-
Ophthalmology Mar 2023
Topics: Humans; Esotropia; Exotropia; Oculomotor Muscles; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 36526451
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.11.002 -
Eye (London, England) Jul 2018Although less frequent than consecutive exotropia, consecutive esotropia is a well-known type of strabismus when it follows the surgical correction of an exotropia....
PURPOSE
Although less frequent than consecutive exotropia, consecutive esotropia is a well-known type of strabismus when it follows the surgical correction of an exotropia. Spontaneous conversion from initial constant, large-angle exotropia beyond the age of 3 months to esotropia or orthophoria, however, is not common. We describe a series of infants who presented a spontaneous evolution from a large-angle infantile exotropia to either an orthophoria or a spontaneously consecutive esotropia.
METHODS
Cases of infants examined in the pediatric neuro-ophthalmology clinic of a tertiary ophthalmology department between 2009 and 2015, and having presented an early large-angle exotropia that spontaneously converted into an esotropia or orthophoria-i.e., without any previous surgery or botulinum toxin injection-were studied.
RESULTS
Ten cases (6 M:4 F) were followed up. Median age at first exotropia assessment was 3.88 months (SD = 6.35). Median age at spontaneous conversion to esotropia or orthophoria was 7.23 months (SD = 14.73). Six patients suffered from severe neurologic or metabolic diseases, three had neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and one was healthy.
CONCLUSION
Spontaneous conversion from initial large-angle exotropia to esotropia or orthophoria can be encountered. The cerebral maturation of visual structures probably accounts for this uncommon strabismus sequence.
Topics: Esotropia; Exotropia; Female; Humans; Hyperopia; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Nervous System Diseases; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 29497134
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0060-0 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Aug 2014
Topics: Accommodation, Ocular; Duane Retraction Syndrome; Esotropia; Eye Movements; Female; Humans; Male; Oculomotor Muscles; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; Vision, Binocular
PubMed: 25360471
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.141070 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2023Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the effectiveness and optimal timing of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for IE to improve ocular alignment and achieve or allow the development of binocular single vision.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, one other database, and three trials registers (November 2021). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized trials and quasi-randomized trials comparing any surgical or non-surgical intervention for IE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for six outcomes using the GRADE classification.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two studies with 234 children with IE. The first study enrolled 110 children (mean age 26.9 ± 14.5 months) with an onset of esotropia before six months of age, and large-angle IE defined as esotropia of ≥ 40 prism diopters. It was conducted between 2015 and 2018 in a tertiary care hospital in South Africa. It compared a maximum of three botulinum toxin injections with surgical intervention of bimedial rectus muscle recession, and children were followed for six months. There were limitations in study design and implementation; the risk of bias was high, or we had some concerns for most domains. Surgery may increase the incidence of treatment success, defined as orthophoria or residual esotropia of ≤ 10 prism diopters, compared with botulinum toxin injections, but the evidence was very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) of treatment success 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 2.77; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The results should be read with caution because 23 children with > 60 prism diopters at baseline in the surgery arm also received botulinum toxin at the time of surgery to augment the recessions. There was no evidence of an important difference between surgery and botulinum toxin injections for over-correction (> 10 prism diopters) of deviation (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.37; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or additional interventions required (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.19; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No major complications of surgery were observed in the surgery arm, while children experienced various complications in the botulinum toxin arm, including partial transient ptosis in 9 (16.7%) children, transient vertical deviation in 3 (5.6%) children, and consecutive exotropia in 13 (24.1%) children. No other outcome data for our prespecified outcomes were reported. The second study enrolled 124 children with onset of esotropia before one year of age in 12 university hospitals in Germany and the Netherlands. It compared bilateral recession with unilateral recession surgeries, and followed children for three months postoperatively. Very low-certainty evidence suggested that there was no evidence of an important difference between bilateral and unilateral surgeries in the presence of binocular vision (numbers with event unclear, P = 0.35), and over-correction (RR of having exotropia 1.09, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.63; 1 study, 118 participants). Dissociated vertical deviation, latent nystagmus, or both were observed in 8% to 21% of participants.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Medial rectus recessions may increase the incidence of treatment success compared with botulinum toxin injections alone, but the evidence was very uncertain. No evidence of important difference was found between bilateral surgery and unilateral surgery. Due to insufficient evidence, it was not possible to resolve the controversies regarding type of surgery, non-surgical intervention, or age of intervention in this review. There is clearly a need to conduct good quality trials in these areas to improve the evidence base for the management of IE.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Botulinum Toxins; Esotropia; Exotropia; Strabismus; Treatment Outcome; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 36645238
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004917.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2013Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Infantile esotropia (IE) is the inward deviation of the eye. Various aspects of the clinical management of IE are unclear; mainly, the most effective type of intervention and the age at intervention.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of various surgical and non-surgical interventions for IE and to determine the significance of age at treatment with respect to outcome.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE, (January 1950 to June 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2013), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to June 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 June 2013. We manually searched the conference proceedings of the European Strabismological Association (ESA) (1975 to 1997, 1999 to 2002), International Strabismological Association (ISA) (1994) and American Academy of Paediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus meeting (AAPOS) (1995 to 2003). Efforts were made to contact researchers who are active in the field for information about further published or unpublished studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised trials comparing any surgical or non-surgical intervention for infantile esotropia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Each review author independently assessed study abstracts identified from the electronic and manual searches.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies were found that met our selection criteria and therefore none were included for analysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The main body of literature on interventions for IE are either retrospective studies or prospective cohort studies. It has not been possible through this review to resolve the controversies regarding type of surgery, non-surgical intervention and age of intervention. There is clearly a need for good quality trials to be conducted in these areas to improve the evidence base for the management of IE.
