-
The New England Journal of Medicine Aug 2023Whether video laryngoscopy as compared with direct laryngoscopy increases the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt among critically ill... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Whether video laryngoscopy as compared with direct laryngoscopy increases the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt among critically ill adults is uncertain.
METHODS
In a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 17 emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs), we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation to the video-laryngoscope group or the direct-laryngoscope group. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications during intubation; severe complications were defined as severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, new or increased vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, or death.
RESULTS
The trial was stopped for efficacy at the time of the single preplanned interim analysis. Among 1417 patients who were included in the final analysis (91.5% of whom underwent intubation that was performed by an emergency medicine resident or a critical care fellow), successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 600 of the 705 patients (85.1%) in the video-laryngoscope group and in 504 of the 712 patients (70.8%) in the direct-laryngoscope group (absolute risk difference, 14.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9 to 18.7; P<0.001). A total of 151 patients (21.4%) in the video-laryngoscope group and 149 patients (20.9%) in the direct-laryngoscope group had a severe complication during intubation (absolute risk difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 4.9). Safety outcomes, including esophageal intubation, injury to the teeth, and aspiration, were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in an emergency department or ICU, the use of a video laryngoscope resulted in a higher incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt than the use of a direct laryngoscope. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense; DEVICE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239195.).
Topics: Humans; Adult; Laryngoscopy; Critical Illness; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Emergency Service, Hospital; Video Recording
PubMed: 37326325
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301601 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2022Tracheal intubation is a common procedure performed to secure the airway in adults undergoing surgery or those who are critically ill. Intubation is sometimes associated... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tracheal intubation is a common procedure performed to secure the airway in adults undergoing surgery or those who are critically ill. Intubation is sometimes associated with difficulties and complications that may result in patient harm. While it is traditionally achieved by performing direct laryngoscopy, the past three decades have seen the advent of rigid indirect videolaryngoscopes (VLs). A mounting body of evidence comparing the two approaches to tracheal intubation has been acquired over this period of time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2016.
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether use of different designs of VLs in adults requiring tracheal intubation reduces the failure rate compared with direct laryngoscopy, and assess the benefits and risks of these devices in selected population groups, users and settings.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science on 27 February 2021. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and conducted forward and backward citation searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs with adults undergoing laryngoscopy performed with either a VL or a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) in any clinical setting. We included parallel and cross-over study designs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data for the following outcomes: failed intubation, hypoxaemia, successful first attempt at tracheal intubation, oesophageal intubation, dental trauma, Cormack-Lehane grade, and time for tracheal intubation.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 222 studies (219 RCTs, three quasi-RCTs) with 26,149 participants undergoing tracheal intubation. Most studies recruited adults undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation. Twenty-one studies recruited participants with a known or predicted difficult airway, and an additional 25 studies simulated a difficult airway. Twenty-one studies were conducted outside the operating theatre environment; of these, six were in the prehospital setting, seven in the emergency department and eight in the intensive care unit. We report here the findings of the three main comparisons according to videolaryngoscopy device type. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision, study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), inconsistency when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity and publication bias. Macintosh-style videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (61 studies, 9883 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that a Macintosh-style VL probably reduces rates of failed intubation (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.65; 41 studies, 4615 participants) and hypoxaemia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99; 16 studies, 2127 participants). These devices may also increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09; 42 studies, 7311 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably improve glottic view when assessed as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 and 4 (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.48; 38 studies, 4368 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We found little or no clear difference in rates of oesophageal intubation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.21; 14 studies, 2404 participants) but this finding was supported by low-certainty evidence. We were unsure of the findings for dental trauma because the certainty of this evidence was very low (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.89; 18 studies, 2297 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I = 96%). Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (96 studies, 11,438 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that hyperangulated VLs probably reduce rates of failed intubation (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76; 63 studies, 7146 participants) and oesophageal intubation (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.81; 14 studies, 1968 participants). In subgroup analysis, we noted that hyperangulated VLs were more likely to reduce failed intubation when used on known or predicted difficult airways (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.48; P = 0.03 for subgroup differences; 15 studies, 1520 participants). We also found that these devices may increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05; 66 studies, 8086 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the glottic view is probably also improved (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.24; 54 studies, 6058 participants; data for Cormack-Lehane grade 3/4 views; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we found low-certainty evidence of little or no clear difference in rates of hypoxaemia (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.11; 15 studies, 1691 participants), and the findings for dental trauma were unclear because the certainty of this evidence was very low (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.59; 30 studies, 3497 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I = 99%). Channelled videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy (73 studies, 7165 participants) We found moderate-certainty evidence that channelled VLs probably reduce rates of failed intubation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.61; 53 studies, 5367 participants) and hypoxaemia (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.50; 15 studies, 1966 participants). They may also increase rates of success on the first intubation attempt (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15; 47 studies, 5210 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and probably improve glottic view (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.21; 40 studies, 3955 participants; data for Cormack-Lehane grade 3/4 views; moderate-certainty evidence). We found little or no clear difference in rates of oesophageal intubation (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.75; 16 studies, 1756 participants) but this was supported by low-certainty evidence. We were unsure of the findings for dental trauma because the certainty of the evidence was very low (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.12; 29 studies, 2375 participants). We were not able to pool data for time required for tracheal intubation owing to considerable heterogeneity (I = 98%).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
VLs of all designs likely reduce rates of failed intubation and result in higher rates of successful intubation on the first attempt with improved glottic views. Macintosh-style and channelled VLs likely reduce rates of hypoxaemic events, while hyperangulated VLs probably reduce rates of oesophageal intubation. We conclude that videolaryngoscopy likely provides a safer risk profile compared to direct laryngoscopy for all adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
Topics: Adult; Critical Illness; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy
PubMed: 35373840
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Aug 2016
Topics: Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy
PubMed: 27251753
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew122 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Oct 2022Recent evidence, highlighted in this editorial, creates a strong argument for universal use of videolaryngoscopy in anaesthesia to improve efficiency and safety of...
Recent evidence, highlighted in this editorial, creates a strong argument for universal use of videolaryngoscopy in anaesthesia to improve efficiency and safety of tracheal intubation. In a recent study published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia, the authors implemented widespread (66%) use of videolaryngoscopy as first choice in one hospital and compared this with a control hospital, in which this was not implemented. Increased videolaryngoscopy use was associated with a significant fall in the rate of difficult airways, use of airway rescue techniques, and operator-reported difficulty, whilst in the control hospitals no such changes were seen. Locations outside the operating theatre might also benefit from universal laryngoscopy, but the evidence base is less robust, most notably in pre-hospital emergency medicine. The extent to which variation in results in different locations is attributable to different patient factors or organisational and operator factors is considered.
Topics: Anesthesiology; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy; Operating Rooms
PubMed: 36192053
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.038 -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Jun 2018To highlight some of the legendary figures in the medical field who have paved the path of thoracic surgery today. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To highlight some of the legendary figures in the medical field who have paved the path of thoracic surgery today.
METHODS
We reviewed historical articles and landmark studies published in anesthesiology, pulmonology, and thoracic surgery, and summarized them as they pertain to current practice.
RESULTS
Throughout our article, we have attempted to chronologically depict how our field has evolved, starting from the development of the stethoscope to reconstructing the esophagus using an extracorporeal tube to minimally invasive complex surgeries that we practice today.
CONCLUSIONS
We hope that our article can inspire the young minds to further grow the field and take it to higher levels.
Topics: History, 15th Century; History, 18th Century; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Laryngoscopes; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Respiratory System; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Stethoscopes; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Thoracoscopes
PubMed: 29501230
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.149 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Mar 2015This paper is an overview of the literature concerning the "know how" of the GlideScope® use in adults. We summarized the main evidences of the last 10 years with... (Review)
Review
This paper is an overview of the literature concerning the "know how" of the GlideScope® use in adults. We summarized the main evidences of the last 10 years with particular attention to experts' suggestions about clinical practice of the GlideScope®, noticing matters still debated on GlideScope® use. We used PubMed to search publications from January 2003 to June 2013 using the search terms "GlideScope", "video laryngoscope" and "videolaryngoscopy". These publications were searched manually or references to further publication not identified using PubMed. All works that made a point worth including were cited in the discussion. Our research confirms the value of GlideScope® use in airway management and highlights the debate about the use of videolaryngoscopes in routine cases and the operators who may use them in clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Airway Management; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy
PubMed: 24861718
DOI: No ID Found -
Chinese Medical Journal Aug 2017UEscope is a new angulated videolaryngoscope (VL). This review aimed to describe the features of UEscope and provide clinical evidences regarding the efficacy and safety... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
UEscope is a new angulated videolaryngoscope (VL). This review aimed to describe the features of UEscope and provide clinical evidences regarding the efficacy and safety of this video device in adult tracheal intubation and its roles in airway management teaching.
