-
Molecular Systems Biology Aug 2021Understanding the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identifying potential therapeutics are global imperatives. Using a quantitative systems pharmacology approach, we...
Understanding the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identifying potential therapeutics are global imperatives. Using a quantitative systems pharmacology approach, we identified a set of repurposable and investigational drugs as potential therapeutics against COVID-19. These were deduced from the gene expression signature of SARS-CoV-2-infected A549 cells screened against Connectivity Map and prioritized by network proximity analysis with respect to disease modules in the viral-host interactome. We also identified immuno-modulating compounds aiming at suppressing hyperinflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients, based on the transcriptome of ACE2-overexpressing A549 cells. Experiments with Vero-E6 cells infected by SARS-CoV-2, as well as independent syncytia formation assays for probing ACE2/SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated cell fusion using HEK293T and Calu-3 cells, showed that several predicted compounds had inhibitory activities. Among them, salmeterol, rottlerin, and mTOR inhibitors exhibited antiviral activities in Vero-E6 cells; imipramine, linsitinib, hexylresorcinol, ezetimibe, and brompheniramine impaired viral entry. These novel findings provide new paths for broadening the repertoire of compounds pursued as therapeutics against COVID-19.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Chlorocebus aethiops; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Repositioning; HEK293 Cells; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Imidazoles; Pyrazines; SARS-CoV-2; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Vero Cells; Virus Internalization; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34339582
DOI: 10.15252/msb.202110239 -
Scientific Reports May 2020Signaling elicited by the stem cell factors SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and MYC not only mediates reprogramming of differentiated cells to pluripotency but has also been...
Signaling elicited by the stem cell factors SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and MYC not only mediates reprogramming of differentiated cells to pluripotency but has also been correlated with tumor malignancy. In this study, we found SOX2 expression signifies poor recurrence-free survival and correlates with advanced pathological grade in bladder cancer. SOX2 silencing attenuated bladder cancer cell growth, while its expression promoted cancer cell survival and proliferation. Under low-serum stress, SOX2 expression promoted AKT phosphorylation and bladder cancer cells' spheroid-forming capability. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of AKT phosphorylation, using MK2206, inhibited the SOX2-mediated spheroid formation of bladder cancer cells. Gene expression profiling showed that SOX2 expression, in turn, induced IGF2 expression, while SOX2 silencing inhibited IGF2 expression. Moreover, knocking down IGF2 and IGF1R diminished bladder cancer cell growth. Lastly, pharmacological inhibition of IGF1R, using linsitinib, also inhibited the SOX2-mediated spheroid formation of bladder cancer cells under low-serum stress. Our findings indicate the SOX2-IGF2 signaling affects the aggressiveness of bladder cancer cell growth. This signaling could be a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for bladder cancer intervention.
Topics: Humans; Insulin-Like Growth Factor II; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Phosphorylation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Receptor, IGF Type 1; SOXB1 Transcription Factors; Signal Transduction; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 32427884
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65006-z -
International Journal of Molecular... Aug 2023Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. GPD1L, a member of the glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase family, has emerged as a...
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. GPD1L, a member of the glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase family, has emerged as a potential tumour suppressor gene, with high expression associated with a favourable prognosis in various cancers. Despite an intriguing inverse relationship observed with HCC, the precise role and underlying function of GPD1L in HCC remain poorly understood. Here, we aimed to investigate the prognostic significance, molecular characteristics, and predictive potential of GPD1L overexpression in HCC. Analysis of independent datasets revealed a significant correlation between high GPD1L expression and poor survival in HCC patients. Spatial and single cell transcriptome datasets confirmed elevated GDP1L expression in tumour tissue compared to adjacent normal tissue. GPD1L exhibited increased expression and promoter demethylation with advancing tumour stage, confirming positive selection during tumorigeneses. GPD1L overexpression was associated with metabolic dysregulation and enrichment of gene sets related to cell cycle control, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and E2F targets. Moreover, we demonstrated an inverse correlation between GPD1L expression and therapeutic response for three therapeutic agents (PF-562271, Linsitinib, and BMS-754807), highlighting its potential as a predictive biomarker for HCC treatment outcomes. These data provide insights into the prognostic significance, molecular characteristics, and predictive potential of GPD1L in HCC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Liver Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 37685919
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713113 -
Lab on a Chip Nov 2020Traditional drug screening models are often unable to faithfully recapitulate human physiology in health and disease, motivating the development of microfluidic...
