-
PloS One 2023Studies have shown improved tolerability with once-weekly versus three-weekly docetaxel in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This...
INTRODUCTION
Studies have shown improved tolerability with once-weekly versus three-weekly docetaxel in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability of nintedanib plus weekly docetaxel in patients with NSCLC.
METHODS
This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT02668393) enrolled patients with locally advanced/metastatic adenocarcinoma NSCLC that had progressed on first-line platinum chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of nintedanib (up to 200 mg twice daily [BID]) combined with weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) over a 28-day treatment cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.
RESULTS
The trial terminated prematurely due to recruitment challenges. At termination, seven patients had received nintedanib 150 mg BID and seven nintedanib 200 mg BID, in combination with weekly docetaxel. In the first treatment cycle, DLTs were reported for 1/6 evaluable patients (16.7%) in each group. The disease control rates were 57.1% and 42.9%, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs affected three patients in each group (42.9%); neutropenia was reported in one patient (14.3%) in each group. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in three patients (42.9%) receiving nintedanib 150 mg, and two patients (28.6%) receiving nintedanib 200 mg.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, nintedanib plus weekly docetaxel was well-tolerated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, without loss of efficacy. DLTs were manageable.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Docetaxel; Lung Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37847688
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292307 -
Cells Aug 2023Patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) invariably develop resistance to anti-androgen therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) has been...
Patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) invariably develop resistance to anti-androgen therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) has been implicated in PCa therapy resistance; however, the mechanisms underlying GR-mediated chemoresistance remain unclear. Lens epithelium-derived growth factor p75 (LEDGF/p75, also known as PSIP1 and DFS70) is a glucocorticoid-induced transcription co-activator implicated in cancer chemoresistance. We investigated the contribution of the GR-LEDGF/p75 axis to docetaxel (DTX)-resistance in PCa cells. GR silencing in DTX-sensitive and -resistant PCa cells decreased LEDGF/p75 expression, and GR upregulation in enzalutamide-resistant cells correlated with increased LEDGF/p75 expression. ChIP-sequencing revealed GR binding sites in the LEDGF/p75 promoter. STRING protein-protein interaction analysis indicated that GR and LEDGF/p75 belong to the same transcriptional network, and immunochemical studies demonstrated their co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization in DTX-resistant cells. The GR modulators exicorilant and relacorilant increased the sensitivity of chemoresistant PCa cells to DTX-induced cell death, and this effect was more pronounced upon LEDGF/p75 silencing. RNA-sequencing of DTX-resistant cells with GR or LEDGF/p75 knockdown revealed a transcriptomic overlap targeting signaling pathways associated with cell survival and proliferation, cancer, and therapy resistance. These studies implicate the GR-LEDGF/p75 axis in PCa therapy resistance and provide a pre-clinical rationale for developing novel therapeutic strategies for advanced PCa.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Receptors, Glucocorticoid; Prostatic Neoplasms; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Glucocorticoids
PubMed: 37626856
DOI: 10.3390/cells12162046 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Dec 2020The addition of docetaxel and abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) heralded a new era in the first-line treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive... (Review)
Review
The addition of docetaxel and abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) heralded a new era in the first-line treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Following the success of these combination regimens, 3 new trials presented data on using enzalutamide or apalutamide in men with mCSPC, which showed similar success. These seminal trials collectively established the addition of docetaxel, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or abiraterone to ADT as standards in the upfront treatment of mCSPC. Notably, a subset of patients in these more recent trials were treated with a combination of docetaxel, ADT, and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors or maintenance androgen receptor signaling inhibitors after docetaxel and ADT that provided an initial glimpse into the efficacy of these triplet or maintenance strategies. We discuss the implications of these recent findings and place them in context of the current mCSPC treatment landscape.
Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Castration; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Receptors, Androgen; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32631766
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.003 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Sep 2022For many years, the standard treatment of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostatic carcinoma (mHSPC) was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. By lowering the...
