-
Wounds : a Compendium of Clinical... Dec 2019Burn wounds are one of the main causes of skin damage. Based on World Health Organization statistics, almost 300 000 people worldwide die of burns each year. In severe... (Review)
Review
Burn wounds are one of the main causes of skin damage. Based on World Health Organization statistics, almost 300 000 people worldwide die of burns each year. In severe burns, the cells and blood vessels are often injured and the blood supply to the wound is disturbed. Many factors such as oxygenation, infection, aging, hormones, and nutrition potentially can influence burn progression and disrupt repair with unbalanced release of various growth factors and cytokines. Different treatment approaches such as dressings and skin substitutes have been applied to aid wound healing. A thorough understanding of the effective factors on burns can improve wound healing outcomes. This review evaluates articles published on the Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed databases that attempt to explain the pathophysiology, molecular components, and therapeutic approaches involved in the burn wound healing process.
Topics: Bandages; Burns; Disease Progression; Humans; Oxidative Stress; Skin Transplantation; Skin, Artificial; Wound Healing
PubMed: 31730513
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Environmental... Jan 2022According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that each year approximately 11 million people suffer from burn wounds, 180,000 of whom die because of... (Review)
Review
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that each year approximately 11 million people suffer from burn wounds, 180,000 of whom die because of such injuries. Regardless of the factors causing burns, these are complicated wounds that are difficult to heal and are associated with high mortality rates. Medical care of a burn patient requires a lot of commitment, experience, and multidirectional management, including surgical activities and widely understood pharmacological approaches. This paper aims to comprehensively review the current literature concerning burn wounds, including classification of burns, complications, medical care, and pharmacological treatment. We also overviewed the dressings (with an emphasis on the newest innovations in this field) that are currently used in medical practice to heal wounds.
Topics: Bandages; Burns; Humans; Knowledge; Patient Care; Wound Healing
PubMed: 35162360
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031338 -
Circulation Oct 2020This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's . It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid... (Review)
Review
This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's . It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life-threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, hemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research.
Topics: Aspirin; Bandages; Emergency Medical Services; First Aid; Glucose; Heat Stroke; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hyperthermia; Hypoglycemia
PubMed: 33084394
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000897 -
Cells Aug 2022Wound healing is highly specialized dynamic multiple phase process for the repair of damaged/injured tissues through an intricate mechanism. Any failure in the normal... (Review)
Review
Wound healing is highly specialized dynamic multiple phase process for the repair of damaged/injured tissues through an intricate mechanism. Any failure in the normal wound healing process results in abnormal scar formation, and chronic state which is more susceptible to infections. Chronic wounds affect patients' quality of life along with increased morbidity and mortality and are huge financial burden to healthcare systems worldwide, and thus requires specialized biomedical intensive treatment for its management. The clinical assessment and management of chronic wounds remains challenging despite the development of various therapeutic regimens owing to its painstakingly long-term treatment requirement and complex wound healing mechanism. Various conventional approaches such as cell therapy, gene therapy, growth factor delivery, wound dressings, and skin grafts etc., are being utilized for promoting wound healing in different types of wounds. However, all these abovementioned therapies are not satisfactory for all wound types, therefore, there is an urgent demand for the development of competitive therapies. Therefore, there is a pertinent requirement to develop newer and innovative treatment modalities for multipart therapeutic regimens for chronic wounds. Recent developments in advanced wound care technology includes nanotherapeutics, stem cells therapy, bioengineered skin grafts, and 3D bioprinting-based strategies for improving therapeutic outcomes with a focus on skin regeneration with minimal side effects. The main objective of this review is to provide an updated overview of progress in therapeutic options in chronic wounds healing and management over the years using next generation innovative approaches. Herein, we have discussed the skin function and anatomy, wounds and wound healing processes, followed by conventional treatment modalities for wound healing and skin regeneration. Furthermore, various emerging and innovative strategies for promoting quality wound healing such as nanotherapeutics, stem cells therapy, 3D bioprinted skin, extracellular matrix-based approaches, platelet-rich plasma-based approaches, and cold plasma treatment therapy have been discussed with their benefits and shortcomings. Finally, challenges of these innovative strategies are reviewed with a note on future prospects.
