-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2022Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease with either skin or joints manifestations, or both, and it has a major impact on quality of life. Although there is currently no... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease with either skin or joints manifestations, or both, and it has a major impact on quality of life. Although there is currently no cure for psoriasis, various treatment strategies allow sustained control of disease signs and symptoms. The relative benefit of these treatments remains unclear due to the limited number of trials comparing them directly head-to-head, which is why we chose to conduct a network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of non-biological systemic agents, small molecules, and biologics for people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using a network meta-analysis, and to provide a ranking of these treatments according to their efficacy and safety.
SEARCH METHODS
For this update of the living systematic review, we updated our searches of the following databases monthly to October 2021: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic treatments in adults over 18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, at any stage of treatment, compared to placebo or another active agent. The primary outcomes were: proportion of participants who achieved clear or almost clear skin, that is, at least Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90; proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) at induction phase (8 to 24 weeks after randomisation).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We conducted duplicate study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and analyses. We synthesised data using pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare treatments and rank them according to effectiveness (PASI 90 score) and acceptability (inverse of SAEs). We assessed the certainty of NMA evidence for the two primary outcomes and all comparisons using CINeMA, as very low, low, moderate, or high. We contacted study authors when data were unclear or missing. We used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to infer treatment hierarchy, from 0% (worst for effectiveness or safety) to 100% (best for effectiveness or safety).
MAIN RESULTS
This update includes an additional 19 studies, taking the total number of included studies to 167, and randomised participants to 58,912, 67.2% men, mainly recruited from hospitals. Average age was 44.5 years, mean PASI score at baseline was 20.4 (range: 9.5 to 39). Most studies were placebo-controlled (57%). We assessed a total of 20 treatments. Most (140) trials were multicentric (two to 231 centres). One-third of the studies (57/167) had high risk of bias; 23 unclear risk, and most (87) low risk. Most studies (127/167) declared funding by a pharmaceutical company, and 24 studies did not report a funding source. Network meta-analysis at class level showed that all interventions (non-biological systemic agents, small molecules, and biological treatments) showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than placebo. Anti-IL17 treatment showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 compared to all the interventions, except anti-IL23. Biologic treatments anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and anti-TNF alpha showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than the non-biological systemic agents. For reaching PASI 90, the most effective drugs when compared to placebo were (SUCRA rank order, all high-certainty evidence): infliximab (risk ratio (RR) 50.19, 95% CI 20.92 to 120.45), bimekizumab (RR 30.27, 95% CI 25.45 to 36.01), ixekizumab (RR 30.19, 95% CI 25.38 to 35.93), risankizumab (RR 28.75, 95% CI 24.03 to 34.39). Clinical effectiveness of these drugs was similar when compared against each other. Bimekizumab, ixekizumab and risankizumab showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than other anti-IL17 drugs (secukinumab and brodalumab) and guselkumab. Infliximab, anti-IL17 drugs (bimekizumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and brodalumab) and anti-IL23 drugs (risankizumab and guselkumab) except tildrakizumab showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than ustekinumab and three anti-TNF alpha agents (adalimumab, certolizumab and etanercept). Ustekinumab was superior to certolizumab; adalimumab and ustekinumab were superior to etanercept. No significant difference was shown between apremilast and two non-biological drugs: ciclosporin and methotrexate. We found no significant difference between any of the interventions and the placebo for the risk of SAEs. The risk of SAEs was significantly lower for participants on methotrexate compared with most of the interventions. Nevertheless, the SAE analyses were based on a very low number of events with low- to moderate-certainty for all the comparisons (except methotrexate versus placebo, which was high-certainty). The findings therefore have to be viewed with caution. For other efficacy outcomes (PASI 75 and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1), the results were similar to the results for PASI 90. Information on quality of life was often poorly reported and was absent for several of the interventions.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our review shows that, compared to placebo, the biologics infliximab, bimekizumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab were the most effective treatments for achieving PASI 90 in people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis on the basis of high-certainty evidence. This NMA evidence is limited to induction therapy (outcomes measured from 8 to 24 weeks after randomisation), and is not sufficient for evaluating longer-term outcomes in this chronic disease. Moreover, we found low numbers of studies for some of the interventions, and the young age (mean 44.5 years) and high level of disease severity (PASI 20.4 at baseline) may not be typical of patients seen in daily clinical practice. We found no significant difference in the assessed interventions and placebo in terms of SAEs, and the safety evidence for most interventions was low to moderate quality. More randomised trials directly comparing active agents are needed, and these should include systematic subgroup analyses (sex, age, ethnicity, comorbidities, psoriatic arthritis). To provide long-term information on the safety of treatments included in this review, an evaluation of non-randomised studies and postmarketing reports from regulatory agencies is needed. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. Living systematic reviews offer a new approach to review updating, in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.
Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Biological Products; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Infliximab; Male; Methotrexate; Network Meta-Analysis; Psoriasis; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Ustekinumab
PubMed: 35603936
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5 -
International Journal of Rheumatic... Apr 2020As glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs are non-specific therapeutic agents that cause many adverse reactions, the development of biologicals aiming to control... (Review)
Review
As glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs are non-specific therapeutic agents that cause many adverse reactions, the development of biologicals aiming to control specific molecular targets is anticipated for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The antibody targeting B cell-activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) belimumab was the first biological approved for SLE. At present, many biologicals, such as anifrolumab (anti-type I interferon receptor antibody) and ustekinumab (antibody against interleukin 12/23 [p40]), are in clinical trials. Thus, successful treatments with biologicals targeting "bridging cytokines" produced by dendritic cells, which form a bridge between the innate and acquired immune/autoimmune systems, is of particular interest. Moreover, a phase IIb clinical trial of baricitinib, a low-molecular-weight compound targeting Janus kinase 1/2, in patients with SLE revealed that baricitinib was significantly more effective for relieving arthritis and skin manifestations than placebo, and the trial met the primary endpoint. In the future, it is expected that drugs with better efficacy and safety profiles will be used to apply therapeutic strategies, such as precision medicine, in which different molecular target drugs are used for patients classified by their conditions, and to set a therapeutic goal of the discontinuation of glucocorticoids.
Topics: Biological Products; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32134201
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13817 -
The Journal of Investigative Dermatology Jul 2022Since the foundation of the European Society for Dermatological Research, pathogenesis of psoriasis has been studied by many research groups, focusing on various... (Review)
Review
Since the foundation of the European Society for Dermatological Research, pathogenesis of psoriasis has been studied by many research groups, focusing on various compartments of the skin. Understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis has evolved into a branching model of innate and acquired immunity. Insights in the genetics of psoriasis proved to be compatible with this model. Inspired by these insights, pathogenesis-based treatments have emerged with unprecedented efficacy and sustainability. In particular, the cytokine network harbors major treatment targets for biologics with TNF-α, the IL-17 family, IL-23 and, in the case of generalized pustular psoriasis, IL-36. Furthermore, the Jak TYK2, PDE-4, and AHR are targets for new small molecules in the treatment of psoriasis. Psoriasis research is a showcase par excellence of translational medicine, resulting in pathogenesis-based treatments.
Topics: Adaptive Immunity; Biological Products; Humans; Psoriasis; Skin; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 35249726
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.014 -
Drugs Aug 2022Ozanimod (Zeposia) is the first sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator to be approved for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active... (Review)
Review
Ozanimod (Zeposia) is the first sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator to be approved for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in the USA, and in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who have had an inadequate or lost response to, or were intolerant of, either conventional therapy or a biologic in the EU. An oral agent, ozanimod is administered once daily as induction and maintenance therapy. In the randomized, double-blind, multinational phase 2 Touchstone and phase 3 True North clinical trials, ozanimod was effective in inducing clinical remission and maintaining remission relative to placebo in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Ozanimod was generally well tolerated in these studies, with manageable or transient adverse events (AEs). Current data from the Touchstone and True North open-label extensions are consistent with the primary studies with respect to therapeutic efficacy and tolerability, with no new safety signals observed. Although further data will be beneficial, ozanimod expands the treatment options for adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Biological Products; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Indans; Oxadiazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors
PubMed: 35994200
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01762-8 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Jan 2022Biologics are used routinely in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but large-scale data reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes among biologic users are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Biologics are used routinely in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but large-scale data reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes among biologic users are lacking. We sought to estimate the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD on biologic therapies.
METHODS
We searched major databases from inception to June 2020 for studies estimating the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in IBD when using biologics (anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF], anti-integrins, and anticytokines). Prevalence and relative risk (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Forty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising 6963 patients. Biologic therapy in IBD pregnancies was associated with a pooled prevalence of 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%; I = 87.4%) for early pregnancy loss, 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%; I = 89.9%) for preterm birth, 0% (95% CI, 0%-0%; I = 0%) for stillbirth, 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; I = 87.0%) for low birth weight, and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%; I = 78.3%) for congenital malformations. These rates are comparable with those published in the general population. In subgroup analyses of a small number of studies, the prevalence of early pregnancy loss and preterm birth were higher in vedolizumab vs anti-TNF users. Meta-regression did not show an association of disease activity or concomitant thiopurine on adverse outcomes. Continued TNF inhibitor use during the third trimester was not associated with risk of preterm birth (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.77-2.60; I = 0%), low birth weight (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.80-2.18; I = 0%), or congenital malformations (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.47-3.49; I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant IBD women using biologics are comparable with that of the general population. PROSPERO protocol #CRD42019135721.
Topics: Biological Products; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 32931960
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.021 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2021Many signaling pathways are dysregulated in cancer cells and the host tumor microenvironment. Aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways promote cancer... (Review)
Review
Many signaling pathways are dysregulated in cancer cells and the host tumor microenvironment. Aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways promote cancer development, progression, and metastasis. Hence, numerous therapeutic interventions targeting RTKs have been actively pursued. Axl is an RTK that belongs to the Tyro3, Axl, MerTK (TAM) subfamily. Axl binds to a high affinity ligand growth arrest specific 6 (Gas6) that belongs to the vitamin K-dependent family of proteins. The Gas6/Axl signaling pathway has been implicated to promote progression, metastasis, immune evasion, and therapeutic resistance in many cancer types. Therapeutic agents targeting Gas6 and Axl have been developed, and promising results have been observed in both preclinical and clinical settings when such agents are used alone or in combination therapy. This review examines the current state of therapeutics targeting the Gas6/Axl pathway in cancer and discusses Gas6- and Axl-targeting agents that have been evaluated preclinically and clinically.
