-
Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Sep 2020The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is recognized as an effective dietary intervention to reduce blood pressure (BP). However, among randomized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Blood Pressure Reduction in Adults with and without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is recognized as an effective dietary intervention to reduce blood pressure (BP). However, among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the DASH diet-mediated BP reduction, there are significant methodological and clinical differences. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess the DASH diet effect on BP in adults with and without hypertension, accounting for underlying methodological and clinical confounders. We systematically searched Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases and identified 30 RCTs (n = 5545 participants) that investigated the BP effects of the DASH diet compared with a control diet in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adults. Both random-effects and fixed-effect models were used to calculate the mean attained systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) differences during follow-up. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. Compared with a control diet, the DASH diet reduced both SBP and DBP (difference in means: -3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.2, -2.3 mm Hg; P < 0.001, and -2.5 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.5, -1.5 mm Hg; P < 0.001, respectively). Hypertension status did not modify the effect on BP reduction. The DASH diet compared with a control diet reduced SBP levels to a higher extent in trials with sodium intake >2400 mg/d than in trials with sodium intake ≤2400 mg/d, whereas both SBP and DBP were reduced more in trials with mean age <50 y than in trials of older participants. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate for both outcomes according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The adoption of the DASH diet was accompanied by significant BP reduction in adults with and without hypertension, although higher daily sodium intake and younger age enhanced the BP-lowering effect of the intervention. This meta-analysis was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42019128120.
Topics: Adult; Blood Pressure; Diet, Sodium-Restricted; Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension; Humans; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32330233
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa041 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Aug 2016To systematically review studies quantifying the associations of long term (clinic), mid-term (home), and short term (ambulatory) variability in blood pressure,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review studies quantifying the associations of long term (clinic), mid-term (home), and short term (ambulatory) variability in blood pressure, independent of mean blood pressure, with cardiovascular disease events and mortality.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science, searched to 15 February 2016 for full text articles in English.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION
Prospective cohort studies or clinical trials in adults, except those in patients receiving haemodialysis, where the condition may directly impact blood pressure variability. Standardised hazard ratios were extracted and, if there was little risk of confounding, combined using random effects meta-analysis in main analyses. Outcomes included all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality and cardiovascular disease events. Measures of variability included standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, and average real variability, but not night dipping or day-night variation.
RESULTS
41 papers representing 19 observational cohort studies and 17 clinical trial cohorts, comprising 46 separate analyses were identified. Long term variability in blood pressure was studied in 24 papers, mid-term in four, and short-term in 15 (two studied both long term and short term variability). Results from 23 analyses were excluded from main analyses owing to high risks of confounding. Increased long term variability in systolic blood pressure was associated with risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.22), cardiovascular disease mortality (1.18, 1.09 to 1.28), cardiovascular disease events (1.18, 1.07 to 1.30), coronary heart disease (1.10, 1.04 to 1.16), and stroke (1.15, 1.04 to 1.27). Increased mid-term and short term variability in daytime systolic blood pressure were also associated with all cause mortality (1.15, 1.06 to 1.26 and 1.10, 1.04 to 1.16, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Long term variability in blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, over and above the effect of mean blood pressure. Associations are similar in magnitude to those of cholesterol measures with cardiovascular disease. Limited data for mid-term and short term variability showed similar associations. Future work should focus on the clinical implications of assessment of variability in blood pressure and avoid the common confounding pitfalls observed to date.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42014015695.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Determination; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Humans
PubMed: 27511067
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4098 -
