-
JMIR Dermatology May 2024Dermatologic patient education materials (PEMs) are often written above the national average seventh- to eighth-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and...
BACKGROUND
Dermatologic patient education materials (PEMs) are often written above the national average seventh- to eighth-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT are large language models (LLMs) that are responsive to user prompts. Our project assesses their use in generating dermatologic PEMs at specified reading levels.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the ability of select LLMs to generate PEMs for common and rare dermatologic conditions at unspecified and specified reading levels. Further, the study aims to assess the preservation of meaning across such LLM-generated PEMs, as assessed by dermatology resident trainees.
METHODS
The Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) of current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs was evaluated for 4 common (atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and herpes zoster) and 4 rare (epidermolysis bullosa, bullous pemphigoid, lamellar ichthyosis, and lichen planus) dermatologic conditions. We prompted ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT to "Create a patient education handout about [condition] at a [FKRL]" to iteratively generate 10 PEMs per condition at unspecified fifth- and seventh-grade FKRLs, evaluated with Microsoft Word readability statistics. The preservation of meaning across LLMs was assessed by 2 dermatology resident trainees.
RESULTS
The current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs had an average (SD) FKRL of 9.35 (1.26) and 9.50 (2.3) for common and rare diseases, respectively. For common diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.8 and 11.21 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). For rare diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.85 and 11.45 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). At the fifth-grade reading level, GPT-4 was better at producing PEMs for both common and rare conditions than ChatGPT-3.5 (P=.001 and P=.01, respectively), DermGPT (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively), and DocsGPT (P<.001 and P=.02, respectively). At the seventh-grade reading level, no significant difference was found between ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DocsGPT, or DermGPT in producing PEMs for common conditions (all P>.05); however, for rare conditions, ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT outperformed GPT-4 (P=.003 and P<.001, respectively). The preservation of meaning analysis revealed that for common conditions, DermGPT ranked the highest for overall ease of reading, patient understandability, and accuracy (14.75/15, 98%); for rare conditions, handouts generated by GPT-4 ranked the highest (14.5/15, 97%).
CONCLUSIONS
GPT-4 appeared to outperform ChatGPT-3.5, DocsGPT, and DermGPT at the fifth-grade FKRL for both common and rare conditions, although both ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT performed better than GPT-4 at the seventh-grade FKRL for rare conditions. LLM-produced PEMs may reliably meet seventh-grade FKRLs for select common and rare dermatologic conditions and are easy to read, understandable for patients, and mostly accurate. LLMs may play a role in enhancing health literacy and disseminating accessible, understandable PEMs in dermatology.
Topics: Humans; Skin Diseases; Patient Education as Topic; Dermatology; Reading; Qualitative Research; Language; Health Literacy; Teaching Materials
PubMed: 38754096
DOI: 10.2196/55898 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The manifestations of bullous pemphigoid (BP) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection are similar in oral mucosa, and the laboratory detection of HSV has some...
BACKGROUND
The manifestations of bullous pemphigoid (BP) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection are similar in oral mucosa, and the laboratory detection of HSV has some limitations, making it difficult to identify the HSV infection in oral lesions of BP. In addition, the treatments for BP and HSV infection have contradictory aspects. Thus, it is important to identify the HSV infection in BP patients in time.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the prevalence and clinical markers of HSV infection in oral lesions of BP.
METHODS
This prospective cross-sectional descriptive analytical study was conducted on 42 BP patients with oral lesions. A total of 32 BP patients without oral lesions and 41 healthy individuals were enrolled as control groups. Polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HSV. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with HSV infection were compared with those without infection.
RESULTS
A total of 19 (45.2%) BP patients with oral lesions, none (0.0%) BP patients without oral lesions, and four (9.8%) healthy individuals were positive for HSV on oral mucosa. Among BP patients with oral lesions, the inconsistent activity between oral and skin lesions (p=0.001), absence of blister/blood blister in oral lesions (p=0.020), and pain for oral lesions (p=0.014) were more often seen in HSV-positive than HSV-negative BP patients; the dosage of glucocorticoid (p=0.023) and the accumulated glucocorticoid dosage in the last 2 weeks (2-week AGC dosage) (p=0.018) were higher in HSV-positive BP patients. Combining the above five variables as test variable, the AUC was 0.898 (p<0.001) with HSV infection as state variable in ROC analysis. The absence of blister/blood blister in oral lesions (p=0.030) and pain for oral lesions (p=0.038) were found to be independent predictors of HSV infection in multivariable analysis. A total of 14 (73.7%) HSV-positive BP patients were treated with 2-week famciclovir and the oral mucosa BPDAI scores significantly decreased (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
HSV infection is common in BP oral lesions. The inconsistent activity between oral and skin lesions, absence of blister in oral lesions, pain for oral lesions, higher currently used glucocorticoid dosage, and higher 2-week AGC dosage in BP patients should alert physicians to HSV infection in oral lesions and treat them with 2-week famciclovir in time.