BACKGROUND
For many years, the standard treatment of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostatic carcinoma (mHSPC) was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. By lowering the testosterone level into the castration range, ADT deprives the tumor of a key growth factor.
METHODS
For this article, we evaluated the treatment recommendations contained in national and international guidelines (German S3 guidelines and those of the European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO], European Association of Urology [EAU], and National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]), as well as pertinent publications revealed by a PubMed search and the congress abstracts of the ESMO and of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO].
RESULTS
The past few years have witnessed fundamental changes in the treatment of mHSPC. Treatment intensification with docetaxel or with the new drugs directed against the androgen receptor signal pathway (abiraterone, apalutamide and enzalutamide) has been found to lower mortality by 19-40% and is now an integral component of first-line therapy. Relevant new findings have also been obtained with threefold combinations of ADT, docetaxel, and abiraterone or darolutamide. For patients with a light tumor burden, local radiotherapy of the primary tumor improves the probability of survival at 3 years by 8% (45.4 versus 49.1 months, difference 3.6 months; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 6.2 months).
CONCLUSION
The treatment of mHSPC is constantly changing. Phase III trials that are now in the recruitment stage, as well as our continually improving understanding of the underlying molecular-pathological mechanisms, will be altering the treatment landscape still further in the years to come.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Treatment Outcome; Docetaxel; Carcinoma; Hormones
PubMed: 35912436
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0294 -
Cancer Research Communications Jul 2023Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of noncutaneous cancer-related deaths in American men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), radical prostatectomy, and...
UNLABELLED
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of noncutaneous cancer-related deaths in American men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy remain the primary treatment for patients with early-stage prostate cancer (castration-sensitive prostate cancer). Following ADT, many patients ultimately develop metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Standard chemotherapy options for CRPC are docetaxel (DTX) and cabazitaxel, which increase median survival, although the development of resistance is common. Cancer stem-like cells possess mesenchymal phenotypes [epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)] and play crucial roles in tumor initiation and progression of mCRPC. We have shown that low-dose continuous administration of topotecan (METRO-TOPO) inhibits prostate cancer growth by interfering with key cancer pathway genes. This study utilized bulk and single-cell or whole-transcriptome analysis [(RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)], and we observed greater expression of several EMT markers, including , , , , , , and in European American and African American aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) subtypes-mCRPC, neuroendocrine variant (NEPC), and taxane-resistant. The taxane-resistant gene was also expressed highly in single-cell subclonal populations in mCRPC. Furthermore, metronomic-topotecan single agent and combinations with DTX downregulated these EMT markers as well as CD44 and CD44/CD133 "stem-like" cell populations. A microfluidic chip-based cell invasion assay revealed that METRO-TOPO treatment as a single agent or in combination with DTX was potentially effective against invasive prostate cancer spread. Our RNA-seq and scRNA-seq analysis were supported by and studies, suggesting METRO-TOPO combined with DTX may inhibit oncogenic progression by reducing cancer stemness in AVPC through the inhibition of EMT markers and multiple oncogenic factors/pathways.
