-
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai... Oct 2021Middle ear cholesteatoma, as a common ear disease, has been further understood in terms of its molecular mechanism, classification and staging, and it is generally... (Review)
Review
Middle ear cholesteatoma, as a common ear disease, has been further understood in terms of its molecular mechanism, classification and staging, and it is generally believed that surgical treatment is the first choice, but there is no final conclusion on its surgical choice. Microscopic surgery includes complete or open radical mastoidectomy with or without reconstruction of the middle ear cavity, and their pros and cons have been debated for decades. In the past decade, a variety of surgical methods have been developed, including various improvements and combined operations that combine the advantages of traditional open radical mastoidectomy and complete mastoidectomy. On the other hand, the emergence of ear endoscopic surgery has opened up new surgical methods, as well as the use of laser and other new technologies to improve the surgical effect and prognosis, but also can not avoid their limitations and shortcomings. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical treatments for middle ear cholesteatoma in order to provide guidance and help for otologists in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma.
Topics: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Ear, Middle; Endoscopy; Humans; Mastoidectomy; Otologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 34628824
DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.10.020 -
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Dec 2012A cadaveric study was performed to test the hypothesis that intact-canal-wall mastoidectomy (ICWM) with otoendoscopy allows for equal or better visualization of the...
A cadaveric study was performed to test the hypothesis that intact-canal-wall mastoidectomy (ICWM) with otoendoscopy allows for equal or better visualization of the middle ear cavity structures when compared with canal-wall-down mastoidectomy (CWDM) with microscopy. Ten temporal bones were prepared with a reversible canal-wall-down tympanomastoidectomy technique. Five anatomic sites in each middle ear cavity (lateral epitympanum, posterior crus of the stapes, the sinus tympani, eustachian tube orifice, and round window niche) were marked with paint. Two otolaryngologists blinded to the purpose of the study viewed the temporal bones with the microscope. Following replacement of the posterior canal walls, the bones were then viewed with a 30° and a 70° otoendoscope. All visualized paint marks for each viewing were recorded and compared. We found that ICWM with 30° or 70° otoendoscopy provided significantly better visualization of the sinus tympani than did CWDM (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference among the three methods in visualization of the lateral epitympanum, posterior crus of the stapes, and round window niche. With respect to the eustachian tube orifice, one of the observers reported significantly better visualization with CWDM (p = 0.036). With adjunctive otoendoscopy, it is not necessary to remove the posterior canal wall to adequately visualize or remove disease from various areas of the middle ear cleft. The use of otoendoscopy during cholesteatoma surgery may allow for more frequent preservation of the posterior canal wall and reduced rates of residual cholesteatoma, given the equal or better visualization of the middle ear cavity.
Topics: Ear Canal; Ear, Middle; Endoscopy; Humans; Mastoid; Microscopy; Tympanic Membrane
PubMed: 23288818
DOI: 10.1177/014556131209101208 -
International Archives of... Jan 2021Retraction pocket is a condition in which the eardrum lies deeper within the middle ear. Its management has no consensus in literature. To assess the role of...
Retraction pocket is a condition in which the eardrum lies deeper within the middle ear. Its management has no consensus in literature. To assess the role of mastoidectomy in the management of retraction pockets added to a tympanoplasty. Prospective study of patients with retraction pocket and referred to surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one managed with tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy and the other group with tympanoplasty only. The minimum follow-up considered was 12 months. The outcomes were: integrity of eardrum, recurrence, and hearing status. This study included 43 patients. In 24 cases retraction occurred in the posterior half of the eardrum, and in 19 patients there was clinical evidence of ossicular interruption. The two groups of treatment were composed by: 21 patients that underwent tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy and 22 patients had only tympanoplasty. One case of the first group had a recurrence. In 32 cases patients follow up was longer than 48 months. The average air-bone gap changed from 22.1 dB to 5 dB. The percentage of air-bone gap improvement was assessed at 60% in those patients treated with mastoidectomy, and 64.3% in those without it ( > 0.5). Tympanoplasty and ossiculoplasty should be considered to treat atelectatic middle ear and ossicular chain interruption. Mastoidectomy as a way to increase air volume in the ear seems to be a paradox; it does not add favorable prognostic factor to management of retraction pockets.
PubMed: 33542746
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709196 -
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and... Apr 2023Endoscopic Ear surgery is evolving day by day and there is need for constant improvement in terms of instrumentation with efficient, quicker, with clear bloodless...