Journal of the American Heart... Dec 2020Background Although exercise training reduces office blood pressure (BP), scarcer evidence is available on whether these benefits also apply to ambulatory blood pressure... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background Although exercise training reduces office blood pressure (BP), scarcer evidence is available on whether these benefits also apply to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), which is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality. The present study aims to assess the effects of exercise training on ABP in patients with hypertension based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results A systematic search of randomized controlled trials on the aforementioned topic was conducted in PubMed and Scopus (since inception to April 1, 2020). The mean difference between interventions (along with 95% CI) for systolic BP and diastolic BP was assessed using a random-effects model. Sub-analyses were performed attending to (1) whether participants were taking antihypertensive drugs and (2) exercise modalities. Fifteen studies (including 910 participants with hypertension) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions lasted 8 to 24 weeks (3-5 sessions/week). Exercise significantly reduced 24-hour (systolic BP, -5.4 mm Hg; [95% CI, -9.2 to -1.6]; diastolic BP, -3.0 mm Hg [-5.4 to -0.6]), daytime (systolic BP, -4.5 mm Hg [-6.6 to -2.3]; diastolic BP, -3.2 mm Hg [-4.8 to -1.5]), and nighttime ABP (systolic BP, -4.7 mm Hg [-8.4 to -1.0]; diastolic BP, -3.1 mm Hg [-5.3 to -0.9]). In separate analyses, exercise benefits on all ABP measures were significant for patients taking medication (all <0.05) but not for untreated patients (although differences between medicated and non-medicated patients were not significant), and only aerobic exercise provided significant benefits (<0.05). Conclusions Aerobic exercise is an effective coadjuvant treatment for reducing ABP in medicated patients with hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Cardiovascular Diseases; Exercise; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33280503
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018487 -
PLoS Medicine Sep 2017Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) appears to reduce BP in hypertension but important questions remain regarding effective implementation and which groups may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) appears to reduce BP in hypertension but important questions remain regarding effective implementation and which groups may benefit most. This individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed to better understand the effectiveness of BP self-monitoring to lower BP and control hypertension.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised trials comparing self-monitoring to no self-monitoring in hypertensive patients (June 2016). Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility and the authors of eligible trials were approached requesting IPD. Of 2,846 articles in the initial search, 36 were eligible. IPD were provided from 25 trials, including 1 unpublished study. Data for the primary outcomes-change in mean clinic or ambulatory BP and proportion controlled below target at 12 months-were available from 15/19 possible studies (7,138/8,292 [86%] of randomised participants). Overall, self-monitoring was associated with reduced clinic systolic blood pressure (sBP) compared to usual care at 12 months (-3.2 mmHg, [95% CI -4.9, -1.6 mmHg]). However, this effect was strongly influenced by the intensity of co-intervention ranging from no effect with self-monitoring alone (-1.0 mmHg [-3.3, 1.2]), to a 6.1 mmHg (-9.0, -3.2) reduction when monitoring was combined with intensive support. Self-monitoring was most effective in those with fewer antihypertensive medications and higher baseline sBP up to 170 mmHg. No differences in efficacy were seen by sex or by most comorbidities. Ambulatory BP data at 12 months were available from 4 trials (1,478 patients), which assessed self-monitoring with little or no co-intervention. There was no association between self-monitoring and either lower clinic or ambulatory sBP in this group (clinic -0.2 mmHg [-2.2, 1.8]; ambulatory 1.1 mmHg [-0.3, 2.5]). Results for diastolic blood pressure (dBP) were similar. The main limitation of this work was that significant heterogeneity remained. This was at least in part due to different inclusion criteria, self-monitoring regimes, and target BPs in included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Self-monitoring alone is not associated with lower BP or better control, but in conjunction with co-interventions (including systematic medication titration by doctors, pharmacists, or patients; education; or lifestyle counselling) leads to clinically significant BP reduction which persists for at least 12 months. The implementation of self-monitoring in hypertension should be accompanied by such co-interventions.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Humans; Hypertension; Life Style; Patient Education as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28926573
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002389 -
Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Nov 2017Beetroot is considered a complementary treatment for hypertension because of its high content of inorganic NO This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Beetroot is considered a complementary treatment for hypertension because of its high content of inorganic NO This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify several aspects of beetroot juice supplementation on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, and the reference lists of previous reviews. Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effects of beetroot juice on resting blood pressure in humans were recruited for quality assessment, meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions; of these, 22 were conducted between 2009 and 2017 and included a total of 47 intervention ( = 650) and 43 control ( = 598) groups. Overall, SBP (-3.55 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.55, -2.54 mm Hg) and DBP (-1.32 mm Hg; 95% CI: -1.97, -0.68 mm Hg) were significantly lower in the beetroot juice-supplemented groups than in the control groups. The mean difference of SBP was larger between beetroot juice-supplemented and control groups in the longer than in the shorter (≥14 compared with <14 d) study durations (-5.11 compared with -2.67 mm Hg) and the highest compared with the lowest (500 compared with 70 and 140 mL/d) doses of beetroot juice (-4.78 compared with -2.37 mm Hg). A positive correlation was observed between beetroot juice doses and the mean differences of blood pressures. In contrast, a smaller effect size of blood pressures was observed after supplementation with higher NO (milligrams per 100 mL beetroot juice). A weak effect size was observed in a meta-analysis of trials that used NO-depleted beetroot juice as a placebo compared with other interventions (-3.09 compared with -4.51 mm Hg for SBP and -0.81 compared with -2.01 mm Hg for DBP). Our results demonstrate the blood pressure-lowering effects of beetroot juice and highlight its potential NO-independent effects.
Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Beta vulgaris; Blood Pressure; Dietary Supplements; Female; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Nitrates
PubMed: 29141968
DOI: 10.3945/an.117.016717 -
The Lancet. Public Health Feb 2017Although it is well established that heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk of hypertension, little is known about the effect of a reduction of alcohol intake on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although it is well established that heavy alcohol consumption increases the risk of hypertension, little is known about the effect of a reduction of alcohol intake on blood pressure. We aimed to assess the effect of a reduction in alcohol consumption on change in blood pressure stratified by initial amount of alcohol consumption and sex in adults.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MedLine, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception up to July 13, 2016, for trials investigating the effect of a change of alcohol consumption on blood pressure in adults using keywords and MeSH terms related to alcohol consumption, blood pressure, and clinical trials, with no language restrictions. We also searched reference lists of identified articles and published meta-analyses and reviews. We included full-text articles with original human trial data for the effect of a change of alcohol consumption on blood pressure in adults, which reported a quantifiable change in average alcohol consumption that lasted at least 7 days and a corresponding change in blood pressure. We extracted data from published reports. We did random-effects meta-analyses stratified by amount of alcohol intake at baseline. All meta-analyses were done with Stata (version 14.1). For the UK, we modelled the effect of a reduction of alcohol consumption for 50% of the population drinking more than two standard drinks per day (ie, 12 g pure alcohol per drink).
FINDINGS
36 trials with 2865 participants (2464 men and 401 women) were included. In people who drank two or fewer drinks per day, a reduction in alcohol was not associated with a significant reduction in blood pressure; however, in people who drank more than two drinks per day, a reduction in alcohol intake was associated with increased blood pressure reduction. Reduction in systolic blood pressure (mean difference -5·50 mm Hg, 95% CI -6·70 to -4·30) and diastolic blood pressure (-3·97, -4·70 to -3·25) was strongest in participants who drank six or more drinks per day if they reduced their intake by about 50%. For the UK, the results would translate into more than 7000 inpatient hospitalisations and 678 cardiovascular deaths prevented every year.
INTERPRETATION
Reducing alcohol intake lowers blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner with an apparent threshold effect. Implementation of effective alcohol interventions in people who drink more than two drinks per day would reduce the disease burden from both alcohol consumption and hypertension, and should be prioritised in countries with substantial alcohol-attributable risk.
FUNDING
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29253389
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30003-8 -
JMIR MHealth and UHealth Jul 2022Self-monitoring of behavior can support lifestyle modifications; however, we do not know whether such interventions are effective in supporting positive changes in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Self-monitoring of behavior can support lifestyle modifications; however, we do not know whether such interventions are effective in supporting positive changes in hypertension-related health behaviors and thus in reducing blood pressure in patients treated for hypertension.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic literature review evaluates the extent to which smartphone app-based self-monitoring of health behavior supports reductions in blood pressure and changes in hypertension-related behaviors. It also explores the behavioral components that might explain intervention effectiveness.
