-
Genes Mar 2022Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog that has been used widely as an anticancer drug for the treatment of a variety of conditions, including ovarian, bladder,... (Review)
Review
Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analog that has been used widely as an anticancer drug for the treatment of a variety of conditions, including ovarian, bladder, non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, and breast cancer. However, enzymatic deamination, fast systemic clearance, and the emergence of chemoresistance have limited its efficacy. Different prodrug strategies have been explored in recent years, seeking to obtain better pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and safety. Different drug delivery strategies have also been employed, seeking to transform gemcitabine into a targeted medicine. This review will provide an overview of the recent developments in gemcitabine prodrugs and their effectiveness in treating cancerous tumors.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Deoxycytidine; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Prodrugs; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 35328020
DOI: 10.3390/genes13030466 -
Lancet (London, England) Oct 2023Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with few treatment options. NAPOLI 3 aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NALIRIFOX... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with few treatment options. NAPOLI 3 aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).
METHODS
NAPOLI 3 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study conducted at 187 community and academic sites in 18 countries worldwide across Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia. Patients with mPDAC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m, leucovorin 400 mg/m, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m, administered sequentially as a continuous intravenous infusion over 46 h) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m, administered intravenously, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Balanced block randomisation was stratified by geographical region, performance status, and liver metastases, managed through an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, evaluated when at least 543 events were observed across the two treatment groups. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04083235.
FINDINGS
Between Feb 19, 2020 and Aug 17, 2021, 770 patients were randomly assigned (NALIRIFOX, 383; nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, 387; median follow-up 16·1 months [IQR 13·4-19·1]). Median overall survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 10·0-12·1) with NALIRIFOX versus 9·2 months (8·3-10·6) with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine (hazard ratio 0·83; 95% CI 0·70-0·99; p=0·036). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 322 (87%) of 370 patients receiving NALIRIFOX and 326 (86%) of 379 patients receiving nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine; treatment-related deaths occurred in six (2%) patients in the NALIRIFOX group and eight (2%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings support use of the NALIRIFOX regimen as a possible reference regimen for first-line treatment of mPDAC.
FUNDING
Ipsen.
TRANSLATION
For the plain language summary see Supplementary Materials section.
Topics: Humans; Gemcitabine; Paclitaxel; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Albumins; Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37708904
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01366-1 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... May 2022There is currently no effective treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While palliative chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to most patients, nearly...
There is currently no effective treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While palliative chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to most patients, nearly all will eventually progress on treatment and long-term survivability remains poor. Given the lack of subsequent line treatment options, in this study, we sought to identify novel strategies to prevent, delay, or overcome resistance to gemcitabine, one of the most widely used medications in PDAC. Using a combination of single-cell RNA sequencing and high-throughput proteomic analysis, we identified a subset of gemcitabine-resistant tumor cells enriched for calcium/calmodulin signaling. Pharmacologic inhibition of calcium-dependent calmodulin activation led to the rapid loss of drug-resistant phenotypes in vitro, which additional single-cell RNA sequencing identified was due to impaired activation of the RAS/ERK signaling pathway. Consistent with these observations, calcium chelation or depletion of calcium in the culture media also impaired ERK activation in gemcitabine-resistant cells, and restored therapeutic responses to gemcitabine in vitro. We observed similar results using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) such as amlodipine, which inhibited prosurvival ERK signaling in vitro and markedly enhanced therapeutic responses to gemcitabine in both orthotopic xenografts and transgenic models of PDAC. Combined, these results offer insight into a potential means of gemcitabine resistance and suggest that select CCBs may provide a clinical benefit to PDAC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.
Topics: Amlodipine; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Calmodulin; Deoxycytidine; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; United States; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 35476525
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2200143119 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Mar 2023Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial...
PURPOSE
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has proven survival benefits for patients with invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, yet its role for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains undefined. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of NAC with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) for patients with high-risk UTUC before extirpative surgery to evaluate response, survival, and tolerability.
METHODS
Eligible patients with defined criteria for high-risk localized UTUC received four cycles of split-dose GC before surgical resection and lymph node dissection. The primary study end point was rate of pathologic response (defined as < ypT2N0). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability.
RESULTS
Among 57 patients evaluated, 36 (63%) demonstrated pathologic response (95% CI, 49 to 76). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in 11 patients (19%). Fifty-one patients (89%) tolerated at least three complete cycles of split-dose GC, 27 patients (47%) tolerated four complete cycles, and all patients proceeded to surgery. With a median follow up of 3.1 years, 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 89% (95% CI, 81 to 98) and 72% (95% CI, 59 to 87), while 2- and 5-year OS rates were 93% (95% CI, 86 to 100) and 79% (95% CI, 67 to 94), respectively. Pathologic complete and partial responses were associated with improved PFS and OS compared with nonresponders (≥ ypT2N any; 2-year PFS 100% and 95% 76%, < .001; 2-year OS 100% and 100% 80%, < .001).
