.