Topics: Animals; Biological Products; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Signal Transduction; Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kinase
PubMed: 34576116
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22189953 -
Drugs Aug 2021Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, auto-inflammatory skin disease originating from the hair follicles. The typical inflammatory nodules, abscesses,... (Review)
Review
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, auto-inflammatory skin disease originating from the hair follicles. The typical inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts (tunnels) are characterized by a massive influx of neutrophils, macrophages, B-cells, plasma cells, T helper (Th)1, Th17 cells and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α. Over the last decades, several clinical trials evaluated the clinical efficacy of different biologics targeting these pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-α and IL-1. However, adalimumab is still the only registered drug for HS. This review discusses biologics and small molecules with high level of evidence for their clinical application, provides guidance on when and how to use these biologics and small molecules in clinical practice, and elaborates on the combination with medical and surgical treatment options beyond the current guidelines. Furthermore this review provides an overview of potential biologics and small molecules currently under investigation for novel targets in HS such as IL-36, C5a, Janus kinase family members, CD-40, LTA4 and CXCR1/2.
Topics: Adalimumab; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Biological Products; CD40 Antigens; Complement Inactivating Agents; Epoxide Hydrolases; Etanercept; Hidradenitis Suppurativa; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Infliximab; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-23; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptors, Interleukin-8A; Receptors, Interleukin-8B; Severity of Illness Index; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thalidomide; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 34283386
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01566-2 -
Natural Product Reports May 2021Covering: up to mid-2020 Terpenoids, also called isoprenoids, are the largest and most structurally diverse family of natural products. Found in all domains of life,... (Review)
Review
Covering: up to mid-2020 Terpenoids, also called isoprenoids, are the largest and most structurally diverse family of natural products. Found in all domains of life, there are over 80 000 known compounds. The majority of characterized terpenoids, which include some of the most well known, pharmaceutically relevant, and commercially valuable natural products, are produced by plants and fungi. Comparatively, terpenoids of bacterial origin are rare. This is counter-intuitive to the fact that recent microbial genomics revealed that almost all bacteria have the biosynthetic potential to create the C5 building blocks necessary for terpenoid biosynthesis. In this review, we catalogue terpenoids produced by bacteria. We collected 1062 natural products, consisting of both primary and secondary metabolites, and classified them into two major families and 55 distinct subfamilies. To highlight the structural and chemical space of bacterial terpenoids, we discuss their structures, biosynthesis, and biological activities. Although the bacterial terpenome is relatively small, it presents a fascinating dichotomy for future research. Similarities between bacterial and non-bacterial terpenoids and their biosynthetic pathways provides alternative model systems for detailed characterization while the abundance of novel skeletons, biosynthetic pathways, and bioactivies presents new opportunities for drug discovery, genome mining, and enzymology.
Topics: Bacteria; Biological Products; Biosynthetic Pathways; Terpenes
PubMed: 33169126
DOI: 10.1039/d0np00066c -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Mar 2023It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.
OBJECTIVES
We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.
METHODS
The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.
RESULTS
Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.
CONCLUSIONS
In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Asthma; Pulmonary Eosinophilia; Biological Products
PubMed: 36538979
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021 -
Nature Chemical Biology Jan 2020Genome mining has become a key technology to exploit natural product diversity. Although initially performed on a single-genome basis, the process is now being scaled up...
Genome mining has become a key technology to exploit natural product diversity. Although initially performed on a single-genome basis, the process is now being scaled up to mine entire genera, strain collections and microbiomes. However, no bioinformatic framework is currently available for effectively analyzing datasets of this size and complexity. In the present study, a streamlined computational workflow is provided, consisting of two new software tools: the 'biosynthetic gene similarity clustering and prospecting engine' (BiG-SCAPE), which facilitates fast and interactive sequence similarity network analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters and gene cluster families; and the 'core analysis of syntenic orthologues to prioritize natural product gene clusters' (CORASON), which elucidates phylogenetic relationships within and across these families. BiG-SCAPE is validated by correlating its output to metabolomic data across 363 actinobacterial strains and the discovery potential of CORASON is demonstrated by comprehensively mapping biosynthetic diversity across a range of detoxin/rimosamide-related gene cluster families, culminating in the characterization of seven detoxin analogues.
Topics: Actinobacteria; Algorithms; Biological Products; Biosynthetic Pathways; Cluster Analysis; Computational Biology; Data Mining; Genome, Bacterial; Genomics; Metabolomics; Microbiota; Multigene Family; Phylogeny; Reproducibility of Results; Software
PubMed: 31768033
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0400-9