UNLABELLED
Endoscopic Ear surgery is evolving day by day and there is need for constant improvement in terms of instrumentation with efficient, quicker, with clear bloodless surgical field and good postoperative outcome and results. The application of Dr Ahila's Endoscopic Ear Surgery Chisel and Mallet are presented. This innovation will provide limited and adequate bone removal in a faster way than drill in endoscopic mastoidectomy and stapedotomy surgeries. Surgical instruments represent a major financial asset to the health care facilities. The use of Dr Ahila's Endoscopic Ear Surgery straight 1 mm or 2 mm Chisel and Mallet is presented. Dr Ahila's Endoscopic Ear Surgery Chisel and Mallet, this innovation will provide faster bone removal than drill or curette without bone dust formation, fogging, irrigation in Endoscopic mastoidectomy and stapedotomy. This instrument is essential to avoid costly replacement, surgeon satisfaction, reduce cost and delays in the operating room and in safe and trained hands enhance patient safety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03629-0.
PubMed: 37200899
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-03629-0 -
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Jun 2023To evaluate the feasibility, morphological, and functional outcomes of endoscopic retrograde transcanal mastoidectomy.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the feasibility, morphological, and functional outcomes of endoscopic retrograde transcanal mastoidectomy.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective study.
SETTINGS
Tertiary Referral Hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed 31 patients with a diagnosis of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma that extended to the mastoid cavity who underwent endoscopic transcanal retrograde canal wall down mastoidectomy under general anesthesia. The tympanic membrane and posterior canal wall reconstruction were done using the tragal cartilage palisade technique reinforced with perichondrium. Morphological and functional results were reported in the follow-up of a minimum of 1 year. The graft uptake was also compared with the presence of granulations and discharge status.
RESULTS
Graft uptake and disease-free conditions were achieved in 21 of 24 patients, that is, 87.5%, and 3 patients required revision surgery. The graft uptake rate was not affected by the presence of granulation tissues and discharge. The hearing was improved after the surgery, which was statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic retrograde mastoidectomy is a new technique to deal with cholesteatoma with excellent results. It is more functional, ideal for sclerotic mastoid, allows faster wound healing, has excellent outcomes, and is a minimally invasive procedure that avoids postauricular incision and tissue dissection. Because the set up for the surgery costs less, it holds a promising future for the developing countries.
Topics: Humans; Mastoidectomy; Prospective Studies; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Mastoid
PubMed: 33848200
DOI: 10.1177/01455613211009439 -
Cureus Oct 2021Our objective is to analyze the risk of particle spread through mastoidectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic with an aim to assess the tools used to mitigate the... (Review)
Review
Our objective is to analyze the risk of particle spread through mastoidectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic with an aim to assess the tools used to mitigate the spread. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Our search terms included: MASTOIDECTOMY + COVID-19 or MASTOIDECTOMY + SAR- CoV-2 or MASTOIDECTOMY + CORONAVIRUS. Studies consistent with the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the review. Of the 20 articles identified in the initial search, six met the inclusion criteria. The included articles were all experimental studies, with five studies using cadaver subjects and one study using live human subjects. Three studies measured droplet spread and three studies measured aerosolized particle spread. The maximum distance of particle spread ranged from 30 cm to 208 cm. Four studies assessed the use of a barrier system, with two using the OtoTent and two using a barrier drape. Two studies defined the microscope alone as a possible mitigatory tool. One study compared burr type and size to determine the effects on particle spread. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, evaluation of tools to mitigate particle spread is imperative for the safety of the surgical team and the healthcare system at large. Barrier drapes, OtoTents and microscopes all have proven to mitigate particle spread; however, further research needs to be performed to compare their efficacy and develop a standard of safety.
PubMed: 34853757
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19040 -
Otolaryngologia Polska = the Polish... Dec 2022ntroductionIn all otologic surgeries, the facial nerve can be considered the most important structure that must be protected. The surgical damage risk of the facial...
