-
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Postoperative chemotherapy is a standard treatment for stage II and III gastric cancer in Asia. With regard to single-agent or doublet, the need for improvement has...
POF (paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) vs. SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX as a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected stage III gastric cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, FNF-014 trial.
BACKGROUND
Postoperative chemotherapy is a standard treatment for stage II and III gastric cancer in Asia. With regard to single-agent or doublet, the need for improvement has consistently been pointed out because of the relatively poor outcome for patients with stage III gastric cancer. Triplet has shown significant survival benefits in the perioperative setting. We conducted a randomized, multicenter, phase III study to compare triplet to doublet regimens for patients with stage III gastric cancer.
METHODS
This is currently enrolling patients ( = 230) with pathologic stage III gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection and achieved R0 resection. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified by tumor stage (IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC, AJCC 8th) into POF or SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX. S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX): oxaliplatin 130 mg/m on day 1, oral S-1 80-120 mg/m divided by two on days 1-14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX): oxaliplatin 130 mg/m on day 1, oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. Folinic acid (or leucovorin), 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX): oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, levo-leucovorin 200 mg/m, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m bolus on day 1, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m continuous infusion over 46 h, every 14 days for 12 cycles. Three doublets were chosen by the clinicians. Paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (POF): paclitaxel 135 mg/m, followed by FOLFOX omitted 5-FU bolus, every 14 days for 12 cycles. The primary end point is 3-year disease-free survival (3-year-DFS). Secondary end points are overall survival (OS) and safety (any adverse event).
DISCUSSION
The results of this study will help establish postoperative clinical evidence for patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT0378826].
PubMed: 35983099
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.861777 -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Mar 2021Calcium levofolinate (CaLev) for intravenous administration is commercially available as a powder that must be reconstituted for injection or reconstituted and then...
PURPOSE
Calcium levofolinate (CaLev) for intravenous administration is commercially available as a powder that must be reconstituted for injection or reconstituted and then diluted before administration. The lack of stability data on CaLev solutions renders necessary extemporaneous manual preparation, preventing the use of automated/semi-automated systems, with a consequent loss in terms of quality and safety.
METHODS
The present work assessed the chemical-physical and microbiological stability of CaLev prepared in sodium chloride 0.9%, glucose 5% and water for injections and stored in polyolefin/polyamide bags and polypropylene syringes at 2-8°C protected from light. For this purpose, we developed and validated a new rapid High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultra Violet Diode-Array Detection (HPLC-UV-DAD) method.
RESULTS
The samples tested were stable for 14 days, retaining >95% of their initial concentration and showing no change in colour, turbidity or pH. Microbiological tests performed on the samples were negative.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results confirmed the analytical stability of CaLev in NaCl 0.9%, glucose 5% and water for injection at concentrations used in clinical practice at our institute. This enables our centralized laboratory to organize the preparation of this drug in advance and the use of robots rather than manual preparation reduces the workload and the risk of preparation errors.
Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Packaging; Drug Stability; Drug Storage; Glucose; Levoleucovorin; Nylons; Polyenes; Polypropylenes; Saline Solution; Syringes; Temperature; Water
PubMed: 32299315
DOI: 10.1177/1078155220918025 -
Oncoimmunology Jul 2016The first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is FOLFIRI (irinotecan, levo-leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) plus bevacizumab....
