-
American Family Physician Jun 2021Since the 1970s, most births in the United States have been planned to occur in a hospital. However, a small percentage of Americans choose to give birth outside of a... (Review)
Review
Since the 1970s, most births in the United States have been planned to occur in a hospital. However, a small percentage of Americans choose to give birth outside of a hospital. The number of out-of-hospital births has increased, with one in every 61 U.S. births (1.64%) occurring out of the hospital in 2018. Out-of-hospital (or community) birth can be planned or unplanned. Of those that are planned, most occur at home and are assisted by midwives. Patients who choose a planned community birth do so for multiple reasons. International observational studies that demonstrate comparable outcomes between planned out-of-hospital and planned hospital birth may not be generalizable to the United States. Most U.S. studies have found statistically significant increases in perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity for home birth compared with hospital birth. Conversely, planned community birth is associated with decreased odds of obstetric interventions, including cesarean delivery. Perinatal outcomes for community birth may be improved with appropriate selection of low-risk, vertex, singleton, term pregnancies in patients who have not had a previous cesarean delivery. A qualified, licensed maternal and newborn health professional who is integrated into a maternity health care system should attend all planned community births. Family physicians are uniquely poised to provide counseling to patients and their families about the risks and benefits associated with community birth, and they may be the first physicians to evaluate and treat newborns delivered outside of a hospital.
Topics: Birth Setting; Birthing Centers; Female; Home Childbirth; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Midwifery; Patient Participation; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Perinatal Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Risk Assessment; United States
PubMed: 34060788
DOI: No ID Found -
PloS One 2018Design and provision of good quality maternity care should incorporate what matters to childbearing women. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to inform... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Design and provision of good quality maternity care should incorporate what matters to childbearing women. This qualitative systematic review was undertaken to inform WHO intrapartum guidelines.
METHODS
Using a pre-determined search strategy, we searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, EMBASE, LILACS, AJOL, and reference lists of eligible studies published 1996-August 2016 (updated to January 2018), reporting qualitative data on womens' childbirth beliefs, expectations, and values. Studies including specific interventions or health conditions were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Authors' findings were extracted, logged on a study-specific data form, and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. Confidence in the quality, coherence, relevance and adequacy of data underpinning the resulting themes was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. A line of argument synthesis was developed.
RESULTS
35 studies (19 countries) were included in the primary search, and 2 in the update. Confidence in most results was moderate to high. What mattered to most women was a positive experience that fulfilled or exceeded their prior personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations. This included giving birth to a healthy baby in a clinically and psychologically safe environment with practical and emotional support from birth companions, and competent, reassuring, kind clinical staff. Most wanted a physiological labour and birth, while acknowledging that birth can be unpredictable and frightening, and that they may need to 'go with the flow'. If intervention was needed or wanted, women wanted to retain a sense of personal achievement and control through active decision-making. These values and expectations were mediated through womens' embodied (physical and psychosocial) experience of pregnancy and birth; local familial and sociocultural norms; and encounters with local maternity services and staff.
CONCLUSIONS
Most healthy childbearing women want a positive birth experience. Safety and psychosocial wellbeing are equally valued. Maternity care should be designed to fulfil or exceed womens' personal and socio-cultural beliefs and expectations.
Topics: Attitude; Culture; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Maternal-Child Health Services; Parturition; Perception; Pregnancy; Social Values; Socioeconomic Factors
PubMed: 29664907
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194906 -
Midwifery Feb 2022To investigate the meaning of the concept of 'obstetric violence' to women in Sweden, who reported a negative birth experience.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the meaning of the concept of 'obstetric violence' to women in Sweden, who reported a negative birth experience.
DESIGN
An inductive qualitative approach with individual narratives. A thematic qualitative content analysis was used.
SETTING
Three midwifery clinics in southwest Scania.
PARTICIPANTS
Twelve women who had given birth less than three years previously and reported a negative/traumatic birth experience.
FINDINGS
The key findings showed that the women had experienced psychological and physical abuse during childbirth which may be interpreted as 'obstetric violence'. Four categories emerged from the analyses describing the women's experiences: Lack of information and consent including poor information and no right to participate in decisions concerning the process of labour, Insufficient pain relief, which encompassed unbearable pain without pain relief, Lack of trust and security where the women experienced staff with bad attitudes and jargon, and The experience of abuse including threats of violence from midwives and where the birth experience was compared to rape.