Traditional drug screening models are often unable to faithfully recapitulate human physiology in health and disease, motivating the development of microfluidic organs-on-a-chip (OOC) platforms that can mimic many aspects of human physiology and in the process alleviate many of the discrepancies between preclinical studies and clinical trials outcomes. Linsitinib, a novel anti-cancer drug, showed promising results in pre-clinical models of Ewing Sarcoma (ES), where it suppressed tumor growth. However, a Phase II clinical trial in several European centers with patients showed relapsed and/or refractory ES. We report an integrated, open setting, imaging and sampling accessible, polysulfone-based platform, featuring minimal hydrophobic compound binding. Two bioengineered human tissues - bone ES tumor and heart muscle - were cultured either in isolation or in the integrated platform and subjected to a clinically used linsitinib dosage. The measured anti-tumor efficacy and cardiotoxicity were compared with the results observed in the clinical trial. Only the engineered tumor tissues, and not monolayers, recapitulated the bone microenvironment pathways targeted by linsitinib, and the clinically-relevant differences in drug responses between non-metastatic and metastatic ES tumors. The responses of non-metastatic ES tumor tissues and heart muscle to linsitinib were much closer to those observed in the clinical trial for tissues cultured in an integrated setting than for tissues cultured in isolation. Drug treatment of isolated tissues resulted in significant decreases in tumor viability and cardiac function. Meanwhile, drug treatment in an integrated setting showed poor tumor response and less cardiotoxicity, which matched the results of the clinical trial. Overall, the integration of engineered human tumor and cardiac tissues in the integrated platform improved the predictive accuracy for both the direct and off-target effects of linsitinib. The proposed approach could be readily extended to other drugs and tissue systems.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Heart; Humans; Lab-On-A-Chip Devices; Sarcoma, Ewing; Tissue Engineering; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 32955072
DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00424c -
Endocrine Connections Jun 2019Broncho-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NENs) are neoplasms orphan of an efficient therapy. Available medical treatments derived from clinical trials are not...
Broncho-pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NENs) are neoplasms orphan of an efficient therapy. Available medical treatments derived from clinical trials are not specific for the management of this malignancy. Sunitinib is a multi-receptor tyrosine-kinases (RTKs) inhibitor that has already shown its efficacy in NENs, but there are no available data about its action in BP-NENs. Therefore, our aim was to understand the effects of RTKs inhibition promoted by sunitinib in order to evaluate new putative targets useful in malignancy treatment. Since our results underlined a role for EGFR and IGF1R in modulating sunitinib antiproliferative action, we investigated the effects of erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor, and linsitinib, an IGF1R inhibitor, in order to understand their function in regulating cells behaviour. Cell viability and caspase activation were evaluated on two immortalised human BP-NEN cell lines and primary cultures. Our results showed that after treatment with sunitinib and/or IGF1, EGF and VEGF, the antiproliferative effect of sunitinib was counteracted by EGF and IGF1 but not by VEGF. Therefore, we evaluated with AlphaScreen technology the phosphorylated EGFR and IGF1R levels in primary cultures treated with sunitinib and/or EGF and IGF1. Results showed a decrease of p-IGF1R after treatment with sunitinib and an increase after co-treatment with IGF1. Then, we assessed cell viability and caspase activation on BP-NEN cell lines after treatment with linsitinib and/or erlotinib. Results demonstrate that these two agents have a stronger antiproliferative effect compared to sunitinib. In conclusion, our results suggest that IGF1R and EGF1R could represent putative molecular targets in BP-NENs treatment.
PubMed: 31035254
DOI: 10.1530/EC-19-0192 -
Endocrine Journal 201411β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) is an NADPH-dependent reductase that converts cortisone to cortisol in adipose tissue. We previously reported that...