The first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is FOLFIRI (irinotecan, levo-leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) plus bevacizumab. With the renewed interest in cancer immunotherapy with agents such as vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors and immune modulators, the possibility exists for the use of one or more of these immunotherapeutics in the first-line setting and thus in combination with the FOLFIRI and bevacizumab regimen. Studies were undertaken to study the effects of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab therapy on peripheral T-cell subsets, and to determine if there are any associations between these subsets and response to therapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets of patients with mCRC (n = 23) were analyzed prior to and during therapy. While there were differences among patients, the majority of patients showed either a minimal change or an increase in CD4(+) T cell to regulatory T cell (Treg) ratios during therapy, as well as either minimal change or a decrease in Treg suppressive activity during therapy. There was also an association (p = 0.036) between a decrease in Treg frequency during FOLFIRI therapy and overall survival, and an association (p = 0.037) between the frequency of Tregs prior to therapy and progression-free survival. Responders to the chemotherapy by RECIST criteria also had a greater decrease in Tregs during therapy vs. pre-therapy (p = 0.0064) as compared to non-responders. While the number of mCRC patients undergoing chemotherapy in this study is relatively small, it provides the rationale for the use of immunotherapeutics in this first-line metastatic setting.
PubMed: 27622042
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1188243 -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2021Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used in the treatment of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. Severe adverse effects are often associated with therapeutic errors, such as...
OBJECTIVE
Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used in the treatment of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. Severe adverse effects are often associated with therapeutic errors, such as daily intake rather than weekly intake. Among them, the risk of bowel perforation is extremely rare (0.1%). We describe a case of bowel perforation, occurred following daily intake of MTX.
CASE REPORT
A 68-year-old man was prescribed to take MTX 7,5 mg orally once a week, while waiting for switch to abatacept for a recent reactivation of rheumatoid arthritis. After 10 days he started having pharyngodynia, hematochezia and general malaise. At medical examination he presented oral and nasal mucositis; moreover, blood exams showed thrombocytopenia. The anamnesis revealed that he had been taken the prescribed dosage of MTX daily, instead of weekly. Therapy with Lederfolin 1000 mg (mg/m²/die) and urine alkalinization started. After 7 days of hospitalization, there was an abrupt worsening of clinical conditions and an emergency CT scan revealed millimetric gas bubbles indicating bowel perforation. The patient underwent an emergency exploratory laparotomy that resulted in peritoneal toilette and sigma resections. Anatomopathological findings were suggestive of MTX poisoning.
CONCLUSIONS
The patient was discharged on the 17th day in good clinical condition.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Intestinal Perforation; Levoleucovorin; Male; Methotrexate
PubMed: 33755972
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25273 -
International Journal of Oncology May 20155-Fluorouracil (5-FU), often used in combination with levofolene (LF), can induce, as an important side effect, the hand-foot syndrome (HFS) due to toxicity on...
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), often used in combination with levofolene (LF), can induce, as an important side effect, the hand-foot syndrome (HFS) due to toxicity on keratinocytes. This can also damage workers involved in its handling. In the present study, we investigated the mechanisms of the toxicity induced by 5-FU alone or together with LF on human keratinocytes in culture. We found that the two drugs, as expected, had potentiating activity on keratinocyte growth inhibition and that this effect was mediated by induction of apoptosis. In our experimental model, an increased autophagic vacuole accumulation was observed in keratinocytes treated with 5-FU as a significant increase of the monodansylcadaverine (MDC) labeling (marker of late autophagy vacuoles) was recorded. However, the synergism of 5-FU with LF on apoptotic occurrence was not paralleled by a similar increase in autophagic vacuoles at 72 h suggesting an antagonistic effect of LF on autophagy elicited by 5-FU. Differential effects on reactive oxygen species (ROS) elevation in cells treated with 5-FU alone or the combination between 5-FU and LF were also observed. 5-FU induced a time-dependent increase of both O2- and lipid peroxidation while the combination of 5-FU and LF caused a stronger intracellular O2- increase only at 24 h while at 48 and 72 h its effect was lower when compared with that one of 5-FU alone. On the other hand, the addition of LF to 5-FU caused a stronger increase of lipid peroxidation at 48 and 72 h, but its effects were significantly lower at 24 h. These results suggest for the first time that LF potentiates the cytotoxicity of 5-FU on keratinocytes likely through the antagonism on autophagy escape pathway and consequent apoptosis potentiation.
