-
Tidsskrift For Den Norske Laegeforening... Jan 2010Knowledge of biomechanics and the cervical spine's anatomy has become more topical as the incidence of whiplash neck disorders has increased. Unfortunately, injuries... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Knowledge of biomechanics and the cervical spine's anatomy has become more topical as the incidence of whiplash neck disorders has increased. Unfortunately, injuries after traffic accidents are often brought to court, where the medical expert's knowledge is of utmost importance to ensure a correct medical evaluation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The article is based on information identified through non-systematic searches of PubMed and on the author's experience as a professor of anatomy.
RESULTS
The cervical spine is particularly vulnerable to forces perpendicular to the length axis. Stability depends largely on the soft tissue. Injuries of soft tissue (especially in ligaments and intervertebral discs) may lead to instability and periosteal reaction with subsequent new formation of bone.
INTERPRETATION
The cervical spine is a relatively weak and vulnerable part of the body. One should consider locally restricted new formations of tissue with corresponding height reduction of the intervertebral disc as a sign of genuine injury.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Biological Evolution; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cervical Vertebrae; Child; Humans; Intervertebral Disc; Ligaments; Odontoid Process; Spinal Injuries
PubMed: 20094120
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.0296 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases May 2021MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS
This phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre 52-week trial included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PsA and classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, with spinal pain Visual Analogue Score ≥40/100 and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥4 despite use of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly for 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter. At week 12, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 300/150 mg. Primary endpoint was ASAS20 (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society) response with secukinumab 300 mg at week 12.
RESULTS
Patients were randomly assigned; 167 to secukinumab 300 mg, 165 to secukinumab 150 mg and 166 to placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg significantly improved ASAS20 response versus placebo at week 12 (63% and 66% vs 31% placebo). The OR (95% CI) comparing secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, using a logistic regression model after multiple imputation, was 3.8 (2.4 and 6.1) and 4.4 (2.7 and 7.0; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg provided significant improvement in signs and symptoms of axial disease compared with placebo in patients with PsA and axial manifestations with inadequate response to NSAIDs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02721966.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33334727
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218808 -
The Angle Orthodontist Aug 2002The present study aimed to provide a version of the Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the detection of the peak in mandibular growth based on the analysis...
The present study aimed to provide a version of the Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the detection of the peak in mandibular growth based on the analysis of the second through fourth cervical vertebrae in a single cephalogram. The morphology of the bodies of the second (odontoid process, C2), third (C3), and fourth (C4) cervical vertebrae were analyzed in six consecutive cephalometric observations (T1 through T6) of 30 orthodontically untreated subjects. Observations for each subject consisted of two consecutive cephalograms comprising the interval of maximum mandibular growth (as assessed by means of the maximum increment in total mandibular length, Co-Gn), together with two earlier consecutive cephalograms and two later consecutive cephalograms. The analysis consisted of both visual and cephalometric appraisals of morphological characteristics of the three cervical vertebrae. The construction of the new version of the CVM method was based on the results of both ANOVA for repeated measures with post-hoc Scheffé's test (P < .05) and discriminant analysis. The new CVM method presents with five maturational stages (Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stage [CVMS] I through CVMS V, instead of Cvs 1 through Cvs 6 in the former CVM method). The peak in mandibular growth occurs between CVMS II and CVMS III, and it has not been reached without the attainment of both CVMS I and CVMS II. CVMS V is recorded at least two years after the peak. The advantages of the new version of the CVM method are that mandibular skeletal maturity can be appraised on a single cephalogram and through the analysis of only the second, third, and fourth cervical vertebrae, which usually are visible even when a protective radiation collar is worn.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Determination by Skeleton; Analysis of Variance; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cephalometry; Cervical Vertebrae; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Discriminant Analysis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Mandible; Multivariate Analysis; Odontoid Process; Statistics as Topic
PubMed: 12169031
DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0316:AIVOTC>2.0.CO;2 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jan 2018Therapeutic targets have been defined for axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in 2012, but the evidence for these recommendations was only of indirect nature....
Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force.