KEY CONCLUSIONS
The study shows that physical and psychological abuse during childbirth exists in Sweden and that women experience this as being subjected to 'obstetric violence' during childbirth. The phenomenon of obstetric violence is very complex. The abuse of women during childbirth might be a significant problem and quality assurance is required to secure the rights of women giving birth.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
In order to secure the rights of birthing women and to promote respectful and supportive care for new mothers, quality development programs are required.
Topics: Attitude of Health Personnel; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Midwifery; Parturition; Pregnancy; Qualitative Research; Violence
PubMed: 34872035
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103212 -
PloS One 2019Concern has been expressed globally over rising caesarean birth rates. Recently, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) called for help from... (Review)
Review
Concern has been expressed globally over rising caesarean birth rates. Recently, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) called for help from governmental bodies, professional organisations, women's groups, and other stakeholders to reduce unnecessary caesareans. As part of a wider research initiative, we conducted an overview of systematic reviews of antenatal and intrapartum interventions, and reports of evidence based recommendations, to identify and highlight those that have been shown to be effective for reducing caesarean birth, promoting vaginal birth and reducing fear of childbirth. Following registration of the review protocol, (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018090681), we searched The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE (Jan 2000-Jan 2018) and searched for grey literature in PROSPERO, and on websites of health professional and other relevant bodies. Screening and selection of reviews, quality appraisal using AMSTAR-2, and data extraction were performed independently by pairs of at least two reviewers. Excluding reviews assessed as 'critically low' on AMSTAR-2 (n = 54), 101 systematic reviews, and 10 reports of evidence based recommendations were included in the overview. Narrative synthesis was performed, due to heterogeneity of review methodology and topics. The results highlight twenty-five interventions, across 17 reviews, that reduced the risk of caesarean, nine interventions across eight reviews that increased the risk of caesarean, eight interventions that reduced instrumental vaginal birth, four interventions that increased spontaneous vaginal birth, and two interventions that reduced fear of childbirth. This overview of reviews identifies and highlights interventions that have been shown to be effective for reducing caesarean birth, promoting vaginal births and reducing fear of childbirth. In recognising that clinical practices change over time, this overview includes reviews published from 2000 onwards only, thus providing contemporary evidence, and a valuable resource for clinicians when making decisions on practices that should be implemented for reducing unnecessary caesarean births safely. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018090681. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018090681.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Fear; Female; Humans; Parturition; Prenatal Care; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 31648289
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224313 -
PloS One 2020Psychological aspects of labor and birth have received little attention within maternity care service planning or clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to propose... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Psychological aspects of labor and birth have received little attention within maternity care service planning or clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to propose a model demonstrating how neurohormonal processes, in particular oxytocinergic mechanisms, not only control the physiological aspects of labor and birth, but also contribute to the subjective psychological experiences of birth. In addition, sensory information from the uterus as well as the external environment might influence these neurohormonal processes thereby influencing the progress of labor and the experience of birth.
METHODOLOGY
In this new model of childbirth, we integrated the findings from two previous systematic reviews, one on maternal plasma levels of oxytocin during physiological childbirth and one meta-synthesis of women´s subjective experiences of physiological childbirth.
FINDINGS
The neurobiological processes induced by the release of endogenous oxytocin during birth influence maternal behaviour and feelings in connection with birth in order to facilitate birth. The psychological experiences during birth may promote an optimal transition to motherhood. The spontaneous altered state of consciousness, that some women experience, may well be a hallmark of physiological childbirth in humans. The data also highlights the crucial role of one-to-one support during labor and birth. The physiological importance of social support to reduce labor stress and pain necessitates a reconsideration of many aspects of modern maternity care.
CONCLUSION
By listening to women's experiences and by observing women during childbirth, factors that contribute to an optimized process of labor, such as the mothers' wellbeing and feelings of safety, may be identified. These observations support the integrative role of endogenous oxytocin in coordinating the neuroendocrine, psychological and physiological aspects of labor and birth, including oxytocin mediated. decrease of pain, fear and stress, support the need for midwifery one-to-one support in labour as well as the need for maternity care that optimizes the function of these neuroendocrine processes even when birth interventions are used. Women and their partners would benefit from understanding the crucial role that endogenous oxytocin plays in the psychological and neuroendocrinological process of labor.
