-
Dermatologic Therapy Dec 2022Although topical drugs are the mainstay of treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis, the developments observed in this field in the last two decades have... (Review)
Review
Although topical drugs are the mainstay of treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis, the developments observed in this field in the last two decades have been limited. The most commonly used drugs are still vitamin D analogues and corticosteroids, both with several limitations. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) plays a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, and tapinarof, a novel, first-in-class, small molecule topical therapeutic AhR-modulating agent has been recently approved by the FDA for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults. Two large, 12-week, phase III trials, PSOARING 1 and 2, showed that 35.4%-40.2% of patients in the tapinarof 1% cream arm achieved the primary endpoint (Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score of 0 or 1 and a decrease of ≥2-5 points at week 12) compared with 6.0%-6.3% for vehicle arm, respectively. The most common adverse effects were folliculitis, contact dermatitis, headache and pruritus. In the open label, 40-week, extension trial, PSOARING 3, the efficacy and safety results were similar, with 40.9% of patients achieving a PGA = 0 at least one time during the trial and 58.2% of patients with PGA≥2 achieved PGA = 0/1 at least once during the trial, without tachyphylaxis. There were no new safety signals, with most frequent adverse events being folliculitis, contact dermatitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. Tapinarof 1% cream has shown to be effective and to have a favorable safety profile in the treatment of psoriatic patients, representing an alternative to the current therapeutic options, increasing our armamentarium in the topical treatment of psoriasis.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Dermatitis, Contact; Double-Blind Method; Folliculitis; Psoriasis; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36226669
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15931 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2020Yeasts of the genus, , formerly known as , are lipophilic yeasts, which are a part of the normal skin flora (microbiome). colonize the human skin after birth and must... (Review)
Review
Yeasts of the genus, , formerly known as , are lipophilic yeasts, which are a part of the normal skin flora (microbiome). colonize the human skin after birth and must therefore, as commensals, be normally tolerated by the human immune system. The yeasts also have a pathogenic potential where they can, under appropriate conditions, invade the stratum corneum and interact with the host immune system, both directly but also through chemical mediators. The species distribution on the skin and the pathogenetic potential of the yeast varies between different related diseases such as head and neck dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, pityriasis versicolor, and folliculitis. The diagnostic methods used to confirm the presence of yeasts include direct microcopy, culture based methods (often a combination of morphological features of the isolate combined with biochemical test), molecular based methods such as Polymerase Chain Reaction techniques, and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time Of Flight mass spectrometry and the chemical imprint method Raman spectroscopy. Skin diseases caused by are usually treated with antifungal therapy and if there are associated inflammatory skin mechanisms this is often supplemented by anti-inflammatory therapy. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of related skin disease, diagnostic methods and treatment options.
Topics: Dermatitis, Seborrheic; Folliculitis; Humans; Malassezia; Skin; Tinea Versicolor
PubMed: 32266163
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00112 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2021Bacterial folliculitis and boils are globally prevalent bacterial infections involving inflammation of the hair follicle and the perifollicular tissue. Some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Bacterial folliculitis and boils are globally prevalent bacterial infections involving inflammation of the hair follicle and the perifollicular tissue. Some folliculitis may resolve spontaneously, but others may progress to boils without treatment. Boils, also known as furuncles, involve adjacent tissue and may progress to cellulitis or lymphadenitis. A systematic review of the best evidence on the available treatments was needed.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of interventions (such as topical antibiotics, topical antiseptic agents, systemic antibiotics, phototherapy, and incision and drainage) for people with bacterial folliculitis and boils.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases up to June 2020: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched five trials registers up to June 2020. We checked the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed systemic antibiotics; topical antibiotics; topical antiseptics, such as topical benzoyl peroxide; phototherapy; and surgical interventions in participants with bacterial folliculitis or boils. Eligible comparators were active intervention, placebo, or no treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were 'clinical cure' and 'severe adverse events leading to withdrawal of treatment'; secondary outcomes were 'quality of life', 'recurrence of folliculitis or boil following completion of treatment', and 'minor adverse events not leading to withdrawal of treatment'. