-
Skin Therapy Letter Jan 2016Dyschromia is a leading cause for cosmetic consultation, especially in those with diverse skin types (mixture of ethnicities) and with the rise of non-core and untrained... (Review)
Review
Dyschromia is a leading cause for cosmetic consultation, especially in those with diverse skin types (mixture of ethnicities) and with the rise of non-core and untrained physicians performing cosmetic procedures. Melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) account for the majority of cases and are characterized by pigmented macules and patches distributed symmetrically in sun-exposed areas of the forehead, cheeks, and chin in melasma, and irregularly in areas of inflammation or an inciting traumatic event with PIH. Treatment is challenging and focused on a variety of mechanisms to stop, hinder, and/or prevent steps in the pigment production (melanocytic hyperactivity) process, breaking down deposited pigment for internal removal or external release, exfoliating cells to enhance turnover, and decreasing inflammation. Topical lightening therapy in combination with sun protection is essential for potential improvement. The most commonly prescribed and researched topical lightening agents are hydroquinone (HQ), azelaic acid (AzA), and retinoids - although only HQ and a triple combination cream (Tri-Luma®; fluocinolone acetonide 0.01%, HQ 4%, tretinoin 0.05%) are US FDA-approved for "bleaching of hyperpigmented skin" (HQ) and "melasma" (Tri-Luma®). Numerous non-HQ brightening/lightening agents, including antioxidant and botanical cosmeceuticals, have recently flooded the market with improvements that claim less irritant potential, as well as avoiding the stigmata associated with HQ agents such as carcinogenesis and cutaneous ochronosis. Combining topical therapy with procedures such as chemical peels, intense pulsed light (IPL), fractional non-ablative lasers or radiofrequency, pigment lasers (microsecond, picosecond, Q-switched), and microneedling, enhances results. With proper treatment, melasma can be controlled, improved, and maintained; alternatively, PIH can be cured in most cases. Herein, we review treatments for both conditions and provide an opinion on proper management for enhanced results.
Topics: Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Hydroquinones; Hyperpigmentation; Inflammation; Melanosis; Phototherapy
PubMed: 27224897
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Oral Health May 2022To compare the reported efficacy and costs of available interventions used for the management of oral lichen planus (OLP).
OBJECTIVE
To compare the reported efficacy and costs of available interventions used for the management of oral lichen planus (OLP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed from database inception until March 2021 in MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane library following PRISMA guidelines. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing an active intervention with placebo or different active interventions for OLP management were considered.
RESULTS
Seventy (70) RCTs were included. The majority of evidence suggested efficacy of topical steroids (dexamethasone, clobetasol, fluocinonide, triamcinolone), topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, cyclosporine), topical retinoids, intra-lesional triamcinolone, aloe-vera gel, photodynamic therapy, and low-level laser therapies for OLP management. Based on the estimated cost per month and evidence for efficacy and side-effects, topical steroids (fluocinonide > dexamethasone > clobetasol > triamcinolone) appear to be more cost-effective than topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus > pimecrolimus > cyclosporine) followed by intra-lesional triamcinolone.
CONCLUSION
Of common treatment regimens for OLP, topical steroids appear to be the most economical and efficacious option followed by topical calcineurin inhibitors. Large-scale multi-modality, prospective trials in which head-to-head comparisons interventions are compared are required to definitely assess the cost-effectiveness of OLP treatments.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Clobetasol; Cyclosporins; Dexamethasone; Fluocinonide; Health Care Costs; Humans; Lichen Planus, Oral; Steroids; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome; Triamcinolone
PubMed: 35524296
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02168-4 -
Middle East African Journal of... 2015This is a summary of current and emerging pharmacologic therapies utilized in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Current therapies, such as ranibizumab,... (Review)
Review
This is a summary of current and emerging pharmacologic therapies utilized in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Current therapies, such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, triamcinolone acetonide, and fluocinolone acetonide, inhibit angiogenesis and inflammation and may be used alone or in combination with laser treatment. Emerging therapies aim to reduce oxidative stress or inhibit other signal transduction pathways, including the protein kinase C cascade and aldose reductase pathway. Future therapies may target other molecules crucial to the pathogenesis of DR, including hepatocyte growth factors and matrix metalloproteinase 9. Finally, the emergence of novel mechanisms of medication delivery may also be on the horizon.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Bevacizumab; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetic Retinopathy; Fluocinolone Acetonide; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Intravitreal Injections; Laser Coagulation; Macular Edema; Ranibizumab; Triamcinolone Acetonide
PubMed: 25949073
DOI: 10.4103/0974-9233.154389 -
Ophthalmology Feb 2018The uveitides are a collection of more than 30 diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation. Many cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis, many... (Review)
Review
The uveitides are a collection of more than 30 diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation. Many cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis, many cases of intermediate uveitis, and most cases of posterior and panuveitides requiring treatment are treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppression. Disease-specific, time-updated modeling of clinical data for several uveitides suggests superior prevention of ocular complications and visual outcomes with immunosuppression. These studies also suggest that oral corticosteroids at doses low enough for safe long-term therapy (i.e., <7.5 mg/day) are ineffective, implying that immunosuppression should be part of the initial regimen. The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study was a randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing systemic therapy with oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression with regional corticosteroid treatment. It demonstrated that, when used properly, oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression can be given safely for up to 7 years with no evident increased risk of systemic side effects compared with regional corticosteroid therapy, except for greater antibiotic use for infections. The Systemic Treatment for Eye Diseases (SITE) Cohort Study suggested long-term safety for this approach, when the immunosuppressive agents were antimetabolites or calcineurin inhibitors. Thus, oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression may be a preferred initial therapy for many noninfectious, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides. Nonalkylating-agent immunosuppression has a low rate of sustained, drug-free remissions, <10%/year. Nonalkylating-agent immunosuppression for >3 years with control of the inflammation for >2 years is associated with a decreased risk of relapse after discontinuing immunosuppression. Alkylating agents can induce sustained drug-free remissions but likely increase the lifetime risk of cancer. Biologics, which target specific cytokines and pathways, hold promise for the future. Monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α have been studied most often, and one, adalimumab, is U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of noninfectious, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Uveitis; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 28942074
