Review

Authors: Femke M de Man, Andrew K L Goey, Ron H N van Schaik...

Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today's literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Interactions; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Inactivation, Metabolic; Irinotecan; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Precision Medicine; Tissue Distribution; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors

PubMed: 29520731
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0644-7

Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Thierry Conroy, Florence Castan, Anthony Lopez...

IMPORTANCE

Early results at 3 years from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial showed survival benefits with adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mature data are now available.

OBJECTIVE

To report 5-year outcomes and explore prognostic factors for overall survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 77 hospitals in France and Canada and included patients aged 18 to 79 years with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection within 3 to 12 weeks before randomization. Patients were included from April 16, 2012, through October 3, 2016. The cutoff date for this analysis was June 28, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 493 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 of body surface area; irinotecan, 150-180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) as adjuvant therapy for 24 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Prognostic factors for overall survival were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 493 patients, 216 (43.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 62.0 (8.9) years. At a median of 69.7 months' follow-up, 367 disease-free survival events were observed. In patients receiving chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine, median disease-free survival was 21.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-26.7) vs 12.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .001) and 5-year disease-free survival was 26.1% vs 19.0%; median overall survival was 53.5 months (95% CI, 43.5-58.4) vs 35.5 months (95% CI, 30.1-40.3) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85; P = .001), and 5-year overall survival was 43.2% vs 31.4%; median metastasis-free survival was 29.4 months (95% CI, 21.4-40.1) vs 17.7 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.2) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001); and median cancer-specific survival was 54.7 months (95% CI, 45.8-68.4) vs 36.3 months (95% CI, 30.5-43.9) (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.82; P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified modified FOLFIRINOX, age, tumor grade, tumor staging, and larger-volume center as significant favorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Shorter relapse delay was an adverse prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The final 5-year results from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial indicate that adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX yields significantly longer survival than gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2011-002026-52; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526135.

Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Leucovorin; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Irinotecan; Oxaliplatin; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Canada; Fluorouracil; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Gemcitabine

PubMed: 36048453
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3829

Review

Authors: Anish Thomas, Yves Pommier

Irinotecan and topotecan have been widely used as anticancer drugs for the past 20 years. Because of their selectivity as topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors that trap TOP1 cleavage complexes, camptothecins are also widely used to elucidate the DNA repair pathways associated with DNA-protein cross-links and replication stress. This review summarizes the basic molecular mechanisms of action of TOP1 inhibitors, their current use, and limitations as anticancer agents. We introduce new therapeutic strategies based on novel TOP1 inhibitor chemical scaffolds including the indenoisoquinolines LMP400 (indotecan), LMP776 (indimitecan), and LMP744, and on tumor-targeted delivery TOP1 inhibitors using liposome, PEGylation, and antibody-drug conjugates. We also address how tumor-specific determinants such as homologous recombination defects (HRD and BRCAness) and Schlafen 11 (SLFN11) expression can be used to guide clinical application of TOP1 inhibitors in combination with DNA damage response inhibitors including PARP, ATR, CHEK1, and ATM inhibitors.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; DNA Topoisomerases, Type I; Humans; Irinotecan; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Precision Medicine; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors; Topotecan

PubMed: 31227499
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1089

Authors: Sumaiyah K Rehman, Jennifer Haynes, Evelyne Collignon...

Cancer cells enter a reversible drug-tolerant persister (DTP) state to evade death from chemotherapy and targeted agents. It is increasingly appreciated that DTPs are important drivers of therapy failure and tumor relapse. We combined cellular barcoding and mathematical modeling in patient-derived colorectal cancer models to identify and characterize DTPs in response to chemotherapy. Barcode analysis revealed no loss of clonal complexity of tumors that entered the DTP state and recurred following treatment cessation. Our data fit a mathematical model where all cancer cells, and not a small subpopulation, possess an equipotent capacity to become DTPs. Mechanistically, we determined that DTPs display remarkable transcriptional and functional similarities to diapause, a reversible state of suspended embryonic development triggered by unfavorable environmental conditions. Our study provides insight into how cancer cells use a developmentally conserved mechanism to drive the DTP state, pointing to novel therapeutic opportunities to target DTPs.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Autophagy; Cell Line, Tumor; Clone Cells; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diapause; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Embryo, Mammalian; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genetic Heterogeneity; Humans; Irinotecan; Mice, Inbred NOD; Mice, SCID; Models, Biological; Signal Transduction; Up-Regulation; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; Mice

PubMed: 33417860
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.018

Review

Authors: Mateusz Kciuk, Beata Marciniak, Renata Kontek...

