-
BMJ Clinical Evidence Sep 2014Croup is characterised by the abrupt onset, most commonly at night, of a barking cough, inspiratory stridor, hoarseness, and respiratory distress due to upper airway... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Croup is characterised by the abrupt onset, most commonly at night, of a barking cough, inspiratory stridor, hoarseness, and respiratory distress due to upper airway obstruction. It leads to signs of upper airway obstruction, and must be differentiated from acute epiglottitis, bacterial tracheitis, or an inhaled foreign body. Croup affects about 3% of children per year, usually between the ages of 6 months and 3 years, and 75% of infections are caused by parainfluenza virus. Symptoms usually resolve within 48 hours, but severe upper airway obstruction can, rarely, lead to respiratory failure and arrest.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in children with mild croup and moderate to severe croup? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to November 2013 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 19 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: corticosteroids (dexamethasone, intramuscular and oral), nebulised budesonide, oral prednisolone, heliox, humidification, and nebulised adrenaline (racemate and L-adrenaline [ephinephrine]).
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Cough; Croup; Epinephrine; Helium; Humans; Humidity; Oxygen; Prednisolone
PubMed: 25263284
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Mar 2009Croup leads to signs of upper airway obstruction, and must be differentiated from acute epiglottitis, bacterial tracheitis, or an inhaled foreign body. Croup affects... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Croup leads to signs of upper airway obstruction, and must be differentiated from acute epiglottitis, bacterial tracheitis, or an inhaled foreign body. Croup affects about 3% of children a year, usually between the ages of 6 months and 3 years, and 75% of infections are caused by Parainfluenza virus. Symptoms usually resolve within 48 hours, but severe infection can, rarely, lead to pneumonia, and to respiratory failure and arrest.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in children with: mild croup; moderate to severe croup; and impending respiratory failure because of severe croup? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 43 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antibiotics, corticosteroids, dexamethasone (intramuscular, oral, single-dose oral, route of administration), heliox, humidification, intermittent positive pressure breathing, L-adrenaline, nebulised adrenaline (epinephrine), nebulised budesonide, nebulised short-acting beta(2) agonists, oral decongestants, oral prednisolone, oxygen, and sedatives.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Croup; Dexamethasone; Epinephrine; Humans; Infant
PubMed: 19445760
DOI: No ID Found -
Respiratory Medicine Mar 2010To clarify issues regarding the frequency, prevention, outcome, and treatment of patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), which is a lower... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To clarify issues regarding the frequency, prevention, outcome, and treatment of patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), which is a lower respiratory tract infection involving the tracheobronchial tree, while sparing the lung parenchyma.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant available data, gathered though searches of PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists, without time restrictions. A conservative random effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Out of the 564 initially retrieved articles, 17 papers were included. Frequency of VAT was 11.5%. Selective digestive decontamination was not proved an effective preventive strategy against VAT (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.31e1.26). Presence, as opposed to the absence, of VAT was not associated with higher attributable mortality (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.57e1.81). Administration of systemic antimicrobials (with or without inhaled ones), as opposed to placebo or no treatment, in patients with VAT was not associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27e1.14). Most of the studies providing relevant data noted that administration of antimicrobial agents, as opposed to placebo or no treatment, in patients with VAT was associated with lower frequency of subsequent pneumonia and more ventilator-free days, but without shorter length of intensive care unit stay or shorter duration of mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS
Approximately one tenth of mechanically ventilated patients suffer from VAT. Antimicrobial treatment of patients with VAT may protect against the development of subsequent ventilator-associated pneumonia and improve weaning outcome.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis; Cross Infection; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Respiration, Artificial; Tracheitis
PubMed: 20205347
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.001 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Mar 2016Ventilator-associated respiratory infections (tracheobronchitis, pneumonia) contribute significant morbidity and mortality to adults receiving care in intensive care... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ventilator-associated respiratory infections (tracheobronchitis, pneumonia) contribute significant morbidity and mortality to adults receiving care in intensive care units (ICU). Administration of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, the current standard of care, may have systemic adverse effects. The efficacy of aerosolized antibiotics for treatment of ventilator-associated respiratory infections remains unclear. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of aerosolized antibiotics in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and tracheobronchitis (VAT), using the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.
METHODS
We conducted a search of three databases (PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane Collaboration) for randomized, controlled trials studying the use of nebulized antibiotics in VAP and VAT that measured clinical cure (e.g., change in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score) as an outcome measurement. We augmented the electronic searches with hand searches of the references for any narrative review articles as well as any article included in the systematic review. Included studies were examined for risk of bias using the Cochrane Handbook's "Risk of Bias" assessment tool.
RESULTS
Six studies met full inclusion criteria. For the systemic review's primary outcome (clinical cure), two studies found clinically and statistically significant improvements in measures of VAP cure while four found no statistically significant difference in measurements of cure. No studies found inferiority of aerosolized antibiotics. The included studies had various degrees of biases, particularly in the performance and detection bias domains. Given that outcome measures of clinical cure were not uniform, we were unable to conduct a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence for the use of inhaled antibiotic therapy as primary or adjuvant treatment of VAP or VAT. Additional, better-powered randomized-controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy of inhaled antibiotic therapy for VAP and VAT.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis; Cross Infection; Humans; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Tract Infections; Tracheitis; Ventilators, Mechanical
PubMed: 26956371
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0202-8