11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) is an NADPH-dependent reductase that converts cortisone to cortisol in adipose tissue. We previously reported that GH and IGF-I decrease 11β-HSD1 activity and mRNA levels in adipocytes. Hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (H6PDH) is involved in the production of NADPH, which is a coenzyme for 11β-HSD1. The aim of the present study was to clarify further the mechanism of repression of 11β-HSD1 activity by GH using linsitinib, an IGF-I receptor inhibitor. The suppression of 11β-HSD1 mRNA by IGF-I was attenuated in the presence of 1 μM linsitinib (17.2% vs. 53.3% of basal level, P<0.05). 11β-HSD1 mRNA levels in cells treated with GH in the presence of 1 μM linsitinib were not different from those in absence of linsitinib (35.9% vs. 33.9%). The increase in IGF-I mRNA levels with GH and 1 μM linsitinib was not different from that in the absence of linsitinib (359% vs. 347%). H6PDH mRNA levels were significantly decreased in cells treated with IGF-I for 8 and 24 h (55.6% and 33.7%, P<0.05). In the presence of 1 μM linsitinib, there was no repression of H6PDH mRNA (111.4%). H6PDH mRNA levels were significantly decreased in cells treated with GH in the absence of linsitinib for 24 h (55.9%, P<0.05), but not for 8 h (89.5%). The presence of 1 μM linsitinib also prevented repression of H6PDH mRNA by GH over 24 h (107.8%). These results suggest that GH directly represses 11β-HSD1 mRNA rather than acting via the IGF-I receptor, and that GH represses H6PDH through locally produced IGF-I.
Topics: 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1; 3T3-L1 Cells; Adipocytes, White; Animals; Carbohydrate Dehydrogenases; Enzyme Repression; Growth Hormone; Imidazoles; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Mice; Phosphorylation; Phthalazines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Pyrazines; Pyridines; RNA, Messenger; Receptor, IGF Type 1; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 24759003
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.ej13-0528 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Jun 2016Cross-talk between type I IGF receptor (IGF1R), insulin receptor (INSR), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mediates resistance to individual receptor blockade....
PURPOSE
Cross-talk between type I IGF receptor (IGF1R), insulin receptor (INSR), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mediates resistance to individual receptor blockade. This study aimed to determine the MTD, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of linsitinib, a potent oral IGF1R/INSR inhibitor, with EGFR inhibitor erlotinib.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
This open-label, dose-escalation study investigated linsitinib schedules S1: once daily intermittent (days 1-3 weekly); S2, once daily continuous; S3, twice-daily continuous; each with erlotinib 100-150 mg once daily; and a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expansion cohort.
RESULTS
Ninety-five patients were enrolled (S1, 44; S2, 24; S3, 12; expansion cohort, 15) and 91 treated. Seven experienced dose-limiting toxicities: QTc prolongation (3), abnormal liver function (2), hyperglycemia (1), and anorexia (1). Common adverse events included drug eruption (84%), diarrhea (73%), fatigue (68%), nausea (58%), vomiting (40%). MTDs for linsitinib/erlotinib were 450/150 mg (S1), 400/100 mg (S2). On the basis of prior monotherapy data, S3 dosing at 150 mg twice daily/150 mg once daily was the recommended phase II dose for the expansion cohort. There was no evidence of drug-drug interaction. Pharmacodynamic data showed IGF-1 elevation and reduced IGF1R/INSR phosphorylation, suggesting pathway inhibition. Across schedules, 5/75 (7%) evaluable patients experienced partial responses: spinal chordoma (268+ weeks), rectal cancer (36 weeks), three NSCLCs including 2 adenocarcinomas (16, 72 weeks), 1 squamous wild-type EGFR NSCLC (36 weeks). Disease control (CR+PR+SD) occurred in 38 of 75 (51%), and 28 of 91 (31%) patients were on study >12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
The linsitinib/erlotinib combination was tolerable with preliminary evidence of activity, including durable responses in cases unlikely to respond to erlotinib monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2897-907. ©2016 AACR.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; ErbB Receptors; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazines; Receptor, IGF Type 1; Receptor, Insulin; Receptors, Somatomedin; Young Adult
PubMed: 26831715
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2218 -
Aging Jan 2023Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PADA) represents a devastating type of pancreatic cancer with high mortality. Defining a prognostic gene signature that can stratify...
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PADA) represents a devastating type of pancreatic cancer with high mortality. Defining a prognostic gene signature that can stratify patients with different risk will benefit cancer treatment strategies.
