-
American Journal of Physiology.... Jun 2021Donepezil is a centrally acting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor with therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases; however, the underlying autonomic and...
Donepezil is a centrally acting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor with therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases; however, the underlying autonomic and cholinergic mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we assessed effects of donepezil on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), HR variability, and body temperature in conscious adult male C57BL/6 mice to investigate the autonomic pathways involved. Central versus peripheral cholinergic effects of donepezil were assessed using pharmacological approaches including comparison with the peripherally acting AChE inhibitor, neostigmine. Drug treatments included donepezil (2.5 or 5 mg/kg sc), neostigmine methyl sulfate (80 or 240 μg/kg ip), atropine sulfate (5 mg/kg ip), atropine methyl bromide (5 mg/kg ip), or saline. Donepezil, at 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, decreased HR by 36 ± 4% and 44 ± 3% compared with saline ( = 10, < 0.001). Donepezil, at 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, decreased temperature by 13 ± 2% and 22 ± 2% compared with saline ( = 6, < 0.001). Modest ( < 0.001) increases in MAP were observed with donepezil after peak bradycardia occurred. Atropine sulfate and atropine methyl bromide blocked bradycardic responses to donepezil, but only atropine sulfate attenuated hypothermia. The pressor response to donepezil was similar in mice coadministered atropine sulfate; however, coadministration of atropine methyl bromide potentiated the increase in MAP. Neostigmine did not alter HR or temperature, but did result in early increases in MAP. Despite the marked bradycardia, donepezil did not increase normalized high-frequency HR variability. We conclude that donepezil causes marked bradycardia and hypothermia in conscious mice via the activation of muscarinic receptors while concurrently increasing MAP via autonomic and cholinergic pathways that remain to be elucidated.
Topics: Animals; Atropine; Autonomic Nervous System; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular System; Cholinergic Agents; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Heart Rate; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Receptors, Muscarinic; Temperature
PubMed: 33851543
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00360.2019 -
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta Feb 2016Recent clinical and laboratory evidences suggest that high fat diet (HFD) induced obesity and its associated metabolic syndrome conditions promotes neuropathology in...
Recent clinical and laboratory evidences suggest that high fat diet (HFD) induced obesity and its associated metabolic syndrome conditions promotes neuropathology in aging and age-related neurological disorders. However, the effects of high fat diet on brain pathology are poorly understood, and the effective strategies to overcome these effects remain elusive. In the current study, we examined the effects of HFD on brain pathology and further evaluated whether donepezil, an AChE inhibitor with neuroprotective functions, could suppress the ongoing HFD induced pathological changes in the brain. Our data demonstrates that HFD induced obesity results in increased neuroinflammation and increased AChE activity in the brain when compared with the mice fed on low fat diet (LFD). HFD administration to mice activated mTOR pathway resulting in increased phosphorylation of mTOR(ser2448), AKT(thr308) and S6K proteins involved in the signaling. Interestingly, donepezil administration with HFD suppressed HFD induced increases in AChE activity, and partially reversed HFD effects on microglial reactivity and the levels of mTOR signaling proteins in the brain when compared to the mice on LFD alone. However, gross levels of synaptic proteins were not altered in the brain tissues of mice fed either diet with or without donepezil. In conclusion, these results present a new insight into the detrimental effects of HFD on brain via microglial activation and involvement of mTOR pathway, and further demonstrates the possible therapeutic role for donepezil in ameliorating the early effects of HFD that could help preserve the brain function in metabolic syndrome conditions.
Topics: Animals; Brain; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Diet, High-Fat; Donepezil; Inflammation; Male; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neuroprotective Agents; Obesity; Signal Transduction; Synapses; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 26554604
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.11.002 -
Neurotherapeutics : the Journal of the... Oct 2020Cognitive dysfunction is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and predicts poor clinical outcomes. It is associated primarily with pathologic involvement of basal... (Review)
Review
Cognitive dysfunction is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and predicts poor clinical outcomes. It is associated primarily with pathologic involvement of basal forebrain cholinergic and prefrontal dopaminergic systems. Impairments in executive functions, attention, and visuospatial abilities are its hallmark features with eventual involvement of memory and other domains. Subtle symptoms in the premotor and early phases of PD progress to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) which may be present at the time of diagnosis. Eventually, a large majority of PD patients develop dementia with advancing age and longer disease duration, which is usually accompanied by immobility, hallucinations/psychosis, and dysautonomia. Dopaminergic medications and deep brain stimulation help motor dysfunction, but may have potential cognitive side effects. Central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and possibly memantine, provide modest and temporary symptomatic relief for dementia, although there is no evidence-based treatment for MCI. There is no proven disease-modifying treatment for cognitive impairment in PD. The symptomatic and disease-modifying role of physical exercise, cognitive training, and neuromodulation on cognitive impairment in PD is under investigation. Multidisciplinary approaches to cognitive impairment with effective treatment of comorbidities, proper rehabilitation, and maintenance of good support systems in addition to pharmaceutical treatment may improve the quality of life of the patients and caregivers.
