-
Ugeskrift For Laeger Oct 2023The technical development has caused a reintroduction of endoscopic techniques directed towards degenerative spine disease. A summary of the endoscopic procedure is... (Review)
Review
The technical development has caused a reintroduction of endoscopic techniques directed towards degenerative spine disease. A summary of the endoscopic procedure is given in this review. The spinal canal is reached through an inter-laminar or transforaminal access. In comparison with open surgery the percutaneous transforaminal access seems especially advantageous for the removal of paramedian and/or foraminal herniated disc material. However, careful patient selection is required, as the restricted manoeuverability and working zone of the endoscope and patient specific pathoanatomy in some cases will disfavour endoscopy.
Topics: Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Treatment Outcome; Lumbar Vertebrae; Endoscopy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37921109
DOI: No ID Found -
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle Nov 2023
Spinal surgery has an important place in neurosurgery practice. Surgical procedures on the lumbar spine include stabilization, discectomy, foraminotomy and...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Spinal surgery has an important place in neurosurgery practice. Surgical procedures on the lumbar spine include stabilization, discectomy, foraminotomy and decompression. Lumbar and lower thoracic spinal surgery can be safely performed under spinal anesthesia (SA). However, there are not many studies on the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia in patients who have undergone long segment stabilization surgery.
.METHODS
Patients who underwent lumbar and lower thoracic spinal instrumentation operations with general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia were included in the study. Demographic characteristics and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of the patients were all recorded. Visual analog scale and quality of life scores were obtained before and after the operation.
.RESULTS
572 patients with SA and 598 patients with GA were included in the study, 352 / 347 had only-lumbar region and 220 / 251 had thoracolumbar region operations, respectively. All patients underwent short/long segment stabilization. Mean operating time was 106.1 / 156.7 minutes. Average blood loss was 375 / 390 mL. All patients were mobilized 16-24 / 24-36 hours after surgery. In our patient group, there were both high-risk and normal-risk subgroups in terms of ASA physical status. During the clinical follow-up, a statistically significant improvement was found for VAS and quality of life scores for both groups (p<0.05).
.CONCLUSION
Spinal anesthesia appears to be a very effective method in lumbar and thoracolumbar surgery. Along with careful patient selection, using this highly effective method provides a comfortable space for the surgeon.
.Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Anesthesia, Spinal; Lumbar Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Treatment Outcome; Spinal Fusion; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38051686
DOI: 10.18071/isz.76.0415 -
BMC Surgery Nov 2023To comprehensively compare and assess the effects of different lumbar fusion techniques in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To comprehensively compare and assess the effects of different lumbar fusion techniques in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched up to December 24, 2022 in this network meta-analysis. Outcomes were pain (pain, low back pain, and leg pain), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), complications, reoperation, and fusion. Network plots illustrated the direct and indirect comparisons of different fusion techniques for the outcomes. League tables showed the comparisons of any two fusion techniques, based on both direct and indirect evidence. The efficacy of each fusion technique for LSS was ranked by rank probabilities.
RESULTS
Totally 29 studies involving 2,379 patients were eligible. For pain, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) was most likely to be the best technique, followed by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-PLIF) had the greatest likelihood to be the optimal technique for low back pain, followed sequentially by MIS-TLIF, minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF), XLIF, Endo-TLIF, TLIF, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF). MIS-PLIF was ranked the most effective technique concerning leg pain, followed by Endo-TLIF, MIS-TLIF, TLIF, Endo-PLIF, PLIF, OLIF, PLF, and XLIF. As regards JOA scores, Endo-TLIF had the maximum probability to be the best technique, followed by MIS-TLIF and TLIF. Endo-PLIF had the greatest likelihood to be the optimum technique for complications, followed by TLIF, MIS-TLIF, Endo-TLIF, OLIF, and XLIF.
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive fusion techniques may be effective in the treatment of LSS, compared with traditional techniques. Minimally invasive techniques were likely non-inferior with regards to postoperative complications.
Topics: Humans; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Spinal Stenosis; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Spinal Fusion; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37968633
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02242-w -
Spine Jun 2023Prospective observational study. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective observational study.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the prevalence of isolated thoracic degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demographic factors and imaging features, as well as the patient-reported quality of life outcomes associated with this condition.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Thoracic intervertebral discs are least susceptible to disc degeneration (DD) and may represent a manifestation of "dysgeneration." These discs may never be hydrated from the beginning and seem hypointense on MRI.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A population-based MRI study of 2007 volunteers was conducted. Each disc from C2/3 to L5/S1 was measured by Pfirrmann and Schneiderman grading. Disc herniation, Schmorl node (SN), high-intensity zones (HIZ), and Modic changes were studied. DD was defined by Pfirrmann 4 or 5. patient-reported quality of life scores, including a 36-item short-form questionnaire and visual analog scale for low back pain, were recorded. Subjects were divided into "isolated thoracic degeneration" (only thoracic segment) and "tandem thoracic degeneration" (thoracic with other segments). The association between imaging findings and isolated thoracic degeneration was determined using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS
The mean age of the subjects was 50.0 ± 0.5 and 61.4% were females (n = 1232). Isolated thoracic degeneration was identified in 2.3% of the cohort. Factors associated with isolated thoracic degeneration included lower age, C6/7 HIZ, T8/9 HIZ, and T8/9 SN. Factors associated with tandem thoracic degeneration included L4/5 posterior bulging. The thoracic and lumbar tandem degeneration group demonstrated higher bodily pain, despite a lower visual analog scale, and a higher physical component score of the 36-item short form.