Therapeutic targets have been defined for axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in 2012, but the evidence for these recommendations was only of indirect nature. These recommendations were re-evaluated in light of new insights. Based on the results of a systematic literature review and expert opinion, a task force of rheumatologists, dermatologists, patients and a health professional developed an update of the 2012 recommendations. These underwent intensive discussions, on site voting and subsequent anonymous electronic voting on levels of agreement with each item. A set of 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations were developed and voted on. Some items were present in the previous recommendations, while others were significantly changed or newly formulated. The 2017 task force arrived at a single set of recommendations for axial and peripheral SpA, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The most exhaustive discussions related to whether PsA should be assessed using unidimensional composite scores for its different domains or multidimensional scores that comprise multiple domains. This question was not resolved and constitutes an important research agenda. There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA. As instruments to assess the patients on the path to the target, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for axial SpA and the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) for PsA were recommended, although not supported by all. Shared decision-making between the clinician and the patient was seen as pivotal to the process. The task force defined the treatment target for SpA as remission or low disease activity and developed a large research agenda to further advance the field.
Topics: Advisory Committees; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Consensus; Decision Making; Humans; Severity of Illness Index; Spondylitis, Ankylosing
PubMed: 28684559
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211734 -
Proceedings of the Royal Society of... Sep 1961
Topics: Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Cervical Atlas; Child; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Infant; Joint Dislocations
PubMed: 14476765
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of the American Academy of... Feb 2020Os odontoideum is a rare entity of the second cervical vertebra, characterized by a circumferentially corticated ossicle separated from the body of C2. The ossicle is a... (Review)
Review
Os odontoideum is a rare entity of the second cervical vertebra, characterized by a circumferentially corticated ossicle separated from the body of C2. The ossicle is a distinct entity from an odontoid fracture or a persistent ossiculum terminale. The diagnosis may be made incidentally on imaging obtained for the workup of neck pain or neurologic signs and symptoms. Diagnosis usually can be made with plain radiographs. MRI and CT can assess spinal cord integrity and C1-C2 instability. The etiology of os odontoideum is a topic of debate, with investigative studies supporting both congenital and traumatic origins. A wide clinical range of symptoms exists. Symptoms may present as nondescript pain or include occipital-cervical pain, myelopathy, or vertebrobasilar ischemia. Asymptomatic cases without evidence of radiologic instability are typically managed with periodic observation and serial imaging. The presence of atlantoaxial instability or neurological dysfunction necessitates surgical intervention with instrumentation and fusion for stability.
Topics: Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Child; Humans; Joint Instability; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 31977608
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00637 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Aug 2022This study aims to describe and analyze the transoral and transnasal approaches for pathologies of the ventral atlas and axis vertebrae, which are considered technically...
Transnasal Endoscopic and Transoral Approaches in the Biopsies of Ventral Atlas and Axis Vertebrae: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study for Preprocedural Scheme, Biopsy Procedure, Core Technique Analysis, Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Outcome.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to describe and analyze the transoral and transnasal approaches for pathologies of the ventral atlas and axis vertebrae, which are considered technically challenging regions for diagnostic biopsy.
METHODS
A series of transnasal endoscopic approach (TNA) and transoral approach (TOA) biopsies for the pathologies of the first and second cervical vertebrae were conducted and retrospectively analyzed from July 2014 to May 2021. The depth of the biopsy trajectory was measured on computed tomography images for all nine patients (eight males and one female with an average age of 58.11 ± 11.60 years), as were the coronal, sagittal, and vertical biopsy safe ranges. The characteristics of each lesion, including radiographic features, blood supply, and destruction of anterior or posterior vertebral body edges, were evaluated to guide the biopsy. Four biopsy core techniques (BCTs), including "lesion perforating", "aspiration", "cutting-and-scraping" and "biopsy forceps utilization" were elaborated in this study. The biopsy procedures and periprocedural precautions were demonstrated. Patient demographics, clinical data, lesion characteristics, diagnostic yield, and complications were recorded for each case.
RESULTS
Eight TOA biopsies for the axis vertebral body and one TNA biopsy for the atlas anterior arch were successfully performed and yielded adequate pathologies. All biopsies were organized based on the preprocedural radiographic measurements, which showed that the average length of biopsy trajectory and coronal, sagittal, and vertical safe biopsy ranges were 85.00 ± 5.88, 20.63 ± 4.75, 16.25 ± 1.49, and 24.63 ± 2.26 mm, respectively, and these corresponding data were 95, 36, 9, and 26 mm in the TNA patient. Six osteolytic lesions (66.7%), one osteoblastic lesion (11.1%), and two mixed lesions (22.2%) were observed, among which seven lesions had a rich blood supply. Biopsy forceps and core needles were utilized to obtain samples in six and three patients, respectively. All the TNA and TOA biopsies were performed with cooperative application of multiple BCTs under compound anatomic and stereotactic navigations. Intraprocedural or postprocedural complications occurred in no patients who underwent the biopsy in the follow-up period (1-39 months). No significant differences were found between the preprocedural and postprocedural blood indexes and visual analogue scale scores.
