-
The American Journal of Managed Care Sep 2011Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving opioid analgesics can be problematic. Opioids are widely used, have a narrow therapeutic index, and can be... (Review)
Review
Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving opioid analgesics can be problematic. Opioids are widely used, have a narrow therapeutic index, and can be associated with severe toxicity. The purpose of this review is to describe pharmacokinetic DDIs associated with opioids frequently encountered in managed care settings (morphine, codeine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, tramadol, and methadone). An introduction to the pharmacokinetic basis of DDIs is provided, and potential DDIs associated with opioids are reviewed. Opioids metabolized by the drug metabolizing enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system (codeine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, fentanyl, tramadol, and methadone) are associated with numerous DDIs that can result in either a reduction in opioid effect or excess opioid effects. Conversely, opioids that are not metabolized by that system (morphine, oxymorphone, and hydromorphone) tend to be involved in fewer CYP450-associated pharmacokinetic DDIs.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Humans; Managed Care Programs; Pharmacogenetics
PubMed: 21999760
DOI: No ID Found -
JAMA Network Open Dec 2022Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) is common in patients after surgery. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) is common in patients after surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the effect of intraoperative esketamine infusion on the incidence of PSD in patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2021 to April 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University in China. Participants included patients aged 18 to 65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification of I to III (with I indicating a healthy patient, II a patient with mild systemic disease, and III a patient with severe systemic disease) who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to either the esketamine group or control group. Data were analyzed using the per protocol principle.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients in the esketamine group received a continuous infusion of esketamine, 0.3 mg/kg/h, intraoperatively. Patients in the control group received an equivalent volume of saline.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the incidence of PSD on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3. Postoperative sleep disturbance was defined as a numeric rating scale score of 6 or higher or an Athens Insomnia Scale score of 6 points or higher. The secondary outcomes included postoperative anxiety and depression scores using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, postoperative pain using the visual analog scale, postoperative hydromorphone consumption, and risk factors associated with PSD.
RESULTS
A total of 183 female patients were randomized to the control group (n = 91; median [IQR] age, 45 [35-49] years) and the esketamine group (n = 92; median [IQR] age, 43 [32-49] years). The incidence of PSD in the esketamine group was significantly lower than in the control group on POD 1 (22.8% vs 44.0%; odds ratio [OR], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.20-0.72]; P = .002) and POD 3 (7.6% vs 19.8%; OR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13-0.84]; P = .02). There were no differences in postoperative depression and anxiety scores between the 2 groups. Postoperative hydromorphone consumption in the first 24 hours (3.0 [range, 2.8-3.3] mg vs 3.2 [range, 2.9-3.4] mg; P = .04) and pain scores on movement (3 [3-4] vs 4 [3-5] points; P < .001) were significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the control group. On multivariable logistic regression, preoperative depression (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01-1.70) and anxiety (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.04-1.80) scores, duration of anesthesia (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08), and postoperative pain score (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.24-2.96) were identified as risk factors associated with PSD.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Results of this trial showed the prophylactic effect of intraoperative esketamine infusion on the incidence of PSD in patients who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100048587.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Adult; Hydromorphone; Sleep Wake Disorders; Laparoscopy; Pain, Postoperative; Sleep
PubMed: 36454569
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44514 -
Journal of Pain Research 2018To review the recent literature on opioid rotation (ie, switching from one opioid drug to another or changing an opioid's administration route) in cancer patients... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To review the recent literature on opioid rotation (ie, switching from one opioid drug to another or changing an opioid's administration route) in cancer patients experiencing severe pain and to develop a novel equianalgesia table for use in routine clinical practice.
METHODS
The MEDLINE database was searched with terms "cancer pain," "opioid rotation," "opioid switching," "opioid ratio," "opioid conversion ratio," and "opioid equianalgesia" for the major opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, and hydromorphone) and the intravenous, subcutaneous, oral, and transdermal administration routes. Selected articles were assessed for the calculated or cited opioid dose ratio, bidirectionality, and use of the oral morphine equivalent daily dose or a direct drug-to-drug ratio.
RESULTS
Twenty publications met our selection criteria and were analyzed in detail. We did not find any large-scale, prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial with robust design, and most of the studies assessed relatively small numbers of patients. Bidirectionality was investigated in seven studies only.
CONCLUSION
The updated equianalgesic table presented here incorporates the latest data and provides information on bidirectionality. Despite the daily use of equianalgesic tables, they are not based on high-level scientific evidence. More clinical research is needed on this topic.