METHODS
Gene expression profiles of PADA patients were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus, including GSE62452 and GSE28735. Differential expression analysis was carried out using the package edgeR in R. Intro-tumor immune infiltrates were quantified by six different computational algorithms XCELL, TIMER, QUANTISEQ, MCPCOUNTER, EPIC, and CIBERSORT. Biological processes were investigated based on R package "clusterProfiler".
RESULTS
13 genes () were eligible for the development of a prognostic gene signature. Performance of the prognostic gene signature was assessed in the discovery set (n = 210), validation set (n = 52), and two external data set (GSE62452, n = 65, and GSE28735, n = 84). Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting 3-year overall survival was 0.727, 0.732, 0.700, and 0.658 in the training set, the validation set, and the two test sets, respectively. KM curve revealed that the low-risk group had an improved prognosis than the high-risk group in all four datasets. PCA analysis demonstrated that the low-risk group was apparently separated from the high-risk group. CD8 T cell and B cell were significantly reduced in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group, while neutrophils were significantly augmented in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. BMS-536924, Foretinib, Linsitinib, and Sabutoclax were more sensitive in the low-risk group, whereas Erlotinib was more effective in the high-risk group.
CONCLUSIONS
We successfully established and verified a novel circadian clock-related gene signature, which could stratify patients with different risk and be reflective of the therapeutic effect of molecular targeted therapy. Our findings could incorporate the pharmacological modulation of circadian clock into future therapeutic strategies.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Circadian Clocks; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Immunity; RNA-Binding Proteins; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
PubMed: 36626244
DOI: 10.18632/aging.204462 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2022Both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) have been implicated in the development of cancers, and the increased...
Both the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) have been implicated in the development of cancers, and the increased expression of both receptors has been observed in esophageal cancer. However, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors of both receptors have thus far failed to provide clinical benefits for esophageal cancer patients. Studies have confirmed the complicated crosstalks that exist between the EGFR and IGF-1R pathways. The EGFR and IGF-1R signals act as mutual compensation pathways, thereby conveying resistance to EGFR or IGF-1R inhibitors when used alone. This study evaluated the antitumor efficacy of the EGFR/HER2 inhibitors, gefitinib and lapatinib, in combination with the IGF-1R inhibitor, linsitinib, on the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Gefitinib or lapatinib, in combination with linsitinib, synergistically inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of ESCC cells, caused significant cell cycle arrest, and induced marked cell apoptosis. Their combination demonstrated stronger inhibition on the activation of EGFR, HER2, and IGF-1R as well as the downstream signaling molecules. In vivo, the addition of linsitinib to gefitinib or lapatinib also potentiated the inhibition effects on the growth of xenografts. Our results suggest the next clinical exploration of the combination of gefitinib or lapatinib with linsitinib in the treatment of ESCC patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; ErbB Receptors; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Gefitinib; Humans; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Lapatinib; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Receptor, IGF Type 1
PubMed: 36142299
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810382 -
British Journal of Cancer Sep 2017Maintenance therapy is important in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib as switch maintenance following platinum-based chemotherapy... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Randomised Phase 2 study of maintenance linsitinib (OSI-906) in combination with erlotinib compared with placebo plus erlotinib after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
BACKGROUND
Maintenance therapy is important in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib as switch maintenance following platinum-based chemotherapy increases survival. Cross-talk between the epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) pathways mediate resistance to individual receptor blockade. This study compared maintenance linsitinib plus erlotinib vs erlotinib plus placebo in patients with NSCLC.
METHODS
In this Phase II randomised trial, patients without progression following four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (N=205) received continuous schedule maintenance oral linsitinib 150 mg or placebo BID combined with erlotinib 150 mg QD for 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
The study was unblinded early due to linsitinib non-superiority. No difference was found between the two treatment groups in median PFS of 125 days linsitinib vs 129 days placebo (P=0.601); no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Tolerability was similar, although in the linsitinib group, treatment-related adverse events and discontinuations were more frequent. No drug-drug interaction was implicated.
CONCLUSIONS
Linsitinib maintenance therapy added to erlotinib did not improve PFS or OS in non-progressing NSCLC patients. This highlights the need for robust biomarkers of response for combinations that incorporate IGFR-targeted therapies in maintenance or other therapeutic settings.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Platinum Compounds; Pyrazines; Receptors, Somatomedin
PubMed: 28772281
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.226