CONCLUSIONS
Isolated thoracic degeneration demonstrated an earlier age of onset, mostly involving the mid-thoracic region (T5/6-T8/9), and in association with findings such as SN. Subjects with tandem thoracolumbar degeneration had less severe lumbar DD and low back pain as compared with those with isolated lumbar degeneration. This paints the picture of "dysgeneration" occurring in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
1.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Low Back Pain; Quality of Life; Intervertebral Disc; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Lumbar Vertebrae
PubMed: 37262423
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004632 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2023Degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD), including spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis, is increasing due to the aging population. Along with the disease severity,... (Review)
Review
Degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD), including spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis, is increasing due to the aging population. Along with the disease severity, lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a mainstay of surgical treatment through decompression, the restoration of intervertebral heights, and the stabilization of motion segments. Currently, pseudoarthrosis after LIF is an important and unsolved issue, which is closely related to osteobiologies. Of the many signaling pathways, the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway contributes to osteoblast differentiation, which is generally regulated by SMAD proteins as common in the TGF-β superfamily. BMP-2 and -4 are also inter-connected with Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and FGF signaling pathways. With the potent potential for osteoinduction in BMP-2 and -4, the combination of allogenous bone and recombinant human BMPs (rhBMPs) is currently an ideal fusion material, which has equalized or improved fusion rates compared to traditional materials. However, safety issues in the dosage of BMP remain, so overcoming current limitations will provide significant advancement in spine surgery. In the future, translational research and the application of clinical study will be important to overcome the current limitations of spinal surgery.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Vertebrae; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins; Spinal Diseases; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38139194
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417365 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Jun 2023To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients...
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with grade-1 L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.
METHODS
Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the comparative analysis included consecutive patients with grade-1 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent oblique LIF (OLIF, n = 36) or minimally invasive transforaminal LIF (MI-TLIF, n = 45) at the Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2016 to August 2017. Patient satisfaction Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), radiographic outcomes including anterior/posterior disc heights (ADH/PDH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), cage subsidence, cage retropulsion, and fusion rate were assessed during a 2-year follow-up. Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were compared between groups using the independent sample t-test. Categorical data are presented as n (%) and were compared between groups using the Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Repetitive measurement and analysis of variance was employed in the analysis of ODI, back pain VAS score, and leg pain VAS score. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
RESULTS
The OLIF and MI-TLIF groups comprised 36 patients (age, 52.1 ± 7.2 years; 27 women) and 45 patients (age, 48.4 ± 14.4 years; 24 women), respectively. Satisfaction rates at 2 years post procedure exceeded 90% in both groups. The OLIF group had less intraoperative blood loss (140 ± 36 vs 233 ± 62 mL), lower back pain VAS score (2.42 ± 0.81 vs 3.38 ± 0.47), and ODI score (20.47 ± 2.53 vs 27.31 ± 3.71) at 3 months follow-up (with trends toward lower values at 2 years follow-up), but higher leg pain VAS scores at all postoperative time points than the MI-TLIF group (all p < 0.001). ADH, PDH, FD, and FW improved in both groups post-surgery. At the 2 year follow-up, the OLIF group had a higher rate of Bridwell grade-I fusion (100% vs 88.9%, p = 0.046) and lower incidences of cage subsidence (8.33% vs 46.67%, p < 0.001) and retropulsion (0% vs 6.67%, p = 0.046) than the MI-TLIF group.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with grade-I spondylolisthesis, OLIF was associated with lower blood loss and greater improvements in VAS for back pain and ODI and radiologic outcomes than MI-TLIF. The OLIF is more suitable for these patients with low back pain as the main symptoms are accompanied by mild or no leg symptoms before operation.
Topics: Humans; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion; Back Pain; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 37154089
DOI: 10.1111/os.13360 -
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical... Jun 2023Aiming at the difficulties of lumbar vertebrae segmentation in computed tomography (CT) images, we propose an automatic lumbar vertebrae segmentation method based on...
Aiming at the difficulties of lumbar vertebrae segmentation in computed tomography (CT) images, we propose an automatic lumbar vertebrae segmentation method based on deep learning. The method mainly includes two parts: lumbar vertebra positioning and lumbar vertebrae segmentation. First of all, we propose a lumbar spine localization network of Unet network, which can directly locate the lumbar spine part in the image. Then, we propose a three-dimensional XUnet lumbar vertebrae segmentation method to achieve automatic lumbar vertebrae segmentation. The method proposed in this paper was validated on the lumbar spine CT images on the public dataset VerSe 2020 and our hospital dataset. Through qualitative comparison and quantitative analysis, the experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper can obtain good lumbar vertebrae segmentation performance, which can be further applied to detection of spinal anomalies and surgical treatment.
