Review

Authors: Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Robert Seifert, Ali Afshar-Oromieh...

This review paper highlights the transformative role of PSMA-targeted diagnostics and therapy in prostate cancer management, particularly focusing on Lu-PSMA-617, approved by the FDA and EMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-chemotherapy and ARPI treatment. Originating from the VISION trial's success, this paper navigates the current radioligand therapy (RLT) indications, emphasizing practical patient selection, planning, and treatment execution. It critically examines Lu-PSMA's comparative effectiveness against cabazitaxel and Ra-223, addressing decision-making dilemmas for mCRPC treatments. Furthermore, the paper discusses Lu-PSMA in chemotherapy-naïve patients and its application in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, underlined by ongoing global studies. A significant concern is Lu-PSMA's long-term safety profile, particularly nephrotoxicity risks, necessitating further investigation. The possibility of Lu-PSMA rechallenge in responsive patients is explored, stressing the need for comprehensive analyses and real-world data to refine treatment protocols. Conclusively, PSMA-targeted therapy marks a significant advance in prostate cancer therapy, advocating for its integration into a multimodal, patient-centric treatment approach. The review underscores the imperative for additional comparative studies to optimize treatment sequences and outcomes, ultimately enhancing long-term prognosis and disease control in prostate cancer management.

Topics: Humans; Male; Lutetium; Prostatic Neoplasms; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Precision Medicine; Dipeptides; Prostate-Specific Antigen

PubMed: 38570288
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.02.007

Review

Authors: Maciej Jaromin, Tomasz Konecki, Piotr Kutwin...

Bladder cancer is the 10th most popular cancer in the world, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is diagnosed in ~80% of all cases. Treatments for NMIBC include transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors is scarce and usually leads to Radical Cystectomy. In this paper, we review recent advancements in conservative treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors. The main focus of the paper is FDA-approved medications: Pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene Firadenovec (Adstiladrin). Other, less researched therapeutic possibilities are also included, namely: N-803 immunotherapy, TAR-200 and TAR-210 intravesical delivery systems and combined Cabazitaxel, Gemcitabine and Cisplatin chemotherapy. Conservative treatment and delaying radical cystectomy would greatly benefit patients' quality of life; it is undoubtedly the future of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

PubMed: 38611044
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071366

Review

Authors: Koji Hatano, Norio Nonomura

The introduction of novel therapeutic agents for advanced prostate cancer has led to a wide range of treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the past decade, new treatment options for mCRPC, including abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, sipuleucel-T, radium-223, Lu-PSMA-617, and Olaparib, have demonstrated a survival benefit in phase 3 trials. Bone-modifying agents have become part of the overall treatment strategy for mCRPC, in which denosumab and zoledronic acid reduce skeletal-related events. Recently, androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) and docetaxel have been used upfront against metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Further, triplet therapy with ARSI, docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy is emerging. However, cross-resistance may occur between these treatments, and the optimal treatment sequence must be considered. The sequential administration of ARSIs, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, is associated with limited efficacy; however, cabazitaxel is effective for patients with mCRPC who were previously treated with docetaxel and had disease progression during treatment with ARSI. Radioligand therapy with Lu-PSMA-617 is a new effective class of therapy for patients with advanced PSMA-positive mCRPC. Tumors with gene alterations that affect homologous recombination repair, such as and alterations, are sensitive to poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in mCRPC. This review sought to highlight recent advances in systemic therapy for mCRPC and strategies to support patient selection and treatment sequencing.

PubMed: 36792090
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.220200

Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Paul G Corn, Elisabeth I Heath, Amado Zurita...

BACKGROUND

Taxane-platinum combinations have shown promising activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers in single-group clinical studies but not in randomised trials. Distinct biological subsets of the disease might derive the greatest benefit from the addition of platinum. We aimed to determine whether adding carboplatin to cabazitaxel would improve the outcomes of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHODS

We did a phase 1-2, open label, randomised study at two centres in men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In phase 1, patients received intravenous cabazitaxel 20-25 mg/m and intravenous carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 3-4 mg/mL per min every 21 days. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose cohort studied in which one of six or fewer patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. In phase 2, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by a computerised algorithm to intravenous cabazitaxel 25 mg/m with or without intravenous carboplatin AUC 4 mg/mL per min. All patients received growth factor support and oral prednisone 10 mg daily. The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose of the combination in phase 1 and investigator-assessed progression-free survival in phase 2. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01505868.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 17, 2012, and May 11, 2015, nine patients completed phase 1 as planned, and 160 were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel (n=79) or cabazitaxel plus carboplatin (n=81) in phase 2. During phase I, grade 3 adverse events were anaemia (n=2), fatigue (n=1), thrombocytopenia (n=1), hypomagnesaemia (n=1), diarrhoea (n=1), hypokalaemia (n=1), anorexia (n=1), and dehydration (n=1), and no grade 4 adverse events occurred. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, therefore, a maximum tolerated dose of cabazitaxel of 25 mg/m and carboplatin of AUC 4 mg/mL per min was selected for phase 2. At a median follow-up of 31·0 months (IQR 20·5-37·1), the combination improved the median progression-free survival from 4·5 months (95% CI 3·5-5·7) to 7·3 months (95% CI 5·5-8·2; hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·50-0·95, p=0·018). In the phase 2 study, the most common grade 3-5 adverse events were fatigue (7 [9%] of 79 in the cabazitaxel group vs 16 [20%] of 81 in the combination group), anaemia (3 [4%] vs 19 [23%]), neutropenia (3 [4%] vs 13 [16%]), and thrombocytopenia (1 [1%] vs 11 [14%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Carboplatin added to cabazitaxel showed improved clinical efficacy compared with cabazitaxel alone for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Although adverse events were more common with the combination, the treatment was safe and generally well tolerated. Our data suggest that taxane-platinum combinations have a clinically beneficial role in advanced prostate cancer and a randomised phase 3 study is planned.