METHODS
A systematic search of 7 databases was conducted in August 2021. Article screening, study and intervention coding, and data extraction were completed independently by reviewers. The search strategy was developed using keywords from previous reviews and relevant literature. Trials involving adults, published after the year 2000, and in the English language were considered for inclusion. The random-effects meta-analysis method was used to account for the distribution of the effect across the studies.
RESULTS
We identified 4638 articles, of which 227 were included for full-text screening. A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were included in the review. In total, 7415 patients with hypertension were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that app-based behavioral self-monitoring interventions had a small but significant effect in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP), on average, by 1.64 mmHg (95% CI 2.73-0.55, n=7301; odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% CI 0.74-3.42, n=114) and in improving changes in medication adherence behavior (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.78, 95% CI 0.22-1.34) compared to usual care or minimal intervention. The review found the intervention had a small effect on supporting improvements in healthy diet by changing habits related to high sodium food (SMD -0.44, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.08) and a trend, although insignificant, toward supporting smoking cessation, low alcohol consumption, and better physical activity behaviors. A subgroup analysis found that behavioral self-monitoring interventions combined with tailored advice resulted in higher and significant changes in both SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in comparison to those not providing tailored advice (SBP: -2.92 mmHg, 95% CI -3.94 to -1.90, n=3102 vs -0.72 mmHg, 95% CI -1.67 to 0.23, n=4199, χ=9.65, P=.002; DBP: -2.05 mmHg, 95% CI -3.10 to -1.01, n=968 vs 1.54 mmHg, 95% CI -0.53 to 3.61, n=400, χ=9.19, P=.002).
CONCLUSIONS
Self-monitoring of hypertension-related behaviors via smartphone apps combined with tailored advice has a modest but potentially clinically significant effect on blood pressure reduction. Future studies could use rigorous methods to explore its effects on supporting changes in both blood pressure and hypertension-related health behaviors to inform recommendations for policy making and service provision.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019136158; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=136158.
Topics: Adult; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Life Style; Medication Adherence; Mobile Applications
PubMed: 35819830
DOI: 10.2196/34767 -
Experimental Gerontology Jun 2023The chronic antihypertensive effect of resistance training (RT) has been widely recognized in mixed-aged populations. However, the specific effect of RT on blood... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The chronic antihypertensive effect of resistance training (RT) has been widely recognized in mixed-aged populations. However, the specific effect of RT on blood pressure (BP) in older individuals (≥60 years) remains unknown. Therefore, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials explored the chronic effects of dynamic RT alone on BP in older people. The study followed the PRISMA statement, and the search was performed using MeSH terms "strength training", "blood pressure" and "aged" on MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. From 1783 potential articles, 24 studies met all inclusion criteria resulting in 835 participants randomized into 26 RT interventions (n = 430) and 24 control groups (n = 405). Overall, BP reduction favoring RT was observed both in SBP (-6.88 [-10.02, -3.73] mmHg) and DBP (-3.37 [-4.71, -2.22] mmHg). Subgroup analysis revealed BP decreases in both participants with hypertension (SBP: -10.42 [-15.67, -5.17]; DBP: -3.99 [-5.76,-2.22] mmHg), and prehypertension (SBP: -4.87 [-7.76, -1.98]; DBP: -2.77 [-4.88, -0.66] mmHg). Improvement in BP was found in studies using traditional RT (free weights and machines) (SBP: -7.04 [-11.04, -3.05]; DBP: -2.60 [-3.72, -1.47] mmHg) and elastic band interventions (SBP: -2.79 [-3.72, -1.86]; DBP:-1.68 [-3.18, -0.18] mmHg). RT performed at moderate intensity (60-80 % 1RM) reduced SBP (-6.98, [-11.93, -2.03]mmHg) and DBP (-3.64 [-5.11, -2.18] mmHg). In conclusion, RT can reduce BP in older people at prehypertensive and hypertensive stage, with traditional RT performed with moderate loads leading to an effect estimate of approximately -7 mmHg for SBP and -4 mmHg for DBP.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Prehypertension; Resistance Training; Hypertension; Blood Pressure; Antihypertensive Agents
PubMed: 37121334
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112193 -
JAMA May 2020The benefit of blood pressure lowering for the prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The benefit of blood pressure lowering for the prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the association of blood pressure lowering with dementia or cognitive impairment.