PubMed: 30464578
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S170269 -
Current Opinion in Nephrology and... Nov 2020This review evaluates current recommendations for pain management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with a specific focus on evidence...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review evaluates current recommendations for pain management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with a specific focus on evidence for opioid analgesia, including the partial agonist, buprenorphine.
RECENT FINDINGS
Recent evidence supports the use of physical activity and other nonpharmacologic therapies, either alone or with pharmacological therapies, for pain management. Nonopioid analgesics, including acetaminophen, topical analgesics, gabapentinoids, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and TCA may be considered based on pain cause and type, with careful dose considerations in kidney disease. NSAIDs may be used in CKD and ESKD for short durations with careful monitoring. Opioid use should be minimized and reserved for patients who have failed other therapies. Opioids have been associated with increased adverse events in this population, and thus should be used cautiously after risk/benefit discussion with the patient. Opioids that are safer to use in kidney disease include oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, methadone, and buprenorphine. Buprenorphine appears to be a promising and safer option due to its partial agonism at the mu opioid receptor.
SUMMARY
Pain is poorly managed in patients with kidney disease. Nonpharmacological and nonopioid analgesics should be first-line approaches for pain management. Opioid use should be minimized with careful monitoring and dose adjustment.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Fentanyl; Humans; Hydromorphone; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Oxycodone; Pain; Pain Management; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 32941189
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000646 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2017Pain is a common symptom with cancer, and 30% to 50% of all people with cancer will experience moderate to severe pain that can have a major negative impact on their... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pain is a common symptom with cancer, and 30% to 50% of all people with cancer will experience moderate to severe pain that can have a major negative impact on their quality of life. Opioid (morphine-like) drugs are commonly used to treat moderate or severe cancer pain, and are recommended for this purpose in the World Health Organization (WHO) pain treatment ladder. The most commonly-used opioid drugs are buprenorphine, codeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, tramadol, and tapentadol.
OBJECTIVES
To provide an overview of the analgesic efficacy of opioids in cancer pain, and to report on adverse events associated with their use.
METHODS
We identified systematic reviews examining any opioid for cancer pain published to 4 May 2017 in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes were no or mild pain within 14 days of starting treatment, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events.
MAIN RESULTS
We included nine reviews with 152 included studies and 13,524 participants, but because some studies appeared in more than one review the number of unique studies and participants was smaller than this. Most participants had moderate or severe pain associated with a range of different types of cancer. Studies in the reviews typically compared one type of opioid or formulation with either a different formulation of the same opioid, or a different opioid; few included a placebo control. Typically the reviews titrated dose to effect, a balance between pain relief and adverse events. Various routes of administration of opioids were considered in the reviews; oral with most opioids, but transdermal administration with fentanyl, and buprenorphine. No review included studies of subcutaneous opioid administration. Pain outcomes reported were varied and inconsistent. The average size of included studies varied considerably between reviews: studies of older opioids, such as codeine, morphine, and methadone, had low average study sizes while those involving newer drugs tended to have larger study sizes.Six reviews reported a GRADE assessment (buprenorphine, codeine, hydromorphone, methadone, oxycodone, and tramadol), but not necessarily for all comparisons or outcomes. No comparative analyses were possible because there was no consistent placebo or active control. Cohort outcomes for opioids are therefore reported, as absolute numbers or percentages, or both.Reviews on buprenorphine, codeine with or without paracetamol, hydromorphone, methadone, tramadol with or without paracetamol, tapentadol, and oxycodone did not have information about the primary outcome of mild or no pain at 14 days, although that on oxycodone indicated that average pain scores were within that range. Two reviews, on oral morphine and transdermal fentanyl, reported that 96% of 850 participants achieved that goal.Adverse event withdrawal was reported by five reviews, at rates of between 6% and 19%. Participants with at least one adverse event were reported by three reviews, at rates of between 11% and 77%.Our GRADE assessment of evidence quality was very low for all outcomes, because many studies in the reviews were at high risk of bias from several sources, including small study size.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The amount and quality of evidence around the use of opioids for treating cancer pain is disappointingly low, although the evidence we have indicates that around 19 out of 20 people with moderate or severe pain who are given opioids and can tolerate them should have that pain reduced to mild or no pain within 14 days. This accords with the clinical experience in treating many people with cancer pain, but overstates to some extent the effectiveness found for the WHO pain ladder. Most people will experience adverse events, and help may be needed to manage the more common undesirable adverse effects such as constipation and nausea. Perhaps between 1 in 10 and 2 in 10 people treated with opioids will find these adverse events intolerable, leading to a change in treatment.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Cancer Pain; Codeine; Fentanyl; Humans; Hydromorphone; Methadone; Oxycodone; Phenols; Review Literature as Topic; Tapentadol; Tramadol
PubMed: 28683172
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012592.pub2 -
JAMA Surgery Aug 2023Opioids administered to treat postsurgical pain are a major contributor to the opioid crisis, leading to chronic use in a considerable proportion of patients....