Topics: Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Deep Learning; Algorithms; Spine; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Hospitals; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
PubMed: 37082799
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13996 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Jul 2023Treatment of adjacent segment disease (ASD) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety and to analyze the technical...
PURPOSE
Treatment of adjacent segment disease (ASD) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety and to analyze the technical advantages, surgical approach, and indications of percutaneous full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of ASD after lumbar fusion in elderly patients.
METHODS
A retrospective of 32 patients with symptomatic ASD were accepted for PELD from October 2017 to January 2020. All patients used the transforaminal approach and recorded the operation time and intraoperative conditions. Preoperative, 3, 12, 24 months of postoperative and at the last follow-up, the pain of back and leg of visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment Treatment Score (JOA) were performed, and the paired student's t test was used to the compare the continuous variables preoperatively and postoperatively. The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to MacNab standards. The lumbar MRI was performed to evaluate the decompression of the nerve roots, and the lumbar lateral and dynamic X-rays were performed to evaluate the stability of the surgical segment.
RESULTS
A total of 32 patients were included in the study, including 17 males and 15 females. The follow-up time ranged from 24 to 50 months, with an average of (33.2 ± 8.1) months and an average operation time of (62.7 ± 28.1) minutes. Compared to preoperatively, the VAS score of the back and leg pain (p < 0.05), ODI (p < 0.05), and JOA (p < 0.05) postoperatively were significantly improved. At the last follow-up, according to the modified MacNab standard assessment, 24 cases were excellent, five cases were good, and three cases were fair, the excellent and good rate was 90.65%. As for complications, one case had a small rupture of the dural sac during the operation, which was found but not repaired during the operation, and one case recurred after the operation. At the last follow-up, there were three cases of intervertebral instability.
CONCLUSION
PELD showed satisfactory short-term efficacy and safety in the management of ASD after lumbar fusion in elderly patients. Therefore, PELD might be an alternative choice for elderly patients with symptomatic ASD after lumbar fusion, but surgical indications must be strictly controlled.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Endoscopy; Diskectomy; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Treatment Outcome; Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Intervertebral Disc Displacement
PubMed: 37232005
DOI: 10.1111/os.13725 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Sep 2023This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in postoperative efficacy between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in postoperative efficacy between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strictly based on the search strategy, we searched the published papers on OLIF and TLIF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. A total of 607 related papers were retrieved, and 15 articles were finally included. The quality of the papers was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology, and the data were extracted and meta-analyzed using Review manager 5.4 software.
RESULTS
Through comparison, it was found that in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, the OLIF group had certain advantages over the TLIF group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry disability index (ODI), disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH), fused segmental lordosis (FSL), and cage height, and the differences were statistically significant. The results were similar in terms of surgery time, complications, fusion rate, VAS for back pain (VAS-BP) and various sagittal imaging indicators, and there was no significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS
OLIF and TLIF can relieve low back pain symptoms in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, but OLIF has certain advantages in terms of ODI and VAS-LP. In addition, OLIF has the advantages of minor intraoperative trauma and quick postoperative recovery.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Lumbar Vertebrae; Spinal Fusion; Lumbosacral Region; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 37079105
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04880-4 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Nov 2023To compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in lumbar degenerative diseases.
METHODS
This study was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42023432460). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database by computer to collect controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of unilateral BE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases from database establishment to May 2023. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, recorded the authors, and sample size, and extracted the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage, Oswestry disability index, Visual analogue scale, lumbar lordosis, disk height, hospital length stay, fusion rate, and complications in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library.
RESULTS
A total of 14 cohort studies with a total of 1007 patients were included in this study, including 472 patients in the BE-TLIF group and 535 patients in the MIS-TLIF group. The BE-TLIF group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the MIS-TLIF group [mean difference (MD) = - 78.72, 95% CI (- 98.47, - 58.97), P < 0.00001] and significantly reduced postoperative drainage than the MIS-TLIF group [MD = - 43.20, 95% CI (- 56.57, - 29.83), P < 0.00001], and the operation time was longer than that of the MIS-TLIF group [MD = 22.68, 95% CI (12.03, 33.33), P < 0.0001]. Hospital length stay in BE-TLIF group was significantly less than that in MIS-TLIF group [MD = - 1.20, 95% CI (- 1.82, - 0.57), P = 0.0002].
CONCLUSION
Compared with MIS-TLIF, BE-TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, less early postoperative low back and leg pain, shorter postoperative hospital length stay, and faster early functional recovery.
Topics: Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Blood Loss, Surgical; Treatment Outcome; Spinal Fusion; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37993948
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04393-1