CONCLUSION
NAC with split-dose GC for high-risk UTUC is a well-tolerated, effective therapy demonstrating evidence of pathologic response that is associated with favorable survival outcomes. Given that these survival outcomes are superior to historical series, these data support the use of NAC as a standard of care for high-risk UTUC, and split-dose GC is a viable option for NAC.
Topics: Humans; Gemcitabine; Cisplatin; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy
PubMed: 36603175
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00763 -
Cell Communication and Signaling : CCS Nov 2022Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy regarding digestive system, which is the fourth leading factor of cancer-related mortalities in the globe. Prognosis...
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal malignancy regarding digestive system, which is the fourth leading factor of cancer-related mortalities in the globe. Prognosis is poor due to diagnosis at advanced disease stage, low rates of surgical resection, and resistance to traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In order to develop novel therapeutic strategies, further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying PC chemoresistance is required. Ribosomal RNA biogenesis has been implicated in tumorigenesis. Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) is responsible for post-transcriptional modifications of ribosomal RNAs during biogenesis, which have been identified as potential markers of various cancers. Here, we investigate the U3 snoRNA-associated protein RRP9/U3-55 K along with its role in the development of PC and gemcitabine resistance.
METHODS
qRT-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemical staining assays were employed to detect RRP9 expression in human PC tissue samples and cell lines. RRP9-overexpression and siRNA-RRP9 plasmids were constructed to test the effects of RRP9 overexpression and knockdown on cell viability investigated by MTT assay, colony formation, and apoptosis measured by FACS and western blot assays. Immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence staining were utilized to demonstrate a relationship between RRP9 and IGF2BP1. A subcutaneous xenograft tumor model was elucidated in BALB/c nude mice to examine the RRP9 role in PC in vivo.
RESULTS
Significantly elevated RRP9 expression was observed in PC tissues than normal tissues, which was negatively correlated with patient prognosis. We found that RRP9 promoted gemcitabine resistance in PC in vivo and in vitro. Mechanistically, RRP9 activated AKT signaling pathway through interacting with DNA binding region of IGF2BP1 in PC cells, thereby promoting PC progression, and inducing gemcitabine resistance through a reduction in DNA damage and inhibition of apoptosis. Treatment with a combination of the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 and gemcitabine significantly inhibited tumor proliferation induced by overexpression of RRP9 in vitro and in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data reveal that RRP9 has a critical function to induce gemcitabine chemoresistance in PC through the IGF2BP1/AKT signaling pathway activation, which might be a candidate to sensitize PC cells to gemcitabine. Video abstract.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Mice, Nude; Cell Line, Tumor; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Signal Transduction; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 36434608
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00974-5 -
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Jan 2023Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC.
METHODS
We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778.
RESULTS
Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS
GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.
Topics: Humans; Gemcitabine; Cisplatin; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Deoxycytidine; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35900311
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1219 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Jul 2023Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.
Topics: Humans; Gemcitabine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Oxaliplatin; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Leucovorin; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Paclitaxel; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37020094
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13353-2 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Sep 2021The standard chemotherapy for squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC) includes platinum plus gemcitabine. Sintilimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, plus platinum... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Sintilimab Plus Platinum and Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ORIENT-12).
INTRODUCTION
The standard chemotherapy for squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC) includes platinum plus gemcitabine. Sintilimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, plus platinum and gemcitabine (GP) has revealed encouraging efficacy as first-line therapy for sqNSCLC in a phase 1b study. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study to further compare the efficacy and safety of sintilimab with placebo, both in combination with GP.
METHODS
ORIENT-12, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, was conducted at 42 centers in the People's Republic of China (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03629925). Patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC and without EGFR-sensitive mutations or ALK rearrangements were enrolled in the study. The stratification factors included clinical stage, choice of platinum, and programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score. The patients, investigators, research staff, and sponsor team were masked to treatment assignment. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1, using an integrated web-response system, to receive sintilimab 200 mg or placebo plus GP every 3 weeks for four or six cycles, followed by sintilimab or placebo as maintenance therapy until disease progression or 2 years. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent radiographic review committee.
