-
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Feb 2022There is increasing recognition that progress in immuno-oncology could be accelerated by evaluating immune-based therapies in dogs with spontaneous cancers. Osteosarcoma...
Losartan Blocks Osteosarcoma-Elicited Monocyte Recruitment, and Combined With the Kinase Inhibitor Toceranib, Exerts Significant Clinical Benefit in Canine Metastatic Osteosarcoma.
PURPOSE
There is increasing recognition that progress in immuno-oncology could be accelerated by evaluating immune-based therapies in dogs with spontaneous cancers. Osteosarcoma (OS) is one tumor for which limited clinical benefit has been observed with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We previously reported the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan suppressed metastasis in preclinical mouse models through blockade of CCL2-CCR2 monocyte recruitment. Here we leverage dogs with spontaneous OS to determine losartan's safety and pharmacokinetics associated with monocyte pharmacodynamic endpoints, and assess its antitumor activity, in combination with the kinase inhibitor toceranib.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
CCL2 expression, monocyte infiltration, and monocyte recruitment by human and canine OS tumors and cell lines were assessed by gene expression, ELISA, and transwell migration assays. Safety and efficacy of losartan-toceranib therapy were evaluated in 28 dogs with lung metastatic OS. Losartan PK and monocyte PD responses were assessed in three dose cohorts of dogs by chemotaxis, plasma CCL2, and multiplex cytokine assays, and RNA-seq of losartan-treated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
RESULTS
Human and canine OS cells secrete CCL2 and elicit monocyte migration, which is inhibited by losartan. Losartan PK/PD studies in dogs revealed that a 10-fold-higher dose than typical antihypertensive dosing was required for blockade of monocyte migration. Treatment with high-dose losartan and toceranib was well-tolerated and induced a clinical benefit rate of 50% in dogs with lung metastases.
CONCLUSIONS
Losartan inhibits the CCL2-CCR2 axis, and in combination with toceranib, exerts significant biological activity in dogs with metastatic osteosarcoma, supporting evaluation of this drug combination in patients with pediatric osteosarcoma. See related commentary by Weiss et al., p. 571.
Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Losartan; Mice; Monocytes; Osteosarcoma
PubMed: 34580111
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2105 -
Translational Vision Science &... Jul 2022To evaluate the efficacy of losartan and prednisolone acetate in inhibiting corneal scarring fibrosis after alkali burn injury in rabbits.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of losartan and prednisolone acetate in inhibiting corneal scarring fibrosis after alkali burn injury in rabbits.
METHODS
Sixteen New Zealand White rabbits were included. Alkali injuries were produced using 1N sodium hydroxide on a 5-mm diameter Whatman #1 filter paper for 1 minute. Four corneas in each group were treated six times per day for 1 month with 50 µL of (1) 0.8 mg/mL losartan in balanced salt solution (BSS), (2) 1% prednisolone acetate, (3) combined 0.8 mg/mL losartan and 1% prednisolone acetate, or (4) BSS. Area of opacity and total opacity were analyzed in standardized slit-lamp photos with ImageJ. Corneas in both groups were cryofixed in Optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound at 1 month after surgery, and immunohistochemistry was performed for alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and keratocan or transforming growth factor β1 and collagen type IV with ImageJ quantitation.
RESULTS
Combined topical losartan and prednisolone acetate significantly decreased slit-lamp opacity area and intensity, as well as decreased stromal myofibroblast α-SMA area and intensity of staining per section and confined myofibroblasts to only the posterior stroma with repopulation of the anterior and mid-stroma with keratocan-positive keratocytes after 1 month of treatment. Corneal fibroblasts produced collagen type IV not associated with basement membranes, and this production was decreased by topical losartan.
