-
JAMA Jun 2022Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is being performed with increasing frequency, but it is unclear whether total intracorporeal surgery improves recovery compared with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
IMPORTANCE
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is being performed with increasing frequency, but it is unclear whether total intracorporeal surgery improves recovery compared with open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVES
To compare recovery and morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction vs open radical cystectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Randomized clinical trial of patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer recruited at 9 sites in the UK, from March 2017-March 2020. Follow-up was conducted at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months, with final follow-up on September 23, 2021.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants were randomized to receive robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (n = 169) or open radical cystectomy (n = 169).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including complications, quality of life, disability, stamina, activity levels, and survival. Analyses were adjusted for the type of diversion and center.
RESULTS
Among 338 randomized participants, 317 underwent radical cystectomy (mean age, 69 years; 67 women [21%]; 107 [34%] received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 282 [89%] underwent ileal conduit reconstruction); the primary outcome was analyzed in 305 (96%). The median number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery was 82 (IQR, 76-84) for patients undergoing robotic surgery vs 80 (IQR, 72-83) for open surgery (adjusted difference, 2.2 days [95% CI, 0.50-3.85]; P = .01). Thromboembolic complications (1.9% vs 8.3%; difference, -6.5% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.4%]) and wound complications (5.6% vs 16.0%; difference, -11.7% [95% CI, -18.6% to -4.6%]) were less common with robotic surgery than open surgery. Participants undergoing open surgery reported worse quality of life vs robotic surgery at 5 weeks (difference in mean European Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 5-Level instrument scores, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03]; P = .003) and greater disability at 5 weeks (difference in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scores, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.15-0.73]; P = .003) and at 12 weeks (difference in WHODAS 2.0 scores, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.09-0.68]; P = .01); the differences were not significant after 12 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer recurrence (29/161 [18%] vs 25/156 [16%] after robotic and open surgery, respectively) and overall mortality (23/161 [14.3%] vs 23/156 [14.7%]), respectively) at median follow-up of 18.4 months (IQR, 12.8-21.1).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, treatment with robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy resulted in a statistically significant increase in days alive and out of the hospital over 90 days. However, the clinical importance of these findings remains uncertain.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN13680280; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.
Topics: Aged; Cystectomy; Female; Humans; Male; Morbidity; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Robotics; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Diversion
PubMed: 35569079
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393 -
International Braz J Urol : Official... 2020Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerged as alternatives treatment options that can provide comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining patients' quality of life.
OBJECTIVE
To review bladder preservation therapies, patient selection criteria, and functional and oncologic outcomes for BPT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive literature review of bladder preservation therapies in Pubmed and Embase.
DISCUSSION
The ideal patient for BPT has low-volume T2 disease, absence of CIS, absence of hydronephrosis, and a maximal TURBT with regular surveillance. Technological advancements involving cancer staging, TURBT technique, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens have improved BPT outcomes, with oncologic outcomes now comparable to those of radical cystectomy. Advancements in BPT also includes a heightened focus on improving quality of life for patients undergoing bladder preservation. Preservation strategies with most evidence for use include trimodality therapy and partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection.
CONCLUSIONS
This review highlights the breadth of strategies that aim to preserve a patient's bladder while still optimizing local tumor control and overall survival. Future areas for innovation include the use of predictive biomarkers and implementation of immunotherapy, moving the field towards patient-tailored care.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Cystectomy; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Organ Sparing Treatments; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 31961624
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01 -
International Braz J Urol : Official... 2022A systematic review of the literature with available published literature to compare ileal conduit (IC) and cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) urinary diversions (UD) in terms... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
A systematic review of the literature with available published literature to compare ileal conduit (IC) and cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) urinary diversions (UD) in terms of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of high-risk elderly patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Protocol Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42020168851.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review, according to the PRISMA Statement, was performed. Search through the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, and Cochrane Database until July 2020.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 2,883 citations and were selected eight studies, including 1096 patients. A total of 707 patients underwent IC and 389 CU. Surgical procedures and outcomes, complications, mortality, and quality of life were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS
CU seems to be a safe alternative for the elderly and more frail patients. It is associated with faster surgery, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, a lower necessity of intensive care, and shorter hospital stay. According to most studies, complications are less frequent after CU, even though mortality rates are similar. Studies with long-term follow up are awaited.
Topics: Aged; Cystectomy; Humans; Quality of Life; Ureterostomy; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Diversion
PubMed: 33861058
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0892 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Dec 2022In this case report, a 58-year-old male with comorbidities of BMI 41 kg/m2, hypertension and diabetes type 2 underwent radical cystectomy. The operation was performed in...
In this case report, a 58-year-old male with comorbidities of BMI 41 kg/m2, hypertension and diabetes type 2 underwent radical cystectomy. The operation was performed in 30-degree Trendelenburg and lasted > 7 hours with a total blood loss of 850 ml. The patient presented with painless bilateral vision loss upon awakening. MRI, CT and CT angiography of the cerebrum was performed and revealed arteriosclerosis and hypophysis adenoma. Neurological and ophthalmic consults were performed. Three weeks post-operatively, bilateral papillary atrophy was present, and posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy was confirmed.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Gynecomastia; Cystectomy; Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic; Breast; Mammography
PubMed: 36621877
DOI: No ID Found -
Archivos Espanoles de Urologia Apr 2019Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in Urology. Several retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Radical cystectomy (RC) is one of the most complex and morbid surgical procedures in Urology. Several retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that robotic-assisted RC (RARC) represents a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, showing non-inferiority in mid-term oncological outcomes. Moreover, important advantages related with perioperative complications have also been published. The aim of this article is to describe RARC surgical steps and to review the most relevant ndings in the eld of RARC, focusing on its strengths and weaknesses when compared with open RC.