Topics: Humans; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Male; Female; Aged; Herpes Simplex; Prevalence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Simplexvirus; Mouth Mucosa; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Mouth Diseases; Adult
PubMed: 38698862
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1387503 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP), an association between lichen planus and bullous pemphigoid lesions, is a rare subepithelial autoimmune bullous disease. Mucous...
BACKGROUND
Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP), an association between lichen planus and bullous pemphigoid lesions, is a rare subepithelial autoimmune bullous disease. Mucous membrane involvement has been reported previously; however, it has never been specifically studied.
METHODS
We report on 12 cases of LPP with predominant or exclusive mucous membrane involvement. The diagnosis of LPP was based on the presence of lichenoid infiltrates in histology and immune deposits in the basement membrane zone in direct immunofluorescence and/or immunoelectron microscopy. Our systematic review of the literature, performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, highlights the clinical and immunological characteristics of LPP, with or without mucous membrane involvement.
RESULTS
Corticosteroids are the most frequently used treatment, with better outcomes in LPP with skin involvement alone than in that with mucous membrane involvement. Our results suggest that immunomodulators represent an alternative first-line treatment for patients with predominant mucous membrane involvement.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Lichen Planus; Mucous Membrane; Pemphigoid, Bullous
PubMed: 38686381
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1243566 -
Cureus Mar 2024Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid (DBP) may present identical to an idiopathic type of illness. Thus, DBP should be considered as a differential diagnosis when evaluating...
Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid (DBP) may present identical to an idiopathic type of illness. Thus, DBP should be considered as a differential diagnosis when evaluating the cause of bullous pemphigoid (BP) in elderly individuals with diabetes. We present the case of a 65-year-old "young-elderly" female who developed bullous lesions after initiation of medication. This case report casts light on a commonly prescribed antidiabetic drug, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, vildagliptin, and its unforeseen complication in the elderly. The long-term complication is BP. With long-term use, there is an increased likelihood of encountering such cases among the elderly. Thus, we recommend that DBP be considered an important early differential diagnosis among elderly diabetics presenting with initial signs and symptoms of BP.
PubMed: 38681395
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57054 -
Cureus Mar 2024In this report, we present a case of a 70-year-old male with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who developed type 1 diabetic...
In this report, we present a case of a 70-year-old male with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who developed type 1 diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) following treatment with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy. Despite well-controlled T2DM with oral hypoglycemic agents, the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) led to rapid deterioration into insulin-dependent status due to ICI-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Vigilant monitoring for hyperglycemia and timely intervention is crucial during ICI therapy, considering the potentially life-threatening complications. Although the patient achieved extended progression-free survival (PFS) post-treatment, re-administration of atezolizumab resulted in a bullous pemphigoid-like rash, necessitating discontinuation of the drug and corticosteroid treatment. The impact of recurring immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on treatment efficacy warrants further investigation.
PubMed: 38681275
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57024 -
Cureus Mar 2024Background Autoimmune vesiculobullous diseases (AIBDs) are a group of diseases characterized by blisters of the skin/mucosa due to the presence of circulating...
Background Autoimmune vesiculobullous diseases (AIBDs) are a group of diseases characterized by blisters of the skin/mucosa due to the presence of circulating autoantibodies against antigens in the epidermis or the dermo-epidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgC3, and IgA on fresh-frozen tissue is the gold standard diagnostic test for AIBDs. However, DIF in the absence of frozen tissue is challenging for the diagnosis of AIBDs. This study aimed to analyze the practical utility of DIF using paraffin-embedded skin biopsy rather than fresh frozen tissue for the diagnosis of AIBDs. Methodology This cross-sectional comparative study included 30 cases of AIBDs. DIF for IgG and IgA was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue (PE-DIF) after proteinase digestion on histopathologically confirmed 15 pemphigus vulgaris (PV), three pemphigus foliaceous (PF), four bullous pemphigoid (BP), three dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), three subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SCPD), and one case each of linear IgA disease and pemphigoid gestationis (PG). PE-DIF staining pattern was compared with the DIF on fresh frozen tissue (FF-DIF). Results All cases of PV and PF showed an intercellular IgG chicken wire staining pattern similar to FF-DIF. However, background staining was more intense in PV cases while less intense in PF cases. Three BP cases showed linear IgG staining in PE-DIF. DH, SCPD, linear IgA disease, and PG cases did not show IgG positivity. Out of three DH cases, two cases showed granular IgA positivity while linear IgA positivity along the basement membrane was seen in a single case of linear IgA disease. Negative IgG staining was observed in SCPD. Immunofluorescence in PE-DIF was rapidly deteriorating than in FF-DIF. Conclusions DIF done on paraffin-embedded tissue can be used as a supplement and salvage technique with histopathology for the diagnosis of AIBDs, particularly when a cryostat facility for frozen tissue is not available and the patient is unable to undergo a second biopsy procedure.