CONCLUSIONS
Combined topical losartan and prednisolone acetate decreased myofibroblast-associated fibrosis after corneal alkali burns that produced full-thickness injury, including corneal endothelial damage. Increased dosages and duration of treatment may further decrease scarring fibrosis.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE
Topical losartan and prednisolone acetate decrease myofibroblast-mediated scarring fibrosis after corneal injury.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Alkalies; Animals; Burns, Chemical; Cicatrix; Collagen Type IV; Corneal Diseases; Corneal Injuries; Fibrosis; Losartan; Myofibroblasts; Rabbits
PubMed: 35819289
DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.7.9 -
Cells Nov 2021Hypertensive nephrosclerosis is the second most common cause of end-stage renal disease after diabetes. For years, hypertensive kidney disease has been focused on the... (Review)
Review
Hypertensive nephrosclerosis is the second most common cause of end-stage renal disease after diabetes. For years, hypertensive kidney disease has been focused on the afferent arterioles and glomeruli damage and the involvement of the renin angiotensin system (RAS). Nonetheless, in recent years, novel evidence has demonstrated that persistent high blood pressure injures tubular cells, leading to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Injury primarily determined at the glomerular level by hypertension causes changes in post-glomerular peritubular capillaries that in turn induce endothelial damage and hypoxia. Microvasculature dysfunction, by inducing hypoxic environment, triggers inflammation, EMT with epithelial cells dedifferentiation and fibrosis. Hypertensive kidney disease also includes podocyte effacement and loss, leading to disruption of the filtration barrier. This review highlights the molecular mechanisms and histologic aspects involved in the pathophysiology of hypertensive kidney disease incorporating knowledge about EMT and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. The role of the Hsp70 chaperone on the angiotensin II-induced EMT after angiotensin II type 1 receptor (ATR) blockage, as a possible molecular target for therapeutic strategy against hypertensive renal damage is discussed.
Topics: Animals; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hypertension, Renal; Kidney; Losartan; Nephritis; Protective Agents
PubMed: 34831368
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113146 -
Clinical Cardiology Aug 2023This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that a total of 11 single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single-pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.
Topics: Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Losartan; Hypertension; Telmisartan; Irbesartan; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Network Meta-Analysis; Hydrochlorothiazide; Valine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Amlodipine; Valsartan; Tetrazoles; Blood Pressure; Essential Hypertension
PubMed: 37432701
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24082 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Feb 2023Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have failed in all phase III glioblastoma trials. Here, we found that ICBs induce cerebral edema in some patients and mice with...
Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have failed in all phase III glioblastoma trials. Here, we found that ICBs induce cerebral edema in some patients and mice with glioblastoma. Through single-cell RNA sequencing, intravital imaging, and CD8 T cell blocking studies in mice, we demonstrated that this edema results from an inflammatory response following antiprogrammed death 1 (PD1) antibody treatment that disrupts the blood-tumor barrier. Used in lieu of immunosuppressive corticosteroids, the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan prevented this ICB-induced edema and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment, curing 20% of mice which increased to 40% in combination with standard of care treatment. Using a bihemispheric tumor model, we identified a "hot" tumor immune signature prior to losartan+anti-PD1 therapy that predicted long-term survival. Our findings provide the rationale and associated biomarkers to test losartan with ICBs in glioblastoma patients.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Glioblastoma; Losartan; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Edema; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 36724255
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2219199120 -
Journal of Clinical Hypertension... Oct 2023Serum urate is a risk factor for hypertension and gout. The DASH diet and losartan independently lower blood pressure (BP); however, their effects on serum urate are... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Serum urate is a risk factor for hypertension and gout. The DASH diet and losartan independently lower blood pressure (BP); however, their effects on serum urate are understudied. We performed a post-hoc analysis of the DASH-losartan trial, which randomized participants with hypertension in parallel fashion to the DASH diet or a standard American diet (control) and in crossover fashion to 4-week losartan or placebo. Serum urate was measured at baseline and after each 4-week period. Diets were designed to maintain weight constant. We examined the effects of DASH (vs control) and/or losartan (vs placebo) on serum urate, overall and among those with baseline serum urate ≥6 mg/dL, using generalized estimating equations. Of 55 participants (mean age 52 years, 58% women, 64% Black), mean (±SD) baseline ambulatory SBP/DBP was 146±12/91±9 and mean (±SD) serum urate was 5.2±1.2 mg/dL. The DASH diet did not significantly reduce urate levels overall (mean difference -0.05 mg/dL; 95%CI: -0.39, 0.28), but did decrease levels among participants with baseline hyperuricemia (-0.33 mg/dL; 95%CI: -0.87, 0.21; P-interaction=0.007 across hyperuricemia groups). Losartan significantly decreased serum urate (-0.23 mg/dL; 95%CI: -0.40, -0.05) with greater effects on serum urate among adults <60 years old versus adults ≥60 years old (-0.33 mg/dL vs 0.16 mg/dL, P interaction = 0.003). In summary, the DASH diet significantly decreased serum urate among participants with higher urate at baseline, while losartan significantly reduced serum urate, especially among younger adults. Future research should examine the effects of these interventions in patients with hyperuricemia or gout.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Hypertension; Losartan; Uric Acid; Hyperuricemia; Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension; Gout
PubMed: 37695134
DOI: 10.1111/jch.14721 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... May 2022The genesis and development of renal fibrosis involve a variety of pathways closely related to inflammation, cytokines, oxidative stress and metabolic abnormalities....