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 18 RCTs (1300 participants). The studies included more males (332) than females (221), although not all studies reported these data. Seventeen trials were conducted in hospitals, and one was conducted in clinics. The participants included both children and adults (0 to 99 years). The studies did not describe severity in detail; of the 232 participants with folliculitis, 36% were chronic. At least 61% of participants had furuncles or boils, of which at least 47% were incised. Duration of oral and topical treatments ranged from 3 days to 6 weeks, with duration of follow-up ranging from 3 days to 6 months. The study sites included Asia, Europe, and America. Only three trials reported funding, with two funded by industry. Ten studies were at high risk of 'performance bias', five at high risk of 'reporting bias', and three at high risk of 'detection bias'. We did not identify any RCTs comparing topical antibiotics against topical antiseptics, topical antibiotics against systemic antibiotics, or phototherapy against sham light. Eleven trials compared different oral antibiotics. We are uncertain as to whether cefadroxil compared to flucloxacillin (17/21 versus 18/20, risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.16; 41 participants; 1 study; 10 days of treatment) or azithromycin compared to cefaclor (8/15 versus 10/16, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.40; 31 participants; 2 studies; 7 days of treatment) differed in clinical cure (both very low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in clinical cure rate between cefdinir and cefalexin after 17 to 24 days (25/32 versus 32/42, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.38; 74 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence), and there probably is little to no difference in clinical cure rate between cefditoren pivoxil and cefaclor after 7 days (24/46 versus 21/47, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.78; 93 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). For risk of severe adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal, there may be little to no difference between cefdinir versus cefalexin after 17 to 24 days (1/191 versus 1/200, RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.62; 391 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). There may be an increased risk with cefadroxil compared with flucloxacillin after 10 days (6/327 versus 2/324, RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.60 to 14.62; 651 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence) and cefditoren pivoxil compared with cefaclor after 7 days (2/77 versus 0/73, RR 4.74, 95% CI 0.23 to 97.17; 150 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). However, for these three comparisons the 95% CI is very wide and includes the possibility of both increased and reduced risk of events. We are uncertain whether azithromycin affects the risk of severe adverse events leading to withdrawal of treatment compared to cefaclor (274 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence) as no events occurred in either group after seven days. For risk of minor adverse events, there is probably little to no difference between the following comparisons: cefadroxil versus flucloxacillin after 10 days (91/327 versus 116/324, RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.98; 651 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence) or cefditoren pivoxil versus cefaclor after 7 days (8/77 versus 5/73, RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.52 to 4.42; 150 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of azithromycin versus cefaclor after seven days due to very low-certainty evidence (7/148 versus 4/126, RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.38 to 4.17; 274 participants; 2 studies). The study comparing cefdinir versus cefalexin did not report data for total minor adverse events, but both groups experienced diarrhoea, nausea, and vaginal mycosis during 17 to 24 days of treatment. Additional adverse events reported in the other included studies were vomiting, rashes, and gastrointestinal symptoms such as stomach ache, with some events leading to study withdrawal. Three included studies assessed recurrence following completion of treatment, none of which evaluated our key comparisons, and no studies assessed quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found no RCTs regarding the efficacy and safety of topical antibiotics versus antiseptics, topical versus systemic antibiotics, or phototherapy versus sham light for treating bacterial folliculitis or boils. Comparative trials have not identified important differences in efficacy or safety outcomes between different oral antibiotics for treating bacterial folliculitis or boils. Most of the included studies assessed participants with skin and soft tissue infection which included many disease types, whilst others focused specifically on folliculitis or boils. Antibiotic sensitivity data for causative organisms were often not reported. Future trials should incorporate culture and sensitivity information and consider comparing topical antibiotic with antiseptic, and topical versus systemic antibiotics or phototherapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bias; Carbuncle; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Furunculosis; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 33634465
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013099.pub2 -
Veterinary Dermatology Jun 2014Superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) is usually caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and routinely treated with systemic antimicrobial agents. Infection is a... (Review)
Review
Guidelines for the diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of canine superficial bacterial folliculitis (Antimicrobial Guidelines Working Group of the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases).
