Review

Authors: Valentina R Minciacchi, Rahul Kumar, Daniela S Krause...

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been a "model disease" with a long history. Beginning with the first discovery of leukemia and the description of the Philadelphia Chromosome and ending with the current goal of achieving treatment-free remission after targeted therapies, we describe here the journey of CML, focusing on molecular pathways relating to signaling, metabolism and the bone marrow microenvironment. We highlight current strategies for combination therapies aimed at eradicating the CML stem cell; hopefully the final destination of this long voyage.

Topics: Epigenesis, Genetic; History, 20th Century; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Models, Biological; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Tumor Microenvironment

PubMed: 33435150
DOI: 10.3390/cells10010117

Review

Authors: Afaf E G Osman, Michael W Deininger

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by a reciprocal translocation [t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)] that leads to the fusion of ABL1 gene sequences (9q34) downstream of BCR gene sequences (22q11) and is cytogenetically visible as Philadelphia chromosome (Ph). The resulting BCR/ABL1 chimeric protein is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that activates multiple signaling pathways, which collectively lead to malignant transformation. During the early (chronic) phase of CML (CP-CML), the myeloid cell compartment is expanded, but differentiation is maintained. Without effective therapy, CP-CML invariably progresses to blast phase (BP-CML), an acute leukemia of myeloid or lymphoid phenotype. The development of BCR-AB1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of CML and ignited the start of a new era in oncology. With three generations of BCR/ABL1 TKIs approved today, the majority of CML patients enjoy long term remissions and near normal life expectancy. However, only a minority of patients maintain remission after TKI discontinuation, a status termed treatment free remission (TFR). Unfortunately, 5-10% of patients fail TKIs due to resistance and are at risk of progression to BP-CML, which is curable only with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overcoming TKI resistance, improving the prognosis of BP-CML and improving the rates of TFR are areas of active research in CML.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Management; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Models, Molecular; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

PubMed: 33773846
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100825

Review

Authors: Nicholas C P Cross, Thomas Ernst, Susan Branford...

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

Topics: Humans; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Recurrence

PubMed: 37794101
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-02048-y

Review

Authors: Miriam Iezza, Sofia Cortesi, Emanuela Ottaviani...

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at "high-risk". Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.

Topics: Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Chromosome Aberrations; Blast Crisis; Risk Assessment

PubMed: 37443737
DOI: 10.3390/cells12131703

Review

Authors: David Vetrie, G Vignir Helgason, Mhairi Copland...

For two decades, leukaemia stem cells (LSCs) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have been advanced paradigms for the cancer stem cell field. In CML, the acquisition of the fusion tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL1 in a haematopoietic stem cell drives its transformation to become a LSC. In AML, LSCs can arise from multiple cell types through the activity of a number of oncogenic drivers and pre-leukaemic events, adding further layers of context and genetic and cellular heterogeneity to AML LSCs not observed in most cases of CML. Furthermore, LSCs from both AML and CML can be refractory to standard-of-care therapies and persist in patients, diversify clonally and serve as reservoirs to drive relapse, recurrence or progression to more aggressive forms. Despite these complexities, LSCs in both diseases share biological features, making them distinct from other CML or AML progenitor cells and from normal haematopoietic stem cells. These features may represent Achilles' heels against which novel therapies can be developed. Here, we review many of the similarities and differences that exist between LSCs in CML and AML and examine the therapeutic strategies that could be used to eradicate them.

Topics: Animals; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Disease Management; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Development; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Research

PubMed: 31907378
DOI: 10.1038/s41568-019-0230-9

Review

Authors: Mhairi Copland

Despite the success of BCR-ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), patients with blast phase (BP)-CML continue to have a dismal outcome with median survival of less than one year from diagnosis. Thus BP-CML remains a critical unmet clinical need in the management of CML. Our understanding of the biology of BP-CML continues to grow; genomic instability leads to acquisition of mutations which drive leukaemic progenitor cells to develop self-renewal properties, resulting in differentiation block and a poor-prognosis acute leukaemia which may be myeloid, lymphoid or bi-phenotypic. Similar advances in therapy are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes; however, this is challenging given the rarity and heterogeneity of BP-CML, leading to difficulty in designing and recruiting to prospective clinical trials. This review will explore the treatment of BP-CML, evaluating the data for TKI therapy alone, combinations with intensive chemotherapy, the role of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the use of novel agents and clinical trials, as well as discussing the most appropriate methods for diagnosing BP and assessing response to therapy, and factors predicting outcome.

Topics: Humans; Blast Crisis; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Prospective Studies; Imatinib Mesylate; Protein Kinase Inhibitors

PubMed: 35866251
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18370

Review

Authors: Alessandro Morotti, Carmen Fava, Giuseppe Saglio...