Topics: Female; Humans; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal Behavior; Maternal Health Services; Midwifery; Models, Biological; Oxytocin; Parturition; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Social Support; Stress, Physiological
PubMed: 32722725
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230992 -
BMJ Open Jul 2022Water immersion during labour using a birth pool to achieve relaxation and pain relief during the first and possibly part of the second stage of labour is an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Water immersion during labour using a birth pool to achieve relaxation and pain relief during the first and possibly part of the second stage of labour is an increasingly popular care option in several countries. It is used particularly by healthy women who experience a straightforward pregnancy, labour spontaneously at term gestation and plan to give birth in a midwifery led care setting. More women are also choosing to give birth in water. There is debate about the safety of intrapartum water immersion, particularly waterbirth. We synthesised the evidence that compared the effect of water immersion during labour or waterbirth on intrapartum interventions and outcomes to standard care with no water immersion. A secondary objective was to synthesise data relating to clinical care practices and birth settings that women experience who immerse in water and women who do not.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
A search was conducted using CINAHL, Medline, Embase, BioMed Central and PsycINFO during March 2020 and was replicated in May 2021.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Primary quantitative studies published in 2000 or later, examining maternal or neonatal interventions and outcomes using the birthing pool for labour and/or birth.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Full-text screening was undertaken independently against inclusion/exclusion criteria in two pairs. Risk of bias assessment included review of seven domains based on the Robbins-I Risk of Bias Tool. All outcomes were summarised using an OR and 95% CI. All calculations were conducted in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V.3, using the inverse variance method. Results of individual studies were converted to log OR and SE for synthesis. Fixed effects models were used when I was less than 50%, otherwise random effects models were used. The fail-safe N estimates were calculated to determine the number of studies necessary to change the estimates. Begg's test and Egger's regression risk assessed risk of bias across studies. Trim-and-fill analysis was used to estimate the magnitude of effect of the bias. Meta-regression was completed when at least 10 studies provided data for an outcome.
RESULTS
We included 36 studies in the review, (N=157 546 participants). Thirty-one studies were conducted in an obstetric unit setting (n=70 393), four studies were conducted in midwife led settings (n=61 385) and one study was a mixed setting (OU and homebirth) (n=25 768). Midwife led settings included planned home and freestanding midwifery unit (k=1), alongside midwifery units (k=1), planned homebirth (k=1), a freestanding midwifery unit and an alongside midwifery unit (k=1) and an alongside midwifery unit (k=1). For water immersion, 25 studies involved women who planned to have/had a waterbirth (n=151 742), seven involved water immersion for labour only (1901), three studies reported on water immersion during labour and waterbirth (n=3688) and one study was unclear about the timing of water immersion (n=215).Water immersion significantly reduced use of epidural (k=7, n=10 993; OR 0.17 95% CI 0.05 to 0.56), injected opioids (k=8, n=27 391; OR 0.22 95% CI 0.13 to 0.38), episiotomy (k=15, n=36 558; OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.27), maternal pain (k=8, n=1200; OR 0.24 95% CI 0.12 to 0.51) and postpartum haemorrhage (k=15, n=63 891; OR 0.69 95% CI 0.51 to 0.95). There was an increase in maternal satisfaction (k=6, n=4144; OR 1.95 95% CI 1.28 to 2.96) and odds of an intact perineum (k=17, n=59 070; OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.79) with water immersion. Waterbirth was associated with increased odds of cord avulsion (OR 1.94 95% CI 1.30 to 2.88), although the absolute risk remained low (4.3 per 1000 vs 1.3 per 1000). There were no differences in any other identified neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This review endorses previous reviews showing clear benefits resulting from intrapartum water immersion for healthy women and their newborns. While most included studies were conducted in obstetric units, to enable the identification of best practice regarding water immersion, future birthing pool research should integrate factors that are known to influence intrapartum interventions and outcomes. These include maternal parity, the care model, care practices and birth setting.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42019147001.
Topics: Female; Humans; Immersion; Infant, Newborn; Labor, Obstetric; Natural Childbirth; Pain; Parturition; Pregnancy
PubMed: 35790327
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517 -
National Vital Statistics Reports :... Jan 2023Objectives-This report presents 2021 data on U.S. births according to a variety of characteristics. Trends in fertility patterns and maternal and infant characteristics...
