-
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Aug 2023Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.
METHODS
Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.
RESULTS
A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Humeral Fractures; Fracture Healing; Bone Plates; Radial Neuropathy; Humerus; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37093269
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04836-8 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Aug 2019To evaluate the effect of intramedullary nail and locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture (PHF). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the effect of intramedullary nail and locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture (PHF).
METHODS
China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), Wan-fang database, Chinese Biomedicine Database (CBM), PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until July 2018. The eligible references all show that the control group uses locking plates to treat PHF, while the experimental group uses intramedullary nails to do that. Two reviewers independently retrieved and extracted the data. Reviewer Manager 5.3 was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight retrospective studies were referred in this study which involves 2699 patients. Meta-analysis results show that the intramedullary nails in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures are superior to locking plates in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, fracture healing time, postoperative complications, and postoperative infection. But there is no significance in constant, neck angle, VAS, external rotation, antexion, intorsion pronation, abduction, NEER, osteonecrosis, additional surgery, impingement syndrome, delayed union, screw penetration, and screw back-out.
CONCLUSIONS
The intramedullary nail is superior to locking plate in reducing the total complication, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate of PHF. Due to the limitations in this meta-analysis, more large-scale, multicenter, and rigorous designed RCTs should be conducted to confirm our findings.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019120508.
Topics: Bone Nails; Bone Plates; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Shoulder Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31470878
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1345-0 -
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Nov 2020The success of treatment of bone fracture and defects are based on a proper contact and compression between the bone fracture fragments. Intraoperative manipulations... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIM
The success of treatment of bone fracture and defects are based on a proper contact and compression between the bone fracture fragments. Intraoperative manipulations such as bone compression or distractions are generally done in order to achieve this. However, none of the bone plates currently in routine use allow these manipulations after fixation to the bone, requiring refixation and repeated drilling, and screwing operations. Based on this shortcoming, we designed a novel adjustable bone plate (ABP) system which allows bone shortening and lengthening even after fixation to the bone surface. The aim of the paper is to clarify the unique properties of the novel bone plate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this paper, the new generation adjustable bone plate applicability, design, indication, and new characteristics in addition to conventional bone plates with review of the literature were discussed and surgical technique was demonstrated in a saw bone model.
RESULTS
This novel design allows for compression and distraction at the fracture ends post fixation as well as bone segment transfers.
CONCLUSIONS
The potential of the new generation ABP plate for use in bone compression, distraction, and the segmental bone transfer is a promising invention for clinical applications in the future.
Topics: Bone Plates; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Humans
PubMed: 32222126
DOI: 10.3906/sag-2002-69 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2023Due to poor bone quality and complexity, some fractures are difficult to treat, with high risk of failure. Moreover, general health is often poor in elderly patients... (Review)
Review
Due to poor bone quality and complexity, some fractures are difficult to treat, with high risk of failure. Moreover, general health is often poor in elderly patients with multiple comorbidity and poor compliance, necessitating perfect first-line management to avoid re-operation. The armamentarium comprises specific internal fixation implants and also complementary methods such as autologous, homologous or heterologous bone graft or bone substitutes with varying mechanical and biological characteristics. Associating these options is what is mean by "augmented fixation". The present review of augmented osteosynthesis addresses the following questions: What are the characteristics of fragility fractures? Fragility fracture is caused by low-energy trauma on bone with poor structural quality and low mineral density. Treatment aims to enable early mobilization and weight-bearing while avoiding mechanical failure of fixation. Prolonged bedrest, loss of mobility and surgical revision are aggravating and sometimes fatal factors in these fragile patients. What are the biological techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? Autologous or homologous bone graft are the most widely used biological augmentation techniques. They fill spaces and promote osteoconduction and consolidation. Some bone-like phosphocalcic structures are opening up promising lines of research. What are the non-biological techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? Hydroxyapatite, phosphocalcic cement and acrylic cement are the most widely used synthetic materials. Biological and mechanical effects are variable according to composition, requiring specific implementation. What are the mechanical techniques of fixation augmentation in fragility fracture? There is at present no consensus as to the augmentation techniques to be applied in fragility fracture. Cerclage or complementary plating, or external fixation associated to internal fixation are possibilities. However, the literature consists only of small series reporting surgical techniques specific to a given surgeon or team. When and how should osteosynthesis for fragility fracture be augmented? The choice of augmentation depends on fracture location, comminution, available material and local experience. The more severe the fracture, the more complex the fixation. The approach needs to be adapted to the preoperative planning and the associated mechanical means (plate, complementary cerclage) and prosthetic replacement should be considered in certain joint fractures or fractures close to load-bearing surfaces. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Fractures, Bone; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Bone Plates; Reoperation; Bone Cements
PubMed: 36404483
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103461 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2019The use of locking plates relies on novel mechanical and biological concepts: the bone healing is endochondral because of the elasticity of the constructs. Preoperative... (Review)
Review
The use of locking plates relies on novel mechanical and biological concepts: the bone healing is endochondral because of the elasticity of the constructs. Preoperative planning is required to determine the fracture reduction strategy and select the implants. The type of plate and the type of screws and their position determine the mechanical properties of the construct. Failure of locking plate fixation is a new phenomenon that differs from conventional plate fixation. These are brought on by inadequate planning, which is made worse when minimally invasive surgery is performed. Often, the fracture is not reduced correctly (leading to malunion), the implant length is incorrect, or the screw type, number, location and implantation sequence are inappropriate. Together these can result in an overly rigid construct with poor healing and implant failure or the opposite, an overly flexible construct that can compromise healing. The return to weight bearing after fracture fixation must be adapted to the type of fracture and construct. While locking plates provide better bone purchase, especially in osteoporotic bone, "en bloc" pulling out of the implant is possible. Delayed fractures at the end of the plates are also possible but can be avoided by making the correct biomechanical choices during fixation. For epiphyseal fractures, there are risks of cut-out and impaction of locking screws in cancellous bone related to the fracture pathology. In the long-term, locking plates can be difficult to remove; however, specialized instrumentation can make this easier.
