-
Postgraduate Medical Journal Jul 1986Azathioprine has been used as an immunosuppressant for over 20 years in cancer chemotherapy, organ transplantation and diseases with confirmed or suspected immune...
Azathioprine has been used as an immunosuppressant for over 20 years in cancer chemotherapy, organ transplantation and diseases with confirmed or suspected immune mechanisms. A hypersensitivity reaction manifesting as fever, rash, myalgia and a neutrophil leucocytosis occurring about 2 weeks after exposure is well documented and has been confirmed by challenge testing. Hypotensive reactions are less common but potentially fatal; a case is reported where repeat exposure resulted in profound circulatory collapse responding only to intervention with inotropic agents.
Topics: Adult; Anaphylaxis; Azathioprine; Humans; Male
PubMed: 3748935
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.62.729.677 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... Sep 2023Azathioprine, a prodrug of 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), is used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and may be continued during pregnancy. Acute cholestatic liver... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Azathioprine, a prodrug of 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), is used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and may be continued during pregnancy. Acute cholestatic liver injury has been reported to occur with azathioprine. We aimed to examine azathioprine related cholestasis effect on pregnancy complications and outcome.
CASE REPORT
We present a unique case of 6-MP-induced severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) that required meticulous combined therapy including plasma exchange. The symptoms resolved following 6-MP withdrawal. A literature review revealed 11 pregnancies complicated by early-induced severe ICP among women treated with azathioprine or 6-MP.
CONCLUSION
We recommend weekly bile acid level tests for pregnant women treated with azathioprine or 6-MP, beginning early in the second trimester of pregnancy, and the prompt discontinuation of treatment upon establishment of an ICP diagnosis.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Azathioprine; Mercaptopurine; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic; Pregnancy Complications
PubMed: 37679010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2023.07.023 -
Cell Reports. Medicine Aug 2023Azathioprine (AZA) therapy failure, though not the primary cause, contributes to disease relapse and progression in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the role...
Azathioprine (AZA) therapy failure, though not the primary cause, contributes to disease relapse and progression in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the role of gut microbiota in AZA therapy failure remains poorly understood. We found a high prevalence of Blautia wexlerae in patients with IBD with AZA therapy failure, associated with shorter disease flare survival time. Colonization of B. wexlerae increased inflammatory macrophages and compromised AZA's therapeutic efficacy in mice with intestinal colitis. B. wexlerae colonization reduced 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) bioavailability by enhancing selenium-dependent xanthine dehydrogenase (sd-XDH) activity. The enzyme sd-XDH converts 6-MP into its inactive metabolite, 6-thioxanthine (6-TX), thereby impairing its ability to inhibit inflammation in mice. Supplementation with Bacillus (B.) subtilis enriched in hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) effectively mitigated B. wexlerae-induced AZA treatment failure in mice with intestinal colitis. These findings emphasize the need for tailored management strategies based on B. wexlerae levels in patients with IBD.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Mercaptopurine; Azathioprine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Biological Availability; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Colitis; Bacteria
PubMed: 37586320
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101153 -
Lupus Science & Medicine Sep 2021Immune dysregulation in SLE and the corresponding immune-modulating and immunosuppressive nature of the treatments may play key roles in infection risk. We compared...
OBJECTIVE
Immune dysregulation in SLE and the corresponding immune-modulating and immunosuppressive nature of the treatments may play key roles in infection risk. We compared serious infection rates among individuals with incident SLE with the general population, and examined the role of treatment initiation in SLE.
METHODS
Newly diagnosed patients with SLE (2006-2013) and general population comparators from the Swedish Lupus Linkage cohort were followed for serious infection through 2016. Adjusted Cox and frailty models estimated the relative risk of first and recurrent infections, respectively. Using a new-user design, rates of serious infections were compared between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) initiators. We then evaluated three DMARDs (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate) in multivariable-adjusted models.
RESULTS
Individuals with SLE experienced more infections (22% vs 6%), especially during the first year of follow-up, and recurrent serious infections were also more common (HR=2.22, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.56). DMARDs were associated with a higher rate of serious infection versus HCQ (HR=1.82, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.60), which attenuated after multivariable-adjustment (HR=1.30, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.95). Among DMARDs, azathioprine was associated with infection (HR=2.19, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.21) and mycophenolate mofetil yielded an HR=1.39 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.96) in multivariable-adjusted models compared with methotrexate. Results were comparable across numerous sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
Individuals with incident SLE were 2-4 times more likely to be hospitalised for infection and experienced more recurrent infections than the general population. Among DMARD initiators, azathioprine was associated with the highest rate.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Azathioprine; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Sweden
PubMed: 34526357
DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000510 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aug 2017
Topics: Aged; Azathioprine; Biopsy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Sweet Syndrome
PubMed: 28284013
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4022-1 -
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD May 2024Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as...
Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as second-line choices despite widespread consensus on their efficacy. We aimed to gather real-world data comparing the tolerability and reasons for discontinuation for these agents, by performing a national United Kingdom survey of side effects and reasons for discontinuation of immunosuppressants in myasthenia gravis. Of 235 patients, 166 had taken azathioprine, 102 mycophenolate, and 40 methotrexate. The most common side effects for each agent were liver dysfunction for azathioprine (23 %), diarrhoea for mycophenolate (14 %), and fatigue for methotrexate (18 %). Women were generally more likely to experience side effects of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine was significantly more likely to be discontinued than mycophenolate and methotrexate due to side effects. There was no significant difference in treatment cessation due to lack of efficacy. This study highlights the significant side-effect burden of treatment for myasthenia gravis. Mechanisms to reduce azathioprine toxicity should be utilised, however mycophenolate and methotrexate appear to be good treatment choices if teratogenicity is not a concern. Women are disadvantaged due to higher frequency of side effects and considerations around pregnancy and breastfeeding. Treatments with improved tolerability are needed.
Topics: Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Methotrexate; Female; Mycophenolic Acid; Azathioprine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Adult; Aged; United Kingdom
PubMed: 38626662
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2024.03.010 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Apr 2023Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the... (Review)
Review
Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6-8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.
Topics: Humans; Azathioprine; Dry Eye Syndromes; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammation; Methotrexate
PubMed: 37026249
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2818_22 -
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie :... 2017IgG-4 related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently discovered systemic fibro-inflammatory disease which affects the ocular system. This pathology is not limited only to the...
IgG-4 related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently discovered systemic fibro-inflammatory disease which affects the ocular system. This pathology is not limited only to the orbit, but may also frequently affect the anatomical structures of the eye, as well as other organs. Suspicion of IgG4-RD is based on careful clinical, radiological and immuno-histological examination with a finding of characteristic histopathological changes. Increased values of serum IgG4 need not necessarily be an unequivocal diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of IgG4-RD. Only a careful histological and immunophenotyping examination together with a clinical finding provide a basis for distinguishing IgG4-RD from other inflammatory pathologies. Corticoids are applied in the treatment of this disease, but they do not exclude the possibility of relapses of clinical manifestations. Second choice pharmaceuticals are azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and the effect of treating relapse of the disease with rituximab is significant.Key words: IgG4 related disease, eye, diagnosis, treatment.
Topics: Azathioprine; Eye Diseases; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Mycophenolic Acid; Orbit
PubMed: 29394077
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000To assess the short-term effects of azathioprine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To assess the short-term effects of azathioprine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline up to and including July 1998 and Embase from 1988-1998. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing azathioprine against placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data was extracted independently by two reviewers (CS, EB); disagreements were resolved by discussion or third party adjudication (MS). The same reviewers (CS, EB) assessed the methodological quality of the trials using a validated quality assessment tool. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the six-month endpoint. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences for joint counts, pain and functional status assessments. Weighted mean differences were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals and for adverse reactions. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are presented. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout, since no statistical heterogeneity was found.
MAIN RESULTS
Three trials with a total of 81 patients were included in the analysis. Forty patients were randomized to azathioprine and forty-one to placebo. A pooled estimate was calculated for two outcomes. A statistically significant benefit was observed for azathioprine when compared to placebo for tender joint scores. The standardized weighted mean difference between treatment and placebo was -0.98 (95% CI -1.45, -0.50). Withdrawals from adverse reactions were significantly higher in the azathioprine group OR=4.56 (95% CI 1.16, 17.85).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Azathioprine appears to have a statistically significant benefit on the disease activity in joints of patients with RA. This evidence however is based on a small number of patients, included in older trials. Its effects on long-term functional status and radiological progression were not assessed due to lack of data. Toxicity is shown to be higher and more serious than that observed with other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Given this high risk to benefit ratio, there is no evidence to recommend the use of azathioprine over other DMARDs.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Azathioprine; Humans
PubMed: 10796441
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001461 -
American Journal of Veterinary Research Jul 2015To investigate the cytotoxic effects of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and 6-thioguanine on canine hepatocytes.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the cytotoxic effects of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and 6-thioguanine on canine hepatocytes.
SAMPLE
Commercially available cryopreserved canine primary hepatocytes.
PROCEDURES
The study consisted of 2 trials. In trial 1, hepatocytes were incubated with azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or 6-thioguanine at 1 of 6 concentrations (0.468, 0.937, 1.875, 3.750, 7.500, or 15.000 μmol/L) for 24, 48, or 72 hours. At each time, cell viability and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity were determined for each thiopurine-concentration combination, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity was determined for cells incubated with each thiopurine at a concentration of 15 μmol/L. In trial 2, hepatocytes were incubated with azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or 6-thioguanine at 1 of 3 concentrations (18.75, 37.50, or 75.00 μmol/L) for 24 hours, after which the free glutathione concentration was determined for each thiopurine-concentration combination and compared with that for hepatocytes incubated without a thiopurine (control).
RESULTS
Incubation of hepatocytes with each of the 3 thiopurines adversely affected cell viability in a time- and concentration-dependent manner; however, this decrease in cell viability was not accompanied by a concurrent increase in LDH or ALT activity. Likewise, free glutathione concentration for hepatocytes incubated for 24 hours with supratherapeutic thiopurine concentrations (> 18.75 μmol/L) did not differ significantly from that of control cells.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Results indicated that thiopurines adversely affected the viability of canine hepatocytes in a time- and concentration-dependent manner but had a nonsignificant effect on the LDH and ALT activities and free glutathione depletion of those hepatocytes.
Topics: Animals; Azathioprine; Cell Line; Cell Survival; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hepatocytes; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mercaptopurine; Thioguanine
PubMed: 26111096
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.76.7.649