Topics: Esotropia; Humans; Infant
PubMed: 23897277
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004917.pub3 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Dec 2023Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) is an uncommon subtype of esotropia characterized by sudden and usually late onset of a relatively large angle of comitant... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) is an uncommon subtype of esotropia characterized by sudden and usually late onset of a relatively large angle of comitant esotropia with diplopia in older children and adults.
METHODS
A literature survey regarding neurological pathologies in AACE was conducted using databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) in order to collect data for a narrative review of published reports and available literature.
RESULTS
The results of the literature survey were analyzed to provide an overview of the current knowledge of neurological pathologies in AACE. The results revealed that AACE with unclear etiologies can occur in many cases in both children and adults. Functional etiological factors for AACE were found to be due to many reasons, such as functional accommodative spasm, the excessive near work use of mobile phones/smartphones, and other digital screens. In addition, AACE was found to be associated with neurological disorders, such as astrocytoma of the corpus callosum, medulloblastoma, tumors of the brain stem or cerebellum, Arnold-Chiari malformation, cerebellar astrocytoma, Chiari 1 malformation, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, pontine glioma, cerebellar ataxia, thalamic lesions, myasthenia gravis, certain types of seizures, and hydrocephalus.
CONCLUSIONS
Previously reported cases of AACE with unknown etiologies have been reported in both children and adults. However, AACE can be associated with neurological disorders that require neuroimaging probes. The author recommends that clinicians should perform comprehensive neurological assessments to rule out neurological pathologies in AACE, especially in the presence of nystagmus or abnormal ocular and neurological indications (e.g., headache, cerebellar imbalance, weakness, nystagmus, papilloedema, clumsiness, and poor motor coordination).
Topics: Child; Adult; Humans; Esotropia; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Astrocytoma; Headache; Eye; Acute Disease; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37145335
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06092-3 -
The American Orthoptic Journal 2015Divergence insufficiency esotropia, or acquired comitant esotropia that is at least 10Δ larger at distance than at near, is most often seen in older adults, and may... (Review)
Review
Divergence insufficiency esotropia, or acquired comitant esotropia that is at least 10Δ larger at distance than at near, is most often seen in older adults, and may also be known as "age-related distance esotropia." Surgical treatment is often indicated for patients who do not tolerate prism therapy, or for those with large angles of esotropia. Surgical treatments have evolved with our understanding of the disease-state. Currently, accepted treatments include lateral rectus resection and medial rectus recession. These surgeries can be performed unilaterally or bilaterally. New surgical techniques such as lateral rectus equatorial myopexy are under investigation and may hold promise as future therapies.
Topics: Esotropia; Humans; Oculomotor Muscles; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; Vision, Binocular; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 26564924
DOI: 10.3368/aoj.65.1.35 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2023The use of botulinum toxin as an investigative and treatment modality for strabismus is well reported in the medical literature. However, it is unclear how effective it... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The use of botulinum toxin as an investigative and treatment modality for strabismus is well reported in the medical literature. However, it is unclear how effective it is in comparison with other treatment options for strabismus.