Topics: Bone Plates; Bone Screws; Device Removal; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Osteoporosis; Postoperative Care; Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 30130659
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.031 -
Scientific Reports Aug 2021Fractures are difficult to treat because of individual differences in bone morphology and fracture types. Compared to serialized bone plates, the use of customized...
Fractures are difficult to treat because of individual differences in bone morphology and fracture types. Compared to serialized bone plates, the use of customized plates significantly improves the fracture healing process. However, designing custom plates often requires the extraction of skeletal morphology, which is a complex and time-consuming procedure. This study proposes a method for extracting bone morphological features to facilitate customized plate designs. The customized plate design involves three major steps: extracting the morphological features of the bone, representing the undersurface features of the plate, and constructing the customized plate. Among these steps, constructing the undersurface feature involves integrating a group of bone features with different anatomical morphologies into a semantic feature parameter set of the plate feature. The undersurface feature encapsulates the plate and bone features into a highly cohesive generic feature and then establishes an internal correlation between the plate and bone features. Using the femoral plate as an example, we further examined the validity and feasibility of the proposed method. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the convenience of redesign through the intuitive editing of semantic parameters. In addition, the proposed method significantly improves the design efficiency and reduces the required design time.
Topics: Bone Plates; Femoral Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Stress, Mechanical
PubMed: 34341376
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94924-9 -
Proceedings of the Institution of... Sep 2022Metal and its alloys have been predominantly used in fracture fixation for centuries, but new materials such as composites and polymers have begun to see clinical use... (Review)
Review
Metal and its alloys have been predominantly used in fracture fixation for centuries, but new materials such as composites and polymers have begun to see clinical use for fracture fixation during the past couple of decades. Along with the emerging of new materials, tribological issues, especially debris, have become a growing concern for fracture fixation plates. This article for the first time systematically reviews the most recent biomechanical research, with a focus on experimental testing, of those plates within ScienceDirect and PubMed databases. Based on the search criteria, a total of 5449 papers were retrieved, which were then further filtered to exclude nonrelevant, duplicate or non-accessible full article papers. In the end, a total of 83 papers were reviewed. In experimental testing plates, screws and simulated bones or cadaver bones are employed to build a fixation construct in order to test the strength and stability of different plate and screw configurations. The test set-up conditions and conclusions are well documented and summarised here, including fracture gap size, types of bones deployed, as well as the applied load, test speed and test ending criteria. However, research on long term plate usage was very limited. It is also discovered that there is very limited experimental research around the tribological behaviour particularly on the debris' generation, collection and characterisation. In addition, there is no identified standard studying debris of fracture fixation plate. Therefore, the authors suggested the generation of a suite of tribological testing standards on fracture fixation plate and screws in the aim to answer key questions around the debris from fracture fixation plate of new materials or new design and ultimately to provide an insight on how to reduce the risks of debris-related osteolysis, inflammation and aseptic loosening.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Plates; Bone Screws; Cadaver; Fracture Fixation; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Materials Testing
PubMed: 35920401
DOI: 10.1177/09544119221108540 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2021In France, 11,294 proximal tibia fractures occurred in 2018 and 6880 surgical procedures were done to treat them. Most of these were tibial plateau fractures, although... (Review)
Review
In France, 11,294 proximal tibia fractures occurred in 2018 and 6880 surgical procedures were done to treat them. Most of these were tibial plateau fractures, although fractures can occur in the metaphysis only or in the intercondylar eminence. The proximal tibia's poor vascularization justifies sparing it by doing a percutaneous treatment, setting the stage for bone union. The treatment must be based on rigorous planning with 3D imaging to determine the type of fracture accurately. The goals of treatment are first to realign the lower limb and then to reduce the articular surface, while addressing any associated injuries. Percutaneous reduction is based on ligamentotaxis and the use of spatulas or balloons that spare the vascularization. Surgical navigation and arthroscopy are precious tools for verifying the reduction. There are several options for stabilization, ranging from using polymethylmethacrylate cement for a Schatzker III fracture to applying a cannulated screw or doing MIPPO (Minimal Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis) with an anatomical plate and adjustable locking screws placed under the depression in complex fractures. Percutaneous surgery is not about the size of the incisions; the focus is on sparing the metaphysis and its vascularization to ensure high-quality and long-lasting stability. It appears to yield better functional outcomes than open reduction and internal fixation, not only for Schatzker type I, II and III fractures, but also for complex fractures where open fixation is more damaging and the source of complications.