Topics: Arousal; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognitive Dysfunction; Donepezil; Executive Function; Humans; Memory, Episodic; Parkinson Disease; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivastigmine; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
PubMed: 33205381
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-020-00963-x -
Theranostics 2023Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to lung fibrosis belongs to WHO Group III, one of the most common subgroups of PH; however, it lacks effective treatment options....
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to lung fibrosis belongs to WHO Group III, one of the most common subgroups of PH; however, it lacks effective treatment options. Cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil (DON) has been shown to effectively improve Group I PH. However, its effects on Group III PH are unknown. A lung fibrosis-induced PH mouse model was constructed using a single intratracheal instillation of bleomycin (BLM), after which DON was administered daily. Pulmonary artery and right ventricle (RV) remodeling were evaluated at the end of the study. Lung tissue in each group was analyzed using RNA sequencing, and the results were further verified with datasets from patients with PH. The mechanisms underlying DON-induced effects on PH were verified both and . DON effectively improved pulmonary artery and RV remodeling in the BLM-induced mouse model. Transcriptomic profiles of lung tissue indicated that the expression of inflammatory and fibrotic genes was significantly changed in this process. In the animal model and patients with PH, T helper 17 lymphocytes (Th17) were the most common inflammatory cells infiltrating the lung tissue. DON significantly inhibited lung fibroblast activation; thus, preventing lung fibrosis and reducing the inflammatory response and Th17 cell infiltration in the BLM-induced lung tissue. In addition, Th17 cells could activate lung fibroblasts by secreting IL17A, and DON-mediated inhibition of Th17 cell differentiation was found to depend on the α7nAchR-JAK2-STAT3 pathway. DON can alleviate lung fibrosis and PH in an experimental mouse model. It inhibited pro-inflammatory Th17 cell differentiation, which is dependent on a cholinergic receptor pathway, thereby regulating fibroblast activation.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Th17 Cells; Donepezil; Lung; Fibrosis; Bleomycin
PubMed: 37064881
DOI: 10.7150/thno.82069 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2021Dementia is a progressive syndrome characterised by deterioration in memory, thinking and behaviour, and by impaired ability to perform daily activities. Two classes of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Dementia is a progressive syndrome characterised by deterioration in memory, thinking and behaviour, and by impaired ability to perform daily activities. Two classes of drug - cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine) and memantine - are widely licensed for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, and rivastigmine is also licensed for Parkinson's disease dementia. These drugs are prescribed to alleviate symptoms and delay disease progression in these and sometimes in other forms of dementia. There are uncertainties about the benefits and adverse effects of these drugs in the long term and in severe dementia, about effects of withdrawal, and about the most appropriate time to discontinue treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of withdrawal or continuation of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, or both, in people with dementia on: cognitive, neuropsychiatric and functional outcomes, rates of institutionalisation, adverse events, dropout from trials, mortality, quality of life and carer-related outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialised Register up to 17 October 2020 using terms appropriate for the retrieval of studies of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine. The Specialised Register contains records of clinical trials identified from monthly searches of a number of major healthcare databases, numerous trial registries and grey literature sources.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised, controlled clinical trials (RCTs) which compared withdrawal of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, or both, with continuation of the same drug or drugs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed citations and full-text articles for inclusion, extracted data from included trials and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Where trials were sufficiently similar, we pooled data for outcomes in the short term (up to 2 months after randomisation), medium term (3-11 months) and long term (12 months or more). We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
We included six trials investigating cholinesterase inhibitor withdrawal, and one trial investigating withdrawal of either donepezil or memantine. No trials assessed withdrawal of memantine only. Drugs were withdrawn abruptly in five trials and stepwise in two trials. All participants had dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, with severities ranging from mild to very severe, and were taking cholinesterase inhibitors without known adverse effects at baseline. The included trials randomised 759 participants to treatment groups relevant to this review. Study duration ranged from 6 weeks to 12 months. There were too few included studies to allow planned subgroup analyses. We considered some studies to be at unclear or high risk of selection, performance, detection, attrition or reporting bias. Compared to continuing cholinesterase inhibitors, discontinuing treatment may be associated with worse cognitive function in the short term (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.64 to -0.21; 4 studies; low certainty), but the effect in the medium term is very uncertain (SMD -0.40, 95% CI -0.87 to 0.07; 3 studies; very low certainty). In a sensitivity analysis omitting data from a study which only included participants who had shown a relatively poor prior response to donepezil, inconsistency was reduced and we found that cognitive function may be worse in the discontinuation group in the medium term (SMD -0.62; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.31). Data from one longer-term study suggest that discontinuing a cholinesterase inhibitor is probably associated with worse cognitive function at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -2.09 Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) points, 95% CI -3.43 to -0.75; moderate certainty). Discontinuation may make little or no difference to functional status in the short term (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.04; 2 studies; low certainty), and its effect in the medium term is uncertain (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.01; 2 studies; very low certainty). After 12 months, discontinuing a cholinesterase inhibitor probably results in greater functional impairment than continuing treatment (MD -3.38 Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) points, 95% CI -6.67 to -0.10; one study; moderate certainty). Discontinuation may be associated with a worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms over the short term and medium term, although we cannot exclude a minimal effect (SMD - 0.48, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.13; 2 studies; low certainty; and SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.08; 3 studies; low certainty, respectively). Data from one study suggest that discontinuing a cholinesterase inhibitor may result in little to no change in neuropsychiatric status at 12 months (MD -0.87 Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) points; 95% CI -8.42 to 6.68; moderate certainty). We found no clear evidence of an effect of discontinuation on dropout due to lack of medication efficacy or deterioration in overall medical condition (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.76; 4 studies; low certainty), on number of adverse events (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.27; 4 studies; low certainty) or serious adverse events (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.39; 4 studies; low certainty), and on mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.55; 5 studies; low certainty). Institutionalisation was reported in one trial, but it was not possible to extract data for the groups relevant to this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests that discontinuing cholinesterase inhibitors may result in worse cognitive, neuropsychiatric and functional status than continuing treatment, although this is supported by limited evidence, almost all of low or very low certainty. As all participants had dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, our findings are not transferable to other dementia types. We were unable to determine whether the effects of discontinuing cholinesterase inhibitors differed with baseline dementia severity. There is currently no evidence to guide decisions about discontinuing memantine. There is a need for further well-designed RCTs, across a range of dementia severities and settings. We are aware of two ongoing registered trials. In making decisions about discontinuing these drugs, clinicians should exercise caution, considering the evidence from existing trials along with other factors important to patients and their carers.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Dementia; Donepezil; Humans; Memantine; Parkinson Disease; Quality of Life; Rivastigmine
PubMed: 35608903
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009081.pub2 -
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2024Genetic variation plays an important role in drug response, there are few relevant studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease continuum (ADC).
BACKGROUND
Genetic variation plays an important role in drug response, there are few relevant studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease continuum (ADC).
OBJECTIVE
This study focused on the associations between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs3793790 and rs2177370) located in the CHAT gene and donepezil response in ADC patients, and further evaluated the associations between the two SNPs and ADC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
According to 2018 National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) standard, amyloid β-protein positive (Aβ+) and negative (Aβ-) patients were recruited according to the Aβ-PET/CT standard. rs3793790 and rs2177370 were genotyped in buccal swab samples by using the MassARRAY system. We used the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Chinese version, caregiver evaluation, and prescribing behavior to assess therapeutic response during the 9-month period. Using logistic regression models, we analyzed the relationship between the two SNPs and donepezil response in 58 Aβ+ patients treated with donepezil alone at the initial diagnosis of ADC. We also explored a probable link between the two SNPs and ADC in 147 Aβ+ and 73 Aβ- patients using a logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS
The chance of donepezil response was higher in patients with the G allele of rs3793790 and/or the A allele of rs2177370 than in those without (odds ratio (OR) 6.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-28.49). Additionally, the rs3793790 variant was not associated with ADC, whereas the A allele in rs2177370 increased 1.51-fold the ADC risk (OR 2.51, 95% CI: 1.28-4.95).
