-
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Aug 2018Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a challenging chronic, granulomatous, large-vessel systemic vasculitis, mostly due to difficulties in early diagnosis and assessing actual... (Review)
Review
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a challenging chronic, granulomatous, large-vessel systemic vasculitis, mostly due to difficulties in early diagnosis and assessing actual disease activity. Since there are no specific diagnostic laboratory tests, biomarkers, or autoantibodies, many patients experience considerable delay in diagnosis. Remembering the possibility of TAK together with the use of acute phase responses and appropriate imaging studies may be helpful for early diagnosis. Since there may be discrepancies between systemic and vascular wall inflammation, using only acute phase responses is not reliable in assessing current disease activity. Therefore, physical examination and new imaging findings should also be used to assess current disease activity. Despite its limitations, the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010) may also be helpful for this purpose. The rationale of medical treatment is to suppress both vascular and systemic inflammation with appropriate systemic immunosuppression, including corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents. In cases of refractory disease activity, leflunomide and biologic agents such as TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab may be tried. In selected cases with persistent lesions that cannot be reversed with medical treatment, endovascular interventions including balloon angioplasty, stent and stent graft replacement, or surgery may be tried. However, such procedures should be performed after suppression of inflammation, i.e. during inactive disease. Prognosis of TAK is probably getting better with lower mortality rates reported in recent years, probably due to the use of more effective medical treatments as well as the use of endovascular interventions when necessary and available.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Biomarkers; Endovascular Procedures; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Leflunomide; Physical Examination; Prognosis; Radiology, Interventional; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 30114347
DOI: 10.3906/sag-1804-136 -
Medical Principles and Practice :... 2018Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, systemic autoimmune disease, affecting the joints with varying severity among patients. The risk factors include... (Review)
Review
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, systemic autoimmune disease, affecting the joints with varying severity among patients. The risk factors include age, gender, genetics, and environmental exposure (cigarette smoking, air pollutants, and occupational). Many complications can follow, such as permanent joint damage requiring arthroplasty, rheumatoid vasculitis, and Felty syndrome requiring splenectomy if it remains unaddressed. As there is no cure for RA, the treatment goals are to reduce the pain and stop/slow further damage. Here, we present a brief summary of various past and present treatment modalities to address the complications associated with RA.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Leflunomide; Physical Therapy Modalities; Risk Factors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 30173215
DOI: 10.1159/000493390 -
Reumatologia Clinica 2019To assess the efficacy and side effects of methotrexate and leflunomide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and side effects of methotrexate and leflunomide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies that included patients who took methotrexate, leflunomide, placebo or another DMARD for RA treatment. A systematic review yielded 1971 articles from databases; once completely reviewed, 73 trials that completed inclusion criteria were selected. In structured workshops for discussion and assessment of each article, 6 could be meta-analyzed for the primary and secondary outcomes: achievement of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 and its core set components; and change of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-Di), liver enzyme aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ratio, new gastrointestinal (GI) side effects and infections.
RESULTS
A total of 1984 patients were included: 986 took leflunomide and 998 methotrexate. The probability of achieving ACR 20 had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74, 1.06) with a trend toward favoring methotrexate; reduction of the swollen joint count was greater for methotrexate: mean difference=0.82 (95%CI 0.24, 1.39); tender joint count, physician global assessment, HAQ-Di, and serum CRP levels revealed no significant difference between groups. Increased liver enzymes were more frequent in the leflunomide group, OR=0.38 (95%CI 0.27, 0.53), and new GI complaints were more common with methotrexate (OR=1.44; 95%CI 1.17, 1.79). There was no difference in the incidence of non-severe infections.
CONCLUSION
Leflunomide used as the first DMARD in RA seemed to be as efficacious as methotrexate; only the reduction of swollen joint count was more marked for methotrexate. Leflunomide was linked to a greater increase in liver enzymes, but there were fewer GI complaints.
Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Aspartate Aminotransferases; C-Reactive Protein; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disability Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Leflunomide; Methotrexate; Treatment Outcome; gamma-Glutamyltransferase
PubMed: 28867467
DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2017.07.020 -
Farmacia Hospitalaria : Organo Oficial... 2023The objective of this review is to gather the available evidence on the different drugs used in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in pregnancy, lactation, their... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review is to gather the available evidence on the different drugs used in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in pregnancy, lactation, their influence on female and male fertility, advice on discontinuation before conception and to help in routine clinical practice for better patient advice on family planning.
METHODS
A bibliographic search was carried out, where published articles (review studies, observational studies and case series) in English or Spanish until April 2020 that analyzed the management of pregnancy, lactation and/or fertility in patients on treatment in immune-mediated diseases were selected.