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.007 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2022To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ciprofloxacin 0.3 % and fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 % otic solution (CIPRO+FLUO), ciprofloxacin 0.3 % otic solution alone... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ciprofloxacin 0.3 % and fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 % otic solution (CIPRO+FLUO), ciprofloxacin 0.3 % otic solution alone (CIPRO), and fluocinolone acetonide 0.025 % otic solution alone (FLUO) administered into the middle ears of pediatric patients with Acute Otitis Media with Tympanostomy Tubes (AOMT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a PK analysis of patients who participated in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind AOMT clinical trials (SALVAT studies CIFLOTIII/10IA02 and CIFLOTIII/10IA04). Each patient received 0.25 mL of CIPRO+FLUO, CIPRO, or FLUO twice a day instilled into the ear canal(s) for 7 days to treat AOMT. Blood samples of patients with unilateral AOMT were collected before the administration of the first dose of study medication at Visit 1 (day 1) and within 1-2 h after the last dose on day 7. Blood samples were analyzed to detect ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide concentrations using two validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) methods, with the lower limit of quantification for ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide in plasma samples being 1 ng/mL. Thirty randomly selected patients between 10 months and 10 years of age (mean age, 4.4 years) were included in the study. Although all available samples were analyzed, only PK data of the 22 patients with both samples and unilateral disease were considered for study purposes.
RESULTS
No detectable concentrations of ciprofloxacin or fluocinolone acetonide in plasma were observed (<1 ng/mL).
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrated negligible systemic exposure to ciprofloxacin and fluocinolone acetonide following topical otic administration in pediatric patients with AOMT.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Child; Child, Preschool; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluocinolone Acetonide; Humans; Otitis Media
PubMed: 35988360
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103573 -
Journal of Ophthalmology 2014Sustained-release corticosteroid treatment has shown to be a promising strategy for macular edema due to retinovascular disease (i.e., diabetes and retinal vein... (Review)
Review
Sustained-release corticosteroid treatment has shown to be a promising strategy for macular edema due to retinovascular disease (i.e., diabetes and retinal vein occlusion) and for the treatment of noninfectious posterior uveitis. Clinicians now have the option of three sustained-release corticosteroid implants: Ozurdex (Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) which releases dexamethasone and two devices that release fluocinolone acetonide, Retisert (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), and Iluvien (Alimera Science, Alpharetta, GA). Each has different physical characteristics and duration effect and has been approved for different indications. Herein we provide a summary of the current clinical knowledge regarding these implants.
PubMed: 25140246
DOI: 10.1155/2014/164692 -
British Medical Journal Jul 1964
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dermatitis, Contact; Dermatitis, Occupational; Detergents; Diagnosis; Eczema; Fluocinolone Acetonide; Hand Dermatoses; Humans; Keratosis; Nickel; Psychosomatic Medicine; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Tinea; Toxicology; Triamcinolone Acetonide; Water; Zinc
PubMed: 14150887
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5402.151 -
BMC Oral Health Mar 2022Although topical steroids are an effective treatment for oral lichen planus, they can have suppressive effects on oral immunity and predispose the patients to Candida...
BACKGROUND
Although topical steroids are an effective treatment for oral lichen planus, they can have suppressive effects on oral immunity and predispose the patients to Candida overgrowth. Lactoferrin is a crucial local immunity protein in the oral cavity with important antimicrobial activity. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate salivary lactoferrin secretion levels and Candida colonization in oral lichen planus patients treated with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase.
METHODS
Saliva samples were collected from 15 oral lichen planus subjects who had never received topical steroid treatment prior to this study and 15 healthy volunteers to determine their salivary lactoferrin levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and to investigate the presence of oral Candida species at baseline and 3 months after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase. Statistical analysis was performed to compare lactoferrin secretion and Candida colonization levels between the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test for independent data or the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for paired data.
RESULTS
The salivary lactoferrin secretion level was not significantly different between the control group and oral lichen planus patients or between before and after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase (P > 0.05). Candida was detected in 11 (73.33%) healthy volunteers, 8 (53.33%) oral lichen planus patients before treatment, and 9 (60%) oral lichen planus patients after treatment with fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase. There was no significant difference in Candida counts between the groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Our study indicates that using fluocinolone acetonide 0.1% in orabase to treat oral lichen planus for 3 months did not affect salivary lactoferrin protein secretion or Candida carriage. Trial registration The trial was registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR identifier: TCTR20200723002).
Topics: Candida; Fluocinolone Acetonide; Humans; Lactoferrin; Lichen Planus, Oral; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35246095
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02096-3