Topics: Bandages; Humans; Quality of Life; Skin; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Wound Healing
PubMed: 35954282
DOI: 10.3390/cells11152439 -
Wounds : a Compendium of Clinical... Jun 2022Wound care professionals face complex challenges in their attempts to achieve healing in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).1 Peripheral neuropathy limits...
Wound care professionals face complex challenges in their attempts to achieve healing in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).1 Peripheral neuropathy limits sensation, which necessitates consistent offloading of the DFU site. Peripheral arterial, venous, or lymphatic circulation disorders must be diagnosed and addressed. Early diagnosis and management of soft tissue or bone infection is required. Chronic kidney disease, glycemic control, and nutritional needs must be addressed along with counterproductive behavior patterns.2 The use of topical hydrocolloid-based hydrogel dressings3 or honey4 on DFUs facilitates moist wound healing and debridement. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that carefully controlling all of these factors helps optimize outcomes for individuals with a DFU. Promising phase 2 clinical studies with stringent inclusion criteria and rigorously applied diagnostic and management procedures are rarely replicated in larger phase 3 RCTs with broader inclusion criteria and less rigorously applied DFU management procedures. Narrow RCT inclusion criteria can limit study applicability for the general DFU population. This installment of Evidence Corner reviews 2 RCTs that use different approaches to address these issues. The first RCT reports interim results of a new autologous skin construct applied to Wagner grade 1 DFUs.5 The second compares the effects of standard wound dressings (SWDs) vs negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) applied to Wagner grade 2, 3, or 4 DFU according to standard protocols during real-world clinical practice in German patients.6.
Topics: Bandages; Debridement; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Foot; Humans; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Wound Healing
PubMed: 35881427
DOI: 10.25270/wnds/2022.175177 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Mar 2022There is need for improvement in effective pressure ulcers preventive strategies. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
There is need for improvement in effective pressure ulcers preventive strategies.
OBJECTIVE
To study whether a multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum prevents PUs development in addition to standard PU preventive care for at-risk hospitalized patients.
DESIGN
Open-label, parallel group, multi-center randomized controlled trial.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING
709 in-hospital patients at risk for pressure ulcers from 25 medical, surgical, and intensive care units of 12 Italian hospitals.
METHODS
A multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam was applied to the sacrum in addition to standard PUs preventive care in the intervention group. In the control group, standard preventive care alone, including systematic pressure ulcer risk assessment, skin assessment three times per day, routine positioning every 4 h, use of active support surface as appropriate, and incontinence skin care, was guaranteed. Primary outcome was incidence of sacral pressure ulcers of any stage at seven days from hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were incidence of sacral pressure ulcers ≥ II stage, number of days needed to PU development, number of skin adverse events due to the foam dressing, number of dressings used for each patient, number of withdrawing patients due to discomfort caused by the foam dressing. Participants were evaluated at baseline and at seven days.
RESULTS
In patients admitted to medical units, 15/113 controls and 4/118 in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p = 0.010; absolute reduction 9.2%; NNT for benefit 11, 95% CI 6 to 44). In patients admitted to surgical units, 21/144 controls and 8/142 in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p = 0.010; absolute reduction 8.9%; NNT for benefit 11 95% CI 6 to 49). Pressure ulcers incidence was not significantly different between the randomization arms (5.2% experimental vs 10.4% control, p = 0.141) in patients admitted to intensive care units. Overall, 46/358 (12.8%) controls and 17/351 (4.8%) in the intervention group developed sacral pressure ulcers (p<0.001; absolute reduction 8%; number needed to treat (NNT) for benefit 12, 95% CI 8 to 26). Incidence of sacral pressure ulcers ≥ II stage did not differ significantly between the two groups. No adverse skin reactions and discomfort attributable to the foam application were reported.
CONCLUSION
A sacral multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam in addition to standard preventive care is effective for pressure ulcers prevention in at-risk hospitalized patients admitted to medical and surgical units.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03900455. The registration (April 1st, 2019) occurred before the first patient was enrolled (October 21st, 2019).