RESULTS
A total of 95 references were selected and the information on each drug was synthesized in tables. Drugs contraindicated in pregnancy are topical retinoids, pimecrolimus, cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, leflunomide, acitretin, and thiopurines. The lack of data advises against the use of apremilast, tofacitinib, baricitinib, anakinra, abatacept, tocilizumab and the new biologicals. Topical salicylates, paracetamol, ultraviolet therapy and hydroxychloroquine treatment are safe, and anti-TNF biological therapy are considered low risk, with certolizumab being the drug of choice throughout pregnancy and lactation. Most are compatible with paternal exposure except for sulfasalazine, mycophenolate and leflunomide, for which suspension of treatment prior to conception is recommended, and cyclosporine with dose requirements of less than 2mg/kg/day.
CONCLUSIONS
In this context of chronic treatments with teratogenic potential, it is necessary to highlight the importance of pregnancy planning to select the safest drug. Given the quality of the available data, it is still necessary to continuously update the information, as well as to promote observational studies of cohorts of pregnant patients and men of childbearing age, including prospective studies, in order to generate more scientific evidence.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Male; Female; Antirheumatic Agents; Breast Feeding; Leflunomide; Prospective Studies; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Fertility
PubMed: 36710223
DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2022.12.005 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021Several studies have investigated the causative role of the microbiome in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but changes in the gut microbiome in RA patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Several studies have investigated the causative role of the microbiome in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but changes in the gut microbiome in RA patients during drug treatment have been less well studied. Here, we tracked the longitudinal changes in gut bacteria in 22 RA patients who were randomized into two groups and treated with Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi formula (HQT) plus methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) plus MTX. There were differences in the gut microbiome between untreated (at baseline) RA patients and healthy controls, with 37 species being more abundant in the RA patients and 21 species (including ) being less abundant. Regarding the functional analysis, vitamin K2 biosynthesis was associated with RA-enriched bacteria. Additionally, in RA patients, alterations in gut microbial species appeared to be associated with RA-related clinical indicators through changing various gut microbiome functional pathways. The clinical efficacy of the two treatments was further observed to be similar, but the response trends of RA-related clinical indices in the two treatment groups differed. For example, HQT treatment affected the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), while LEF treatment affected the C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Further, 11 species and 9 metabolic pathways significantly changed over time in the HQT group (including , which increased), while only 4 species and 2 metabolic pathways significantly changed over time in the LEF group. In summary, we studied the alterations in the gut microbiome of RA patients being treated with HQT or LEF. The results provide useful information on the role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of RA, and they also provide potentially effective directions for developing new RA treatments.
Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Clostridium; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Leflunomide; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged
PubMed: 34721377
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.704089 -
BMC Nephrology Nov 2021The results of leflunomide (LEF) in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) were inconsistent. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
The results of leflunomide (LEF) in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) were inconsistent.
METHODS
A total of 149 kidney biopsy-confirmed IgAN patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m and protein excretion levels ≥0.75 g/d were enrolled, with 65 subjects receiving half-dose CS plus LEF (LEF group), and the 84 counterpart patients accepting full-dose corticosteroid (Full CS group). The primary outcomes included the complete remission (CR) rates and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcomes were the overall remission (OR) rates and a combined event (eGFR reduced ≥30%, end-stage renal disease [ESRD], hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplantation).
RESULTS
During the 18 months of follow-up, the CR rates were 72 and 64% in the LEF and Full CS groups (P = 0.299), respectively. The proportion of patients with OR rates in the LEF group and Full CS group was 89% versus 75%, respectively (P = 0.027). Serious AEs were observed only in the Full CS group (P = 0.017). The incidences of total AEs (P = 0.036) and infections (P = 0.024) were lower in the LEF group than in the Full CS group.
CONCLUSIONS
LEF combined with half-dose CS is superior to full-dose CS in the treatment of IgAN.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Humans; Leflunomide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 34736419
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02555-z -
Protein & Cell Oct 2020Emerging and re-emerging RNA viruses occasionally cause epidemics and pandemics worldwide, such as the on-going outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we...
Emerging and re-emerging RNA viruses occasionally cause epidemics and pandemics worldwide, such as the on-going outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we identified two potent inhibitors of human DHODH, S312 and S416, with favorable drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic profiles, which all showed broad-spectrum antiviral effects against various RNA viruses, including influenza A virus, Zika virus, Ebola virus, and particularly against SARS-CoV-2. Notably, S416 is reported to be the most potent inhibitor so far with an EC of 17 nmol/L and an SI value of 10,505.88 in infected cells. Our results are the first to validate that DHODH is an attractive host target through high antiviral efficacy in vivo and low virus replication in DHODH knock-out cells. This work demonstrates that both S312/S416 and old drugs (Leflunomide/Teriflunomide) with dual actions of antiviral and immuno-regulation may have clinical potentials to cure SARS-CoV-2 or other RNA viruses circulating worldwide, no matter such viruses are mutated or not.
Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Betacoronavirus; Binding Sites; COVID-19; Cell Line; Coronavirus Infections; Crotonates; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Gene Knockout Techniques; Humans; Hydroxybutyrates; Influenza A virus; Leflunomide; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitriles; Orthomyxoviridae Infections; Oseltamivir; Oxidoreductases; Oxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group Donors; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Protein Binding; Pyrimidines; RNA Viruses; SARS-CoV-2; Structure-Activity Relationship; Thiazoles; Toluidines; Ubiquinone; Virus Replication
PubMed: 32754890
DOI: 10.1007/s13238-020-00768-w -
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Aug 2021Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been described in patients treated with leflunomide. To assess the association between leflunomide and PH. We identified incident...
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been described in patients treated with leflunomide. To assess the association between leflunomide and PH. We identified incident cases of PH in patients treated with leflunomide from the French PH Registry and through the pharmacoVIGIlAnce in Pulmonary ArTerial Hypertension (VIGIAPATH) program between September 1999 to December 2019. PH etiology, clinical, functional, radiologic, and hemodynamic characteristics were reviewed at baseline and follow-up. A pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the World Health Organization's global database was conducted. We then investigated the effect of leflunomide on human pulmonary endothelial cells. Data are expressed as median (min-max). Twenty-eight patients treated with leflunomide before PH diagnosis was identified. A total of 21 (75%) had another risk factor for PH and 2 had two risk factors. The median time between leflunomide initiation and PH diagnosis was 32 months (1-120). Right heart catheterization confirmed precapillary PH with a cardiac index of 2.37 L⋅min ⋅m (1.19-3.1) and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance at 9.63 Wood Units (3.6-22.1) without nitric oxide reversibility. Five patients (17.9%) had no other risk factor for PH besides exposure to leflunomide. No significant hemodynamic improvement was observed after leflunomide withdrawal. The pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the World Health Organization's database revealed a significant overrepresentation of leflunomide among reported pulmonary arterial hypertension-adverse drug reactions. studies showed the dose-dependent toxicity of leflunomide on human pulmonary endothelial cells. PH associated with leflunomide is rare and usually associated with other risk factors. The pharmacovigilance analysis suggests an association reinforced by experimental data.
Topics: Cardiac Catheterization; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Leflunomide; Lung; Pharmacovigilance
PubMed: 33502958
DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202008-913OC -
The American Journal of the Medical... May 1997Leflunomide is a new immunomodulatory drug that is effective in experimental models of autoimmune diseases and in allo or xenotransplantation. In a phase II clinical... (Review)
Review
Leflunomide is a new immunomodulatory drug that is effective in experimental models of autoimmune diseases and in allo or xenotransplantation. In a phase II clinical trial, leflunomide showed high tolerability and efficacy in patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis. The immunomodulatory activity of leflunomide is attributed to its primary metabolite A77 1726, which is a malononitrilamide. The in vitro and in vivo mechanisms of action of this class of compounds are not defined completely. Several malononitrilamide analogues and A77 1726 inhibit T- and B-cell proliferation, suppress immunoglobulin production, and interfere with cell adhesion. Although no central molecular mechanism of action has been proposed to explain all the effects of the malononitrilamides, the inhibition of de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis and of cytokine- and growth factor receptor-associated tyrosine kinase activity are leading hypotheses for the effects of A77 1726 on T- and B-cell proliferation and function. Leflunomide is effective when administered in daily dosages of 10 mg and 25 mg to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. The improved efficacy of a 25 mg dose is associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects (gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss, allergic reactions, skin rash, and reversible alopecia). Because of the long plasma half-life of A77 1726 (11 to 16 days), loading doses are necessary to achieve steady state concentrations. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials that use daily dosages of 10 mg or 20 mg are under way in the United States and Europe to confirm and extend the results of the phase II study. Malononitrilamide analogues of A77 1726 are being evaluated for immunosuppressive efficacy in preclinical models of transplantation. If these analogues show efficacies and therapeutic indexes that are similar to leflunomide in these models and that have shorter half-lives than A77 1726 in phase I trials, the preclinical and phase I data will be used to select the analogues for phase II trials in organ transplant recipients.
Topics: Aniline Compounds; Animals; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Autoimmune Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Crotonates; Graft Rejection; Humans; Hydroxybutyrates; Immunosuppressive Agents; Isoxazoles; Leflunomide; Molecular Structure; Nitriles; Organ Transplantation; Toluidines; Transplantation Immunology
PubMed: 9145039
DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199705000-00008