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the presence of a specific chromosome marker (Ph-chromosome) as well as of the corresponding molecular marker (BCR-ABL fusion transcripts) provides suitable and precise tools to monitor the burden of the disease present at diagnosis and that of the residual disease present at specific time points during treatment. A huge number of studies have clearly demonstrated that in CML cytogenetic and molecular responses are strictly correlated to the final outcome of the patients and the correct use of standardized methods to assess the achievement of specific degrees of disease reduction at specific time points during treatment has become an essential part of proper clinical management of CML. The target to be achieved and the corresponding "optimal response" definition are however evolving, and at least for some patients, they may be represented not only by best possible overall survival (OS) but also by the possibility to discontinue the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and therefore to live in a treatment-free remission (TFR) status. Therefore, at least for some patients, deep degrees of molecular response, as MR(4) and MR(4.5), whose precise definition has been recently introduced and that are prerequisites to try to discontinuation, are becoming the target to be achieved even in common clinical practice. As a fast initial decline of the disease burden after therapy start may be highly predictive for the final outcome of patients not only in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and of PS but also in terms of possibility of achieving deep molecular responses, a more intense and punctual monitoring of the response of CML patients during the first 6 months of TKI therapy is now recommended by the more recent versions of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, as this represents the major driver to decide therapy.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; DNA Mutational Analysis; Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Staging; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

PubMed: 25921389
DOI: 10.1007/s11899-015-0258-1

Authors: Fangmin Zhong, Xueru Zhang, Zihao Wang...

BACKGROUND

The relationship between ferroptosis and the progression and treatment of hematological tumors has been extensively studied, although its precise association with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains uncertain.

METHODS

Multi-transcriptome sequencing data were utilized to analyze the ferroptosis level of CML samples and its correlation with the tumor microenvironment, disease progression, and treatment response. Machine learning algorithms were employed to identify diagnostic ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs). The consensus clustering algorithm was applied to identify ferroptosis-related molecular subtypes. Clinical samples were collected for sequencing to validate the results obtained from bioinformatics analysis. Cell experiments were conducted to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of induced ferroptosis in drug-resistant CML.

RESULTS

Ferroptosis scores were significantly lower in samples from patients with CML compared to normal samples, and these scores further decreased with disease progression and non-response to treatment. Most FRGs were downregulated in CML samples. A high ferroptosis score was also associated with greater immunosuppression and increased activity of metabolic pathways. Through support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO), and random forest (RF) algorithms, we identified five FRGs (ACSL6, SLC11A2, HMOX1, SLC38A1, AKR1C3) that have high diagnostic value. The clinical diagnostic value of these five FRGs and their effectiveness in differentiating CML from other hematological malignancies were validated using additional validation cohorts and our real-world cohort. There are significant differences in immune landscape, chemosensitivity, and immunotherapy responsiveness between the two ferroptosis-related molecular subtypes. By conducting cellular experiments, we confirmed that CML-resistant cells are more sensitive to induction of ferroptosis and can enhance the sensitivity of imatinib treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study unveils the molecular signature of ferroptosis in samples from patients with CML. FRG identified by a variety of machine learning algorithms has reliable clinical diagnostic value. Furthermore, the characterization of different ferroptosis-related molecular subtypes provides valuable insights into individual patient characteristics and can guide clinical treatment strategies. Targeting and inducing ferroptosis holds great promise as a therapeutic approach for drug-resistant CML.

Topics: Ferroptosis; Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Biomarkers, Tumor; Tumor Microenvironment; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Computational Biology; Machine Learning

PubMed: 39026664
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1402669

Meta-Analysis Review

Authors: Nikolas von Bubnoff, Justus Duyster

BACKGROUND

The treatment options for bcr-abl positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) include chemotherapy, immune therapy, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and molecular therapy. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib was approved for the treatment of CML in 2002. Data from clinical trials allow a comparison of treatment options.

METHODS

The literature on the treatment and monitoring of CML was selectively reviewed. A total of 94 original articles were analyzed, along with the recommendations of an international expert committee and the medical societies. This review is current as of November 2009.

RESULTS

In a clinical phase 3 trial of imatinib treatment for patients in the chronic phase of CML, the rates of progression-free and overall survival at 6 years were 93% and 88%, respectively. Thus, imatinib is clearly superior to interferon-alpha, hydroxyurea, and busulfan with respect to survival. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is only a fall back option because of transplantation-associated mortality. One in four patients in the chronic phase of CML has an inadequate cytogenetic response to imatinib and therefore requires a change of treatment. Most imatinib-resistant patients in the chronic phase of CML go into remission again after switching to one of the new tyrosine kinase inhibitors, dasatinib and nilotinib.

CONCLUSION

Imatinib is now the standard initial first-line treatment for CML in the chronic phase. Regular hematologic and cytogenetic monitoring during treatment is indispensable so that patients with an inadequate response can be identified.

Topics: Benzamides; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Piperazines; Prevalence; Pyrimidines; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stem Cell Transplantation; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

PubMed: 20221270
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0114

Authors: Nicole S Arellano, Shannon E Elf

A new approach helps examine the proportion of cancerous and healthy stem cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and how this influences treatment outcomes.

Topics: Humans; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Antineoplastic Agents; Neoplastic Stem Cells

PubMed: 39503728
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.103775