Irinotecan has been used in the treatment of various malignancies for many years. Still, the knowledge regarding this drug is expanding. The pharmacogenetics of the drug is the crucial component of response to irinotecan. Furthermore, new formulations of the drug are introduced in order to better deliver the drug and avoid potentially life-threatening side effects. Here, we give a comprehensive overview on irinotecan's molecular mode of action, metabolism, pharmacogenetics, and toxicity. Moreover, this article features clinically used combinations of the drug with other anticancer agents and introduces novel formulations of drugs (e.g., liposomal formulations, dendrimers, and nanoparticles). It also outlines crucial mechanisms of tumor cells' resistance to the active metabolite, ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38). We are sure that the article will constitute an important source of information for both new researchers in the field of irinotecan chemotherapy and professionals or clinicians who are interested in the topic.

Topics: Activation, Metabolic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; DNA, Neoplasm; Dosage Forms; Drug Compounding; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Irinotecan; Male; Models, Molecular; Molecular Structure; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms; Nucleic Acid Conformation; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prodrugs; Protein Conformation; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors

PubMed: 32664667
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144919

Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Mythili Shastry, Saya Jacob, Hope S Rugo...

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the potent cytotoxicity of chemotherapy with the antigen -specific targeted approach of antibodies into one single molecule. Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP-2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in calcium signal transduction and is expressed in multiple tumor types. TROP-2 expression is higher in HER2-negative breast tumors (HR+/HR-) and is associated with worse survival. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a first-in-class TROP-2-directed ADC with an anti-TROP-2 antibody conjugated to SN-38, a topoisomerase inhibitor via a hydrolysable linker. This hydrolysable linker permits intracellular and extracellular release of the membrane permeable payload enabling the "bystander effect" contributing to the efficacy of this agent. There was significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with SG versus chemotherapy in pretreated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), resulting in regulatory approval. Common adverse events (AE) reported were neutropenia and diarrhea. SG also demonstrated clinical activity versus chemotherapy in a phase III trial of HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and is under evaluation in first-line metastatic and early stage TNBC as well. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is a TROP-2 ADC that differs from SG in that it has a cleavable tetrapeptide linker and a more potent topoisomerase inhibitor payload. This construct is highly stable in circulation with a longer half-life than SG, and undergoes cleavage in presence of intracellular lysosomal proteases. Dato-DXd demonstrated preliminary efficacy in unselected metastatic TNBC, with common AEs of low-grade nausea and stomatitis. Dato-DXd is being investigated in phase III studies in metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2- MBC. These novel TROP-2 ADCs have the potential to deliver enhanced efficacy with reduced toxicity in MBC and possibly in early stage breast cancer (EBC).

Topics: Female; Humans; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Immunoconjugates; Irinotecan; Topoisomerase Inhibitors; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

PubMed: 36302269
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.007

Review

Authors: Gérard Milano, Federico Innocenti, Hironobu Minami...