ntroductionIn all otologic surgeries, the facial nerve can be considered the most important structure that must be protected. The surgical damage risk of the facial nerve will be increased in presence of facial canal dehiscence (FCD).AimIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the FCD and its associated situations in patients with chronic otitis media undergoing mastoidectomy.Materials and Methods850 patients who performed ear surgery were reviewed. Patients who did not perform mastoidectomy were excluded. In patients, the ratios, localization of FCD, and association of facial canal dehiscence with cholesteatoma were researched. Association between FCD and closed-cavity tympanomastoidectomy, open-cavity tympanomastoidectomy, and radical mastoidectomy procedures, and also an association between FCD and primary or revision surgery was evaluated. ResultsFacial canal dehiscence was found in 8.4% of patients. The relationship between dehiscence and cholesteatoma was found significant (p<0.001). In the comparison of radical mastoidectomy and closed-cavity tympanomastoidectomy, dehiscence was higher in the radical mastoidectomy group (p<0.03). In revision cases, dehiscence was seen more frequently (p<0.003). FCD incidence was higher in adult patients than in pediatric patients (p<0.001). Twenty of 468 patients who were operated on for cholesteatoma had congenital cholesteatoma. ConclusionFacial canal dehiscence can be seen especially in cases with cholesteatoma and when performing radical mastoidectomy and revision surgeries. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of the status of facial nerve and determination of situations in which occurrence of FCD is more likely both preoperatively and intraoperatively will minimalize potential complications.Keywords: Cholesteatoma, tympanic, radical mastoidectomy, oval window, tympanomastoidectomy.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Cholesteatoma; Chronic Disease; Ear, Middle; Otitis Media; Mastoidectomy
PubMed: 36805516
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1772 -
3D Printing in Medicine Apr 20233D-printed temporal bone models can potentially provide a cost-effective alternative to cadaver surgery that can be manufactured locally at the training department. The...
BACKGROUND
3D-printed temporal bone models can potentially provide a cost-effective alternative to cadaver surgery that can be manufactured locally at the training department. The objective of this study was to create a cost-effective 3D-printed model suitable for mastoidectomy training using entry level and commercially available print technologies, enabling individuals, without prior experience on 3D-printing, to manufacture their own models for basic temporal bone training.
METHODS
Expert technical professionals and an experienced otosurgeon identified the best material for replicating the temporal bone and created a cost-effective printing routine for the model using entry-level print technologies. Eleven participants at a temporal bone dissection course evaluated the model using a questionnaire.
RESULTS
The 3D-printed temporal bone model was printed using a material extrusion 3D-printer with a heat resistant filament, reducing melting during drilling. After printing, a few simple post-processing steps were designed to replicate the dura, sigmoid sinus and facial nerve. Modifying the 3D-printer by installing a direct-drive and ruby nozzle resulted in more successful prints and less need for maintenance. Upon evaluation by otorhinolaryngology trainees, unanimous feedback was that the model provided a good introduction to the mastoidectomy procedure, and supplementing practice to cadaveric temporal bones.
CONCLUSION
In-house production of a cost-effective 3D-printed model for temporal bone training is feasible and enables training institutions to manufacture their own models. Further, this work demonstrates the feasibility of creating new temporal bone models with anatomical variation to provide ample training opportunity.
PubMed: 37062800
DOI: 10.1186/s41205-023-00174-y -
The Medical Journal of Malaysia Aug 2021Similar to other surgical fraternities, endoscopic ear surgery (EES) faced great challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many elective operations involving EES needed...
Similar to other surgical fraternities, endoscopic ear surgery (EES) faced great challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many elective operations involving EES needed to be postponed, resulting in accumulated cases. Throughout one year during COVID-19, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Johor, Malaysia continued to perform various EES procedures. Although EES is an aerosol-generating procedure, it has become evidence that this minimallyinvasive surgical approach offers lesser bony drilling and shorter operative time as compared to open mastoidectomy. Thus, this reduced the risk of viral transmission to the surgeons and operating staffs.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Mastoidectomy; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34558558
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of International Advanced... Dec 2019Canal wall down mastoidectomy is a surgical technique used for the eradication of middle ear disease. The remaining large mastoid bowl is associated with a number of... (Review)
Review
Canal wall down mastoidectomy is a surgical technique used for the eradication of middle ear disease. The remaining large mastoid bowl is associated with a number of issues; one of the main techniques that have been developed in order to avoid such problems is the obliteration of the mastoid cavity. The materials used for this reason are either biological or synthetic. The purpose of this survey is to review the published literature related to the therapeutic value of mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE from 2008 to 2018 using the criteria mastoid obliteration, canal wall down mastoidectomy, chronic otitis media, and cholesteatoma. The search focused on papers concerning the mastoid obliteration with synthetic material, as we focused on looking for outcomes and reported complications. Out of a total of 244 citations, 15 articles were identified, where patients underwent mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials. Most authors used bioactive glass as a filler material. Mastoid obliteration resulted in a decrease in the complications associated with the open mastoid cavity. On the basis of the available limited literature, it seems that mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials is a valuable and safe surgical technique for patients who undergo canal wall down mastoidectomy. The bioactive glass appears to be the most reliable synthetic material.
Topics: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Chronic Disease; Ear Canal; Humans; Mastoid; Mastoidectomy; Otitis Media; Surgical Flaps; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31846919
DOI: 10.5152/iao.2019.7038