RESULTS
Between September 25, 2018 and July 26, 2019, a total of 543 patients were screened, of whom 357 patients were randomized to the sintilimab-GP group (n = 179) and the placebo-GP group (n = 178). After a median follow-up period of 12.9 months, sintilimab-GP continued to reveal a meaningful improvement in PFS than placebo-GP (hazard ratio = 0.536 [95% confidence interval: 0.422-0.681], p < 0.00001). Treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 86.6% patients in the sintilimab-GP group and in 83.1% in the placebo-GP group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event leading to death was 4.5% and 6.7% in the two treatment groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Regarding PFS, sintilimab plus GP reveals clinical benefit than GP alone as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. The toxicity was acceptable, and no new unexpected safety signals were observed.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Platinum; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 34048947
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.011 -
Cancer Research Aug 2023Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an insidious disease with a low 5-year survival rate. PDAC is characterized by infiltration of abundant tumor-associated...
UNLABELLED
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an insidious disease with a low 5-year survival rate. PDAC is characterized by infiltration of abundant tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), which promote immune tolerance and immunotherapeutic resistance. Here we report that macrophage spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) promotes PDAC growth and metastasis. In orthotopic PDAC mouse models, genetic deletion of myeloid Syk reprogrammed macrophages into immunostimulatory phenotype, increased the infiltration, proliferation, and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells, and repressed PDAC growth and metastasis. Furthermore, gemcitabine (Gem) treatment induced an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PDAC by promoting protumorigenic polarization of macrophages. In contrast, treatment with the FDA-approved Syk inhibitor R788 (fostamatinib) remodeled the tumor immune microenvironment, "re-educated" protumorigenic macrophages towards an immunostimulatory phenotype and boosted CD8+ T-cell responses in Gem-treated PDAC in orthotopic mouse models and an ex vivo human pancreatic slice culture model. These findings illustrate the potential of Syk inhibition for enhancing the antitumor immune responses in PDAC and support the clinical evaluation of R788 either alone or together with Gem as a potential treatment strategy for PDAC.
SIGNIFICANCE
Syk blockade induces macrophage polarization to an immunostimulatory phenotype, which enhances CD8+ T-cell responses and improves gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a clinically challenging malignancy.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Humans; Gemcitabine; Tumor-Associated Macrophages; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Immune Tolerance; Immunosuppression Therapy; Tumor Microenvironment; Cell Line, Tumor
PubMed: 37306759
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-3645 -
JAMA Network Open Feb 2023Due to the ongoing bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel has been increasingly used as first-line therapy for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel vs Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the Treatment of Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
IMPORTANCE
Due to the ongoing bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel has been increasingly used as first-line therapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, data directly comparing these 2 therapies are lacking.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the outcomes of patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel vs BCG.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 23 (12-33) months for patients receiving gemcitabine and docetaxel and 49 (27-79) months for patients receiving BCG. All patients were treated at the University of Iowa tertiary care center. A total of 312 patients with high-risk treatment-naive NMIBC were included; 174 patients were treated with BCG therapy and 138 were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy.
EXPOSURES
After undergoing complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor, patients received either sequential intravesical gemcitabine, 1 g, and docetaxel, 37.5 mg, or 1 vial of BCG. Induction treatments were administered once per week for 6 weeks. Maintenance regimens were initiated if the patient was disease free at the first follow-up visit.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was high-grade recurrence-free survival (RFS). Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of covariates with outcomes. Adverse events were reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.
RESULTS
Among 312 patients, the median (IQR) age was 73 (66-79) years; 255 patients (81.7%) were male and 292 (93.6%) were White. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics such as sex, smoking status, and pretreatment tumor pathology were similar between treatment groups. High-grade RFS estimates were 76% (95% CI, 69%-82%) at 6 months, 71% (95% CI, 64%-78%) at 12 months, and 69% (95% CI, 62%-76%) at 24 months in the BCG group and 92% (95% CI, 86%-95%) at 6 months, 85% (95% CI, 78%-91%) at 12 months, and 81% (95% CI, 72%-87%) at 24 months in the gemcitabine and docetaxel group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses controlled for age, sex, treatment year, and presence of carcinoma in situ revealed that treatment with gemcitabine and docetaxel was associated with better high-grade RFS (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97; P = .04) and RFS (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.92; P = .02) than treatment with BCG. Induction therapy for BCG was associated with greater treatment discontinuation than induction therapy for gemcitabine and docetaxel (9.2% vs 2.9%; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cohort study, gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy was associated with less high-grade disease recurrence and treatment discontinuation than BCG therapy. These findings suggest that, while awaiting results from an ongoing randomized clinical trial during the current BCG shortage, use of gemcitabine and docetaxel can be considered for recommendation in updated practice guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; BCG Vaccine; Docetaxel; Gemcitabine; Cohort Studies; Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36853609
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0849