Topics: Adhesives; Bandages; Humans; Polyurethanes; Pressure Ulcer; Silicones
PubMed: 35124474
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104172 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 11 million people suffer from burns every year, and 180,000 die from them. A burn is a condition in which heat,... (Review)
Review
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 11 million people suffer from burns every year, and 180,000 die from them. A burn is a condition in which heat, chemical substances, an electrical current or other factors cause tissue damage. Burns mainly affect the skin, but can also affect deeper tissues such as bones or muscles. When burned, the skin loses its main functions, such as protection from the external environment, pathogens, evaporation and heat loss. Depending on the stage of the burn, the patient's condition and the cause of the burn, we need to choose the most appropriate treatment. Personalization and multidisciplinary collaboration are key to the successful management of burn patients. In this comprehensive review, we have collected and discussed the available treatment options, focusing on recent advances in topical treatments, wound cleansing, dressings, skin grafting, nutrition, pain and scar tissue management.
Topics: Humans; Wound Healing; Skin; Skin Transplantation; Bandages; Burns
PubMed: 38003548
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216357 -
Advances in Clinical and Experimental... Jun 2019Epidemiological data regarding venous leg ulcers, specifically low healing rates and frequent recurrences (occurring in 20-70% of the cases), seems surprising regarding... (Review)
Review
Epidemiological data regarding venous leg ulcers, specifically low healing rates and frequent recurrences (occurring in 20-70% of the cases), seems surprising regarding recent progress in the management of this complication. The aim of this review is to present the current state of knowledge on venous leg ulcer management, especially compression therapy. Treatment of venous ulcers should be comprehensive and wellorganized, based on modern standards and up-to-date, and should involve elaborated treatment strategies. A thorough diagnostic process followed by adequate treatment may result in marked improvement of the outcomes, with up to 67% healing rate at 12 weeks and up to 81% within 24 weeks. Continuation of therapeutic activities after the ulceration has been healed is reflected by a marked decrease in the recurrence rates, down to 16% whenever the patient is actively involved in the therapeutic process. Furthermore, early diagnosis and appropriate causal treatment may prevent progression of the illness.
Topics: Compression Bandages; Disease Progression; Humans; Recurrence; Stockings, Compression; Varicose Ulcer; Wound Healing
PubMed: 30085435
DOI: 10.17219/acem/78768 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2021Leg ulcers are open skin wounds on the lower leg that can last weeks, months or even years. Most leg ulcers are the result of venous diseases. First-line treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Leg ulcers are open skin wounds on the lower leg that can last weeks, months or even years. Most leg ulcers are the result of venous diseases. First-line treatment options often include the use of compression bandages or stockings.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of using compression bandages or stockings, compared with no compression, on the healing of venous leg ulcers in any setting and population.
SEARCH METHODS
In June 2020 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions by language, date of publication or study setting.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials that compared any types of compression bandages or stockings with no compression in participants with venous leg ulcers in any setting.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
At least two review authors independently assessed studies using predetermined inclusion criteria. We carried out data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE methodology.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 14 studies (1391 participants) in the review. Most studies were small (median study sample size: 51 participants). Participants were recruited from acute-care settings, outpatient settings and community settings, and a large proportion (65.9%; 917/1391) of participants had a confirmed history or clinical evidence of chronic venous disease, a confirmed cause of chronic venous insufficiency, or an ankle pressure/brachial pressure ratio of greater than 0.8 or 0.9. The average age of participants ranged from 58.0 to 76.5 years (median: 70.1 years). The average duration of their leg ulcers ranged from 9.0 weeks to 31.6 months (median: 22.0 months), and a large proportion of participants (64.8%; 901/1391) had ulcers with an area between 5 and 20 cm. Studies had a median follow-up of 12 weeks. Compression bandages or stockings applied included short-stretch bandage, four-layer compression bandage, and Unna's boot (a type of inelastic gauze bandage impregnated with zinc oxide), and comparator groups used included 'usual care', pharmacological treatment, a variety of dressings, and a variety of treatments where some participants received compression (but it was not the norm). Of the 14 included studies, 10 (71.4%) presented findings which we consider to be at high overall risk of bias. Primary outcomes There is moderate-certainty evidence (downgraded once for risk of bias) (1) that there is probably a shorter time to complete