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
Search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized clinical trials published from database inception through December 31, 2019, that evaluated the association of blood pressure lowering on cognitive outcomes. The control groups consisted of either placebo, alternative antihypertensive agents, or higher blood pressure targets.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were screened and extracted independently by 2 authors. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to report pooled treatment effects and CIs.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was dementia or cognitive impairment. The secondary outcomes were cognitive decline and changes in cognitive test scores.
RESULTS
Fourteen randomized clinical trials were eligible for inclusion (96 158 participants), of which 12 reported the incidence of dementia (or composite of dementia and cognitive impairment [3 trials]) on follow-up and were included in the primary meta-analysis, 8 reported cognitive decline, and 8 reported changes in cognitive test scores. The mean (SD) age of trial participants was 69 (5.4) years and 40 617 (42.2%) were women. The mean systolic baseline blood pressure was 154 (14.9) mm Hg and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 83.3 (9.9) mm Hg. The mean duration of follow-up was 49.2 months. Blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a reduced risk of dementia or cognitive impairment (12 trials; 92 135 participants) (7.0% vs 7.5% of patients over a mean trial follow-up of 4.1 years; odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]; absolute risk reduction, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.09%-0.68%]; I2 = 0.0%) and cognitive decline (8 trials) (20.2% vs 21.1% of participants over a mean trial follow-up of 4.1 years; OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; absolute risk reduction, 0.71% [95% CI, 0.19%-1.2%]; I2 = 36.1%). Blood pressure lowering was not significantly associated with a change in cognitive test scores.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident dementia or cognitive impairment.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk
PubMed: 32427305
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.4249 -
Current Hypertension Reports Apr 2023Hypertension is the primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease and adequate blood pressure control is often elusive. The objective of this work was to conduct a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Hypertension is the primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease and adequate blood pressure control is often elusive. The objective of this work was to conduct a meta-analysis of trial data of isometric resistance training (IRT) studies in people with hypertension, to establish if IRT produced an anti-hypertensive effect. A database search (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE) identified randomised controlled and crossover trials of IRT versus a sedentary or sham control group in adults with hypertension.
RECENT FINDINGS
We included 12 studies (14 intervention groups) in the meta-analyses, with an aggregate of 415 participants. IRT reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean difference (MD) - 7.47 mmHg (95%CI - 10.10, - 4.84), P < 0.01; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) MD - 3.17 mmHg (95%CI - 5.29, - 1.04), P < 0.01; and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) MD - 7.19 mmHg (95%CI - 9.06, - 5.32), P < 0.0001. Office pulse pressure and resting heart rate was not significantly reduced, neither were 24-h or day-time ambulatory blood pressures (SBP, DBP). Night-time blood pressures, however, were significantly reduced with SBP MD - 4.28 mmHg (95%CI - 7.88, - 0.67), P = 0.02, and DBP MD - 2.22 mmHg (95%CI - 3.55, - 0.88), P < 0.01. IRT does lower SBP, DBP and MAP office and night-time ambulatory SBP and DBP, but not 24-h mean ambulatory blood pressures in people with hypertension.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hypertension; Resistance Training; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Hypotension
PubMed: 36853479
DOI: 10.1007/s11906-023-01232-w