METHODS
We performed a detailed step-by-step description of the RARC surgical technique, paying particular attention to its specific surgical details and adding our tips and tricks for an out standing performance. We also conducted a review of the most relevant articles in literature in terms of oncological, pathological and perioperative results. All these findings have been compared with the classical open radical cystectomy (ORC) technique.
RESULTS
None of the studies published have demonstrated RARC to have worse oncological outcomes (PSM,RFS, CSS, OS) compared to ORC. RARC shows a decrease in blood loss and transfusion rates. No differences have been observed in complications rate, length of hospital stay, quality of life, and time to bowel movement between both approaches. The two disadvantages of RARC compared to ORC are a longer operative time and increased cost. Operating time can be reduced with surgeons gaining experience and technique standardization. The cost disparities and operative time between ORC and RARC at high-volume academic centers are less pronounced than in the general medical community.
CONCLUSIONS
RARC is a technically feasible and safe approach, with oncological, pathological and perioperative results, at least, equivalent to ORC.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Cystectomy; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 30945656
DOI: No ID Found -
Archivos Espanoles de Urologia Jul 2019Bladder leiomyomas are rare benign tumors; their common presentation are irritative and obstructive urinary symptoms. The treatment is complete surgical resection.
UNLABELLED
Bladder leiomyomas are rare benign tumors; their common presentation are irritative and obstructive urinary symptoms. The treatment is complete surgical resection.
OBJECTIVE
To present our experience in the diagnosis and the treatment of bladder leiomyoma.
METHODS
A series of three clinical cases.
RESULTS
In our series, two patients were women and one was man. The mean age was 33 years. Two women presented with irritative urinary symptoms and palpation of a pelvic mass, and the man was asymptomatic. Ultrasound showed the presence of an adnexal mass with left hydronephrosis in a female patient, bladder tumor in another female patient and pelvic mass of unknown etiology in the male patient. CT scan and MRI demonstrated the bladder origin of the lesion. A biopsy confirmed a bladder leiomyoma. Surgical treatment was partial cystectomy in all patients, and in one of them, nephrectomy was performed. During follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic and without recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Imaging studies guide to diagnosis. Transurethral resection is recommended in lesions smaller than 3 cm. and enucleation or partial cystectomy in larger lesions. Prognosis is good.
Topics: Adult; Cystectomy; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 31274128
DOI: No ID Found -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... Jul 2015The application and use of robotics during radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer are still being defined. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The application and use of robotics during radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer are still being defined.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted, with an emphasis on studies published within the previous 5 years. Areas of interest included patient selection, outcomes, cost, and comparisons of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy to open surgery.
RESULTS
Although data are lacking in this field, using robotic assistance for radical cystectomy may lead to improvements in estimated blood loss, time to bowel activity, and reduced hospital stay; however, these improvements come at the cost of increased operative time and have a learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS
The widespread adoption of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy has not gained acceptance due to lack of evidence and clinical trials showing superiority over open surgery.
Topics: Cystectomy; Humans; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 26351885
DOI: 10.1177/107327481502200307 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Apr 2023Bladder cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer in Europe, with major healthcare costs. For patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, recurrences,... (Review)
Review
Bladder cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer in Europe, with major healthcare costs. For patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, recurrences, treatment and surveillance regimes with multiple invasive procedures are a significant burden. Muscle invasive or metastatic disease is treated with radical surgery, radiation therapy and/or systemic chemo- or immunotherapy, with a five-year overall survival of around 50% and long-term quality of life issues for survivors. We present a brief overview of bladder cancer in various stages and give examples of new developments.
Topics: Humans; Cystectomy; Europe; Quality of Life; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 37057696
DOI: No ID Found -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Mar 2015To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC), Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (LRC) and Robot-assisted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC), Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (LRC) and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC). RARC is to be compared to LRC and ORC and LRC compared to ORC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted, collating studies comparing RARC, LRC and ORC. Surgical and oncological outcome data were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies were selected with total of 2,104 cases analyzed. RARC had a longer operative time (OPT) compared to LRC with no statistical difference between length of stay (LOS) and estimated blood loss (EBL). RARC had a significantly shorter LOS, reduced EBL, lower complication rate and longer OPT compared to ORC. There were no significant differences regarding lymph node yield (LNY) and positive surgical margins (PSM.) LRC had a reduced EBL, shorter LOS and increased OPT compared to ORC. There was no significant difference regarding LNY.
CONCLUSION
RARC is comparable to LRC with better surgical results than ORC. LRC has better surgical outcomes than ORC. With the unique technological features of the robotic surgical system and increasing trend of intra-corporeal reconstruction it is likely that RARC will become the surgical option of choice.
Topics: Cystectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Operative Time; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 25847896
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2015.1.41 -
Anesthesiology Aug 2014
Topics: Cystectomy; Female; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Male; Norepinephrine; Postoperative Complications; Vasoconstrictor Agents
PubMed: 25050510
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000323