Topics: Bone Plates; Bone Screws; Fracture Fixation, Internal; France; Humans; Tibial Fractures
PubMed: 33316447
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102753 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Research :... Sep 2021This preliminary study quantified tibia cartilage thickness (Cart.Th), subchondral bone plate thickness (SBPl.Th) and subchondral trabecular bone (STB)...
This preliminary study quantified tibia cartilage thickness (Cart.Th), subchondral bone plate thickness (SBPl.Th) and subchondral trabecular bone (STB) microarchitecture in subjects with varus- or valgus- malaligned knees diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) and compared them to controls (non-OA). Tibial plateaus from 25 subjects with knee-OA (undergoing knee arthroplasty) and 15 cadavers (controls) were micro-CT scanned (17 µm/voxel). Joint alignment was classified radiographically for OA subjects (varus-aligned n = 18, valgus-aligned n = 7). Cart.Th, SBPl.Th, STB bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and their medial-to-lateral ratios were analyzed in anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial and posterolateral subregions. Varus-OA and valgus-OA were compared to controls. Compared to controls (1.19-1.54 mm), Cart.Th in varus-OA was significantly lower anteromedially (0.58 mm, -59%) and higher laterally (2.19-2.47 mm, +60-63%); in valgus-OA, Cart.Th was significantly higher posteromedially (1.86 mm, +56%). Control medial-to-lateral Cart.Th ratios were around unity (0.8-1.1), in varus-OA significantly below (0.2-0.6) and in valgus-OA slightly above (1.0-1.3) controls. SBPl.Th and BV/TV were significantly higher medially in varus-OA (0.58-0.72 mm and 37-44%, respectively) and laterally in valgus-OA (0.60-0.61 mm and 32-37%), compared to controls (0.26-0.47 mm and 18-37%). In varus-OA, the medial-to-lateral SBPl.Th and BV/TV ratios were above unity (1.4-2.4) and controls (0.8-2.1); in valgus-OA they were closer to unity (0.8-1.1) and below controls. Varus- and valgus-OA tibia differ significantly from controls in Cart.Th, SBPl.Th and STB microarchitecture depending on joint alignment, suggesting structural changes in OA may reflect differences in medial-to-lateral load distribution upon the tibial plateau. Here we identified an inverse relationship between cartilage thickness and underlying subchondral bone, suggesting a whole-joint response in OA to daily stimuli.
Topics: Bone Plates; Cancellous Bone; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular; Humans; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Tibia
PubMed: 33241575
DOI: 10.1002/jor.24914 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jul 2021Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common hand trauma. The current surgical fixation options for such fractures include percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning and nonlocking...
BACKGROUND
Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common hand trauma. The current surgical fixation options for such fractures include percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning and nonlocking and locking plate fixation. Although bone plate fixation, compared with Kirschner wire pinning, has superior fixation ability, a consensus has not been reached on whether the bone plate is better placed on the dorsal or lateral side.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fixation of locking and regular bone plates on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-five artificial metacarpal bones were used in the experiment. Metacarpal shaft fractures were created using a saw blade, which were then treated with four types of fixation as follows: (1) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the dorsal side (LP_D); (2) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the lateral side (LP_L); (3) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the dorsal side (RP_D); (4) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the lateral side (RP_D); and (5) two K-wires (KWs). All specimens were tested through cantilever bending tests on a material testing system. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the five fixation types were determined based on the force-displacement data. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the specimens with metacarpal shaft fractures were first analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test.
RESULTS
The maximum fracture force results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (230.1 ± 22.8 N, mean ± SD) ≅ RP_D group (228.2 ± 13.4 N) > KW group (94.0 ± 17.4 N) > LP_L group (59.0 ± 7.9 N) ≅ RP_L group (44.5 ± 3.4 N). In addition, the stiffness results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (68.7 ± 14.0 N/mm) > RP_D group (54.9 ± 3.2 N/mm) > KW group (20.7 ± 5.8 N/mm) ≅ LP_L group (10.6 ± 1.7 N/mm) ≅ RP_L group (9.4 ± 1.2 N/mm).
CONCLUSION
According to our results, the mechanical strength offered by lateral plate fixation of a metacarpal shaft fracture is so low that even KW fixation can offer relatively superior mechanical strength; this is regardless of whether a locking or nonlocking plate is used for lateral plate fixation. Such fixation can reduce the probability of extensor tendon adhesion. Nevertheless, our results indicated that when lateral plate fixation is used for fixating a metacarpal shaft fracture in a clinical setting, whether the mechanical strength offered by such fixation would be strong enough to support bone union remains questionable.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone Plates; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Materials Testing; Metacarpal Bones
PubMed: 34233702
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02575-3