Irinotecan is a topoisomerase inhibitor, widely used in treatment of malignancies including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as part of the FOLFIRINOX regimen prescribed as a first-line treatment in several countries. However, irinotecan has not been successfully introduced as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer and few randomized clinical studies have evaluated its added value. Efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was reported in the phase III NAPOLI-1 trial in metastatic PDAC following failure of gemcitabine-based therapy. Several features of nal-IRI pharmacokinetics (PK) could result in better outcomes versus nonliposomal irinotecan. Irinotecan is a prodrug that is converted to active SN-38 by carboxylesterase enzymes and inactivated by cytochrome P450 3A4/3A5. SN-38 is inactivated by UGT1A1 enzymes. Individual variations in their expression and activity could influence enhanced localized irinotecan activity and toxicity. Liposomal irinotecan exploits the enhanced permeability and retention effect in cancer, accumulating in tumor tissues. Liposomal irinotecan also has a longer half-life and higher area under the concentration-time curve (0-∞) than nonliposomal irinotecan, as the liposomal formulation protects cargo from premature metabolism in the plasma. This results in irinotecan activation in tumor tissue, leading to enhanced cytotoxicity. Importantly, despite the longer exposure, overall toxicity for nal-IRI is no worse than nonliposomal irinotecan. Liposomal irinotecan exemplifies how liposomal encapsulation of a chemotherapeutic agent can alter its PK properties, improving clinical outcomes for patients. Liposomal irinotecan is currently under investigation in other malignancies including biliary tract cancer (amongst other gastrointestinal cancers), brain tumors, and small-cell lung cancer.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Fluorouracil; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Liposomes; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

PubMed: 35445479
DOI: 10.1111/cas.15377

Meta-Analysis

Authors: Federico Nichetti, Simone Rota, Paolo Ambrosini...

IMPORTANCE

The NAPOLI 3 trial showed the superiority of fluorouracil, leucovorin, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (NALIRIFOX) over the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NABP) as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Analyses comparing NALIRIFOX and GEM-NABP with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To derive survival, response, and toxic effects data from phase 3 clinical trials and compare NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and GEM-NABP.

DATA SOURCES

After a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings' libraries, Kaplan-Meier curves were extracted from phase 3 clinical trials conducted from January 1, 2011, until September 12, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Phase 3 clinical trials that tested NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, or GEM-NABP as first-line treatment of metastatic PDAC and reported overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were selected. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Individual Participant Data reporting guidelines.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Individual patient OS and PFS data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier plots of original trials via a graphic reconstructive algorithm. Overall response rates (ORRs) and grade 3 or higher toxic effects rates were also collected. A pooled analysis was conducted, and results were validated via a network meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was OS. Secondary outcomes included PFS, ORR, and toxic effects rates.

RESULTS

A total of 7 trials with data on 2581 patients were analyzed, including 383 patients treated with NALIRIFOX, 433 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, and 1756 patients treated with GEM-NABP. Median PFS was longer in patients treated with NALIRIFOX (7.4 [95% CI, 6.1-7.7] months) or FOLFIRINOX (7.3 [95% CI, 6.5-7.9] months; [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 0.86-1.70]; P = .28) compared with patients treated with GEM-NABP (5.7 [95% CI, 5.6-6.1] months; HR vs NALIRIFOX, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22-1.73]; P < .001). Similarly, GEM-NABP was associated with poorer OS (10.4 [95% CI, 9.8-10.8]; months) compared with NALIRIFOX (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.00-1.39]; P = .05], while no difference was observed between FOLFIRINOX (11.7 [95% CI, 10.4-13.0] months) and NALIRIFOX (11.1 [95% CI, 10.1-12.3] months; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.81-1.39]; P = .65). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR among NALIRIFOX (41.8%), FOLFIRINOX (31.6%), and GEM-NABP (35.0%). NALIRIFOX was associated with lower incidence of grade 3 or higher hematological toxic effects (eg, platelet count decreased 1.6% vs 11.8% with FOLFIRINOX and 10.8% with GEM-NABP), but higher rates of severe diarrhea compared with GEM-NABP (20.3% vs 15.7%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, NALIRIFOX and FOLFIRINOX were associated with similar PFS and OS as first-line treatment of advanced PDAC, although NALIRIFOX was associated with a different toxicity profile. Careful patient selection, financial toxic effects consideration, and direct comparison between FOLFIRINOX and NALIRIFOX are warranted.

Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Irinotecan; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Leucovorin; Oxaliplatin; Gemcitabine; Fluorouracil; Adenocarcinoma

PubMed: 38190183
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50756

Authors: Rajen Mody, Alice L Yu, Arlene Naranjo...