FUNDING

Sanofi Genzyme, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Prostate Cancer Moon Shot Program, and Solon Scott III Prostate Cancer Research Fund.

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Anorexia; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Dehydration; Diarrhea; Fatigue; Humans; Hypokalemia; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neutropenia; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids; Thrombocytopenia

PubMed: 31515154
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30408-5

Authors: Sofie Snipstad, Ýrr Mørch, Einar Sulheim...

Delivery of drugs and nanomedicines to tumors is often heterogeneous and insufficient and, thus, of limited efficacy. Microbubbles in combination with ultrasound have been found to improve delivery to tumors, enhancing accumulation and penetration. We used a subcutaneous prostate cancer xenograft model in mice to investigate the effect of free and nanoparticle-encapsulated cabazitaxel in combination with ultrasound and microbubbles with a lipid shell or a shell of nanoparticles. Sonopermeation reduced tumor growth and prolonged survival (26%-100%), whether the free drug was co-injected with lipid-shelled microbubbles or the nanoformulation was co-injected with lipid-shelled or nanoparticle-shelled microbubbles. Coherently with the improved therapeutic response, we found enhanced uptake of nanoparticles directly after ultrasound treatment that lasted several weeks (2.3 × -15.8 × increase). Neither cavitation dose nor total accumulation of nanoparticles could explain the variation within treatment groups, emphasizing the need for a better understanding of the tumor biology and mechanisms involved in ultrasound-mediated treatment.

Topics: Animals; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Delivery Systems; Heterografts; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Microbubbles; Nanoparticles; Prostatic Neoplasms; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonic Therapy

PubMed: 33549379
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.026

Randomized Controlled Trial

TheraP: a randomized phase 2 trial of Lu-PSMA-617 theranostic treatment vs cabazitaxel in progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Clinical Trial Protocol ANZUP 1603).

Authors: Michael S Hofman, Louise Emmett, John Violet...

OBJECTIVE

To assess the activity and safety of cabazitaxel chemotherapy vs that of treatment with Lu-PSMA-617, a novel radiolabelled small molecule that binds with high affinity to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have received prior docetaxel treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The TheraP trial (ANZUP 1603) is an open-label, randomized, stratified, two-arm multicentre phase 2 trial comparing the activity and safety of cabazitaxel chemotherapy vs Lu-PSMA-617 therapy in the treatment of men with mCRPC. Key eligibility criteria include prior docetaxel chemotherapy, rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, sufficient PSMA avidity, as defined by centrally reviewed Ga-PSMA-11 and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with no discordant FDG-avid PSMA-negative sites of disease. Patients in the control group receive standard treatment with cabazitaxel (20 mg/m ) i.v. every 3 weeks with prednisolone 10 mg daily orally, for a maximum of 10 cycles. Patients in the experimental group receive Lu-PSMA-617 (8.5 GBq decreasing by 0.5 GBq per cycle) i.v. every 6 weeks, for up to a maximum of six cycles. In the event of an exceptional response as defined on centrally reviewed post-therapy single-photon emission CT imaging, treatment will be suspended but can recommence on progression. The trial aims to include 200 patients who will be centrally randomized to one of the two treatment groups, in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is PSA response. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS, PSA PFS, objective tumour response, pain response, pain PFS, health-related quality of life, and frequency and severity of adverse events. The treatment and outcomes of patients excluded on the basis of low PSMA avidity or discordant FDG-avid disease on screening Ga-PSMA-11 and Fluorine-18 ( F)-FDG-PET/CT scan will also be assessed. Enrolment in the study commenced on 29 January 2018.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Lu-PSMA-617 offers a potential additional life-prolonging treatment option for men with mCRPC. The results of this trial will determine, for the first time in a randomized design, the activity and safety of Lu-PSMA-617, as compared with cabazitaxel chemotherapy in men with progressive mCRPC.

Topics: Dipeptides; Disease-Free Survival; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Humans; Lutetium; Male; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prognosis; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiotherapy Dosage; Taxoids; Theranostic Nanomedicine; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 31638341
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14876

Authors: Daniel J George, Oliver Sartor, Kurt Miller...

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of several life-prolonging therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, real-world data on their use, survival effect, and safety are limited. Using electronic health record data from the Flatiron Health database, we studied real-world treatment patterns and health outcomes in patients with mCRPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort analysis of electronic health record data of patients with confirmed mCRPC between January 2013 and September 2017. The primary objective was to describe real-world treatment patterns, including treatment type, duration, and sequencing. Secondary objectives included describing patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 2559 patients with mCRPC, 1980 (77%) received at least 1 line of life-prolonging therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, sipuleucel-T, or radium-223). Of patients receiving first-line therapy, 49% received second-line therapy, and of these, 43% received third-line therapy. Abiraterone/prednisone and enzalutamide accounted for 65% of first-line therapies and 54% of second-line therapies. Docetaxel was the most common third-line therapy (24%). Back-to-back use of abiraterone/prednisone and enzalutamide was common. Radium-223 monotherapy use was 2% in the first-line setting, 3% in the second-line setting, and 8% in the third-line setting. The median overall survival was longer in patients who received life-prolonging therapies (23.7 months; 95% confidence interval: 22.3-25.1 months) than in those who did not (10.1 months; 95% confidence interval: 9.1-11.5 months).

CONCLUSION

These real-world insights on over 2500 patients with mCRPC supplement findings from randomized controlled trials and may help to inform clinical trial design, treatment guidelines, and clinical decision-making.

Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Docetaxel; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Tissue Extracts

PubMed: 32057714
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.019