BACKGROUND
Superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) is usually caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and routinely treated with systemic antimicrobial agents. Infection is a consequence of reduced immunity associated with alterations of the skin barrier and underlying diseases that may be difficult to diagnose and resolve; thus, SBF is frequently recurrent and repeated treatment is necessary. The emergence of multiresistant bacteria, particularly meticillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP), has focused attention on the need for optimal management of SBF.
OBJECTIVES
Provision of an internationally available resource guiding practitioners in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of SBF.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE GUIDELINES
The guidelines were developed by the Antimicrobial Guidelines Working Group of the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases, with consultation and advice from diplomates of the American and European Colleges of Veterinary Dermatology. They describe optimal methods for the diagnosis and management of SBF, including isolation of the causative organism, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, selection of antimicrobial drugs, therapeutic protocols and advice on infection control. Guidance is given for topical and systemic modalities, including approaches suitable for MRSP. Systemic drugs are classified in three tiers. Tier one drugs are used when diagnosis is clear cut and risk factors for antimicrobial drug resistance are not present. Otherwise, tier two drugs are used and antimicrobial susceptibility tests are mandatory. Tier three includes drugs reserved for highly resistant infections; their use is strongly discouraged and, when necessary, they should be used in consultation with specialists.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE
Optimal management of SBF will improve antimicrobial use and reduce selection of MRSP and other multidrug-resistant bacteria affecting animal and human health.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Folliculitis; Skin Diseases, Bacterial
PubMed: 24720433
DOI: 10.1111/vde.12118 -
JAMA Dermatology Dec 2020Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, effectively reduced disease severity in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in 2 phase 3 monotherapy... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor, effectively reduced disease severity in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in 2 phase 3 monotherapy studies.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of 4 mg and 2 mg of baricitinib in combination with background topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy in adults with moderate to severe AD who previously had an inadequate response to TCS therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial, BREEZE-AD7 (Study of Baricitinib [LY3009104] in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis) was conducted from November 16, 2018, to August 22, 2019, at 68 centers across 10 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and South America. Patients 18 years or older with moderate to severe AD and an inadequate response to TCSs were included. After completing the study, patients were followed up for up to 4 weeks or enrolled in a long-term extension study.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 2 mg of baricitinib once daily (n = 109), 4 mg of baricitinib once daily (n = 111), or placebo (n = 109) for 16 weeks. The use of low-to-moderate potency TCSs was allowed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear), with a 2-point or greater improvement from baseline at week 16.
RESULTS
Among 329 patients (mean [SD] age, 33.8 [12.4] years; 216 [66%] male), at week 16, a vIGA-AD score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) was achieved by 34 patients (31%) receiving 4 mg of baricitinib and 26 (24%) receiving 2 mg of baricitinib compared with 16 (15%) receiving placebo (odds ratio vs placebo, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.4-5.6]; P = .004 for the 4-mg group; 1.9 [95% CI, 0.9-3.9]; P = .08 for the 2-mg group). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 64 of 111 patients (58%) in the 4-mg group, 61 of 109 patients (56%) in the 2-mg group, and 41 of 108 patients (38%) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 patients (4%) in the 4-mg group, 2 (2%) in the 2-mg group, and 4 (4%) in the placebo group. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, and folliculitis.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
A dose of 4 mg of baricitinib in combination with background TCS therapy significantly improved the signs and symptoms of moderate to severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previous studies of baricitinib in AD.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03733301.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Azetidines; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Folliculitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Male; Middle Aged; Nasopharyngitis; Purines; Pyrazoles; Respiratory Tract Infections; Severity of Illness Index; Signal Transduction; Sulfonamides; Young Adult
PubMed: 33001140
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Mar 2019
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Alopecia; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Folliculitis; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Recurrence; Remission Induction
PubMed: 30092322
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.050