PURPOSE

The combination of irinotecan, temozolomide, dintuximab, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (I/T/DIN/GM-CSF) demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in the randomized Children's Oncology Group ANBL1221 trial. To more accurately assess response rate and toxicity, an expanded cohort was nonrandomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were eligible at first relapse or first designation of refractory disease. Oral T and intravenous (IV) irinotecan were administered on days 1 to 5 of 21-day cycles. DIN was administered IV (days 2-5), and GM-CSF was administered subcutaneously (days 6-12). The primary end point was objective response, analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis per the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible patients were randomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF (February 2013 to March 2015); 36 additional patients were nonrandomly assigned to I/T/DIN/GM-CSF (August 2016 to May 2017). Objective (complete or partial) responses were observed in nine (52.9%) of 17 randomly assigned patients (95% CI, 29.2% to 76.7%) and 13 (36.1%) of 36 expansion patients (95% CI, 20.4% to 51.8%). Objective responses were seen in 22 (41.5%) of 53 patients overall (95% CI, 28.2% to 54.8%); stable disease was also observed in 22 of 53. One-year progression-free and overall survival for all patients receiving I/T/DIN/GM-CSF were 67.9% ± 6.4% (95% CI, 55.4% to 80.5%) and 84.9% ± 4.9% (95% CI, 75.3% to 94.6%), respectively. Two patients did not receive protocol therapy and were evaluable for response but not toxicity. Common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were fever/infection (18 [35.3%] of 51), neutropenia (17 [33.3%] of 51), pain (15 [29.4%] of 51), and diarrhea (10 [19.6%] of 51). One patient met protocol-defined criteria for unacceptable toxicity (grade 4 hypoxia). Higher DIN trough levels were associated with response.

CONCLUSION

I/T/DIN/GM-CSF has significant antitumor activity in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Study of chemoimmunotherapy in the frontline setting is indicated, as is further evaluation of predictive biomarkers.

Topics: Adolescent; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Immunotherapy; Infant; Irinotecan; Male; Neuroblastoma; Survival Analysis; Temozolomide

PubMed: 32343642
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00203

Rechallenge for Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Acquired Resistance to First-line Cetuximab and Irinotecan: A Phase 2 Single-Arm Clinical Trial.

Authors: Chiara Cremolini, Daniele Rossini, Emanuela Dell'Aquila...

IMPORTANCE

Based on a small retrospective study, rechallenge with cetuximab-based therapy for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were previously treated with the same anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-based regimen might be efficacious. Recent data suggest the role of liquid biopsy as a tool to track molecular events in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the activity of cetuximab plus irinotecan as third-line treatment for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC who were initially sensitive to and then resistant to first-line irinotecan- and cetuximab-based therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter phase 2 single-arm trial conducted from January 7, 2015, to June 19, 2017. Liquid biopsies for analysis of ctDNA were collected at baseline. Main eligibility criteria included RAS and BRAF wild-type status on tissue samples; prior first-line irinotecan- and cetuximab-based regimen with at least partial response, progression-free survival of at least 6 months with first-line therapy, and progression within 4 weeks after last dose of cetuximab; and prior second-line oxaliplatin- and bevacizumab-based treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Biweekly cetuximab, 500 mg/m2, plus irinotecan, 180 mg/m2.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival and, as an exploratory analysis, RAS mutations in ctDNA.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (9 women and 19 men; median age, 69 years [range, 45-79 years]) were enrolled. Six partial responses (4 confirmed) and 9 disease stabilizations were reported (response rate, 21%; 95% CI, 10%-40%; disease control rate, 54%; 95% CI, 36%-70%). Primary end point was met because lower limit of 95% CI of response rate was higher than 5%. RAS mutations were found in ctDNA collected at rechallenge baseline in 12 of 25 evaluable patients (48%). No RAS mutations were detected in samples from patients who achieved confirmed partial response. Patients with RAS wild-type ctDNA had significantly longer progression-free survival than those with RAS mutated ctDNA (median progression-free survival, 4.0 vs 1.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18-0.98; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This is the first prospective demonstration that a rechallenge strategy with cetuximab and irinotecan may be active in patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC with acquired resistance to first-line irinotecan- and cetuximab-based therapy. The evaluation of RAS mutational status on ctDNA might be helpful in selecting candidate patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02296203.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Genes, ras; Humans; Irinotecan; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Prospective Studies; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Risk Factors; Time Factors

PubMed: 30476968
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5080