healing of venous leg ulcers in people wearing compression bandages or stockings compared with those not wearing compression (pooled hazard ratio for time-to-complete healing 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 to 3.10; I = 59%; 5 studies, 733 participants); and (2) that people treated using compression bandages or stockings are more likely to experience complete ulcer healing within 12 months compared with people with no compression (10 studies, 1215 participants): risk ratio for complete healing 1.77, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.21; I = 65% (8 studies with analysable data, 1120 participants); synthesis without meta-analysis suggests more completely-healed ulcers in compression bandages or stockings than in no compression (2 studies without analysable data, 95 participants). It is uncertain whether there is any difference in rates of adverse events between using compression bandages or stockings and no compression (very low-certainty evidence; 3 studies, 585 participants). Secondary outcomes Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that people using compression bandages or stockings probably have a lower mean pain score than those not using compression (four studies with 859 participants and another study with 69 ulcers): pooled mean difference -1.39, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.98; I = 65% (two studies with 426 participants and another study with 69 ulcers having analysable data); synthesis without meta-analysis suggests a reduction in leg ulcer pain in compression bandages or stockings, compared with no compression (two studies without analysable data, 433 participants). Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression may improve disease-specific quality of life, but not all aspects of general health status during the follow-up of 12 weeks to 12 months (four studies with 859 participants; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if the use of compression bandages or stockings is more cost-effective than not using them (three studies with 486 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
If using compression bandages or stockings, people with venous leg ulcers probably experience complete wound healing more quickly, and more people have wounds completely healed. The use of compression bandages or stockings probably reduces pain and may improve disease-specific quality of life. There is uncertainty about adverse effects, and cost effectiveness. Future research should focus on comparing alternative bandages and stockings with the primary endpoint of time to complete wound healing alongside adverse events including pain score, and health-related quality of life, and should incorporate cost-effectiveness analysis where possible. Future studies should adhere to international standards of trial conduct and reporting.
Topics: Aged; Bandages, Hydrocolloid; Bias; Compression Bandages; Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Middle Aged; Pain Management; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stockings, Compression; Time Factors; Varicose Ulcer; Wound Healing; Zinc Oxide
PubMed: 34308565
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013397.pub2 -
International Wound Journal Feb 2023This meta-review aimed to appraise and synthesise findings from existing systematic reviews that measured the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcers healing.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-review aimed to appraise and synthesise findings from existing systematic reviews that measured the impact of compression therapy on venous leg ulcers healing. We searched five databases to identify potential papers; three authors extracted data, and a fourth author adjudicated the findings. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used for quality appraisal and the certainty of the evidence was appraised using GRADEpro. Data analysis was undertaken using RevMan. We identified 12 systematic reviews published between 1997 and 2021. AMSTAR-2 assessment identified three as high quality, five as moderate quality, and four as low quality. Seven comparisons were reported, with a meta-analysis undertaken for five of these comparisons: compression vs no compression (risk ratio [RR]: 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-1.78; P < .00001; moderate-certainty evidence); elastic compression vs inelastic compression (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.96-1.08; P < .61 moderate-certainty evidence); four layer vs
bandage systems (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82-1.40; P < .63; moderate-certainty evidence); comparison between different four-layer bandage systems (RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.93-1.25; P = .34; moderate-certainty evidence); compression bandage vs compression stocking (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.03; P = .18; moderate-certainty evidence). The main conclusion from this review is that there is a statistically significant difference in healing rates when compression is used compared with no compression, with moderate-certainty evidence. Otherwise, there is no statistically different difference in healing rates using elastic compression vs inelastic compression, four layer vs bandage systems, different four-layer bandage systems, or compression bandages vs compression stockings. Topics: Humans; Compression Bandages; Varicose Ulcer; Stockings, Compression; Wound Healing; Data Analysis; Leg Ulcer
PubMed: 35855678
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13891