IMPORTANCE
Opioids administered to treat postsurgical pain are a major contributor to the opioid crisis, leading to chronic use in a considerable proportion of patients. Initiatives promoting opioid-free or opioid-sparing modalities of perioperative pain management have led to reduced opioid administration in the operating room, but this reduction could have unforeseen detrimental effects in terms of postoperative pain outcomes, as the relationship between intraoperative opioid usage and later opioid requirements is not well understood.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the association between intraoperative opioid usage and postoperative pain and opioid requirements.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cohort study evaluated electronic health record data from a quaternary care academic medical center (Massachusetts General Hospital) for adult patients who underwent noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia from April 2016 to March 2020. Patients who underwent cesarean surgery, received regional anesthesia, received opioids other than fentanyl or hydromorphone, were admitted to the intensive care unit, or who died intraoperatively were excluded. Statistical models were fitted on the propensity weighted data set to characterize the effect of intraoperative opioid exposures on primary and secondary outcomes. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.
EXPOSURES
Intraoperative fentanyl and intraoperative hydromorphone average effect site concentration estimated using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary study outcomes were the maximal pain score during the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and the cumulative opioid dose, quantified in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), administered during the PACU stay. Medium- and long-term outcomes associated with pain and opioid dependence were also evaluated.
RESULTS
The study cohort included a total of 61 249 individuals undergoing surgery (mean [SD] age, 55.44 [17.08] years; 32 778 [53.5%] female). Increased intraoperative fentanyl and intraoperative hydromorphone were both associated with reduced maximum pain scores in the PACU. Both exposures were also associated with a reduced probability and reduced total dosage of opioid administration in the PACU. In particular, increased fentanyl administration was associated with lower frequency of uncontrolled pain; a decrease in new chronic pain diagnoses reported at 3 months; fewer opioid prescriptions at 30, 90, and 180 days; and decreased new persistent opioid use, without significant increases in adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Contrary to prevailing trends, reduced opioid administration during surgery may have the unintended outcome of increasing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Conversely, improvements in long-term outcomes might be achieved by optimizing opioid administration during surgery.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Analgesics, Opioid; Hydromorphone; Retrospective Studies; Pain, Postoperative; Fentanyl; Opioid-Related Disorders
PubMed: 37314800
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2009 -
Anesthesiology Jun 2020Intrathecal opioids are routinely administered during spinal anesthesia for postcesarean analgesia. The effectiveness of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Intrathecal opioids are routinely administered during spinal anesthesia for postcesarean analgesia. The effectiveness of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia is well established, and the use of intrathecal hydromorphone is growing. No prospective studies have compared the effectiveness of equipotent doses of intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal hydromorphone as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for postcesarean analgesia. The authors hypothesized that intrathecal morphine would result in superior analgesia compared with intrathecal hydromorphone 24 h after delivery.
METHODS
In this single-center, double-blinded, randomized trial, 138 parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 150 µg of intrathecal morphine or 75 µg of intrathecal hydromorphone as part of a primary spinal anesthetic and multimodal analgesic regimen; 134 parturients were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale score for pain with movement 24 h after delivery. Static and dynamic pain scores, nausea, pruritus, degree of sedation, and patient satisfaction were assessed every 6 h for 36 h postpartum. Total opioid consumption was recorded.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in pain scores with movement at 24 h (intrathecal hydromorphone median [25th, 75th] 4 [3, 5] and intrathecal morphine 3 [2, 4.5]) or at any time point (estimated difference, 0.5; 95% CI, 0 to 1; P = 0.139). Opioid received in the first 24 h did not differ between groups (median [25th, 75th] oral morphine milligram equivalents for intrathecal hydromorphone 30 [7.5, 45.06] vs. intrathecal morphine 22.5 [14.0, 37.5], P = 0.769). From Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median time to first opioid request was 5.4 h for hydromorphone and 12.1 h for morphine (log-rank test P = 0.200).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the hypothesis was that intrathecal morphine would provide superior analgesia to intrathecal hydromorphone, the results did not confirm this. At the doses studied, both intrathecal morphine and intrathecal hydromorphone provide effective postcesarean analgesia when combined with a multimodal analgesia regimen.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesics, Opioid; Cesarean Section; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydromorphone; Male; Morphine; Pain, Postoperative; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32251031
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003283