CONCLUSION
The genetic variants of rs3793790 and rs2177370 were associated with the donepezil response, and rs2177370 may have a moderate relationship with the risk of ADC.
Topics: Humans; Donepezil; Alzheimer Disease; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Female; Male; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Genotype; Logistic Models; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Mental Status and Dementia Tests
PubMed: 38894884
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S462786 -
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Oct 2018Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects over 45 million people worldwide. Patients with severe AD require help with daily activities and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects over 45 million people worldwide. Patients with severe AD require help with daily activities and show severe memory impairment. Currently, donepezil is one of two drugs approved by FDA and Health Canada for the treatment of severe AD (MMSE score <10). It is prescribed as 5 or 10 mg/d and an FDA-approved 23-mg/d dose.
METHOD
This review will discuss risks and benefits of donepezil at these doses in severe AD. Articles were identified using PubMed using the MeSH terms "donepezil" AND "Alzheimer Disease" AND "severe." Three double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies, one post hoc analysis, and one subgroup analysis were selected.
RESULTS
Donepezil was found to benefit patients in cognition and global functioning. The most consistent improvement was in severe impairment battery (SIB) scores. However, more patients treated with high dosage of donepezil discontinued their treatment due to various adverse events (AEs).
CONCLUSION
Clinicians must weigh benefits against adverse events when determining the course of therapy, as recommendations for cholinesterase inhibitors in advanced AD remain unclear and vary with different guidelines.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition Disorders; Donepezil; Humans; PubMed
PubMed: 30058285
DOI: 10.1111/cns.13035 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Nov 2004Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors, which prevent the hydrolysis of acetylcholine, have been approved for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) for over a... (Review)
Review
Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors, which prevent the hydrolysis of acetylcholine, have been approved for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) for over a decade. However, the first ChE inhibitors were associated with a high incidence of side-effects and general tolerability concerns, including hepatotoxicity. Side-effects associated with increased cholinergic activity, particularly in the gastrointestinal (GI) system, can prevent patients from achieving effective doses of drug. In addition, the advanced age and frail nature of patients with AD mean that poor tolerability is a serious concern. The potential for drug-drug interactions is also an important consideration, due to the high prevalence of comorbid disease in these patients. Data both from clinical trials and studies in routine clinical practice have shown that donepezil is associated with a low incidence of GI adverse events (AEs) that is comparable with placebo. Donepezil is a potent, selective inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase, and selective inhibition of central as opposed to peripheral ChEs might be expected to reduce the incidence of AEs, thus this may explain the lower incidence of cholinergic AEs observed following treatment with donepezil, compared with nonselective ChE inhibitors. There are no differences in cardiovascular AEs, including bradycardia, between placebo and donepezil groups in the clinical trials published to date, even in a very sick vascular dementia population with high rates of comorbidity and concomitant medication use. Data from single- and multiple-dose studies of donepezil in patients with hepatic impairment and with moderately to severely impaired renal function indicate that donepezil is safe and well tolerated in these groups. Furthermore, both in vitro and clinical studies have shown that donepezil is not associated with drug-drug interactions. The incidence of weight loss is very similar between donepezil- and placebo-treated patients. Although insomnia and other sleep disorders have been reported following administration of donepezil, lengthening the time period before increasing the dose of donepezil from 5 to 10 mg day(-1) or switching to morning dosing can reduce these events to the levels of placebo-treated patients. Over 770 million days of patient use and an extensive publication database demonstrate that donepezil has a good tolerability and safety profile.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Drug Interactions; Humans; Indans; Piperidines; Sleep Wake Disorders; Weight Loss
PubMed: 15496217
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.01848.x -
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease... 2009In the severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, functional autonomy is lost, psychiatric and behavioral symptoms become increasingly troublesome, and cognitive deficits... (Review)
Review
In the severe stages of Alzheimer's disease, functional autonomy is lost, psychiatric and behavioral symptoms become increasingly troublesome, and cognitive deficits increase until most patients require complete care, usually in specialized nursing homes. Consequently,some health care professionals question the benefits of pharmacologic intervention during these later stages. Since primary care physicians are often first to see these patients, they have key roles in recognizing the benefits of treatment and initiating appropriate management and referral. Three prospective randomized clinical trials of donepezil in severe Alzheimer's disease have been conducted; these show donepezil treatment is associated with functional and cognitive benefits, although behavioral benefits were not consistently observed. Donepezil was well tolerated; side effects were transient, mild to moderately severe, and cholinergic in nature. Donepezil has strong data throughout the Alzheimer's disease spectrum and, therefore, represents a first-line monotherapy that can provide benefits to patients in all stages of Alzheimer's disease.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Indans; Memantine; Neuropsychological Tests; Piperidines; Primary Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 19246572
DOI: 10.1177/1533317509332094 -
Health Technology Assessment... 2001Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and is characterised by an insidious onset and slow deterioration. The estimated prevalence of Alzheimer's... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and is characterised by an insidious onset and slow deterioration. The estimated prevalence of Alzheimer's disease for a standard health authority (500,000 people) is about 3330. Current service involves a wide range of agencies, and drug therapy for some patients.