The genesis and development of renal fibrosis involve a variety of pathways closely related to inflammation, cytokines, oxidative stress and metabolic abnormalities. Renal fibrosis is the result of a complex combination of a variety of lesions. Epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) of renal tubular epithelial cells is considered the key to renal fibrosis. Losartan is a typical Angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonist and relaxes blood vessels. In this study, we investigated the effects of losartan on Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction (UUO) model mice by studying the changes in the TGF-β/Smad and metabolomics. Male C57BL/6 J mice were intervened with the UUO model and given losartan (10, 20, 30 mg/kg/d) for 28 consecutive days. The results showed that losartan could reduce UUO-induced abnormal serum metabolic spectrum and renal function. It could also improve renal tubular-interstitial injury and fibrosis by reducing tubulointerstitial dilation and collagen deposition. In addition, losartan promoted the expression of Smurf2 and Smurf1, i.e., Smad7 and E3 ubiquitin-linked enzymes, in the nucleus to degrade the type I receptor of TGF-β1 (TβR-I) and P-Smad2/3 to inhibit renal tubular epithelial cells EMT. In summary, these findings indicated that losartan could regulate the TGF-β/Smad and metabolic pathway in UUO model mice through ubiquitination to reduce renal fibrosis.
Topics: Animals; Fibrosis; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Losartan; Male; Metabolic Networks and Pathways; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Signal Transduction; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Ureteral Obstruction
PubMed: 36068784
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112931 -
Journal of Cardiology Jul 2023Serum uric acid (SUA) is activated in catabolic, hypoxic, and inflammatory conditions characteristic of heart failure (HF) and is a source of reactive oxygen species.... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Serum uric acid (SUA) is activated in catabolic, hypoxic, and inflammatory conditions characteristic of heart failure (HF) and is a source of reactive oxygen species. Losartan is unique among other angiotensin receptor blockers in reducing SUA.
OBJECTIVES
To study the patient characteristics and outcome associations by SUA levels, as well as the effect of high- vs. low-dose losartan on SUA levels in HF.
METHODS
HEAAL was a double-blind trial, comparing the effect of two doses of losartan 150 (high dose) vs. 50 (low dose) mg/day among 3834 patients with symptomatic HF, a left ventricular ejection fraction≤40 %, and known intolerance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In the present study, we studied the associations of SUA with outcomes and the effect of high- vs. low-dose losartan on SUA levels, incident hyperuricemia, and gout.
RESULTS
Patients with higher SUA had more comorbidities, worse renal function, were more symptomatic, used diuretics more frequently, and were 1.5- to 2-fold more likely to experience HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. The benefit of high-dose losartan to improve HF outcomes was not influenced by baseline SUA levels (interaction p > 0.1). Compared with low-dose, high-dose losartan reduced SUA by -0.27 (-0.34 to -0.21) mg/dL, p < 0.001. The incidence of hyperuricemia was reduced with high-dose losartan, but the incidence of gout was not.