SIGNIFICANCE
The utilization of metronomic-like dosing regimens of topotecan alone and in combination with DTX resulted in the suppression of makers associated with EMT and stem-like cell populations in AVPC models. The identification of molecular signatures and their potential to serve as novel biomarkers for monitoring treatment efficacy and disease progression response to treatment efficacy and disease progression were achieved using bulk RNA-seq and single-cell-omics methodologies.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Topotecan; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Administration, Metronomic; Androgen Antagonists; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Taxoids; Disease Progression; Carrier Proteins; Microfilament Proteins
PubMed: 37476073
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0427 -
Cancer Medicine Aug 2023This study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tislelizumab versus docetaxel in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
This study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving tislelizumab versus docetaxel in the open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 trial called RATIONALE-303 (NCT03358875). HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, and the EQ-5D-5L instruments. A longitudinal analysis of covariance assessed the change from baseline to Week 12 and from baseline to Week 18. A time to deterioration analysis was also performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Eight hundred and five patients were randomized to either tislelizumab (n = 535) or docetaxel, respectively (535 and 270 to tislelizumab and docetaxel, respectively). The tislelizumab arm improved while the docetaxel arm worsened in the QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL scale score (difference LS mean change Week 18: 5.7 [95% CI: 2.38, 9.07, p = 0.0008]), fatigue (Week 12: -3.2 [95% CI: -5.95, -0.37, p < 0.0266]; Week 18: -4.9 [95% CI: -8.26, -1.61, p = 0.0037]), and QLQ-LC13 symptom index score (Week 12: -5.5 [95% CI: -6.93, -4.04, P < 0.0001]; Week 18: -6.6 [95% CI: -8.25, -4.95, p < 0.0001]). The tislelizumab arm had improvements in coughing versus the docetaxel arm (Week 12: -4.7 [95% CI: -8.57, -0.78, p = 0.0188]; Week 18: -8.3 [95% CI: -13.02, -3.51, p = 0.0007]). The patients who received tislelizumab were less at risk for clinically meaningful worsening in the overall lung cancer symptom index scale (hazard ratio (HR): 0.24 [95% CI: 0.162, 0.356], p < 0.0001), dyspnea (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.567, 0.958], p = 0.0109), coughing (HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.534, 1.019], p = 0.0309), and peripheral neuropathy (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.370, 0.810] p = 0.0011). In general, tislelizumab versus docetaxel was associated with improved HRQoL and symptoms of lung cancer in patients who previously failed treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Docetaxel; Cough
PubMed: 37587845
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6361 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2023We aimed to study the relation between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of docetaxel in early breast cancer and recommend a target exposure.
AIMS
We aimed to study the relation between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of docetaxel in early breast cancer and recommend a target exposure.
METHODS
A PK/PD study was performed in 27 early breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for 4 cycles followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel 75-100 mg/m infused every 21 days. Individual Bayesian estimates of docetaxel PK parameters were obtained using a nonparametric population PK model developed with data from patients with metastatic breast cancer who received dose-intensified docetaxel (300-350 mg/m ). Docetaxel area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) in each cycle and total cumulative AUC (AUCcum) were calculated and related to the incidence of adverse effects and tumour recurrence.
RESULTS
Docetaxel clearance showed no change over the 4 treatment cycles, but a gradual increase in the volume of distribution was observed. One third of the patients had at least 1 dose reduction of docetaxel due to toxicity. The mean AUC, AUCcum and Cmax in patients showing docetaxel-associated adverse events were significantly higher than in patients free of toxicity (P < .05). Fatigue and decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were related to docetaxel AUC and Cmax and pain to AUC. AUC and Cmax >4.5 mg*h/L and 3.5 mg/L, respectively, were risk factors for docetaxel toxicity, while an AUC <4.5 mg*h/L was associated with tumour recurrence.
CONCLUSION
We report for the first time a relation between docetaxel exposure and toxicity and recommend specific targets of drug exposure with implications for the clinical management of early breast cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Docetaxel; Breast Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Bayes Theorem; Taxoids; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36098504
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15526 -
Scientific Reports Nov 2023Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide is the most widely used complementary therapy in cancer. The present study aims to investigate the possible interaction between...
Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide is the most widely used complementary therapy in cancer. The present study aims to investigate the possible interaction between Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide and Docetaxel (a chemotherapy drug) and the first-line medication for prostate cancer treatment (Flutamide) and sensitizing the cells to these treatments. The cytotoxic effects of Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide in combination with Docetaxel and Flutamide on prostate cancer cells were investigated by the MTT test, Hoechst staining, and flow cytometry. In addition, the expression of genes related to apoptosis, angiogenesis, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition pathway (EMT), and prostate cancer biomarkers by Real-Time PCR was investigated. The results demonstrated that IC50 values for Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide (30 μM and 20 μM), Docetaxel (10 μM and 5 μM), and Flutamide (20 μM and 12 μM) with MTT were confirmed by flow cytometry in a dose and time-dependent manner. Regarding the high efficacy of Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide in combination with Flutamide and Docetaxel, 10 μM and 5 μM Flutamide were used instead of 20 μM and 12 μM and 5 μM and 2 μM Docetaxel was used instead of 10 μM and 5 μM in PC3 and LNCap, respectively. Moreover, for the first time, it was shown that Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide alone and in combination with Docetaxel and Flutamide significantly augmented apoptosis, reduced cell migration and colonization, and downregulated expression of KLK2 and EMT pathway genes in both PC3 and LNCap cell line (P < 0.01). Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide synergistically increased the effect of Docetaxel and Flutamide and increased the sensitivity of the prostate cancer cell lines to these drugs. Therefore, it may provide a new therapeutic strategy against prostate cancer.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Reishi; Prostate; Flutamide; Prostatic Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Polysaccharides
PubMed: 37919464
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46118-8 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Sep 2023We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of atezolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via meta-analysis and systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of atezolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via meta-analysis and systematic review.
METHODS
Publications were searched from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing Vipers Chinese Science and Technology Journal database (VIP), Wanfang database, PubMed database, Embase database, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of atezolizumab and docetaxel in the treatment of patients with NSCLC were collected. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to November 2021 and updated on 22 April 2023. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the included studies were screened and quality evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.3 (Cochrane Training, Summertown, Oxford UK) software.
RESULTS
A total of 6 RCTs were included in our analysis, including 6348 patients with NSCLC. Our results showed that the atezolizumab group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the docetaxel group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81); P < .00001). In terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), the atezolizumab group was not significantly superior to the docetaxel group (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.02; P = .20), (relative ratio [RR] = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.95-1.26; P = .20). In terms of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), after treatment, the number of patients with TRAEs in the atezolizumab group was significantly lower than in the docetaxel group (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P < .00001).
CONCLUSION
Compared with docetaxel, atezolizumab can significantly prolong OS in patients with NSCLC and reduce the occurrence of TRAEs, but there is no advantage in PFS or ORR remission rate. Due to some limitations in case numbers and quality of included studies, multicenter, large sample, high-quality RCTs are still needed for further validation.
Topics: Humans; Docetaxel; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Treatment Outcome; Lung Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37318886
DOI: No ID Found -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Sep 2021Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) mechanism is responsible for metastasis and migration of cancer cells to neighboring cells and tissues. Morphologically,... (Review)
Review
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) mechanism is responsible for metastasis and migration of cancer cells to neighboring cells and tissues. Morphologically, epithelial cells are transformed to mesenchymal cells, and at molecular level, E-cadherin undergoes down-regulation, while an increase occurs in N-cadherin and vimentin levels. Increasing evidence demonstrates role of EMT in mediating drug resistance of cancer cells. On the other hand, paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel (DTX) are two chemotherapeutic agents belonging to taxene family, capable of inducing cell cycle arrest in cancer cells via preventing microtubule depolymerization. Aggressive behavior of cancer cells resulted from EMT-mediated metastasis can lead to PTX and DTX resistance. Upstream mediators of EMT such as ZEB1/2, TGF-β, microRNAs, and so on are involved in regulating response of cancer cells to PTX and DTX. Tumor-suppressing factors inhibit EMT to promote PTX and DTX sensitivity of cancer cells. Furthermore, three different strategies including using anti-tumor compounds, gene therapy and delivery systems have been developed for suppressing EMT, and enhancing cytotoxicity of PTX and DTX against cancer cells that are mechanistically discussed in the current review.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Cell Line, Tumor; Docetaxel; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Humans; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 34175815
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111824