DATA SOURCES
The Wan Fang Data, CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant English and Chinese articles published up to January 15, 2017, using the following keywords: "HC video laryngoscope", "UE videolaryngoscope", "video laryngoscope", and "videolaryngoscopy".
STUDY SELECTION
Human case reports, case series, observable studies, and randomized controlled clinical trials were included in our search. The results of these studies and their reference lists were cross-referenced to identify a common theme.
RESULTS
UEscope features the low-profile portable design, intermediate blade curvatures, all-angle adjustable monitor, effective anti-fog mechanisms, and built-in video recording function. During the past 5 years, there have been a number of clinical studies assessing the application and roles of UEscope in airway management and education. As compared with direct laryngoscope, UEscope improves laryngeal visualization, decreases intubation time (IT), and increases intubation success rate in adult patients with normal and difficult airways. These findings are somewhat different from the previous results regarding the other angulated VLs; they can provide an improved laryngeal view, but no conclusive benefits with regard to IT and intubation success rate. Furthermore, UEscope has extensively been used for intubation teaching and shown a number of advantages.
CONCLUSIONS
UEscope can be used as a primary intubation tool and may provide more benefits than other VLs in patients with normal and difficult airways. However, more studies with large sample are still needed to address some open questions about clinical performance of this new VL.
Topics: Equipment Design; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Video Recording
PubMed: 28748861
DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.211536 -
Critical Care Medicine Apr 2017
Topics: Critical Illness; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy
PubMed: 28291113
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002270 -
European Journal of Pediatrics Apr 2024How and when the forces are applied during neonatal intubation are currently unknown. This study investigated the pattern of the applied forces by using sensorized...
How and when the forces are applied during neonatal intubation are currently unknown. This study investigated the pattern of the applied forces by using sensorized laryngoscopes during the intubation process in a neonatal manikin. Nine users of direct laryngoscope and nine users of straight-blade video laryngoscope were included in a neonatal manikin study. During each procedure, relevant forces were measured using a force epiglottis sensor that was placed on the distal surface of the blade. The pattern of the applied forces could be divided into three sections. With the direct laryngoscope, the first section showed either a quick rise of the force or a discontinuous rise with several peaks; after reaching the maximum force, there was a sort of plateau followed by a quick drop of the applied forces. With the video laryngoscope, the first section showed a quick rise of the force; after reaching the maximum force, there was an irregular and heterogeneous plateau, followed by heterogeneous decreases of the applied forces. Moreover, less forces were recorded when using the video laryngoscope. Conclusions: This neonatal manikin study identified three sections in the diagram of the forces applied during intubation, which likely mirrored the three main phases of intubation. Overall, the pattern of each section showed some differences in relation to the laryngoscope (direct or video) that was used during the procedure. These findings may provide useful insights for improving the understanding of the procedure. What is Known: • Neonatal intubation is a life-saving procedure that requires a skilled operator and may cause direct trauma to the tissues and precipitate adverse reactions. • Intubation with a videolaryngoscope requires less force than with a direct laryngoscope, but how and when the forces are applied during the whole neonatal intubation procedure are currently unknown. What is New: • Forces applied to the epiglottis during intubation can be divided into three sections: (i) an initial increase, (ii) a sort of plateau, and (iii) a decrease. • The pattern of each section shows some differences in relation to the laryngoscope (direct or videolaryngoscope) that is used during the procedure.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy; Manikins
PubMed: 38260994
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05418-x -
Anaesthesia Apr 2015
Topics: Equipment Design; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Laryngoscopes; Laryngoscopy; Video Recording
PubMed: 25764406
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13052