CONCLUSIONS
In HEAAL, hyperuricemia was associated with worse outcomes. High-dose losartan reduced SUA and hyperuricemia more than low-dose and the cardiovascular benefits of high-dose losartan were not modified by SUA levels.
Topics: Humans; Losartan; Uric Acid; Hyperuricemia; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Heart Failure
PubMed: 37030532
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.04.005 -
BMJ Open Apr 2023To examine valsartan, losartan and irbesartan usage and switching patterns in the USA, UK, Canada and Denmark before and after July 2018, when the first...
OBJECTIVES
To examine valsartan, losartan and irbesartan usage and switching patterns in the USA, UK, Canada and Denmark before and after July 2018, when the first Angiotensin-Receptor-Blocker (ARB) (valsartan) was recalled.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING
USA, Canadian administrative healthcare data, Danish National Prescription Registry and UK primary care electronic health records.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients aged 18 years and older between January 2014 and December 2020.
INTERVENTION
Valsartan, losartan and irbesartan.
MAIN OUTCOME
Monthly percentages of individual ARB episodes, new users and switches to another ARB, ACE inhibitors (ACEI) or calcium channel blockers containing products.
RESULTS
We identified 10.8, 3.2, 1.8 and 1.2 million ARB users in the USA, UK, Canada and Denmark, respectively. Overall proportions of valsartan, losartan and irbesartan use were 18.4%, 67.9% and 5.2% in the USA; 3.1%, 48.3% and 10.2% in the UK, 16.3%, 11.4% and 18.3% in Canada, 1%, 93.5% and 0.6% in Denmark. In July 2018, we observed an immediate steep decline in the proportion of valsartan use in the USA and Canada. A similar trend was observed in Denmark; however, the decline was only minimal. We observed no change in trends of ARB use in the UK. Accompanying the valsartan decline was an increase in switching to other ARBs in the USA, Canada and Denmark. There was a small increase in switching to ACEI relative to the valsartan-to-other-ARBs switch. We also observed increased switching from other affected ARBs, losartan and irbesartan, to other ARBs throughout 2019, in the USA and Canada, although the usage trends in the USA remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION
The first recall notice for valsartan resulted in substantial decline in usage due to increased switching to other ARBs. Subsequent notices for losartan and irbesartan were also associated with increased switching around the time of the recall, however, overall usage trends remained unchanged.
Topics: Humans; Losartan; Irbesartan; Valsartan; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Hypertension; Tetrazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Canada; Denmark; United Kingdom
PubMed: 37068898
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070985 -
Journal of the... Sep 2011Candesartan is a relatively novel antihypertensive agent of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Several clinical trials have compared candesartan with losartan in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Candesartan is a relatively novel antihypertensive agent of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Several clinical trials have compared candesartan with losartan in the management of essential hypertension. However, systematic assessment of efficacy and safety between candesartan and losartan is still lacking.
METHODS
We reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing candesartan with losartan for net reduction in blood pressure from baseline, response and control rates, and incidences of common and serious adverse events.Weighted mean differences (WMD), and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 12 RCTs with 3644 patients were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing the efficacy of candesartan and losartan in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the end of the follow-up period, results with candesartan were superior to losartan in the reduction SBP and DBP (WMD, -2.97; 95% CI, -4.18 - -1.77; p < 0.001; WMD, -1.76; 95% CI, -2.57 - -0.96; p < 0.001; respectively). Candesartan had better response and control rates than losartan. (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18; p < 0.01; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.50; p = 0.008). Reported common adverse events for the two agents were not significantly different (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.86-1.12; p = 0.78). The incidence of serious adverse events for candesartan was lower than for losartan (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92; p = 0.03). The net reduction of DBP showed negative correlation with baseline DBP in both candesartan and losartan groups (regression coefficient -1.81, p = 0.03 and regression coefficient -1.56, p = 0.02, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Candesartan is superior to losartan in reducing blood pressure. Candesartan also causes fewer serious adverse events than losartan.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Losartan; Publication Bias; Regression Analysis; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21421652
DOI: 10.1177/1470320310391503