Topics: Antidotes; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Cell Line; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Flow Cytometry; Fluorouracil; Humans; Keratinocytes; Levoleucovorin; Lipid Peroxidation; Oxidative Stress; Reactive Oxygen Species
PubMed: 25709090
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2904 -
BMC Cancer Nov 2020FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations...
Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC.
METHODS
EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer.
DISCUSSION
This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003 . Registered April 18, 2019.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Irinotecan; Levoleucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oxaliplatin; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Survival Rate; Young Adult
PubMed: 33203393
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07576-9 -
Cancer Science Aug 2012This phase II, open-label, single-arm study investigated sunitinib + FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer....
This phase II, open-label, single-arm study investigated sunitinib + FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients received i.v. FOLFIRI (levo-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) + irinotecan 180 mg/m(2), followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus then 2400 mg/m(2) 46-h infusion) every 2 weeks, and oral sunitinib 37.5 mg/day on Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off), until disease progression or treatment withdrawal. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, with a target median of 10.8 months (35% improvement over FOLFIRI alone). Seventy-one patients started a median of 3 (range 1-11) sunitinib cycles (median relative dose intensity, <60%). The median PFS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 4.7-9.2) by independent review, 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 5.4-9.5) by investigator assessment. Objective response rate (complete responses + partial responses) was 36.6% (independent review) and 42.3% (investigator assessment). Clinical benefit rate (complete responses + partial responses + stable disease) was 83.1% (independent review) and 88.7% (investigator assessment). Common all-causality, any-grade, adverse events were: neutropenia and leukopenia (both 97.2%); thrombocytopenia (84.5%); diarrhea and nausea (both 78.9%); decreased appetite (74.6%); and fatigue (66.2%). Neutropenia (96%) was the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse event. This study was closed early due to findings from a concurrent phase III study of sunitinib + FOLFIRI in non-Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In conclusion, the median PFS for sunitinib + FOLFIRI in Japanese patients was shorter than the 10.8 month target, indicating that sunitinib did not add to the antitumor activity of FOLFIRI. This study was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00668863).
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Indoles; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pyrroles; Sunitinib; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22537162
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02320.x -
Investigational New Drugs Jun 2014Efatutazone, a novel oral highly-selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, has demonstrated some inhibitory effects on disease...
Phase 1 study of efatutazone, a novel oral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, in combination with FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND
Efatutazone, a novel oral highly-selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, has demonstrated some inhibitory effects on disease stabilization in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) enrolled in previous phase I studies. Here, we evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of efatutazone combined with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, levo-leucovorin, and irinotecan) as second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with mCRC.
METHODS
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated at 2 efatutazone dose levels of 0.25 and 0.50 mg (the recommended dose [RD] of efatutazone monotherapy) twice daily in combination with FOLFIRI in a 3-9 patient cohort. Furthermore, tolerability at the RD level was assessed in additional patients, up to 12 in total. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics and biomarkers and tumor samples for archival tissues were collected from all patients.
RESULTS
Fifteen patients (0.25 mg, 3; 0.5 mg, 12) were enrolled. No DLTs were observed. Most patients experienced weight increase (100 %) and edema (80.0 %), which were manageable with diuretics. Common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (93.3 %), leukopenia (46.7 %), and anemia (33.3 %). Stable disease was observed in 8 of the 14 patients evaluable for tumor response. The plasma adiponectin levels increased over time and increased dose. No clear relationship was detected between treatment efficacies and plasma levels of adiponectin as well as the expression levels of PPARγ and the retinoid X receptor in tumor tissues.
CONCLUSIONS
Efatutazone combined with FOLFIRI demonstrates an acceptable safety profile and evidence of disease stabilization in Japanese patients with mCRC. The RD for efatutazone monotherapy can be used in combination with FOLFIRI.
Topics: Adiponectin; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Camptothecin; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; PPAR gamma; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24337768
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-013-0056-3 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Feb 1997Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial
High-versus low-dose levo-leucovorin as a modulator of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a 'GISCAD' phase III study. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.