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective was to examine the efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy in the treatment of strabismus compared with alternative conservative or surgical treatment options. This review sought to ascertain those types of strabismus that particularly benefit from the use of botulinum toxin as a treatment option (such as small angle strabismus or strabismus with binocular potential, i.e. the potential to use both eyes together as a pair). The secondary objectives were to investigate the dose effect and complication rates associated with botulinum toxin.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers on 6 July 2022, together with reference checking to identify additional studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery, botulinum toxin alternatives (i.e. bupivacaine) and conservative therapy such as orthoptic exercises, prisms, or lens therapy for people of any age with strabismus. All relevant RCTs identified in this update compared botulinum toxin with strabismus surgery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methods expected by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs with 242 participants that enrolled adults with esotropia or exotropia, children with acquired esotropia, and children with infantile esotropia. The follow-up period ranged from six to 36 months. Two studies were conducted in Spain, and one each in Canada and South Africa. We judged the included studies to have a mixture of low, unclear and high risk of bias. We did not consider any of the included studies to be at low risk of bias for all domains. All four studies reported the proportion of participants who improved or corrected strabismus, defined as ≤ 10 prism diopters (PD) at six months (two studies) or ≤ 8 PD at one year (two studies). Low-certainty evidence suggested that participants treated with the surgery may be more likely to improve or correct strabismus compared with those who treated with botulinum toxin (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.99; I² = 50%; 4 studies, 242 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study, which enrolled 110 children with infantile esotropia, suggested that surgery may reduce the incidence of additional surgical intervention required, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.34 to 6.91; 1 study, 101 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies conducted in Spain compared botulinum toxin with surgery in children who required retreatment for acquired or infantile esotropia. These two studies provided low-certainty evidence that botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achieving sensory fusion (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.23; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) and stereopsis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.25; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 102 participants) compared with surgery. Three studies reported non-serious adverse events. Partial transient ptosis (range 16.7% to 37.0%) and transient vertical deviation (range 5.6% to 18.5%) were observed among participants treated with botulinum toxin in three studies. In one study, 44.7% participants in the surgery group experienced discomfort. No studies reported serious adverse events or postintervention quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
It remains unclear whether botulinum toxin may be an alternative to strabismus surgery as an independent treatment modality among certain types of strabismus because we found only low and very low-certainty evidence in this review update. Low-certainty evidence suggests that strabismus surgery may be preferable to botulinum toxin injection to improve or correct strabismus when types of strabismus and different age groups are combined. We found low-certainty evidence suggesting botulinum toxin may have little to no effect on achievement of binocular single vision compared with surgery in children with acquired or infantile esotropia. We did not find sufficient evidence to draw any meaningful conclusions with respect to need for additional surgery, quality of life, and serious adverse events. We identified three ongoing trials comparing botulinum toxin with conventional surgeries in the varying types of strabismus, whose results will provide relevant evidence for our stated objectives. Future trials should be rigorously designed, and investigators should analyze outcome data appropriately and report adequate information to provide evidence of high certainty. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness should be examined in addition to clinical and safety outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Botulinum Toxins; Esotropia; Strabismus; Canada
PubMed: 36916692
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006499.pub5 -
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 2021To evaluate the relationship of changes in hypermetropia and ocular alignment in patients with accommodative esotropia.
PURPOSES
To evaluate the relationship of changes in hypermetropia and ocular alignment in patients with accommodative esotropia.
METHODS
The medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with refractive accommodative esotropia (esotropia eliminated or decreased to within 10 D with full hyperopic correction) were retrospectively reviewed. Cycloplegic refractions culled from medical records were converted into spherical equivalents. Presence of amblyopia, changes in refractive error and ocular alignment at admission and after the follow-up period were evaluated.
RESULTS
Seventy patients (mean age: 6.01 ± 5.41 years; female: 60.6%; mean follow-up: 5.8 ± 3 years) had corrected esotropia of 40 ± 20 prismatic diopters at admission. The average decrease per year in near and distance deviations with glasses was 1.71 ± 3.96 prismatic diopters/year and 1.09 ± 3.25 prismatic diopters/year, respectively. The total myopic shift of the right and left eyes was 1.08 ± 1.35 D and 1.20 ± 1.40 D, respectively. Myopic shift/year was 0.22 D/year and 0.26 D/year, respectively. The correlation between the rate of myopic shift and rate of change in corrected near deviation was weak. The correlation for the rate of myopic shift was not high for the right and left eyes (r=0.18; p=0.15).
CONCLUSION
The amount of deviation and hypermetropia gradually decreased in accommodative esotropia during follow-up. On the other hand, it may be incorrect to assure patients that the amount of deviation will decrease in parallel with the refractive error.
Topics: Accommodation, Ocular; Child; Child, Preschool; Esotropia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperopia; Infant; Retrospective Studies; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 33567009
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210020 -
Clinical & Experimental Optometry Apr 2022Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) is characterised by the acute onset of diplopia which affects work and life.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE) is characterised by the acute onset of diplopia which affects work and life.
BACKGROUND
To describe the clinical characteristics and discuss the aetiology of acute acquired comitant esotropia.
METHODS
The medical records of 51 patients with AACE were retrospectively analysed, and their age, occupation, daily average time spent on near work, angle of deviation, refractive error and aetiology were analysed.
RESULTS
The age at onset of AACE was eight to 55 years. Thirty-nine patients were aged 12 to 36 years (76.5%), and 42 patients (82.4%) were myopic. The angle of deviation was 20 (12 to 35) during near fixation and 25 (18 to 40) during distance fixation. The deviation during distance fixation was larger than that during near fixation, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). The daily average time of near work before onset was 9.0 h (8.0 h to 10.0 h); 35 patients (68.6%) spent more than 8 h performing near work. Their occupations included students, accountants, information technology staff, and those who required electronic use for a long time. There is no correlation between the angle of deviation and the time of near work (p > 0.05). Among the 51 patients, three had intracranial diseases. Diplopia resolved in 47 cases following treatment. The angle of deviation post-treatment was 0 (0 to 5) during near and 0 (0 to 3) during distance fixation.
CONCLUSION
AACE occurs mostly in myopic older children and adults. The onset of esotropia is related to long-term near work. AACE patients mostly present an angle of deviation that is larger during distance than near fixation. Intracranial disease is an infrequent but important cause of AACE that needs to be excluded in all cases.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Diplopia; Esotropia; Humans; Refractive Errors; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult
PubMed: 33926368
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1914510