OBJECTIVES
To provide a rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine in the symptomatic treatment of people suffering from Alzheimer's disease.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. METHODS - DATA SOURCES: Searches were made of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, National Research Register, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS, EconLit, MRC Trials database, Early Warning System, Current Controlled Trials, TOXLINE, Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings, and Getting Easier Access to Reviews. All sources were searched over the period covered by the databases up to March/July 2000. Bibliographies of related papers were assessed for relevant studies and experts were contacted for advice and peer review, and to identify additional published and unpublished references. Manufacturer submissions to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) were reviewed.
METHODS - STUDY SELECTION
Studies were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) INTERVENTION: donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine used to treat Alzheimer's disease. (2) PARTICIPANTS: people diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease who meet the criteria for treatment with donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine. (3) OUTCOMES: measures assessing changes in cognition, function, behaviour and mood, quality of life (including studies assessing carer well-being and carer-input), and time to institutionalisation. (4) DESIGN: systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and RCTs comparing donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine with placebo or each other or non-drug comparators were included in the review of effectiveness. Economic studies of donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine used to treat Alzheimer's disease that included a comparator (or placebo) and both the costs and consequence (outcomes) of treatment were included in the review of cost-effectiveness. Studies in non-English language, and abstracts and conference poster presentations of systematic reviews, RCTs and economic evaluations were excluded. Two reviewers identified studies by independently screening study titles and abstracts, and then by examining the full text of selected studies to decide inclusion. METHODS - DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer, with any disagreements resolved through discussion. The quality of RCTs was assessed using the Jadad scale and the quality of systematic reviews was assessed using criteria developed by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The quality of economic evaluation studies was assessed by their internal validity (i.e. the methods used) using a standard checklist, and external validity (i.e. the generalisability of the economic study to the population of interest) using a series of relevant questions. METHODS - DATA SYNTHESIS: The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine were synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies. In the economic evaluation, the reviewers assessed whether adjustments could be made to existing models to reflect the current situation in England and Wales. RESULTS - CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS: (1) Donepezil--three systematic reviews and five RCTs (plus four studies from industry (unpublished data, submitted as commercial in confidence)) were found. Results suggest that donepezil is beneficial when assessed using global and cognitive outcome measures. (2) Rivastigmine--three systematic reviews and five RCTs (plus two studies from industry (unpublished data, submitted as commercial in confidence)) were found. Results suggest that rivastigmine is beneficial in terms of global outcome measures. (3) Galantamine--one systematic review and three RCTs (plus three studies from industry (unpublished data, submitted as commercial in confidence)) were found. Results suggest that galantamine is beneficial in terms of global, cognitive and functional scales. RESULTS - SUMMARY OF BENEFITS: It is difficult to quantify benefits from the evidence available in the literature. Statistically significant improvements in tests such as ADAS-cog (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale) may not be reflected in changes in daily life. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Carbamates; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Donepezil; Galantamine; Humans; Indans; Neuroprotective Agents; Nootropic Agents; Phenylcarbamates; Piperidines; Rivastigmine
PubMed: 11262420
DOI: 10.3310/hta5010