BACKGROUND
Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this combination has not yet been established. Low-dose LV appears to be as active as high-dose LV in the daily-times-five regimen, but no randomized study of the levorotatory stereoisomer (6S-LV) given at two different dose levels has been published.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Between November 1991 and June 1994, 422 patients (all with measurable disease previously untreated with chemotherapy) were randomized to 6S-LV (100 mg/sqm/i.v.) + 5-FU (370 mg sqm/15 min i.v. infusion), both administered for 5 days every 28 days (arm A), or to 6S-LV (10 mg/sqm/i.v./5-FU (doses as above), also given for 5 days every 28 days (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of response rates (WHO criteria): the secondary endpoint was the assessment of survival and tolerability. No evaluation of the quality of life or the symptomatic effect of treatment was planned.
RESULTS
The response rate was 9.3% in arm A (95% CI: 5.4-13.1), with 2 CR and 18 PR, and 10.7% in arm B (95% CI: 6.5-14.9), with 3 CR + 19 PR, without any significant difference (P = 0.78). The median time to progression was eight months in both groups and overall survival was 11 months, with no difference between treatments. Toxicity mainly consisted of gastrointestinal side effects (mucositis and diarrhoea), which were rarely severe (grade 3-4: 5%-10% of patients) and similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In this large-scale multicentre trial, the low and high doses of 6S-LV appeared to be equivalent in terms of the biochemical modulation of 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer although, for several reasons (including the timing and the strict criteria of response evaluation, the high number of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, the multi-institutional nature of the study, the dose and modality of 5-FU administration), the response rate was lower than that reported in some of the other published studies. Given the considerable difference in economic cost between the two dosages, the use of high-dose 6S-LV in the daily-times-five regimen is not recommended in clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Leucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 9093726
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008200713533 -
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Jan 2015Leucovorin is commonly used as folate supplement in 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, but needs to be converted to active 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (methyleneTHF)... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of Modufolin® compared to Isovorin® after single dose intravenous administration to patients with colon cancer: a randomized study.
PURPOSE
Leucovorin is commonly used as folate supplement in 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, but needs to be converted to active 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (methyleneTHF) intracellularly. This provides for interindividual differences. MethyleneTHF has recently been developed into the stable, distributable drug, Modufolin®. The aim was to compare the concentration of folate metabolites in tumor, mucosa, and plasma of patients with colon cancer after administration of Modufolin® or Isovorin® (levo-leucovorin).
METHODS
Thirty-two patients scheduled for colon resection were randomized to receive Modufolin® or Isovorin® at dosage of 60 or 200 mg/m². The study drug was given as one i.v. bolus injection after anesthesia. Plasma was collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis before, during, and after surgery. Tissue biopsies were collected at surgery. Folate metabolites were analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
RESULTS
MethyleneTHF and THF concentrations were significantly higher in mucosa (p < 0.01, both dosages) and tumors (p < 0.01, 200 mg/m²) after Modufolin® as compared to Isovorin® administration. The results correlated with PK observations. The Modufolin® to Isovorin® C(max) ratio for methyleneTHF was 113 at 200 mg/m² and 52 at 60 mg/m²; the AUC(last) ratios were 17 and 9, respectively. The THF plasma concentrations were also higher after Modufolin® administration (C(max) ratio 23, AUC(last) ratio 13 at 200 mg/m²; C(max) ratio 15, AUC(last) ratio 11 at 60 mg/m²).
CONCLUSION
Modufolin® administration resulted in significantly higher methyleneTHF levels than Isovorin® and may potentially increase the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The results encourage further evaluation of Modufolin® as a substitute to Isovorin® including the potential clinical benefits.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidotes; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Biotransformation; Colonic Neoplasms; Combined Modality Therapy; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Fluorouracil; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Intestinal Mucosa; Levoleucovorin; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Period; Prodrugs; Single-Blind Method; Tetrahydrofolates; Tissue Distribution
PubMed: 25342290
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2611-9