CONCLUSION
With a sophisticated preprocedural arrangement, cooperative application of BCTs, and careful periprocedural precautions, transnasal endoscopic and transoral biopsies are two feasible, efficient, and well-tolerated procedures that achieve satisfactory diagnostic yield, complication rate, and clinical outcome.
Topics: Aged; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Biopsy; Cervical Atlas; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35706342
DOI: 10.1111/os.13366 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Feb 2020This review summarises the present, limited, knowledge of os odontoideum (OO). The prevalence is unknown, and the aetiology is widely debated, though irrelevant to... (Review)
Review
This review summarises the present, limited, knowledge of os odontoideum (OO). The prevalence is unknown, and the aetiology is widely debated, though irrelevant to management of the disease. Surgery of symptomatic patients is advocated, as there is more uncertainty about the treatment of asymptomatic patients. Diagnosis is obtained with plain X-ray. However, nowadays MRI and CT scanning are recommended for further clarification and judgement of the severity. Knowledge of OO is important to minimise misjudgement and consequently inappropriate treatment. It is recommended, that patients are examined by highly specialised spine doctors before further cervical manipulation due to the high risk of instability with potentially severe consequences.
Topics: Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Odontoid Process; Quadriplegia; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32138818
DOI: No ID Found -
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira... Feb 2019To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used.
OBJECTIVE
To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used.
METHODS
Retrospective case-series evaluation of patients who underwent spinal surgery with axis instrumentation using screws.
RESULTS
Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The most common cause of mechanical instability was spinal cord trauma involving the axis (36 patients - 55.4%), followed by congenital craniocervical malformation (12 patients - 18.5%). Thirty-seven (57%) patients required concomitant C1 fusion. Bilateral axis fixation was performed in almost all cases. Twenty-three patients (35.4%) underwent bilateral laminar screws fixation; pars screws were used in twenty-two patients (33.8%), and pedicular screws were used isolated in only three patients (4.6%). In fourteen patients (21.5%), we performed a hybrid construction. There was no neurological worsening nor vertebral artery injury in this series.
CONCLUSION
Axis screw instrumentation proved to be a safe and efficient method for cervical stabilization. Laminar and pars screws were the most commonly used.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Axis, Cervical Vertebra; Bone Screws; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 30892444
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.2.198 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2017We aim to establish a complete summary on the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) to Cranio Cervical Junction (CCJ): evolution since first description, criteria to... (Review)
Review
We aim to establish a complete summary on the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) to Cranio Cervical Junction (CCJ): evolution since first description, criteria to predict the feasibility and limitations, anatomical landmarks, indications and biomechanical evaluation after performing the approach. A comprehensive literature search to identify all available literature published between March 2002 and June 2015, the articles were divided into four categories according to their main purpose: 1- surgical technique, 2- anatomical landmarks and limitations, 3- literature reviews to identify main indications, 4- biomechanical studies. Thereafter, we demonstrate the approach step-by-step, using 1 fresh and 3 silicon injected embalmed cadaveric specimen heads. 61 articles and one poster were identified. The approach was first described on cadaveric study in 2002, and firstly used to perform odontoidectomy in 2005. The main indication is odontoid rheumatoid pannus and basilar invagination. The nasopalatine line (NPL), the superior nostril-hard palate Line (SN-HP), the naso-axial line (NAxL), the rhinopalatine Line (RPL) and other methods were described to predict the anatomical feasibility of the approach. The craniocervical fusion is potentially unnecessary after removal of < 75% of one occipital condyle. A recent cadaveric study stated the possibility of C1-C2 fusion via EEA. This paper reviews all available clinical and anatomical studies on the EEA to CCJ. The approach marked a significant evolution since its first description in 2002. Because of its lesser complications compared to the transoral approach, the EEA became when feasible, the approach of choice to the ventral CCJ.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Endoscopy; Humans; Nose; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 29187946
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.277.12220