Objectives-This report presents 2021 data on U.S. births according to a variety of characteristics. Trends in fertility patterns and maternal and infant characteristics are described and interpreted.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Adolescent; Humans; United States; Maternal Age; Pregnancy in Adolescence; Birth Rate; Birth Certificates; Parturition
PubMed: 36723449
DOI: No ID Found -
Prilozi (Makedonska Akademija Na... Apr 2022Traumatic childbirth is an international public health problem because it is supposed that currently up to 45% of new mothers have reported such an experience.... (Review)
Review
Traumatic childbirth is an international public health problem because it is supposed that currently up to 45% of new mothers have reported such an experience. International rates of PTSD due to birth trauma range between 1.5 and 9 percent of all births. Birth trauma is defined as an event occurring during the labour and delivery process that involves actual or threatened serious injury or death of the mother or her infant. A traumatic event or situation creates psychological trauma when it overwhelms the individual's ability to cope, and leaves that person fearing death, annihilation, mutilation, or psychosis. The individual may feel emotionally, cognitively, and physically overwhelmed. The aim of this article is to present a review of published data for childbirth trauma over various periods of time, as well as in different regions of the world. Studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycInfo, ProQuest and PILOTS (Published International Literature of Traumatic Stress) over the last 20 years. More than 8000 articles were found. In this article we present and discuss some important findings.
Topics: Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Infant; Mothers; Parturition; Pregnancy; Psychological Trauma; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 35451296
DOI: 10.2478/prilozi-2022-0002 -
International Journal of Qualitative... Dec 2020: Women's experiences of pregnancy, labour and birth are for some pregnant women negative and they develop a fear of childbirth, which can have consequences for their... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: Women's experiences of pregnancy, labour and birth are for some pregnant women negative and they develop a fear of childbirth, which can have consequences for their wellbeing and health. The aim was to synthesize qualitative literature to deepen the understanding of women's experiences of fear of childbirth.: A systematic literature search and a meta-synthesis that included 14 qualitative papers.: The main results demonstrate a deepened understanding of women's experiences of fear of childbirth interpreted through the metaphor "being at a point of no return". Being at this point meant that the women thought there was no turning back from their situation, further described in the three themes: To suffer consequences from traumatic births, To lack warranty and understanding, and To face the fear.: Women with fear of childbirth are need of support that can meet their existential issues about being at this point of no return, allowing them to express and integrate their feelings, experiences and expectations during pregnancy, childbirth and after birth.Women with fear after birth, i.e., after an earlier negative birth experience, need support that enables them to regain trust in maternity care professionals and their willingness to provide them with good care that offers the support that individual women require. Women pregnant for the first time require similar support to reassure them that other's experiences will not happen to them.
Topics: Attitude to Health; Delivery, Obstetric; Fear; Female; Humans; Parturition; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Qualitative Research; Trust
PubMed: 31858891
DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1704484 -
Women and Birth : Journal of the... Sep 2023When midwives offer birth assistance at home birth and free-standing birth centres, they must adapt their skill set. Currently, there are no comprehensive insights on... (Review)
Review
PROBLEM
When midwives offer birth assistance at home birth and free-standing birth centres, they must adapt their skill set. Currently, there are no comprehensive insights on the skills and knowledge that midwives need to work in those settings.
BACKGROUND
Midwifery care at home birth and in free-standing birth centres requires context specific skills, including the ability to offer low-intervention care for women who choose physiological birth in these settings.
AIM
To synthesise existing qualitative research that describes the skills and knowledge of certified midwives at home births and free-standing birth centres.
STUDY DESIGN
We conducted a systematic review that included searches on 5 databases, author runs, citation tracking, journal searches, and reference checking. Meta-ethnographic techniques of reciprocal translation were used to interpret the data set, and a line of argument synthesis was developed.
RESULTS
The search identified 13 papers, twelve papers from seven countries, and one paper that included five Nordic countries. Three overarching themes and seven sub-themes were developed: 'Building trustworthy connections,' 'Midwife as instrument,' and 'Creating an environment conducive to birth.'
CONCLUSION
The findings highlight that midwives integrated their sensorial experiences with their clinical knowledge of anatomy and physiology to care for women at home birth and in free-standing birth centres. The interactive relationship between midwives and women is at the core of creating an environment that supports physiological birth while integrating the lived experience of labouring women. Further research is needed to elicit how midwives develop these proficiencies.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Midwifery; Home Childbirth; Birthing Centers; Parturition; Anthropology, Cultural; Qualitative Research
PubMed: 37037696
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.03.010