PubMed: 38665766
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56916 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024Numerous cutaneous manifestations have been associated with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and vaccination, but new-onset bullous pemphigoid (BP) or...
BACKGROUND
Numerous cutaneous manifestations have been associated with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and vaccination, but new-onset bullous pemphigoid (BP) or flaring up of pre-existing BP is a rare side effect of COVID-19 vaccines that has been mentioned to a lesser extent in the literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review focused on the association between the new- onset or flare-up of BP and the COVID-19 vaccination.
METHOD
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and the Web of Science databases up to 11 March 2023. The search aimed to identify English-language studies reporting new-onset or flare-ups of BP as a potential side effect of the COVID-19 vaccination. The search terms included bullous pemphigoid and COVID-19 vaccination-related MeSH terms.
RESULTS
The systematic review of 40 articles investigating the incidence of BP in individuals who received various COVID-19 vaccines revealed pertinent findings. Among the 54 patients with new-onset BP, the median age was 72.42 years, and most were men (64%). Conversely, the median age of the 17 patients experiencing a flare-up of BP was 73.35 years, with a higher proportion of women (53%). Regarding vaccination types, a significant number of patients (56%) developed new-onset BP after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech).
CONCLUSION
This study indicates a potential association between COVID-19 vaccinations, particularly mRNA vaccines, and the occurrence of BP. It suggests that this rare autoimmune disorder may be triggered as an adverse event following the COVID-19 vaccination. However, it is important to note that the majority of BP patients in our study were unaffected by the COVID-19 vaccine, and even those who experienced worsening of their conditions were managed without significant consequences. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Physicians should be mindful of this uncommon adverse event and encourage patients to complete their planned vaccination schedules.
PubMed: 38654835
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1293920 -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer Apr 2024With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic...
With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.
Topics: Humans; Consensus; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Radioimmunotherapy; Exanthema; Oncologists
PubMed: 38599660
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007675 -
Indian Journal of Dermatology,... Feb 2024Objective To determine the diagnostic utility of C4d immunohistochemical marker in cases of bullous pemphigoid by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive...
Objective To determine the diagnostic utility of C4d immunohistochemical marker in cases of bullous pemphigoid by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Methods We conducted an exploratory study (retrospectively and prospectively) from January 2017 to June 2022. All direct immunofluorescence proven cases of bullous pemphigoid were included in the study while cases with inadequate tissue for immunohistochemistry studies were excluded. Results Among the 57 cases of bullous pemphigoid, 49 showed positivity for C4d marker. All the ten control cases of inflammatory dermatoses were negative for C4d staining. A sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 55.56% were calculated with a confidence interval of 95%. Conclusion Direct immunofluorescence on fresh or frozen skin tissue remains the gold standard. But in circumstances where direct immunofluorescence facilities are not available, C4d immunohistochemistry marker staining on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material submitted for standard microscopic investigation can, in most cases, confirm the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, obviating the need for a second biopsy. Limitation It is a single centre study. Selection bias may come into play.
PubMed: 38595011
DOI: 10.25259/IJDVL_124_2023 -
Journal of Dermatological Science Mar 2024Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease, is classically defined by the presence of IgG autoantibodies directed against the...
BACKGROUND
Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease, is classically defined by the presence of IgG autoantibodies directed against the hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 (type XVII collagen) and BP230 and the predominance of skin lesions. Several studies have addressed the role of anti-BP180 IgE in patients and experimental models, while data on anti-BP230 IgE are scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To assess anti-BP230 IgE level by ELISA in BP sera and to correlate it with disease severity and clinical characteristics.
METHODS
BP sera underwent anti-BP230 IgE ELISA and Western blotting against human BP230 fragments.
RESULTS
We demonstrate that 36/154 (23%) of BP sera were positive for anti-BP230 IgE. Anti-BP230 IgE levels had no correlation with clinical phenotype or disease activity per se. Interestingly, anti-BP230 IgE was significantly associated with disease activity within individuals during the course of the disease. Additionally, anti-BP230 IgE and total IgE levels showed a significant correlation. Notably, anti-BP230 IgG correlated interindividually with disease activity. By Western blotting, the C-terminal domain of BP230 fragments (C2; amino acids 2024-2349 and C3; amino acids 2326-2649), provided the best serological assay for anti-BP230 IgE detection.
CONCLUSION
As a complementary tool, IgE immunoblotting is recommended to obtain an optimal serological diagnosis, particularly in patients with severe disease without IgG reactivity by BP180- or BP230-specific ELISA. Although the detection of serum anti-BP230 IgE is not of major diagnostic significance, it may be relevant for therapeutic decisions, e.g., for anti-IgE-directed treatment, which has been successfully used in case series of BP.
PubMed: 38582700
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2024.03.009